Saturday, 4 January 2025

Pick 'n' mix: "We Live in Time"


They still sometimes try and make 'em like they used to, just not with the same rigorous level of script editing. We Live in Time is an old-school romantic drama and terminal illness-based weepie - a latter-day Love Story - but also a vehicle for two of the British film industry's brightest stars; it's a prospective date movie, but also a movie movie, with an only tangential relation to real life in several places. The playwright Nick Payne - who broke through with 2015's Constellations before turning a somewhat erratic hand to screenwriting (The Sense of an Ending, The Last Letter from Your Lover) - has been paired with the generally reliable director John Crowley (Intermission, Boy A, Brooklyn) to unpick a relationship we see being played out in multiple tenses at once. Their film opens with a fixed point: thirtysomething couple Tobias (Andrew Garfield) and Almut (Florence Pugh) sitting in a doctor's office, where the latter is informed her ovarian cancer has returned. A decision is taken: rather than submit to further, punishing rounds of chemo (with no guarantee of a positive outcome), Almut chooses to live to the best of her abilities for as long as she still has available. At this juncture, We Live in Time fragments: the story of how this couple got here - complete with ultra-contrived meet cute - is set, sometimes arbitrarily, alongside the story of how this extra time plays out, a process that sees these kids venture into childrearing and, in the Michelin-starred Almut's case, into high-level competitive cheffing. Watching on from the cheap seats, we soon realise the whole film is a varyingly finessed contrivance, designed to bring two very likable performers closer together - and close enough for the rest of us to feel something by proxy.


It's not just at a structural level that We Live in Time presents as a grab bag. What we're watching is 70% movie hogwash, 20% nice human moments and 10% hogwash that makes for nice movie moments; that ratio even persists at a cellular level, within individual scenes. It might be enough to justify a night out in this first, broadly unpromising week of the New Year - we do, after all, live in very real, very specific time - but to take the longer view for a moment, I was never wholly persuaded what atomising this story, blowing it up and asking us to reassemble its pieces mentally, really achieves, beyond perhaps keeping bland Working Title-like chronology at bay. Certainly, any cause-and-effect goes up in smoke, gets vaporous: first Almut refuses chemo, then she's on it, and the couple's child proves even more incidental to the action than the kid in Challengers. (The point may be that life is arbitrary and random, but it's also hard not to think that certain screenwriters just aren't interested in the dramatic possibilities of parenting.) A second later, though, something sputters or flickers into near-life; it's a sporadically working title. Credit Crowley with getting the best out of his actors once more. His leads here keep this perilously whitebread couple interesting and sympathetic, and at least try to the keep the action real, although I must confess a lot of the film's credibility vanished for me the instant Almut was revealed as not just a lauded chef but a former international ice skater. (And some people claim the movies are still in touch with reality.) Crowley's previous films never shied away from melodrama, but it was generally a means of accessing material that felt emotionally vivid and true. Here he's visibly encouraging viewer indulgence. Garfield polishes off Jaffa Cakes in the bath; a pregnant Pugh expresses a craving for Tunnock's tea cakes; at a low point, a doctor passes round the Celebrations. The film itself proves as artificial as peanut brittle; even this viewer, proud owner of Britain's sweetest tooth, emerged far from fully sated, but maybe that's what results when creatives hand you a bag of promising ingredients and invite you to assemble the full meal yourself. (You start snacking on whatever's to hand.) We Live in Time is almost commendably bold in this abdication of editorial responsibility; the trouble is it's no more moving or stirring than the first five minutes of any Ready, Steady, Cook.

We Live in Time is now playing in cinemas nationwide.

Thursday, 2 January 2025

In his shoes: "Nickel Boys"


RaMell Ross's first film, 2018's lyrical documentary 
Hale County This Morning, This Evening, found a new way of looking at American life; at once dreamy yet sharp-eyed, it was that rare example of non-fiction where the camera, liberated from stubborn objectivity, felt like an observer with its own distinct personality. In Ross's first stab at literary adaptation - the already much-praised Nickel Boys, drawn from Colson Whitehead's Pulitzer Prize-winning novel - that gaze persists, for better and worse. The new film represents a revival of the first-person camera perspective, which is to say that almost everything we see is observed from the viewpoint of Whitehead's protagonist Elwood Curtis. Occasionally, we catch Elwood himself (played first by Ethan Cole Sharp, then by Ethan Herisse) reflected in a window or mirror. Mostly we're looking through the eyes of a young Black lad growing up in the America of the early 1960s. We look up at the family Christmas tree and the adults crowded around the poker table; we look at a TV showing a Martin Luther King speech; we look towards adoring grandmother Hattie (Aunjanue Ellis-Taylor), noting the love in her eyes; and we look on at the cruelties of the reform school system Elwood is forced to negotiate. What's impressive is how quickly this approach takes and sticks. Partly it's our familiarity with this perspective, gained if not from such first-person oddities as 1946's Lady in the Lake, then from the kill scenes in slasher movies and, more recently, the comic business of TV's Peep Show. Partly it's because Nickel Boys affords us time to get used to it. Crucially, it never seems a forced perspective, because Ross shoots a lot of casual, everyday, even bitty-seeming material, the kind of spots and vignettes that made up his previous film: a school brochure sliding down a fridge door, pencils stuck in a classroom ceiling, a thread being wrapped tightly around a thumb. The film's opening stretch is basically collaging formative memories, but it also goes to our recognition of Elwood as a restless, curious, distractible soul. Having Robbie Williams played by a CG chimp is a gimmick (or at best a USP), because it doesn't finally tell us anything new. (Not least as nobody in Better Man ever mentions the fact.) The camera perspective here is a tool, because it opens something up.

For starters: an idea of physical and emotional growth, and the threats to same. Yes, it helps that this camera is initially knee-high to a grasshopper and literally rises scene by scene. But it also allows us, from time to time, to look Elwood's white oppressors squarely in the eye, and to observe in close-up someone who denies your existence or truly, plainly hates you. It's not just that Nickel Boys teaches us how to watch it, it's that it teaches us how to read individual images and clusters of images and figure out - as Elwood himself comes to figure out - exactly what they mean. The aim is to bring the viewer (and, I suspect, the non-Black viewer in particular) closer to the experience of what it is to be Black in a systematically racist America, and the film's most effective sequences compress the distance between camera, character and viewer to such an extent that these three elements become one. Formally, then, Nickel Boys is nothing if not ambitious. For some while, though, what we're actually looking at (never mind the perspective, for a minute) is visually pretty conventional: a handsomely appointed, awards-ready period coming-of-age saga that also doubles as a parable of Black endurance and survival. That opening stretch is quietly radical rather than fervently revolutionary, mindful of an assumed awards-season audience it doesn't want to alienate or throw off. Having got us comfortable in Elwood's shoes, however, Ross begins to take bolder, lengthier strides: interruptions to the timeline (flashforwards that envision a future of some kind for these characters), deviations from the established POV (other bodies, other shoes, other positions in space). The movie grows as Elwood grows, in other words, assuming greater formal complexity, but its perspective fragments. Suddenly, we see Elwood Now set alongside an Elwood of the future (Daveed Diggs), burdened with a sense of Elwood Then, and Ross's boundless empathy - and editorial skill - ensures the film does right by all these iterations.

Again, much about Nickel Boys is impressive indeed. If I held onto one lingering reservation, though - and only more tightly through the second half, which means I can't quite frame Ross's film as the readymade masterpiece some have - it's the failure or unwillingness to articulate a clear and precise understanding of the horrors of the Nickel Academy, and of the wider society that enables it. I can but whisper this, in the face of some of the season's most rapturous reviews, but Nickel Boys does seem an insistently tasteful adaptation of Whitehead's book - doubly so, if you were to set it against the memory of Barry Jenkins' overlooked Prime Video adaptation of the same author's The Underground Railroad, with its searing, unforgettable images, or Peter Mullan's fierce, often unrestrained The Magdalene Sisters, on comparable subject matter. Those works had fire in their bellies, which was sporadically allowed to rage across the screen and illuminate, but Nickel Boys proves an altogether slower, more controlled burn; you sense Ross never wants to scald the viewer (or reopen old scars), which is honourable, if something of an artistic limitation. Those rave reviews are clearly responding to that delicacy, to Ross's thoughtful, careful handling, and these are inarguably among the film's qualities, but this retelling supposes on some fundamental existential level that the worst brutalities of an oppressive society forever exist just out of sight or within PG-13 guidelines, which demonstrably isn't the case. (We might do well to trust the evidence of our own eyes on this one, but even Steve McQueen's 12A-rated Blitz, which the same critics sniffed at en masse, snuck so much more context into each frame.) Ross's dreaminess clouds and softens Elwood's gaze: from these images, I got that the kid's classmates were dying off, but never really how or why. The consolation, and this has clearly been enough for most early responders, is that this camera sees so much else besides: at the very least, Nickel Boys demonstrates how one tweak or rethink of the directorial line of approach can imbue what might otherwise have been another museum piece with bruising, moving, galvanising lived experience. Even if it doesn't see everything, it still sees more than most.

Nickel Boys opens in selected cinemas from tomorrow.

Monday, 30 December 2024

Birdsong: "On Becoming a Guinea Fowl"


On the evidence of her first two features, the Welsh-Zambian filmmaker Rungano Nyoni's talents stretch far beyond a gift for leftfield titling:
On Becoming a Guinea Fowl, her follow-up to 2017's terrific I Am Not a Witch, is further distinguished by unusual images and unexpected lines of narrative approach. The new film unfolds in Zambia, in itself an underfilmed location, and for some while it unfolds at a Zambian roadside, where Shula (Susan Chardy) has parked up upon discovering her uncle's lifeless body on a trail outside a brothel. We initially wonder whether this will be a rare entry in that darkly comic subgenre where a corpse proves central to proceedings (cf. The Trouble with Harry, Weekend at Bernie's), but for Nyoni, the stiff is really just an extraordinary way to bring an extended family together. Shula's bibulous sister Nsansa (Elizabeth Chisela) is first to arrive on the scene, bogling around the body to Afrobeats, and before long, everybody's showing up at the family home: myriad aunties, the girls' grief-stricken mother, the dead man's widow, those who knew the deceased and those who suffered at his hands, for the inevitable commiserations are soon mingling with ugly rumours and allegations of abuse. We wait for it to settle down and to take definitive form, but - to its considerable credit - the film never does; instead, at various points, it resembles a homecoming drama, a whodunnit (because almost everyone has their reasons for wanting Uncle Fred dead), a study in trauma, a #MeToo movie with the dials cranked up to eleven, and - looser and more impressionistic still - a treatise on how we live with those secrets that others would rather take with them to the grave. OBAGF is a little of all these movies, in the end; its title derives from Shula's memories of kids-telly schooling on the importance of having a sound warning system, but it also speaks to an idea of shapeshifting that informs the film entire.

It's a lively one, in other words. The mode is broadly realist - actual locations, inhabited by local performers and non-professionals - but scarcely a scene proceeds in the expected manner. Shula - the sensible one here, to whom our sympathies are quickly drawn - discovers the body on the way back from a fancy dress party, which means she's seen standing over the corpse in a fatsuit of some kind. The Zambian equivalent of sitting shiva offers an opportunity for the women of this tribe to compare gel nails, gossip and get thoroughly sloshed. (One alternative - if greatly more prosaic - title: Drunk Mourning.) One reason Nyoni has been embraced as such a hope is that her first two films have done more than most to reroute the cinema and knock its constituent scenes and stories off the beaten path that has become such a chore to travel down in recent years. Her tactics here even deviate from those of her previous film, which was driven above all else by its striking imagery. Guinea Fowl has the occasional off-kilter image (that fatsuit; a flooded lodging house), but it's chiefly powered by decentered storytelling that kept reminding me of Robert Altman: ever-swelling ensemble, overlapping dialogue, wry humour. Yet this 21st century Altman is also capable of seriousness whenever she's addressing the abuse at this story's heart. When Nsansa describes her experiences with Uncle Fred, it explains why she drinks, and also why so many of the womenfolk here are seen staggering around, caught between grief and giggly relief. The liveliness is sometimes indistinguishable from volatility: the power's out, the laughter's manic, the emotion high. Sometimes it's plain stressy: on one level, this is the tale of a woman trying to get through a funeral without shouting "dude was a sex pest" at the top of her lungs, much as some are going to have to hold their tongues at the Trump inauguration next week. Narratively, it can seem haphazard - but it's clearly been pushed that way by these dazed characters, and when at the last Shula finds a different way to communicate her concerns, she's following the lead of her idiosyncratic director. Compressed into an intense 99 minutes, it's a lot - even the film's most fervent admirers will find stretches of it confounding - but, again, it is for these characters, too; and far better a filmmaker give us a lot to unpack and process than - as has become more common - nothing like enough.

On Becoming a Guinea Fowl is now playing in selected cinemas.

Sunday, 29 December 2024

For what it's worth...




UK box office Top Ten (for the weekend of December 20-22, 2024):

1 (new) Mufasa: The Lion King (PG)
2 (2) Wicked: Part 1 (PG) **
3 (1) Moana 2 (U) ***
4 (4) Paddington in Peru (PG)
5 (3Gladiator II (15) ***
6 (6) Conclave (12A) ****
7 (new) Ivanov/Wright The Nutcracker - ROH London 2024 (uncertificated)
8 (5) Kraven the Hunter (15)
9 (re) It's a Wonderful Life (U) *****
10 (9) Red One (12A)

(source: BFI)

My top five:
1. Spirited Away [above]
5. Gremlins

 
DVD/Blu-Ray/Download top ten: 

1 (2) Love Actually (15) ***
2 (5) Elf (PG) **
3 (6) The Polar Express (U)
4 (1) Venom: The Last Dance (15)
5 (3) Alien: Romulus (15) ***
6 (re) Joker: Folie à Deux (15) **
7 (9) Arthur Christmas (U) **
8 (re) Terrifier 3 (18)
9 (new) Smile 2 (18)
10 (15) Dune: Part Two (12) **


My top five: 
1. Speak No Evil
5. Didi

 
Top five films on terrestrial TV this week:
1. The Untouchables (New Year's Day, BBC2, 10pm)
2. Strangers on a Train (Friday, BBC2, 9.35am)
3. The Godfather (Saturday, Channel 4, 9.45pm)
4. The Godfather Part II (New Year's Eve, Channel 4, 11.05pm)
5. The Searchers (New Year's Day, BBC2, 1.15pm)

Saturday, 28 December 2024

Monkey trouble: "Better Man"


As you'll have heard, Better Man is the chimp-based Robbie Williams movie, a framing that first sounds like more gibberish from a popular cinema that has shown signs of comprehensively losing it, but which scans on some instinctive level: you can well imagine the Robbie of 1997, the one who dyed his hair Gazza blonde and started drinking with the Gallaghers and Chris Evans, masturbating in public or flinging his own poop at horrified onlookers. This one leftfield choice allows Michael Gracey, the Aussie director who broke out translating Baz Luhrmann for kids with 2017's The Greatest Showman, to attempt something new and relatively unexpected with the jukebox musical at a point, six years on from the (cough) Oscar-winning Bohemian Rhapsody, when the form badly needs it. (I say relatively unexpected, because Better Man arrives in cinemas only a few weeks after Piece by Piece, which was Pharrell Williams done as Lego.) The movie's Williams is, in familiar fashion, a Stokey tearaway dazzled even by the tawdry limelight inhabited by his failing club singer father (Steve Pemberton, reliably good) and subsequently undergoing boyband bootcamp (where Damon Herriman, as Take That manager Nigel Martin-Smith, resembles Colin Firth if he were on some sort of watchlist), overnight celebrity, solo highs and lows, drink, girls, pills and depression, all the topics the real Robbie has been so candid about over the years. It's just that he's represented, in this case, by a mo-cap primate - conjured by Weta, voiced and performed by Jonno Davies - rather than BAFTA-seeking flesh-and-blood. I'll give Better Man this: at most junctures, it feels less template than test balloon, floated before us to see what the multiplex audience is now willing to swallow. What next: Olly Murs as a felt hippo?

Gracey's film is still floating within established pop biopic parameters; narratively at least, it's never as far out as I was hoping. There's surely a more piercing, arthouse-ready musical rendition of la vie Williams, perhaps one that leant more heavily into the heart-on-sleeve psychodrama of such songs as the Stephen Duffy-penned "Advertising Space" (which gets nowhere near this soundtrack). We get flickers of this adjacent movie in the aftermath of Take That's break-up, scored to "Come Undone" and featuring the image of this monkey man trapped on the other side of the thin ice he's been skating on, struggling for air. Dramatically, however, it might have been more interesting if the other characters were seen to respond in some way to the idea of Robbie-as-chimp, as they never do here. Instead, we get the multiplex-and-radio-friendly version of the greatest hits: brief sex and drugs, snarkily postmodern narration (Robbie-as-chimp-as-Deadpool), Rhesus Robbie rampaging down Regent Street to "Rock DJ", happy ending, home. (The heart does rather sink around the halfway mark upon the realisation we're going to have to experience "She's the One" and "Angels" again.) In other respects, however, Better Man proves more perplexing; the spectre of nonsense re-enters the frame. After The Greatest Showman's runaway success seven years ago, you would have thought the studios would have been begging Gracey to oversee one of these pricey New Musicals that have been coming down the pipes at regular intervals; instead, he's wound up on a project with no stars and few faces, and where the money's gone on rights clearance and a roaming computer graphic. Gracey brings much the same tits-and-teeth energy to his task as he did to his earlier hit, but it would only be admirable if Better Man felt less fatally parochial.

For a big holiday musical, Better Man doesn't look like much: even its exteriors have that wishy-washy digital sheen, as if everything beyond the chimp had also been green-screened in. (I began thinking more fondly of 2019's Rocketman, another modestly budgeted pop biopic where the flights of fancy were booked on a shoestring.) Cheap, cheerful, cheesy-to-naff: it's undeniably very Robbie, and there's an argument the anonymous approach isn't inappropriate for a film about a performer who never cracked America and wound up duetting with a cartoon cat on those Felix ads. Yet Better Man never fully answers the question of why we've been invited to witness a 140-minute movie about Robbie Williams - who, whatever else he is, is no Bowie, no Elton, no Amy Winehouse. Never mind Murs, by the time of the finale - in which Chimp Robbie declares himself a light entertainer (and that's OK) - we could almost be watching The Shane Richie Story. I'll confess I just couldn't get my head around this one, and that may be partly because I never got Robbie the first time, but it's also because I don't get where some part of the popular cinema is going, why there's a generation of cinemagoers, creatives and critics who just want their movies to be memes on a bigger screen, meant to inspire random thoughts rather than revelation or rapture. Why is Robbie a chimp? How is Nicole Appleton British all of a sudden? (Is it because Gracey couldn't afford to hire Canadian?) You look to Better Man to explain itself, to show its logic or creative reasoning, and all it can offer in return is an insouciant shrug, a CG leading man and another reprise of "Let Me Entertain You". I can't see it expanding the Williams fanbase unduly, but it feels symptomatic of a year where the movies, having long since abandoned their pretensions to being any good, decided en masse to give up making basic sense. Murs: your time is now.

Better Man is now playing in cinemas nationwide.

On demand: "Wallace & Gromit: Vengeance Most Fowl"


This time last year, I concluded my review of the almost immediately forgettable sequel
Chicken Run: Dawn of the Nugget by offering up a prayer that Nick Park was busying himself with plasticine in an Aardman corner office. The good news this Christmas, as you've doubtless already noticed, is that he was. Vengeance Most Fowl - which, in a sign of the many masters Aardman are now contracted to serve, opened in UK cinemas on December 18 and aired on the BBC on Christmas Day ahead of its arrival on Netflix in the New Year - is itself more than a little sequelly: it sees the return of not just Park's beloved Wallace and Gromit, but Feathers McGraw, the dead-eyed penguin antagonist of 1993's The Wrong Trousers, here going full Max Cady in busting out of prison (or zoo) to make our heroes' lives tricky again. Yet the return to tried-and-tested Aardman formula has been supplemented by a few fresh visual and narrative ideas. The W&G garden, for starters, has been repurposed as Gromit's escape from an incessantly automated household - until the introduction of AI gnome Norbot (voiced by Reece Shearsmith), who's scraped all his operating data from a show called DIY Action Force and promptly sets about turning this florid Kew into an angular, rather soulless Marienbad ("Neat and tidy!"). Sometimes these new ideas feel faintly recycled: having a copper answer the phone with "'ello 'ello 'ello" is an example of a joke being so old it's been semi-forgotten and so amuses all over again. (Perhaps inevitably, the character is voiced by Peter Kay.) And when Norbot is seized upon as a Trojan horse enabling Feathers to access our heroes' home, Vengeance Most Fowl returns to a foundational idea of genre cinema: that, when placed in the wrong hands, tech might prove as much existential threat as nifty timesaver.

The new film thus mirrors a struggle going on within Aardman, a cottage industry whose Oscar wins prompted deals with major players (first DreamWorks, then Sony, now Netflix) and thereafter a scaling-up of production to meet the ruthless demands of a bigger system. As Vengeance bears out, the company's strong suit remains those little, humanising touches at which neither supercomputer nor artificial intelligence could arrive. Feathers idly tapping a flipper while guessing Wallace's password (it's not, in the end, rocket science); a young constable (Lauren Patel) busting open a cellar door CSI-style while wielding a flashlight, only for her superior to reach around the doorjamb and flip the lightswitch; Wallace, in a low moment, plucking out a discordant version of the series' theme tune on an untuned piano. My gut feeling is that no Aardman feature - not even the beloved Farmageddon - has quite scaled the dizzy heights of the company's short masterpieces, because - to use a metaphor even the dozy Wallace could grasp - the internal wiring gets looser and flappier, those Eureka moments more spaced out, the bigger the films become. The whole Norbot business here feels like a delaying tactic designed to fill the forty-or-so minutes before the Fury/Usyk-like main event of visually mirroring, perfectly matched adversaries Gromit and Feathers going head-to-head once more; we're watching two workable ideas for shorts that have been twisted together like pipecleaners. (Or moulded together from differently coloured lumps of clay.) The positive is that Park and co-director Merlin Crossingham thereby allow themselves time to exercise greater control over notionally small stuff: the voice casting (Ben Whitehead's soothing Northern tones amply matching the late Peter Sallis's performances as Wallace), a light smattering of choice sightgags, varyingly suggestive puns ("ooh, me begonias") which will doubtless yield an even cheerier response over the boozy festive period. Nothing too revolutionary, then, but a small step back in the right direction for its makers.

Wallace & Gromit: Vengeance Most Fowl is now streaming via iPlayer, and will also be available to stream via Netflix from January 2, 2025.