Tuesday, 14 July 2026

In memoriam: Sam Neill (Telegraph 13/07/26)


Sam Neill
, who has died aged 78, was a well-travelled and quietly adventurous actor who broke through as the Antipodean cinema came to international prominence in the 1970s. Over subsequent decades, he became a favourite of casting directors and cinephiles alike, adding quality to both blockbusters and cult indie items, and switching with scant fuss between suave villainy, wry heroism and a default human decency.

Whether pursued by a T-Rex in Jurassic Park (1993) or jilted on a rainswept shore in Jane Campion’s The Piano (1993), he insisted he was only ever going where the work was; a run of menial jobs as a teenager had taught him “you have to bloody work to make a bloody quid”. And as he once noted, with not untypical self-deprecation, “the pathetic thing about actors is that they don’t feel valid unless they’re acting.”

He got his big break by chance, in an industry taking its first stumbling steps towards wider recognition. He made a fleeting screen debut, long-haired and bearded, as a bohemian in the low-budget TV drama The City of No (1971), but his first major role came with Roger Donaldson’s thriller
Sleeping Dogs (1977), which starred Neill as a loner obliged to pick sides in a New Zealand reimagined as a police state.

“I really had no idea what I was doing,” Neill told one interviewer. “In fact, none of us did. Apart from [cinematographer] Michael Seresin, who shot it, no-one on that production had ever made a feature film before. In fact, there hadn’t been a feature film made in New Zealand for something like 17 years.” Nevertheless, boosted by the Hollywood-bound Donaldson’s emergent widescreen nous, it became the most successful Kiwi film of all time and the first to play theatrically in the United States.

Its success carried Neill across the Tasman Sea, although his progress wasn’t wholly smooth: the only journalist who turned up for Sleeping Dogs’ Melbourne press junket was a sports reporter who’d made a mistake (“We abandoned the idea altogether, and he and I got half-cut at the bar”). Nevertheless, Neill soon booked a 40-episode run as the philandering Ben Dawson on daytime soap The Sullivans (1979-80), before demonstrating a tender side as Harry Beecham, the reserved admirer of Judy Davis’s Sybylla, in Gillian Armstrong’s My Brilliant Career (1979).

Davis went on to win the BAFTA, but the project proved just as significant for Neill: “I’d done Sleeping Dogs, and I thought, ‘That was a one-off, I’ll never do another film.’ […] But I did get cast in Brilliant Career, I kind of understood a little bit more about what was necessary, and it was a great opportunity for me. That film transformed me into an actor, rather than just a part-time thespian.”

It also brought him to the attention of James Mason, a childhood favourite of Neill’s, who called him out of the blue one day: “I picked up the phone, very puzzled, and a strangely familiar voice said, ‘Hello, this is James Mason. You don’t know me, but my wife and I watched your film My Brilliant Career, and we think you’re good. And what is more, we think you should be working beyond Australia. So I’m sending you an air ticket. We would like you to come and stay with us in Switzerland, and then go on to England and meet my agent. What do you say?’”

He said yes, and suddenly found himself in demand globally. In 1981, he served early notice of his flexibility, heading to Taiwan with the up-and-coming Mel Gibson for the gung-ho Attack Force Z; to Cold War Berlin, for Andrzej Żuławski’s gutsy, still-jawdropping marital psychodrama Possession; and to the UK, to play Damien, spawn of Satan, in Omen III: The Final Conflict (“not the greatest film in the history of cinema, but I gave it a bash”). That year’s roster could have been more varied yet: he had also been considered for the role of Indiana Jones in Raiders of the Lost Ark.

He made steady progress as the decade went on, turning heads as the debonair hero of TV’s Reilly, Ace of Spies (1983), and briefly being considered as 007 before The Living Daylights (1987); he overcame thespian nerves to work with Meryl Streep on two Fred Schepisi films, the David Hare adaptation Plenty (1985) and the true-life drama A Cry in the Dark (1988), where he was quietly dignified as Lindy Chamberlain’s husband Michael.

He lost out on the Alan Rickman role in Die Hard (1988), but his beefed-up part as Nicole Kidman’s husband in yachting thriller Dead Calm (1989) had personal and professional benefits. He met make-up artist Noriko Watanabe during filming – the pair married that year – and Steven Spielberg later admitted it was this role that persuaded him to consider Neill for Jurassic Park. The actor aced another Hollywood audition in submarine drama
The Hunt for Red October (1990), before showing up in the mordant Aussie comedy Death in Brunswick (1990) and Wim Wenders’ sprawling futuristic folly Until the End of the World (1991).

The role of cranky paleontologist Dr. Alan Grant in Jurassic had originally been earmarked for longtime Spielberg favourite Harrison Ford, but Neill made it his own, riffing off flesh-and-blood co-stars Laura Dern and Jeff Goldblum, and bringing softening paternal notes to a character who might otherwise have seemed as hard as flint. The movie was an event that became a phenomenon, and then the most successful film of all time; for decades to come, children and complete strangers would stop Neill on the street and greet him as “Dr. Grant”. (Neill maintained this was preferable to being mistaken for his Australian near-lookalike Hugo Weaving.)

Yet that same year Neill played a very different role – the uptight landowner Stewart, fall guy in the agonised love triangle at the heart of Jane Campion’s muddily romantic melodrama The Piano. This proved as much an arthouse sensation as Jurassic Park had been in the multiplexes, and as tough a shoot: both sets were lashed by tropical storms, while Neill’s off-camera bonhomie had little effect on Method co-stars Harvey Keitel and Holly Hunter.

Yet Neill quietly busied himself, burrowing under the character’s fragile masculinity: “His faults are manifest. But, of course, it’s the other dimensions you can bring to a character that give them depth and interest and, with luck, some humanity… I felt [that] instead of the usual six or seven layers of skin, he only has two. He is raw, tender and vulnerable. And there is pathos to be found in someone like that. That pathetic quality has a comic dimension as well.”

Boosted by Hunter’s Oscar win, the film made $140m off a $7m budget; it also won the Cannes Palme d’Or, making Campion the first woman ever to win the prize. For Neill, it was a pinnacle: “It sits on my funny old CV like a medal on my chest… I was there in an important feminist film. I was there on the front line in an important New Zealand film. Neither of these labels does the film justice. It’s a work of art. And look, that tiny little figure in the fabric — see down there on the right — that’s me. It’s a film that will always have a place in cinema history. And I served in it.”

He was born Nigel John Dermot Neill in Omagh on September 14, 1947, the second of three children for Dermot Neill, a Kiwi then stationed with the Royal Irish Fusiliers, and his English-born wife Priscilla (née Ingham). The family would relocate to Christchurch in 1954, where young Nigel, a stammerer from birth, renamed himself Sam on the grounds his birthname was “a little too effete for a New Zealand playground… it saved me a lifetime of pain”.

After attending boarding school at Christ’s College, Neill studied English literature at university in Canterbury and Victoria, developing an interest in politics and New Zealand’s emerging theatre scene. Yet his first gig upon graduation was behind the camera, directing and editing short films for the New Zealand Film Unit on such subjects as the architect Ian Athfield. (Athfield later designed Neill’s home in Queenstown.) Subsequent directorial gigs were few and far between, although Neill oversaw Cinema of Unease (1995), a fine history of New Zealand cinema, and made-for-TV comic noir The Brush-Off (2004), starring David Wenham.

In the post-Jurassic period, Neill received the accolade of voicing a character on The Simpsons: “I’m playing a cat burglar. I’ve made it. This is the high point of my career. I’m really chuffed.” He was roguish as the painter Norman Lindsay, surrounded by illustrious female flesh (and a blushing Hugh Grant) in John Duigan’s Sirens (1994); he was committed in both senses, albeit to no great end, as the unravelling insurance investigator in John Carpenter’s no less fraying In the Mouth of Madness (1994).

Neill’s name recurred in the Bond conversation ahead of GoldenEye (1995), but industry consensus seemed to have been that the effects were the real star of Jurassic Park: indeed, Neill was deemed surplus to requirements for Spielberg’s solid sequel The Lost World (1997). Embracing middle age, Neill settled happily into supporting roles: scheming as King Charles II in Restoration (1995), meeting a sorry end in Event Horizon (1997), losing Kristin Scott Thomas to Robert Redford in The Horse Whisperer (1998), having fun back home in fond Aussie comedy The Dish (2000).

The new millennium found Neill repeating himself, some indication of the direction Hollywood was now heading in. A schedule clash forced him to turn down an unspecified part in Peter Jackson’s long-gestating Lord of the Rings adaptation to appear as Alan Grant in Jurassic Park III (2001); the character later reunited with Dern and Goldblum in Jurassic World: Dominion (2022), an altogether weary instalment of a profitable but creatively redundant franchise reboot.

Yet he stretched himself, too, mastering iambic pentameter for Sally Potter’s Yes (2004), and playing a priest wrestling with his former life as a dog in Toa Fraser’s oddly charming Dean Spanley (2008). He supported emerging directors, bolstering François Ozon’s acidic period drama Angel (2007), the Spierig brothers’ Daybreakers (2009), Taika Waititi’s Hunt for the Wilderpeople (2016) and Warwick Thornton’s jolting reverse-angle Outback Western Sweet Country (2017).

There was the odd dud – he was handsomely rewarded for his part (as a villainous João Havelange) in the notorious FIFA-backed counterhistory United Passions (2014) – but he was wise enough not to log too many. Instead, he filled gaps in his schedule with blue-chip TV work: Thomas Wolsey on The Tudors (2007), nefarious Ulsterman Chief Inspector Campbell on Peaky Blinders (2013-14), General MacArthur in the BBC’s And Then There Were None (2015).

By then, he’d developed prominent outside interests, having returned to New Zealand in 1993 to launch a wine label, Two Paddocks, specialising in organically cultivated pinot noir. “I’d like the vineyard to support me, but I’m afraid it is the other way round,” Neill confessed. “It is not a very economic business. It is a ridiculously time- and money-consuming business. I would not do it if it was not so satisfying and fun – and it gets me pissed once in a while.”

He received the OBE in 1991, the DCNZM in 2007, and the New Zealand knighthood in 2022. That same year, he received a diagnosis of blood cancer; he spent his chemo treatment writing a memoir, Did I Ever Tell You This?, published in March 2023. In it, Neill reflected on past blessings: “Now that I’m out of action for at least a few months, it throws into sharp relief that deep need I have to act, how much I need to go to work. I love being on a film set… I love being with other actors: how stimulating, how funny, how sad, how vulnerable they can be. They are the best company I know. I love doing what I know how to do. It’s a good job. I fit in.”

His marriage to Watanabe ended in 2015. He is survived by four children: two sons, a daughter, and an adopted stepdaughter from Watanabe’s first marriage.

Sam Neill, born 14 September 1947, died 13 July 2026.

Sunday, 12 July 2026

On demand: "Rangeela"


Ram Gopal Varma's self-reflexive romance
Rangeela opens with the most Nineties musical number imaginable; it's a hell of a way to introduce its restless heroine. To scatter a few Western reference points, the routine starts as a Hal Hartley-ish soft shoe shuffle, turning heads on a Bombay sidestreet, but matters rapidly become altogether more Flashdancey, and soon this chica and her cohort are overpowering armed troops and running off into the sunset with their weapons. (Heaven knows what this insurrection has to do with the rapping toddler we encounter at one point.) A hell of a gal, then, this Mili (Urmila Matondkar), a voluminously haired agent of chaos and change - albeit one who just wants to dance, a position she fills in her day job as a Bollywood background artist. (The prologue is a dream, but it's also the kind of dream routinely choreographed on soundstages across Bombay.) Opportunity knocks when the leading lady quits the titular production, and our Mili is offered a rapid promotion to the limelight. Yet with opportunity comes renewed complication, in this case a choice Mili faces between her rough-edged scalper boyfriend Munna (Aamir Khan), very much a creature of the streets, and Raj Kamal (Jackie Shroff), the brooding screen idol she now finds herself acting opposite, very much the worldly, debonair older man to Munna's snarky, sulky boy. Even this, though, feels too rational a framing for a masala movie that increasingly begins to flirt with the irrational - and that doesn't seem all that many lost marbles away from succumbing to full-on amour fou.

The central love triangle yields a modern Cinderella story (Munna sports a Buttons-like cap, while his best pal collects his conquests' slippers) and a snapshot of a newly confident film industry that is also, in itself, a product of a newly confident film industry. Yet Varma also views that industry as its own fairytale, complete with heroes, heroines, monsters and magic, with stories that become lore. (Among this script's real-life referents: the success and provenance of the previous year's Hum Aapke Hain Koun...!, the backstory of Amitabh Bachchan, the films of Coppola and Spielberg.) The Munna-Mili-Raj affair, in this context, assumes the air of a much-discussed blind item, torn from the tabloids' gossip pages and now splashed in vivid Technicolor across the big screen; it's scuttlebutt writ large. As that suggests, this is no small exercise in style, rather a movie movie that, in its extravagance and excess, indirectly explains how its director ended up overseeing erotic thrillers. Every sequence in Rangeela is its own dream, a fantasy defined by a prevailing lushness of image and this camera's essentially democratic gaze. Varma's scenes of everyday Bombay life are every bit as seductive as those involving the film set: everything is movie, if you know where to put the lights and which filters to use. A.R. Rahman's songs similarly avoid the conventional beats: by mid-Nineties Bollywood's radio-friendly standards, they're practically avant-garde, their strangeness only exacerbated by Varma's experimental shot compositions. Why are Mili and Munna flying on a bright yellow sofa-taxi over the New York skyline to the strains of what sounds like a Kate Bush B-side? Then again: why shouldn't they be? This is a movie, after all. The film's disparate energies and personalities would break up and travel in very different directions in the years that followed - an RGV biography, at this point, would be a hell of a read - but what they imprinted here counts as thrilling proof of how adventurous and voracious the Hindi mainstream of the 1990s was in its pursuit of the new and vital, of fresh takes on the old familiar stories. Thirty years later, Rangeela remains as fresh, tart and tantalising as the best gelato: popular film art you may feel an urge to lick.

Rangeela is currently streaming via Prime Video; as part of this year's London Indian Film Festival, I'll be in conversation with Aamir Khan at the BFI Southbank this Thursday (the 16th) at 6pm - further details here.

Friday, 10 July 2026

For what it's worth...




UK box office Top Ten (for the weekend of July 3-5, 2026):

1 (1) Toy Story 5 (PG) **
2 (new) Minions & Monsters (U)
3 (new) The Invite (15) ****
4 (2) Supergirl (12A)
5 (5) Obsession (18) *
6 (3) Disclosure Day (12A) **
7 (4) Jackass: Best and Last (18)
8 (8) Backrooms (15)
9 (new) Alpha (15)
10 (6) Scary Movie (15)

(source: BFI)

My top five:


DVD/Blu-Ray/Download top ten: 

1 (new) The Devil Wears Prada 2 (12)
2 (1) Michael (12)
3 (new) Obsession (18) *
4 (3) Avatar: Fire and Ash (12) ***
5 (7) Superman (12)
6 (6) Mortal Kombat II (15)
7 (2) Project Hail Mary (12) ***
8 (new) The Descent (15) ***
9 (8) The Super Mario Galaxy Movie (PG)
10 (new) Mortal Kombat 2 Film Collection (15)


My top five: 
1. Hoppers


Top five films on terrestrial TV this week:
1. North by North-West (Saturday, BBC Two, 2.15pm)
2. Vertigo (Saturday, BBC Two, 4.25pm)
3. Insomnia [above] (Friday, BBC Two, 11.05pm)
4. Grease (Sunday, ITV1, 6.50pm)
5. Oppenheimer (Sunday, BBC Two, 10pm)

Wednesday, 8 July 2026

Back to the drawing board: "A Grand Day Out" and "The Wrong Trousers"


To celebrate a half-century of Aardman Animations - and better prepare us for this September's third
Shaun the Sheep film - we're getting a full retrospective over the remainder of the summer. Revisited almost four decades on from its making, what's most striking about 1989's A Grand Day Out is how closely its form and content align; how clearly it was the work of a mildly eccentric figure, alone at his drawing table in a basement, assembling what would eventually prove his grandest design. For the plasticine Wallace, building a rocket to retrieve cheese from the moon, read the flesh-and-blood Nick Park, then a boyish NFTS student plotting to both update and revolutionise filmed animation via the reapplication of artisanal craft methods. The result now seems more than ever a time capsule, using jerky stopmotion - the same processes viewers of a certain age will recognise as having given life to Morph, Bagpuss and Windy Miller - to fashion choice sight gags: Gromit being used to prop up a workbench, the mice donning sunglasses as one to witness blast-off, the leads finding different ways to counter the boredom of the long Bank Holiday excursion into space, not something Méliès had allowed himself to consider at the start of the century. These characters would get sleeker and more defined, as human performers tend to upon first contact with stardom, and the vehicles they'd travel in got bigger and zippier. Yet the elements moulded into this clay from the very outset included a great charm and wit, an abundant, irresistible cheeriness (best illustrated here by the benign fate of the machine that pursues our heroes across the surface of the Moon), and an overarching comic philosophy that would define the best of Aardman's subsequent work: treat even stratospheric events as though they were the basis of a wet weekend in Filey.

1993's The Wrong Trousers - the breakout success, the Oscar winner, the quantum leap forward - bears about as much relation to its appealingly clunky predecessor as, say, Terminator II: Judgment Day did to James Cameron's directorial debut Piranha II: The Spawning. We're back on the homefront this time, depicted as no less chaotic and hazardous than the wider universe, especially after we factor in a pair of robotic "Techno Trousers" ("Ex-NASA," Wallace coos, "Fantastic for walkies") and the dire financial straits that lead to our heroes taking in a dodgy lodger we instantly distrust. (Partly because, even by Aardman's standards, his eyes are too close together.) That's right, it's Shallow Grave - Danny Boyle's 18-rated breakthrough of the following year - only with a sociopathic penguin in the place of Keith Allen. Both films, made on shoestring budgets by creatives in the first years of their career, were acutely attuned to the interpersonal jeopardies lurking within the flatshare scenario: no-one has any money (why else would the capable, practically minded Gromit still be living with a clueless bachelor like Wallace?), some folks (Wallace) aren't exactly pulling their weight, others (Gromit) feel left out of key decision-making (perhaps an inevitability when you literally don't have a voice), and there's always the possibility someone sleeping under the same roof wants to do away with you (Feathers McGraw).

All of which is to acknowledge how these well-kneaded blobs of plasticine seem to take on recognisably human contours and characteristics; Park and co. built an entire empire out of modelling clay without ever losing sight of what makes us tick (or ticks us off) on a daily basis. The Wrong Trousers remains very funny in this: clock the sleepy Wallace pulling his PJs over those techno-trousers, or Gromit's rightly cherished eyebrow raise as he realises the berryblast of jam conventionally intercepted by a flying piece of toast is instead bound for his face at a considerable rate of knots. (Genius has a way of stopping time, or making its own time.) Yet the lighting of these models and maquettes alone - particularly during the storm sequence, and Gromit's backstreet pursuit of Feathers - elevates this half-hour to the standing of art, and that's before a superb closing setpiece carried as much by sound (the rattle of the toy train, the click of the tracks, the satisfying clunk of penguin in milkbottle) as by anything we see whizzing before our eyes. Later W&G features would prove slicker and smoother yet: they would be Aardman's Avatars, more ambitious, sometimes dazzling, generally well-liked. But I don't think they ever topped The Wrong Trousers: here, unlike Wallace, Park got the dimensions and speed, the set-up and execution just right.

A Grand Day Out and The Wrong Trousers return to selected cinemas from Friday.

Sunday, 5 July 2026

For what it's worth...




UK box office Top Ten (for the weekend of June 26-28, 2026):

1 (1) Toy Story 5 (PG) **
2 (new) Supergirl (12A)
3 (2) Disclosure Day (12A) **
4 (new) Jackass: Best and Last (18)
5 (3) Obsession (18) *
6 (4) Scary Movie (15)
7 (new) Bleach: Thousand-Year Blood War - The Calamity (15)
8 (5) Backrooms (15)
9 (new) Les Liaisons Dangereuses - NT Live 2026 (15)
10 (7) Michael (12A)

(source: BFI)

My top five:
5. Swimming Pool


DVD/Blu-Ray/Download top ten: 

1 (1) Michael (12)
2 (2) Project Hail Mary (12) ***
3 (4) Avatar: Fire and Ash (12) ***
4 (24) Ready or Not 2: Here I Come (15)
5 (6) The Magic Faraway Tree (U)
6 (5) Mortal Kombat II (15)
7 (17) Superman (12)
8 (9) The Super Mario Galaxy Movie (PG)
9 (10) Wicked: For Good (PG)


My top five: 
1. Hoppers


Top five films on terrestrial TV this week:
1. Godland (Saturday, BBC Two, 1.30am)
2. Glory [above] (Sunday, Channel 4, 1.20am)
3. Blade Runner (Sunday, BBC Two, 10pm)
4. Marcel the Shell with Shoes On (Saturday, BBC Two, 8.40am)
5. Thunderball (Sunday, ITV1, 6.55am)

Saturday, 4 July 2026

Appetites: "The Invite"


Olivia Wilde's new comedy The Invite extends a long tradition of what we might call dinner-party cinema, where the key ingredients are these: a sprinkling of actors, honed to sharp but hopefully still representative points; a single, well-furnished location; a sense of a tumultuous, finally rather testing or trying evening; barbed or otherwise polished dialogue, ideally trialled in a stage setting. Mix them as you would a pre-dinner cocktail, and you end up with the kind of would-be sophisticated entertainment guests can chew over at real-world soirées: think 1967's lodestone Guess Who's Coming to Dinner, Woody Allen's gossipy Husbands and Wives, the French smash Le dîner de cons, Polanski's insufferable Carnage. Adapted by Will McCormack and Rashida Jones from a Spanish play-turned-film (known locally as Sentimental and internationally as The Couple Upstairs) which has already been reworked in multiple languages, Wilde's film operates primarily as a study in radically different energies. Representing exhausted middle age: Seth Rogen (Fozzie Bear playing Oscar the Grouch, sore of back, sorer still of spirit) and Wilde herself (status-anxious, overly committed to the fate of a soufflé) as frazzled parents who see a late supper with their upstairs neighbours as a rare chance to reposition themselves as vibrant social butterflies. Gliding into this married couple's recently refurbished space: sexologist Penélope Cruz and her firefighter beau Edward Norton, who may just be everything their hosts dream of being, namely cosmopolitan (they speak Spanish!), childless, audibly passionate in their lovemaking (Wilde has warned Rogen not to complain), cool as cucumbers, and stylishly attractive in their upward mobility. The guests arrive bearing cheesecake that melts in the mouth and a proposal, indecent or otherwise, which will determine just how close our leads want to get to what these outsiders have. An alternative title floats into view: Guess Who's Coming After Dinner.

By all trustworthy reports, Wilde's previous film as director, 2022's much-hyped Don't Worry Darling, had its virtues and selling points, but its narrative chicanery got out of hand. The controlled chaos of her new project, by contrast, provides welcome reassurance that today's filmmakers haven't entirely abandoned the playbook their predecessors passed down. Wilde has found an excellent script, cast the hell out of it (perfectly, indeed), and then endeavoured not to mess up what was set on the page. Here's an overdue return for a cinema that finds ordinary people, with all their hang-ups and insecurities, fascinating; between them, McCormack, Jones and Wilde set up a tasty tag-team encounter between a couple who possibly care too much what other people think and another who have longstanding reasons for not giving a hoot. As a director, Wilde busies herself tracking shifts in energy. This night starts off cranky and awkward, as Rogen and Wilde row and the former eyes Norton from a suspicious distance; it starts to feel more convivial, as the couples split into mutually reinforcing groups of two (Rogen/Cruz, Wilde/Norton); secrets and confidences are shared, bombshells dropped; and then it all starts to get a little too much for some of the participants. Wilde wards off any residual staginess in the text by giving the couples' interactions a borderline manic antsiness, that demonstrated by folks who've been let off the leash for a night: the filmmaking has its own playful, curious, sometimes outright fruity energy, heightened only further by a mischievous Devonté Hynes score, determined to fill any gaps that it can. But Wilde also organises all this conversation intelligently: once the initial small talk is set aside, this foursome get deeper and deeper into it - until at least a couple of them realise they may have got in too deep.

A smart screenplay is one thing, but The Invite also has actors capable of improvising over the top of it for added value; once everyone's taken their seats, we're getting a symphony of people rubbing one another up the wrong way (and finding that they secretly enjoy the sensation). That Rogen has been getting the most glowing notices may partly be down to his status as the underdog in this heavyweight cast, the actor with the most to prove (despite a largely agreeable two-decade career). But his Joe is also the character who has the most to respond to: set on edge by Norton's glibness, irritated by Wilde's urge to suck up to these outsiders, at once startled, aroused and terrified by Cruz's forwardness, he's the one person in this room whom you sense would rather back out and go solo with some weed. (Which may well be the right call, all told.) Yet Wilde, turning cartwheels while hyperventilating, is almost as funny in passing, and though Norton possibly sounds too New Agey to fully convince as a fireman, he also gets a line I don't think I was expecting to hear in a mainstream film in 2026 ("Nobody in America can afford anything these days"). Towards the end, the material's roots begin to show: after all its interpersonal carnage, The Invite offers the conventional closure of a middlebrow stageplay, paying lip service to the idea that what the Rogen-Wilde pairing really needs isn't carnal knowledge but in-person couples' counselling. We're sat down too long; the laughter rate and pulse dips. Yet what comes before it really is stimulating and cheering: a fun night at the movies, a revival of the old-school farce with skill, craft and a progressive, feminist, sex-positive viewpoint (more European than American, finally), and a most effective corrective to a prevailing movie trend. The Invite is what The Drama might have been, if our comedies were still being made by grown-ups with real lives and not sniggering trolls: for once, a talking-point movie actually merits some positive talking about.

The Invite is now showing in cinemas nationwide.

Johnson's travels: "Nirvanna The Band The Show The Movie"


The Canadian writer-director-actor-conceptualist Matt Johnson has used the goodwill occasioned by his leftfield tech tale BlackBerry to revive an old pet project. First launched in 2007 as a webseries and later promoted to cable television, Nirvanna The Band The Show was a shuffling postmodern sitcom that tracked two would-be creatives - trilby-sporting schemer Matt (Johnson, playing a flailing version of himself) and tagalong musician pal Jay (Jay McCarrol) - as they pottered around the streets of their native Toronto trying to catch a break, tailed by much the same diegetic camera crew as could be spotted in such millennial mock-docs as The Office and Parks & Rec. This new big-screen variation on a theme actually opens with unused footage of Matt and Jay as they were in 2008, hatching a plan for their band Nirvanna (the spelling or misspelling goes unexplained, but somehow feels pertinent) to headline local nitespot the Rivoli. Cut to: Matt and Jay in the same place in 2025, older and broader in the beam, but no closer to achieving their youthful goal. Still, Matt has a plan. Plans, even, as Matt has always had. All of which is to say you wouldn't have to be au fait with Nirvanna The Band The Series to grasp where Nirvanna The Band The Show The Movie is coming from. A mix of incredibly complex planning, apparent improvisation and genuine ingenuity, Johnson's film - an answer to the question "what if Jackass had been made by Canadian brainiacs rather than all-American jocks?" - will go on to encompass a death-defying skydive from a prominent Toronto landmark, a time machine fashioned from a rusty old RV, as well as the sight of Matt and Jay, shuffling now towards middle age and its attendant crises, encountering and interacting with their own younger selves. Some of this entails traditional forms of movie trickery, but much of it has been done for real; throughout NTBTSTM, the shooting permits typically issued by municipal authorities to filmmakers never quite seem big enough to cover the full scope of Matt Johnson's imagination. Which may explain why so much of the film looks to have been shot undercover, or otherwise on the fly.


The wider the film roams, the higher it climbs, the richer this decidedly sui generis item becomes: these 100 minutes are at once an expansion or remix of the original show, a lap of honour allowing the real Matt and Jay to realise at least one of their earlier dreams, a remake of Back To The Future with heroes who couldn't be any less like the aspirational Marty McFly, a magic trick of sorts (Curt Lobb and Robert Upchurch's super-sharp cutting helps, but you'll also spend at least half the running time wondering how certain shots and effects were realised) and, in its own shambling, shrugging, insistently minor-key way, a demonstration of the cinema's infinite possibilities. NTBTSTM unfolds within a universe of wipeclean boards, where anything and everything could still happen; it involves the chicanery common to summer event movies - giving a sense that our protagonists are adrift in a world that is much bigger than it initially appears - but has none (or fewer) of the overheads and expenses. Somehow both artisanal and spectacular, the film keeps changing shape in surprising, confounding, funny ways. (One early sign Matt's thinking out of the box: the time travel movie he cites onscreen is that mad Ashton Kutcher thing The Butterfly Effect.) Best of all, Johnson makes this questing back-and-forth immense, infectious fun: watching NTBTSTM, you can physically feel the joy of someone making a film on their own terms, revisiting the buoying popular art of their youth, creating and tricking out a world of their own, and doing all of the above while hanging out and goofing off with old friends. (As in The Dirties and BlackBerry, the whole movie hinges on a bromance between two men who have nothing if they don't have each other: the middle stretch is The Butterfly Effect by way of Power Ballad.) The resulting experiment - the closest any film this summer has come to recapturing the puckish, playful, anything-goes spirit of the blockbusters of our childhood - confirms this filmmaker as a prodigious ideas man, perhaps a 21st century Preston Sturges, constitutionally unable to tell a story in the routine manner. In a healthier film ecosystem, our studio chiefs would be dangling the biggest cheques in the Western world before Matt Johnson's busy head - but maybe he's happy with playing the Rivoli.

Nirvanna The Band The Series The Movie is now showing in selected cinemas.