Monday, 27 April 2026

The chronology of water: "Rose of Nevada"


Oddities Week continues with
Rose of Nevada, Cornish auteur Mark Jenkin's distinctive take on the ghost-ship subgenre. Jenkin's previous films Bait and Enys Men were set in workaday South West coastal communities beset by social division and supernatural anomalies; collectively, they formed a heartening revival of both a rudimentary film technique (hand-developed film, post-synched sound) and the kind of regional filmmaking that fell out of fashion and favour once everybody else determined they had to go and seek their fortune in London. But now, armed with a BAFTA and an all-access festival pass, Jenkin is himself going places. His latest, shot in vibrant Nic Roeg Technicolor, introduces emergent, adventurous faces (George Mackay, Callum Turner) into this director's familiar milieu: a well-worn fishing village, here one where the trawler of the title, previously involved in a tragedy thirty years ago, has found its way back into harbour with zero hands on deck. Still, the approach remains so distinct from what's around it in the contemporary cinema that it takes a good fifteen-to-twenty minutes to resettle into the Jenkin way; the opening section has to teach us anew how to watch a film removed of all the usual fuss and clutter. What's noticeable - and surprising, even to those of us who saw Jenkin's previous films - is how much Jenkin conveys via his generally taciturn, square-framed, rough-edged close-ups. We sense, for starters, just how this community has split along generational lines, the chatty younger folk itching to talk about the tragedies befalling the local fishermen, even as their elders clam up. (One exception: a lank-haired dementia patient/seer, prone to confusing present and past, as this plot will eventually.) More striking yet: how these shots come to establish a loaded, ominous mood, borne out when a new three-man crew - grizzled captain Francis Magee and hired hands Mackay and Turner - cast off in this same cursed vessel. Etched into the wooden frame of one of the bunks the lads sleep in: a stark warning to "Get Off The Boat Now".

At which point, a fierce local knowledge - or muscle memory - kicks in. This is a trawlerman movie made by someone who's studied how these boats actually work; with its documentary-like coverage of the gulls above and the ropes and pulleys below, the film Rose most closely resembles, for long stretches at sea, is 2012's immersive experiment Leviathan. The old ways become new, pertinent and urgent again - especially once our boys return home and realise they've docked in the recent past. Something's gone adrift; bearings start to be lost. If the narrative is far from plain sailing, Jenkin's shot selection - comprising four weatherbeaten or otherwise textured close-ups to every one suggestive, Deren-like sliver of dream imagery - begins to feel like necessary ballast, exactly what this director needed to tell this particular story. (Here are shots that appear the results of several weeks' beachcombing, visual information laid out as plainly as it would be on the sands; every image is its own seashell or fossil.) And the actors put in a real shift. Few films have made better use of - and more closely relied on - Mackay's open-faced legibility, the actor set to looking ever more aghast at developments. That quality becomes doubly effective when set against the vague air of fecklessness given off by the squintier, shiftier Turner - the market-stall Richard Gere - as a young man only too prepared to go along with this new arrangement, which is to say the old arrangement, if it means sleeping with a dead man's wife. (Arguably, these youngsters are overshadowed by another cherishably characterful turn from Magee, the Bob Mitchum of the cream tea set.) If Rose of Nevada turns out to be a hit, as my packed first-weekend screening would indicate, that may partly be down to star names, and partly down to being horror/fantasy-adjacent: on some basic level, we're dealing with a brinier Brigadoon here. Yet it's also surely attributable to Jenkin attempting what few others have of late: his is a cinema that continues to speak, on some sublimated, unconscious level, to the choppy waters and backwash we're all passing through. Some of the new film's tensions are regional: you do come away with a sense of those pressures felt by the young in crumbling coastal communities to stay in place and knuckle down. But it also strikes me as significant that Jenkin has been a post-Brexit discovery. Steered by a crew of queasy and uneasy shipmates, Rose of Nevada proves unusually attuned to what it means - and how it feels - for a people to be living in the present and the past simultaneously.

Rose of Nevada is now playing in selected cinemas.

Sunday, 26 April 2026

Possession(s): "Mother Mary"


Well, April
is supposed to be the studios' R&D month, devoted to risks, gambles and shots in the dark. It's no longer Oscar season, so the movies don't have to pretend to be respectable, and it's not yet summertime, so they don't have to be IMAX big. Mother Mary, A24's choice of counterprogramming to this weekend's dubious sure thing Michael, is an old-school women's picture approached from a wildly eccentric angle by the ever-unpredictable David Lowery (Ain't Them Bodies Saints, Pete's Dragon, A Ghost Story). At its heart: a power struggle in the costume department. A scarred, nervy and generally washed out Anne Hathaway is the Gaga-like pop sensation who arrives amid a thunderstorm at the country retreat/workshop of diva costumier Michaela Coel. She's hoping to come away with a dress fit for what she insinuates will be her farewell performance, but progress in this matter is soon complicated by the fact this pair have a past: they may indeed have once been an item, and the designer has retained some measure of resentment over the way the singer subsequently stepped out in other designers' clothes. In theory, then, this is a clash of artistic visions and temperaments: the deeply damaged soul versus the prickly provocateur peering loftily down from her drawing board. Yet even that feels too conventional a reading for what's really going on here. In actual fact, those of us watching on from the cheap seats soon find ourselves scrambling to maintain our bearings and marbles, while also reaching out for a few urgently needed and reassuring reference points.

When Paul Thomas Anderson, for one, moved into this field, he returned with what was, in Phantom Thread, his most hemmed-in project, a Californian's impersonation of Brit period-flick reticence. Mother Mary initially appears far more theatrical: it opens with a long reunion scene in which Hathaway and Coel talk in a way no two human beings have ever talked, and the former performs an interpretative dance routine - with its inferences of demonic possession, it's more Linda Blair than Lionel - to a tune we don't hear. Those trailers weren't lying, one concludes: this is a decidedly odd one, and you may well spend some of it - as I did - wondering whether a script hasn't landed in the wrong pigeonhole. Sudden, stark in-camera scene and lighting changes indicate the director of the scarcely less batshit The Green Knight has set his sights on producing a better-dressed revival of the Sleuth-like filmed play; but then Sleuth, Deathtrap and their ilk never featured a scene involving a possessed FKA Twigs. That Mother Mary eventually won me over had a lot to do with these actresses, who apparently got whatever there was to get in this material, and who elevate it to a rare intensity. Something really does seem to be at stake in the matter of Hathaway versus Coel: it's soft vs. spiky, white privilege vs. lingering slights, fairytale princess vs. perhaps the most extraordinary looking performer working today. In the second half, Lowery's gift for image generation returns to the forefront; although shot on a far smaller budget, his concert scenes - reframing pop as something mythic, closer to a ritual or rite - make the Taylor Swift movie seem newly unimaginative. So there's another battle going on within Mother Mary: between the stagey and the cinematic, and - in the eyes of this judge - the latter just nicks it on points. Lowery's film doesn't attain the layered surrealism of, say, Peter Strickland's In Fabric, another treatise on the alchemy of creation fixated on a haunted red dress; some part of me couldn't shake the suspicion this is an artefact designed to justify the existence (and hefty pricetag) of a lavish, A24-published coffee table tome. Yet as flop Anne Hathaway vehicles go, Mother Mary is more intriguing, even fascinating, than 2023's Eileen - and it dares to go places next week's conventionally tailored The Devil Wears Prada 2 likely won't.

Mother Mary is now playing in selected cinemas.

Saturday, 25 April 2026

For what it's worth...




UK box office Top Ten (for the weekend of April 17-19, 2026):

1 (1) The Super Mario Galaxy Movie (PG)
2 (2Project Hail Mary (12A) ***
3 (3) The Drama (15) **
4 (new) Lee Cronin's The Mummy (18)
5 (new) Akira (15) ***
6 (4) The Magic Faraway Tree (U)
7 (new) Time Hoppers: The Silk Road (U)
8 (6) BTS World Tour 'Arirang' Live Viewing in Japan (12A)
9 (new) All My Sons - NT Live 2026 (12A)
10 (new) Bhooth Bangla (12A)

(source: BFI)

My top five:
3. Rose of Nevada


DVD/Blu-Ray/Download top ten: 

1 (1) Avatar: Fire and Ash (12) ***
2 (8) Hamnet (12) **
3 (6) Wicked: For Good (PG)
4 (7) "Wuthering Heights" (15)
5 (5) The Housemaid (15)
6 (12) The Super Mario Bros Movie (PG)
7 (2) Sinners (15) ****
8 (9) G.O.A.T. (PG)
9 (new) Reminders of Him (12)
10 (3) One Battle After Another (15) ****

4. The Chronology of Water


Top five films on terrestrial TV this week:
1. The Untouchables (Sunday, BBC Two, 10pm)
2. Minority Report (Saturday, ITV1, 10.20pm and Thursday, ITV1, 10.45pm)
3. Living (Saturday, Channel 4, 9pm)
4. The World's End (Friday, ITV1, 10.45pm)
5. The Man in the Iron Mask [above] (Sunday, five, 1.45pm)

Saturday, 18 April 2026

For what it's worth...




UK box office Top Ten (for the weekend of April 10-12, 2026):

1 (1) The Super Mario Galaxy Movie (PG)
2 (2Project Hail Mary (12A) ***
3 (3) The Drama (15) **
4 (4) The Magic Faraway Tree (U)
5 (5Hoppers (U) ****
6 (new) BTS World Tour 'Arirang' Live Viewing in Goyang & Japan (12A)
7 (new) You, Me & Tuscany (12A)
8 (new) undertone (15) **
9 (new) California Schemin' (15)
10 (new) The Stranger (15) ****

(source: BFI)

My top five:
5. Akira [above]


DVD/Blu-Ray/Download top ten: 

1 (1) Avatar: Fire and Ash (12) ***
2 (4) Sinners (15) ****
3 (5) One Battle After Another (15) ****
5 (2) The Housemaid (15)
6 (7) Wicked: For Good (PG)
7 (3) "Wuthering Heights" (15)
8 (9) Hamnet (12) **
9 (8) G.O.A.T. (PG)
10 (22) Apollo 13 (PG) ***



Top five films on terrestrial TV this week:
1. Jurassic Park (Saturday, ITV1, 7am)
2. Don't Look Now (Friday, BBC Two, 11.05pm)
3. Four Weddings & A Funeral (Tuesday, BBC One, 10.40pm)
4. Pearl (Friday, Channel 4, 1.05am)
5. The King's Speech (Sunday, BBC Two, 10pm)

Friday, 17 April 2026

Un air de famille: "Father Mother Sister Brother"


Much as any family is composed of disparate parts, so too Jim Jarmusch's Father Mother Sister Brother - surprise winner of last year's Venice Golden Lion - is made up of separate, only loosely connected items. This new film marks a return to the portmanteau form of Jarmusch's earlier Night on Earth and Coffee and Cigarettes: it's really three shorts, of roughly thirty minutes apiece, on a familial theme. The first, "Father", finds a straight-edged brother and sister (Adam Driver and Mayim Bialik) venturing deep into the New Jersey woods to pay a long-overdue visit with the hermit-like father (Tom Waits) who's been scrounging money off the pair of them. "Mother", set in and around Dublin's suburbs, describes a gathering of matriarch Charlotte Rampling and her two daughters, uptight Cate Blanchett and pink-haired free spirit Vicky Krieps; it's unclear whether or not it's a good sign that all three women have shown up wearing Bergman scarlet. (Ingmar, not Ingrid.) Finally, in "Sister Brother", the most wide-ranging of the three shorts, Indya Moore and Luka Sabbat play recently orphaned American twins in Paris, wondering what to do with the apartment - and the material objects - their folks have left behind. A very Jarmuschian - indeed, very indie - idea of the family emerges: people have secrets they hide from one another, communication is often awkward, strained and unnatural, and were it not for the fact they share a surname and a bloodline, nobody would think to put some of these individuals together. (For starters: Adam from Girls and Blossom from Blossom. And you're telling me Tom Waits gave life to these two?!) 
And yet: in a moment where America's conservative faction is getting weird (again) around the family unit and the roles we play within it, there is something heartening about Jarmusch's Zen insistence we could all stand to be a good deal chiller about everything familial. So yes, some of our relatives are flawed and imperfect; and yes, those closest to us by birth are still often kind of unknowable. But - and here you can almost hear Jarmusch adding a "hey man" as a footnote to every frame of each story he tells here - that's cool, too.

Onscreen, the worldview manifests as a radical simplification of form. The shorts are self-contained units, affording ample time and space to small, manageable casts whose individual components have either worked with this director before or are hip enough to know the effect Jarmusch seeks: not straining but being, with no labouring of the point. "Father" is an especially effective platform for Waits to play the sly old goat (or Jersey Devil); one of its takehomes is that every film would be improved with a bit more Tom Waits. While we wait for Hollywood to address that issue, Jarmusch leaves us to savour the eternal pleasures of the uncluttered frame: FMSB is unmistakably the work of a creative who's been left to do his own thing for nigh-on fifty years, who feels beholden to no contemporary trend. The crisp, clear photography - credited to veteran Lynch favourite Frederick Elmes and the versatile, much-travelled Yorick Le Saux - allows a hundred tiny gestures to register; one overhead shot of a table set for tea in the second part may be the most elegant spread I've seen in the American cinema this side of Scorsese's The Age of Innocence. (Jarmusch finds it so tasty he keeps cutting back to it.) If there's a slight limitation, it's that the film's overarching philosophy is consistent to the point of repetition. Jarmusch acknowledges as much, writing in links between the three shorts: shots of passing skateboarders (liberated from familial duty, unlike his main characters), a recurring use of the phrase "Bob's your uncle" (more family), an ongoing discourse on the properties and uses of water (being thinner than blood). Everything (kind of) connects, but only the third short feels like any true progression - being what happens after mother and father, and indeed "Mother" and "Father", have passed - and Moore and Sabbat work up what feels instinctively like an authentic, earnest sibling bond. (They've got one another's backs, which still counts for something in Jarmuschland.) The whole project is as vibes-based as the contemporary cinema gets without the manager hanging crystals up in the foyer, but it's fun to see Jarmusch, erstwhile king of ironic detachment, getting a little cuddlier with age: he's still chill, but he's grown into welcoming a little more warmth into his frames.

Father Mother Sister Brother is now playing in selected cinemas.

Thursday, 16 April 2026

Midsummer night's dream-film: "Miroirs No. 3"


Our beleaguered arthouse distributors are having a firesale on festival favourites before this year's Cannes gets under way: everything must go on release. As of tomorrow,
the new François Ozon will find its screens under threat from a new Christian Petzold, the German writer-director whose naggingly academic dramas have, in the past, left this viewer markedly more quizzical than many of my colleagues. (I'm not looking to write a thesis; I'm really just here for a good time.) Miroirs No. 3 is a miniature - an 86-minute four-hander - but also a throwback to the ambiguous artfilms of yore; like some cross between Three Colours Blue and Philip Haas's underrated movie adaptation of Paul Auster's The Music of Chance, it pivots on a car crash before making vague movements in the direction of a study of happenstance. The crash, on the backroads of the German countryside, robs pianist Laura (recent Petzold favourite Paula Beer) of her boyfriend, but throws Laura herself clear into the home and life of Betty (Barbara Auer), an older woman who was first on the scene. Betty, who initially appears hung up on painting the fence surrounding her roadside property, refers to Laura as Yelena, and wistfully recounts the story of Tom Sawyer to her bedbound charge as a means of getting her unexpected new housemate to pick up a paintbrush of her own. It feels like the kind of bedtime story a parent might well tell her child, much as the film around this scene gradually shapes up as a Petzoldian reverie, shifting away from the taut psychological realism of this director's early, breakthrough films in favour of something altogether more dreamlike.

The signs are there from the off. Miroirs' early scenes are somehow too bright, too sunny, too placidly quiet to belong to the real world. If we're being rational about it, it makes no sense for Laura to move in with a stranger like Betty, save that this is exactly the sort of spiritual connection the women have in, say, certain Bergman movies; it also makes no sense that Betty's rough-edged husband and son (Matthias Brandt and Enno Trebs), mechanics who make their living tampering with the GPSes on sportscars, should have left Betty rattling around on pills in a remote country property, except that's what bluffly unthinking men do in arthouse movies. (Well, that and ply the women who pass through their lives with beer. I can't rule out the possibility Petzold is floating a free-associative pun on his lead actress's surname in such moments: it's that kind of film.) The scene strategy is generally perverse, as it would be in any dream. No character is ever quite where they ought to be, which occasions a lot of huffing and puffing around between Betty's home and the garage where the men work; whether bikes, dishwashers or cars, things keep breaking down or falling apart; and Petzold positions Beer upfront as a postergirl for preoccupation. (Setting us, in turn, to wonder whether this is a limbo of Laura's own making, or one which exists solely inside her own imagination; on the soundtrack, Frankie Valli belts out the night begins to turn your head around.) Miroirs does enough, in this way, to invite spectator speculation: this, you feel, is one reason we critics have collectively had such a soft spot for everything Petzold. (He often needs explaining.) It's also that flight of fancy a filmmaker only gets to make once the moneymen have learnt to trust in them totally. As a narrative, the film feels loose, rattly, as if it too could fall apart at any moment; this script's screws forever seem in need of tightening. But it does conjure up an idea of leisure, of being far from home with no particular plans: it wouldn't surprise me to learn Petzold made it because the money and actors were available, the weather was good, and he had a gap in his schedule. Minor, but intriguing.

Miroirs No. 3 opens in selected cinemas from tomorrow.

Needles and the damage done: "Diamonds/Diamanti"


Completing this week's line-up of festival faves: the Turkish-born, Italy-based Ferzan Özpetek, whose early Noughties melodramas positioned him as a back-up Almodóvar. (To the extent that he would later bill himself, with no small measure of grandiosity, as simply 
Özpetek.) Much as the beloved Pedro has started to get self-referential with age, so too, apparently, has Özpetek: his latest Diamonds, its maker's biggest domestic hit, opens with footage of the filmmaker gathering his favourite actresses together for a meal at which he announces he has a new project for them all to star in. One of the party, observing the almost exclusively distaff line-up, wonders whether the project might be titled Vaginodrome, a suggestion her director overrules as inappropriate. Yet Diamonds does unfold within a milieu that might indeed merit such a description: a demanding costumier's female-staffed workshop in 1970s Rome, sprung into frantic life to provide the clothes for a (female) Oscar-winning director - for which cinephiles are bound to read Lina Wertmüller - as she gears up on her next production. (Özpetek, we should note, has never even been nominated for an Oscar, but a fellow can dream.) By day, the assembled minions measure, cut, ruche and stitch, pausing in between to bicker and gossip; after hours, they endure a variety of issues, from ingrate children to abusive spouses. They're the real diamonds, you see.

As a rugged, red-blooded heterosexual male keeping one eye on this year's tense Championship run-in, your correspondent is almost certainly not the target audience in this instance, but even he could broadly see the appeal: for two-and-a-quarter hours, Özpetek outlines a lavishly furnished safe space into which viewers might retreat for a few laughs, tears, sobs and swoons. (An alternative title: Glamma Mia!) Although he gets distracted when, for some reason, his women have to measure up a phalanx of shirtless young actors in tighty-whities, this is clearly a director who adores actresses, granting even the lowliest of clothiers a close-up, a moment or a signature flourish; Özpetek ends the film with a list of those grande dames he still wants to work with, which is either touching or desperate. Only if you switch on your critical faculties do you notice there's no variation of tone, no heightening of stakes, a liability in a 135-minute feature: even when Diamonds turns its hand to something more dramatic - as in the domestic abuse subplot - it soon snaps back so as to give the other gals something light to do. Everything is sunny, fabulous, bella; everyone is handsome, sassy, well-dressed; the year's most insistently applied musical theme, meanwhile, plods and pulls its strings. There are, of course, worse things for a semi-prominent filmmaker to do with the money afforded him; and there are worse ways for us to spend an afternoon than being cosseted. (It's the movie equivalent of a spa day or long lunch on someone else's dime: an indulgence.) Yet there's a reason Almodóvar is routinely hailed as a great of world cinema and Özpetek isn't; I came away from Diamonds with a newfound respect for the way Jocelyn Moorhouse's slightly under-appreciated The Dressmaker, from a decade or so ago, troubled to mix up its camp.

Diamonds opens in selected cinemas from tomorrow.