Friday, 12 June 2026

For what it's worth...




UK box office Top Ten (for the weekend of June 5-7, 2026):

1 (new) Scary Movie (15)
2 (new) The Amazing Digital Circus: The Last Act (12A)
3 (new) Masters of the Universe (12A)
4 (1) Backrooms (15)
5 (4) Obsession (18) *
6 (2) Star Wars: The Mandalorian and Grogu (12A)
7 (3) Michael (12A)
8 (6) The Sheep Detectives (PG)
9 (5) The Devil Wears Prada 2 (12A)
10 (7) Tuner (15) ***

(source: BFI)

My top five:
2. Strictly Ballroom [above]
5. Swimming Pool


DVD/Blu-Ray/Download top ten: 

1 (2) Project Hail Mary (12) ***
2 (4) Avatar: Fire and Ash (12) ***
3 (1) The Super Mario Galaxy Movie (PG)
4 (6) The Housemaid (15)
5 (new) Avatar: 3 Movie Collection (12) ***
6 (5) "Wuthering Heights" (15)
7 (7) A Minecraft Movie (PG)
8 (10) Wicked: For Good (PG)
9 (15) Mother's Pride (12) **
10 (9) Hoppers (U) ****


My top five: 
1. Hoppers


Top five films on terrestrial TV this week:
1. Strangers on a Train (Sunday, BBC Two, 12.25pm)
2. From Russia with Love (Sunday, ITV1, 12.30pm)
3. The Magnificent Seven (Saturday, BBC Two, 3.15pm)
4. BlacKkKlansman (Sunday, BBC Two, 12.25am)
5. Letter to Brezhnev (Tuesday, BBC Two, 12.05am)

Thursday, 11 June 2026

American dreamers: "Boogie Nights"


Paul Thomas Anderson has finally won his Oscar for three decades of mostly solid-gold work, so this would seem as good a time as any to go back to 1997's
Boogie Nights and see where it all began. It wasn't, of course, this filmmaker's first time: that was the previous year's Hard Eight, a taut, two-handed gambling fable that very few people saw, and even Anderson himself wasn't entirely happy with. His follow-up was something much more ambitious: a film as big (and, indeed, as long) as its central character's career-making manhood. When I wrote last year that One Battle After Another was Anderson's most Tarantinoid film, I should have qualified it: it was Anderson's most Tarantinoid film since Boogie Nights. Much as Tarantino made his name with Seventies-scored tales of how bandits and bank robbers occupied their downtime and days off, Anderson here announced himself by considering what 1970s porn stars, porn producers and porn crews might get up to on those rare afternoons when they weren't fucking or making arrangements to fuck. The crucial difference was that Anderson was a Tarantino with empathy and imagination: amid the carefree pashing of the adult film business as it was in the San Fernando Valley of the late 1970s, he located a mutually protective, quasi-familial unit whose palace of earthly delights - the home-cum-studio (and I do mean cum-studio) of pre-eminent porn producer Jack Horner (Burt Reynolds) - is threatened by a sudden technological shift (the transition from the permanency of celluloid film stock, Horner's preferred medium, to cheap and unlovely video) and their own personal foibles.

As we open, all of that is in the future. Boogie Nights' secret is that it's really a hangout movie with characters who sometimes hang out naked. As generously endowed busboy Eddie Adams (Mark Wahlberg) makes contacts and friends in the wake of his Horner-engineered rebranding as the scene's hottest new stud Dirk Diggler, so too we as viewers make contacts and friends. (And Anderson starts assembling his ultimate turn-of-the-millennium ensemble: it's fantasy football for indie-film heads.) Here's John C. Reilly as porn stablemate (and part-time magician) Reed Rothchild; here's Julianne Moore as scene elder Amber Waves, giving the performance that makes fullest sense of Britney's current predicament; here's Heather Graham, perfect casting as the wide-eyed ingenue known as Rollergirl on account of the skates she never takes off; here's William H. Macy as the sad-moustached Little Bill, working a minor miracle in giving a running cuckold gag a genuinely tragic dimension; here, belatedly, is Philip Seymour Hoffman as poor old Scotty, besotted with the broadly heterosexual Eddie from the first moment he claps eyes on him. As Eddie climbs the porn-biz ladder, we're happy for him; it feels like an indictment of 21st century Hollywood that Wahlberg was rarely this sharp and never this charming again. As the character succumbs to the druggy excesses of the early Reagan years, we back away and hope for the best. As he finds his way back to something like the light - in a truly genius close-up, to the unlikely strains of Rick Springfield's "Jessie's Girl" - we smile, laugh and maybe even tear up. In the meantime, we have time to marvel at the high-end craft credits: between the rich period production design, costumes and hair, and the deep-dive Seventies supercuts gracing the soundtrack (I mean, Sniff 'n' The Tears' "Driver's Seat": seriously, come on now), Boogie Nights is as deluxe and as layered as indies of this period got. From the outset, this was a filmmaker in visible search of excellence.

The key to it all may be that Jack Horner (a terrific late Reynolds performance, even if the actor himself was far from sure about it) isn't merely an avatar of vulgar, cigar-puffing capitalism, nor the sketchy idea of a porn producer we possibly all have in our heads. Instead he is - rather like Anderson - a self-improving auteur: a filmmaker with an eye, good ideas and some sense of what the audience want, recruiting the best available talent and clinging to the hope of making more than just money - of making something that lasts. (Was the film-versus-video debate in the film Anderson's response to seeing the uptake of cheap, smeary digital video on sets around him?) So yes, Boogie Nights is a film with boobs and bums and bits, but it's also a story about the struggles of someone trying to elevate their chosen art form in the face of commercial realities, told by a creative found in the process of elevating his chosen art form. Anderson makes the industry politicking at least as stimulating as the fucking, by casting such compelling performers as Philip Baker Hall (as a rival impresario) and Robert Ridgely (as the deviant moneyman The Colonel); he makes the sex properly sexy, at least for a while; and he already seems to know exactly what to do with the camera, raising us up amid the highs while never overlooking the lows, of which there are many in the second half. (One thought on this rewatch: Boogie Nights contains the first great Anderson phone call, but it's on a prison phone, and it captures Horner distancing himself from The Colonel after the latter admits his predilection for underage girls. Again, Jack has standards the wider industry doesn't.)

At a certain point, Anderson even begins entertaining and amusing himself. (Is this any different from Tarantino's self-gratification? Yes, because increasingly the latter isn't giving anybody else any pleasure.) Alfred Molina's final-reel cameo as the movie's sort-of big boss - a twitchy, gun-toting drug kingpin in a towelling dressing gown - is an obvious loose-end of a scene that's just too good (and too well-directed) to be left on the cutting-room floor, a prodigy's holler of look what I can do with cinema. In the lead-in to the business with Don Cheadle's Buck in the doughnut shop, you can spy 1999's Magnolia coming into view. And what's with the sonic mystery Anderson stitches into the very end of the closing credits? (The Internet, inevitably, has its theories.) He sets about all this with an optimism that might well be impossible for a filmmaker to summon thirty years later, with the whole world on OnlyFans: while acknowledging the darker side of pornography, he also spots that for a while, it found a place and provided some kind of home for everyone. (Here's Luis Guzman as the nightclub owner turned background artist in Dirk Diggler's first investigations.) Boogie Nights proved sex positive in a way the New Extreme Cinema emerging from Europe around the same time just wasn't: whether noting the quirks and peccadillos of the porn set or eavesdropping Jack Horner's lighting instructions to cameraman Ricky Jay ("there's shadows in life, baby"), it demonstrated a worldliness the American mainstream never really picked up on, and eventually - as it retreated into teenage bedrooms with comic books - backed nervily away from. This is the kind of public statement that needs to be appended with Diggler-length asterisks, caveats and get-out clauses, but there are points in Boogie Nights where you find yourself wondering why the legitimate motion picture business of the 2020s can't be more like the L.A. porn scene of the 1970s. Paul Thomas Anderson made saucer-eyed dreamers of us all.

Boogie Nights returns to selected cinemas from tomorrow.

Wednesday, 10 June 2026

Close encounters (but no cigar): "Disclosure Day"


Whether you're going on the movies or the British weather, I think we can say it's been a funny sort of summer so far. With the major studios scaling back production, there was very little opening in the course of May that resembled an event movie of the old vintage - the tardy toy nostalgia of last week's Masters of the Universe, already written off as the summer's first flop, hardly counts - leaving the multiplex wide open to attack from ever-ready and always-grinding YouTubers. As I write, three of the UK's Top Five films owe their existence to online content creators, the much-discussed Backrooms and Obsession joined this past weekend by the grand finale of larky YouTube hit The Amazing Digital Circus, which - with zero in the way of pre-publicity - nevertheless pulled in more spectators than Sony's shrugging He-Man/Skeletor reunion. The studios' big idea - and, really, their last throw of the dice before the dubious spectacle of a Trump World Cup hoves into view - is to recall the now 79-year-old Steven Spielberg to four-quadrant business, and to fund him (to the tune of a reported $115m) to continue his inquiries into extraterrestrial activity. Yet Disclosure Day - written by Jurassic Park's David Koepp from a story idea by Spielberg himself - actually proves to be far less about aliens than it is about we earthlings: our doubts and fears, the lies we tell, the secrets we keep. Thematically, at least, it's not as far removed from Spielberg's recent memoir-movie The Fabelmans as you might expect.


It starts rather better than it ends: no preamble, no messing about, dropping us almost directly into the lap of a whistleblower on the run through contemporary America. Daniel Kellner (Josh O'Connor) has his girl (Eve Hewson) at his side and a metallic doohickey in his pocket; the first fear Disclosure Day touches upon is that this thingummyjig will at some point prove crucial to the plot. Kellner is being pursued by a bearded Colin Firth, in stiffly patrician mode as a private security overlord, and he's being assisted, via burner phone, by Colman Domingo, heading up some kind of resistance movement in a comfy cardigan. More immediately compelling are the backdrops Spielberg sets his characters against. Kellner is introduced handing over a rucksack full of USBs amid the baying crowd of a wrestling match; Domingo conducts his business out of what appears to be a regional playhouse where a set is being constructed. Everything, instantly, is either sport or theatre, and another form of spectacle presents itself after a breakfast-table encounter with a strange bird leaves Kansas City weatherwoman Emily Blunt speaking first fluent Russian, to the understandable bemusement of goofball beau Wyatt Russell; then Korean, allowing her to make a critical intervention in an ongoing diplomatic crisis before the morning forecast; and then - once the camera turns her way - speaking in tongues to baffled viewers across the Midwest. It's a nice, sublimated gag on Koepp and Spielberg's part: what if a lowly weathergirl became the fount of all knowledge? But this development also speaks (if you'll pardon the pun) to what Spielberg is getting at here: people at loggerheads, talking at cross-purposes, not at all on the same page. What if aliens, by insisting on complete transparency, made their own fateful intervention in the culture wars? And what if a filmmaker best known for inspiring (and hymning) togetherness instead turned his attention to the thornier subject of today's social division?

For ninety of these 145 minutes, that's an intriguing enough hook for us to go along with, and we do feel in safe hands. Given this story's somewhat mechanical nature, Spielberg's primary task here is to reassure us: we may not initially be in possession of all the key narrative info - as Blunt is - but it will be revealed to us in time. We surely need that reassurance: this is, after all, one of this director's chillier, more paranoiac films, its atomised characters falling subject not just to remote surveillance (so that's what the doohickey does) but also passing flurries of hail and snow and the steely blue-grey palette of 2005's War of the Worlds. Spielberg's judicious flow of information actually meshes well with this plot. Whether brought about by alien bird or metal bar, alien contact here involves a bad case of TMI, downloading not just those languages but a century's worth of crashlandings and cover-ups to the cerebral cortex; as Spielberg frames it, this is not unlike mainlining everything on social media in a matter of seconds, so, y'know, best be careful, like. Disclosure Day deviates from current cinematic trends in its marked ambivalence towards tech: Spielberg even makes a scene out of two characters crushing a smartphone with a car, a fantasy many viewers outside of the Backrooms demographic may well have had in their desire to reject all cookies for eternity. But the film is old-world in other respects, too: in its sincere handling of the test of faith faced by the Hewson character, a former novitiate pressured to turn in the man she loves (she even contracts stigmata at one point), and in its cosy belief that local TV news - perhaps, after all, the right, digestible level of information - may yet come to spare us from nuclear annihilation. It should be rallying. So why was it that I came away from Disclosure Day so disappointed, and despairing all the more about the future of the American event movie?

Partly, it's a personnel problem: none of these performers disgrace themselves, but these characters - cardboard cutout goodies and baddies; moving parts, devoid of depth - just don't stick in the mind the way Roy Neary and Elliott do. Mostly, though, it's a story issue. Disclosure Day gets much less persuasive the further it goes along this path and, at some point of no return, even turns its director against itself: what you end up watching is one-third the best of Spielberg and two-thirds the worst of him. Given the prime June release date, absolutely nobody should have been expecting anything as revelatory as The Fabelmans, which seemed like a big, liberating step forward in this filmography. Even so, this feels like well-trodden ground: Spielberg's not the only person to have headed this way in this manner. (A question the film silently poses: how many X-Files reboots does any one civilisation need?) With its oddly muted thrills and spills - one good car chase through a rural farmhouse, but that's about it - the whole looks and feels like a slightly wearied attempt to get back up to full blockbuster speed, or an effort to update some lost Amblin runaround of the 1980s. I spent the entire second half wishing I was rewatching Jeff Nichols' underseen Midnight Special, a limber Spielberg homage that proved more emotionally resonant than anything the real thing arrives at here. Is it not significant that Disclosure Day should hinge on a flatpack reconstruction of an old image, familiarly lit by Janusz Kamiński, mechanically scored by John Williams, in such a way as to tell us what to feel? It's the exact moment the savvy Spielberg gets overruled and undermined by the sappy Spielberg, certain in his belief that what one character - and the world - needs now is more comforting fantasy, an echo of the past. Disclosure Day is mostly muscle memory, a twinge of something, inspired in places, laboured in many others. So this curious non-summer persists - and the old world continues to perish before our eyes.

Disclosure Day is now showing in cinemas nationwide.

Tuesday, 9 June 2026

Eastern promises: "Erupcja"


Where February's
The Moment found Charli xcx representing what she knew - the vagaries of the modern music business - the new indie curio Erupcja, which may not have been made or distributed as widely here without the singer's participation, offers a slightly bigger challenge: an attempt on the singer's part to walk a few hundred miles in another woman's shoes. Pete Ohs' film revives that Nineties strain of American peregrination - think Before Sunrise or Barcelona - which travelled in search of some greater perspective on the follies of romantic youth; it has good ideas and sound instincts, even if the overall execution left me shrugging for much of its 71 minutes. Charli plays Bethany, one half of a vaguely hipsterish London couple who've booked a weekend break to Warsaw in Poland. Unlike boyfriend Rob (Robert Popper lookalike Will Madden), who hopes to propose on the couple's last night in town, Bethany has been this way before - as, surely, has Ohs, sweeping us up on a guided tour of one of Europe's less filmed and therefore less familiar cities. ("I never thought Warsaw would be this green," the wide-eyed Rob remarks, although nothing in the film proves as green as Rob himself.) Bethany's reasons for returning soon become clear. In passing, we meet Nel (Lena Góra), a reluctant florist who lives and works in the city, with whom, we learn, the lovestruck Bethany once had a fling and hopes to reconnect; yet Nel has another lingering ex in Ula (Agata Trzebuchowska, the young nun of Pawlikowski's Ida). Round and round they all go, to the accompaniment of what sounds like a fairground calliope and beneath the all-seeing eye of a Polish narrator (Jacek Zubiel), until the sudden eruption of Mount Etna plays havoc with European air travel and strands everybody in place. Moral of the story: you can't fight nature.

You can see what Ohs is getting at. Erupcja has the neatness of a short story Rohmer might have filmed, coupled to the openness of those early Godard features; it's one of the few films set over a weekend that you can imagine actually being shot over a (busy) weekend, on the hoof, with a skeleton crew gathering at Stansted around a pop star travelling without make-up so as to prevent any onlookers making a fuss. As a drama, it's fairly conventional: young woman caught between dull security (as represented by poor old Rob, with his deeply trad ideas of couples activities and his longing glances at the nearby Novotel) and the romantic possibility Nel embodies. Taking it out onto the streets freshens this material up, as it did back in Godard's day; but I'm less certain that Ohs succeeds in bulking this anecdote out. As so often with early, microbudget works, the performances are variable, governed less by clear and sharp direction than by who's in town or willing to travel and how prepared they are to work for scale (or less). Ohs is at least fairly shrewd in the way he co-opts Charli's emergent screen persona - here's a gal who cares not for the bourgeois restrictions of the brassiere, and really doesn't want to be pinned down elsewhere else; Bethany, indeed, is such a flighty character the film allows her to vanish from sight for much of its second half - but the supporting characterisations come off somewhere between colourless and wan. Much as Charli's not yet a film star in the way she absolutely is a pop star, so too Erupcja isn't an entirely satisfying movie: increasingly, it seems slight - even jejune - in comparison with the films with which it enters into discussion, gesturing towards rich Rohmerian wisdom, but ultimately stuck at an A24 level of depth. It's a pity, as the stronger scenes and stretches here suggest a semi-promising miniature, fashioned in the right adventurous spirit: at this point in time, it's just reassuring to know there are American filmmakers who've retained possession of a passport.

Erupcja is now playing in selected cinemas.

Friday, 5 June 2026

For what it's worth...




UK box office Top Ten (for the weekend of May 29-31, 2026):

1 (new) Backrooms (15)
2 (1) Star Wars: The Mandalorian and Grogu (12A)
3 (2) Michael (12A)
4 (3) Obsession (18) *
5 (4) The Devil Wears Prada 2 (12A)
6 (6) The Sheep Detectives (PG)
7 (new) Tuner (15) ***
8 (9) The Super Mario Galaxy Movie (PG)
9 (new) Power Ballad (15) ****
10 (7) Passenger (15) ***

(source: BFI)

My top five:
5. Tuner


DVD/Blu-Ray/Download top ten: 

1 (1) The Super Mario Galaxy Movie (PG)
2 (2) Project Hail Mary (12) ***
3 (10) G.O.A.T. (PG)
4 (5) Avatar: Fire and Ash (12) ***
5 (7) "Wuthering Heights" (15)
6 (11) The Housemaid (15)
7 (15) A Minecraft Movie (PG)
8 (6) Ready or Not 2: Here I Come (15)
9 (9) Hoppers (U) ****
10 (12) Wicked: For Good (PG)


My top five: 
1. Hoppers


Top five films on terrestrial TV this week:
1. Great Expectations (Saturday, BBC Two, 10.20am)
2. Unforgiven [above] (Sunday, BBC Two, 10.45pm)
3. BlackBerry (Saturday, Channel 4, 11.35pm)
4. Nomadland (Sunday, Channel 4, 1am)
5. Ali & Ava (Tuesday, BBC Two, 12.05am)

Thursday, 4 June 2026

Sound of metal: "Tuner"


While the hip young cinekids rally around their preferred online creators, Tuner is being offered as the seniors' special in the screen next door. Here is an old-school New York thriller such as your poppa - maybe even your grandpoppa - used to make: unsexy, unlikely to go viral in the way Backrooms and Obsession have, such a throwback that it features Dustin Hoffman in a leading role. Emergent cherub Leo Woodall, from Nuremberg and the last Bridget Jones, is Niki, a workaday piano tuner with an extraordinary gift: a sensitivity of hearing such that he can also crack safes with the right equipment to hand. Hoffman is his legitimate employer, with whom our boy spends his afternoon bickering as they wend from one chichi residence to the next; Havana Rose Liu is the piano student Niki impresses with his perfect pitch in a scene that recalls what Hoffman was doing with playing cards back in Rain Man, itself now approaching its fortieth anniversary; and Lior Raz is the heavy who makes Niki an offer he feels he cannot refuse after his mentor gets in a financial jam. As if Tuner couldn't be any less cutting-edge, it's pursuing a very old plot - the kid who gets in up to his (in this instance, ultra-delicate) ears - of a kind that might well have been the basis of a poverty-row noir fashioned seventy-odd years ago, a comparison the film appears to welcome, given the copious jazz and blues standards on its soundtrack.

The director is recent Oscar-winner Daniel Roher (who also co-writes with Robert Ramsey), and you could probably drive yourself crazy wondering what the new film has in common with his documentary Navalny. (Most likely scenario: Roher took a meeting the day after his Oscar win, the suits asked him what he wanted to do next, and he suggested something light and fictional.) Some large part of Tuner - actually, its strongest part - does, however, function as a kind of character study, gradually drawing out, as a documentarist might well seek to draw out, the protagonist's personality, belief system, strengths, weaknesses and red lines. This is easily the best showcase yet for Woodall, who exudes something of the young Ryan Gosling's sleepy, shuffling chill from within a snug hoodie, and gets to play diverse duets with each of his co-stars: sparring with gramps Hoffman, flirting awkwardly with Liu, gulping before Raz, and having his hair ruffled by Tovah Feldshuh as Hoffman's wife. One big giveaway that Tuner is an oldtimers' movie at heart: it's not unduly fussed about instant gratification, instead letting all the above relationships build and simmer. 

What thrills there are here remain defiantly analogue: occasional setpieces, made in the editing suite, in which Woodall is set to twiddling a knob against the clock while The Zone of Interest sound designer Johnnie Burn turns circles to discern exactly when a pin drops and the mechanisms click. Here, as elsewhere, the movie is revealed as less concerned with worldbuilding or statement-making than it is with tinkering. Much as these characters are bothered by niggly little things (loud noises, the coda to a piano concerto), so those behind the camera find ways to nudge this narrative on (as with a mid-film, very old-school montage) or set themselves technical tasks to accomplish (Burn, for his part, engineers a couple of wrenchingly violent sound cuts late on). It's neither as spectacular nor as zeitgeisty as what's on in the screen next door, and arguably too mechanical in its closing reels: here, Roher starts to force his plot, where previously he was content to tease out developments. (That noisome crunching you can hear is a clunky gear change or two.) A note-perfect ending, however, should help you forgive some of its flaws - and any truly healthy cinema needs its mechanics and tinkerers as much as it needs its artists and visionaries.

Tuner is now showing in selected cinemas.

Tuesday, 2 June 2026

On demand: "La Grazia"


We're not quite talking Luca Guadagnino levels of copybook-blotting here, but abundance has inarguably dulled the lustre of the Paolo Sorrentino filmography these past few years. Too-easy funding begat far too many movies, few of which sustained the bracing formal rigour of this director's 2004 breakthrough The Consequences of Love, most of which merely restated whatever Sorrentino was getting at with The Great Beauty a decade or so ago. Yet La Grazia marks an appreciable change of tack, and the return of Sorrentino the political junkie, previously front and centre in 2008's Il Divo and 2018's Loro. After a lengthy preamble that briefs us on the legal powers and responsibilities of the Italian President, we're reintroduced to Toni Servillo - baleful as ever - on the rooftop of the presidential palace in Rome, from where his fictional head of state Mariano De Santis gazes out over the country he's been appointed to keep an eye on; from this high vantage point, the presidency would appear as ceremonial a position as the gargoyles carved into the building's walls. 

De Santis, we learn, has been nicknamed Reinforced Concrete: "it's flattering", his top general assures him, although some of that tag's implied dullness lingers. An aging bureaucrat, a sometime judge, widowed and still heartbroken with it, he's a decent cove, broadly liberal in his opinions, far from a tyrant, but even he has to admit "I'm the most boring person I know", a verdict Sorrentino underlines by surrounding De Santis with his usual Felliniesque hangers-on. He has six months left in office - a period he shares with an Italian astronaut orbiting the Earth - so the question becomes what to do with that time. He puts off a proposed Vogue interview about his style choices and threatens to dodder off into his own memories, before his daughter-slash-assistant reminds him he still has official business on the table: two potential pardons, which formalise the grace of the title but are complicated by human emotion and the political climate, and a euthanasia bill which likewise requires delicate handling. Suddenly, thanks to the grace of Sorrentino's framing and Servillo's central performance, this grey old man, who might otherwise strike the eye as an Italianate John Major, becomes an unexpectedly compelling protagonist: someone trying to resist the inevitable, seize the moment, find peace and make a real and positive difference in this world. Just one of those goals would usually be tough enough.

Is Mariano De Santis an analogue of some kind for his aging director? I ask, because Sorrentino has himself presented, in the course of his last few productions, as a filmmaker getting ever more set in his own ways, hung up on the false equation that insists excess + shimmer + sheen = cinema. The first sign he's attempting something new here is the overarching greyness of De Santis's world: overcast skies, pencil-etching exteriors, meeting rooms (this character's natural habitat) where the director practically abandons us to breathe in the dust and feel the silent weight of history bearing down. For a long while, until De Santis beats a midfilm retreat to his Alpine hometown in a bid to clear his head and get some perspective, only Gabo Barranco's electronic score - representing the pulse of the modern world - is allowed to unsettle the status quo. In the meantime, it's the people who grab us, not the places - and one reason Sorrentino has proven much more reliable of late than Guadagnino has been his sure grasp of character: he's something like a cartoonist - a prodigiously gifted visual artist - defining the folks who appear before us in a few brisk, economic strokes before handing over these sketches to his performers to fill in any gaps.

Servillo, one of the great minimalist actors of our time, once more conveys multitudes with a melancholy gaze, a shrug, a reset of the jaw. This De Santis fellow is a man out of time in every sense: agonised by issues of legacy, he's like a better paid (and naturally far better appointed) variant of the wearied salarymen played by Takashi Shimura in Ikiru and Bill Nighy in LivingBut he's also a character who speaks fruitfully to the present moment, awash as that is with hands-off politicians elected to oversee managed decline rather than bring about real change, preferable though these may still be to the dogwhistling nostalgia merchants. When we first encounter Mariano De Santis, he appears jaded indeed - as he confesses in passing, he's a man who no longer dreams at night - but Sorrentino's plotting obliges him to look ahead: he has a vision of something, however modest, and then works to make it a reality and Italy a better and more compassionate place. You couldn't quite call La Grazia an example of late style - not least because Sorrentino is a relatively youthful 56 - but it looks and feels like a transition to a more mature mode: a director's recognition that a filmmaker of his standing can, after all, turn down the superficial dazzle to ensure his words and gestures matter and thereby arrive at some greater beauty besides. As the case of Mariano De Santis demonstrates, it's really never too late.

La Grazia is now streaming via MUBI.