Wednesday, 12 August 2026

Growth: "Songs of Forgotten Trees"


"Presented by" Anurag Kashyap in his role as the Hindi cinema's most forceful moderniser, Anuparna Roy's
Songs of Forgotten Trees has the air of an odd-couple flatshare comedy redirected into more naturalistic and reflective territory; its heroines' apartment block would appear to stand equidistant between recent critics' darling All We Imagine As Light and Claudia Weill's repertory fave Girlfriends. The flatmates here are two women occupying different positions in Mumbai society. Shweta (Sumi Baghel) is an IT worker and the new girl in town, a bit of a country mouse who flinches at the city's noise and men. Naaz Shaikh's Thooya, on the other hand, is a sex worker and aspirant actress struggling to process the recent death of her father, her last living relative: she's started to think anew of both an old school friend and one of her elderly clients, who didn't so much as lay a finger on her, although these fond reveries are sporadically interrupted by an altogether less positive relationship with her (married) cheeseball of a landlord. Roy watches the pair's initially tentative interactions, catching in passing those lonely nights when one or both parties have nothing better to do than gaze longingly out of the window at the city beyond; every now and again, though, the director cuts away to the mighty hollong trees swaying in some other part of the country. The implication appears to be that these girls are themselves trees, or at least saplings that might some day grow into trees - and who'd likewise go overlooked or otherwise taken for granted were it not for the loving gaze of Roy's camera.

It is, as you may sense from the above, a film that demands a certain patience on the viewer's part: what Roy sets herself to recapturing here is that period where we're still waiting for life to start and for a reason to go out into the world. For most of these 80 minutes, we're holed up in this embryonic flat, a sparsely furnished and carefully maintained nutshell, watching its inhabitants cooking, cleaning and washing, or humming to themselves in the downtime between meetings with their variously demanding clients; in their quiet, observational way, these commonplace back-and-forths tell you a lot about the state of play between men and women in today's India. It helps that both these actresses are very watchable: skilfully suggesting a growing bond while maintaining distinct personalities, these women come to fit together inside this poky flat like trees in the forest, providing mutual support, shade and cover. (By the closing image, their roots seem to have intertwined.) The one scene that doesn't wholly ring true is a late argument between the pair in the back of a cab - this, you feel, is Roy attempting to force some overt conflict into shot before the credits roll - although even this slight misstep yields a choice sequence of huffy laundry-folding: we've surely all known awkward moments in flatsharing like this. It remains a project that clearly needed some watering and tending to reach us. (Maybe it wouldn't have travelled this far without Kashyap sticking his name on the credits; such is the way the industry still operates.) Yet you can see Songs of Forgotten Trees growing before your eyes: we're watching and living with Mumbaikars we know here - or people we feel we know almost intimately by the time cinema protocol requires us to move out.

Songs of Forgotten Trees opens in selected cinemas from Friday.

Tuesday, 11 August 2026

Land of the lost: "The End of Oak Street"


The End of Oak Street
 presents as a prime opportunity. It arrives towards the end of a summer that has generated a lot of money for the studios, but also a dearth of original and creatively rewarding blockbusters. And amid a movie summer in which even that bedrock normie Steven Spielberg was seen to go a touch nutty in the heat (cf. Disclosure Day), it offers the season's most conventionally Spielbergian premise, being part evocation of 1980s suburbia and part dinosaur flick. As if all this wasn't enough, it's also a chance for a major studio release to finally deliver on the promise of those tepid Jurassic World reboots, which kept threatening to bring their dinosaurs ashore and into densely populated areas - as a savvier Spielberg did in 1997's The Lost World - but then... just didn't. It's not that the couple played by Anne Hathaway and Ewan McGregor and their two-point-four children (the point four being the dog, Starbuck) don't have problems enough of their own before the dinos show up. He's been laid off and has started drinking; she's leaning in the direction of divorce; and the dog is making a terrible mess of the neighbours' gardens, although perhaps not as big a mess as some will. But then a tear in the space-time continuum - represented by some very Spielbergian flashes of light - mires this sunny block of 20th century suburban housing in prehistoric swampland, and here's where The End of Oak Street starts to get interesting. All the sub-Stand By Me/Stranger Things nostalgia of the first reel falls away, leaving behind a study of a family unit operating in near-isolation, having been cut off from the grid and left at the mercy of the law of the jungle. Somewhere in here: the kind of B-movie Rod Serling might have written had he had the misfortune to see the people and policies the America of 2026 keeps voting for.

Your actual writer-director is David Robert Mitchell, who did as much as anyone to kickstart the current horror renaissance with 2014's It Follows; the new film demonstrates that the latter was no fluke, and also that this filmmaker's head has cleared a little in the years since 2018's Under the Silver Lake. (Which may actually have been Mitchell's Disclosure Day.) From the off, you catch Mitchell working nifty split-diopter tricks within his panoramic frames: he's sly about introducing his scaly antagonists as tails and silhouettes, and he's rightly insistent in his belief that fewer VFX means better VFX (because it gives the effects houses time to finesse what they're working on). True, some of the elements he's having to marshall here are as generic as they come. There's a scene or two of Hollywood Science Talk as the family try and fathom what's just happened and how to get back to the future. The crisis allows McGregor's weak-willed paterfamilias to prove his worth, and his son (Christian Convery) to get closer to the classmate he's been crushing on. There's even a subplot about the fate of the dog. Yet I enjoyed Oak Street, in large part because it's one of the few films this summer to understand what's so tantalising and compelling about its own premise, in the same way, say, Speed or Twister did. These little boxes on a hillside become fancy packaging for the film's apex predators to tear through; it's mildly unnerving to witness the bustling, sunny suburbia of those opening scenes emptying out - or being emptied out - once the tyrannosauruses take over. Mitchell treats us to at least one image Spielberg didn't dare film in his dino movies, and keeps one or two nasty tricks up his sleeve for the home straight; this is a film operating at the upper limits of its 12A certificate. Arguably it's no more than Jumanji with bigger teeth and a softish takeback ending (partly justified by a tribute Mitchell pays amid the closing credits: it's his fantasy as much as it is that of anybody else). Yet running to a brisk 99 minutes, it's also an unusually economic example of what has come to seem like an endangered species: the purely fun summer movie, made by creatives who've devoured enough of them growing up to know what makes a good one.

The End of Oak Street opens in cinemas nationwide this Friday.

Monday, 10 August 2026

Soldier boys: "Ish"


Silly season isn't the worst time for a British filmmaker to announce themselves with a forceful opening statement: at the very least, it affords us the opportunity to watch a creative daring to go against the flow and taking their chosen medium seriously, if not perhaps Nolan-seriously. The story the erstwhile visual artist Imran Perretta is telling with his debut feature
Ish is, in many respects, a familiar one: it's that of two little boys coming of age the hard way. But Perretta brings to it new-ish strategies and station calls, new-ish lines of attack. For starters, he frames events in a snazzy, high-contrast black-and-white that recalls La Haine, that epochal coming-of-age tale, or - closer to home - Shane Meadows' tragicomic boxing saga TwentyFourSeven; and he's training his camera on the altogether underfilmed mean streets of Luton and its immediate environs. The first time we meet Perretta's boys - pint-sized British-Asian lad Ishmael, known as Ish (Farhan Hasnat) and his older, taller, curly-haired Arab pal Maram (Yahya Kitana) - they're biking into the woods to scrump handfuls of blackberries; the scene could be described as Edenic, were it not for the planes roaring overhead on the way to the airport where Ish's dad Naeem (Avin Shah) works a security detail. The fall here occurs once the boys are back on concrete, in an urban environment defined by sirens, fractious chatter, not quite broken but lopsided and fragile homes, and a pivotal police stop-and-search that drives a decisive wedge between the film's protagonists. Gather ye blackberries while ye may.

Here, Ish follows on from countless recent Britfilms, not least 2015's jolting stop-and-search documentary The Hard Stop. But the Britain of 2026 is not the same as the Britain of a decade ago; the world has changed, and this is the first feature I've seen to deploy the current state of play in the Middle East as a resonant plot point. On paper, granted, it sounds more than halfway goofy: overhearing the urgent sniping on talk radio and seeing the Palestinian flag flying nearby, Ish and Maram come to believe the conflict will spill over into their own backyard. You'd call them too young to know any better, except that the conflict does spill over, in a roundabout way: what Perretta is getting at is how our young internalise a world that appears to be ever more frantically border-policing, and in a state of near-constant conflict. Crucially, this filmmaker isn't a polemicist, rather an artist and a humanist: he observes that the stop-and-search, on an otherwise nondescript suburban backroad, merely accelerates a gradual, possibly organic severing of the bond between the two boys. Maram is falling in with an older, more boisterous crowd who leave their bikes at home to refocus their energies and attentions on cars and girls; when Ish flees the scene of the stop-and-search - leaving Maram at the mercy of the coppers - it's because he's scared, like the child he is, watching the streets that had previously been his playground transformed into a warzone, contested territory. It's "think global, act local" writ widescreen large: a drama that doesn't go anywhere near the West Bank, but which nevertheless sets us to thinking about power structures, allyship, courage, the choosing of sides.

Rather than approaching these subjects with a heavy hand, Perretta gathers small but telling incidents and interactions: Ish retains an appreciably anecdotal shape and feel, as if something like this happened to this filmmaker as a boy and has bugged him ever since. Making a movie about it twenty-odd years on allows him to flesh such incidents out, to try and see more sides of the story, and to stop beating himself up about it. (Most of the characters here are compromised or conflicted in some way, even if it's just Dad shaking people down at the airport to keep a roof over his family's head or Gran - a warm, wise turn from veteran Sudha Bhuchar - sneaking the odd cigarette.) There are sporadic overemphases, a few shortfalls in the prevailing empathy. It's a little on-the-nose that every TV and radio on screen should be tuned to news from Gaza, though this at least explains how the conflict gets into the boys' heads in the first place; and Perretta has no time whatsoever for the police, depicted as silent, faceless pursuers with Terminator-like tracking technology, as much a merciless machine as the IDF of the boys' nightmares. (The tracking sequences might as well flash "ACAB" in the corner of the screen.) But Ish has the craft to make even perversely localised conflict cinematic. This supporting cast collectively push for a depth beyond the reach of our primetime telly dramas; Perretta's self-composed score enhances the lyricism of his images; and cinematographer Jermaine Canute Edwards shoots it like one of Ray's Apu films, going not for prettifying sheen but well-lit, granular detail. Some part of it remains perverse: perhaps only an artist could have stopped to consider what effect a genocide in Gaza would have on the youth of Luton. But that very thoughtfulness, that leap of the creative imagination, proves central to a film that answers the age-old lament "won't somebody think of the children?" Perretta has, most persuasively.

Ish is now playing in selected cinemas.

Sunday, 9 August 2026

For what it's worth...




UK box office Top Ten (for the weekend of July 31-August 2, 2026):

1 (new) Spider-Man: Brand New Day (12A) ***
2 (1) The Odyssey (15) ***
3 (2) Toy Story 5 (PG) **
4 (4) Minions & Monsters (U)
5 (3) Moana (PG)
6 (6) The Invite (15) ****
7 (7) Obsession (18) *
8 (8) Evil Dead Burn (18)
9 (new) Ish (15) ****
10 (5) Jana Nayagan (15)

(source: BFI)

My top five:
2. Ish


DVD/Blu-Ray/Download top ten: 

1 (3) Disclosure Day (12) **
2 (8) Michael (12)
3 (new) Supergirl (12)
4 (1) Star Wars: The Mandalorian and Grogu (12)
5 (5) Obsession (18) *
6 (2) The Super Mario Galaxy Movie (PG)
7 (9) The Devil Wears Prada 2 (12)
8 (4) Mortal Kombat II (15)
9 (6) Troy (15) **
10 (7) Backrooms (15)


My top five: 
1. Hoppers


Top five films on terrestrial TV this week:
1. The Man Who Knew Too Much [above] (Sunday, BBC Two, 12.20pm)
2. Inside Llewyn Davis (Sunday, BBC Two, 10pm)
3. Fallen Leaves (Saturday, BBC Two, 12.50am)
4. Lady Macbeth (Sunday, BBC Two, 11.40pm)
5. How to Have Sex (Sunday, Channel 4, 11pm)

Thursday, 6 August 2026

On demand: "The Ear/Ucho"


Filmed under the noses of the Soviets and consequently withheld from the eyes of the viewing public for twenty years, 1970's odd but effective political fable The Ear shuttles back and forth between the rooms of one Prague household, conveying as it goes the perilous position many Czechs found themselves in at the moment of its making. A Government minister (Radoslav Brzobohatý)
 returns home from a broadly typical high-society function and finds he's both keyless and powerless, a source of particular annoyance to the wife at his side (Jiřina Bohdalová). More curious still: once the couple eventually get inside the house, they find their electricity may be off, but the lights are still on in a neighbour's property. So they're very much in the dark, and co-writer/director Karel Kachyňa's illuminating flashbacks begin to tell the tale of what actually went down at the night's big party, reframed now as a hotbed of scheming and plotting that may well have something to do with the pair's present predicament. The mind immediately goes to Miloš Forman's The Firemen's Ball, from a few years earlier, except that these festivities have turned somehow sinister, with a lot of talking behind backs in euphemisms and coded whispers. Having spent the evening being in with the regime's in-crowd, our protagonist will now spend the wee small hours not just sleepless but out in the cold, apparently designated as an enemy of the State.

What Kachyňa was working towards - and gets - is a potent idea of being under surveillance, under suspicion and under threat; these 95 minutes describe a state of psychological siege in which even boozy, after-midnight chatter between a husband and wife might prove somebody's undoing. The married parties come to turn against one another; we sense how even a well-placed functionary isn't safe in this set-up (in large part because he is so well-placed); and the darkness of the house leads us to wonder and worry whether someone's physically waiting in the shadows. (There's barely any let-up once power is restored to the property around the halfway mark: now this couple appear hopelessly exposed.) If we become edgy, too, it's because this camera functions both as a sympathetic ear, recognising what it is to have to live under these pressures, and a silent co-conspirator, recording everything for the powers-that-be. By the end of this long dark night of the Communist soul, it's got brutal, bearing down so heavily on the superb lead performers that it threatens to shatter the very foundations of this marriage: the closing stretch is a Bergman movie where Big Brother has usurped God, leaving poisonous ideology in the place of vacillating faith. A textbook example of a small, self-contained story elevated and expanded by canny craft and technique, what's most thrilling and daring about it is that Kachyňa would himself have been at great risk of returning home from any cast-and-crew screening to find an unmarked car parked on his street and his name on some sort of list.

The Ear is now streaming via YouTube.

Wednesday, 5 August 2026

Rats!: "Flushed Away"


We rejoin the summer Aardman retrospective with the company entering a new era, and a difficult moment. By this point, the Bristol-based animators had formed a partnership with American giants DreamWorks, whose executives presumably hoped to convert what had previously been an uncommonly successful cottage industry into an all-out hit factory. More specifically, they were looking for product for Q4 of 2006 that would match the success of DreamWorks' big Easter release Over the Hedge (budget: $80m, final take: $340m). Aardman and DreamWorks' previous collab, 2005's Wallace and Gromit in the Curse of the Were-Rabbit, was essentially an extension of the Bristolians' short triumphs, with a built-in audience. (From a budget of $30m, it made $193m: everyone left the boardroom happy.) But Flushed Away proved a trickier sell. This time round, Aardman were starting from scratch; they were moving away from their specialist field of claymation into digimation; and they were determined to hang onto their signature Britishness at all costs. The story, engineered by co-director Sam Fell, Morph creator Peter Lord and sitcom legends Dick Clement and Ian LeFrenais, was unusually attuned to class: it followed the progress of well-to-do Kensington house mouse Roddy St. James (voiced by Hugh Jackman) after he's flushed into the underworld of the London sewers. Beyond Jackman, the voice cast was a job lot of BAFTA's finest: Kate Winslet as the sort-of love interest, Ian McKellen - heard imitating Larry Grayson at one point - as underworld heavy The Toad, Bill Nighy as an albino hired thug, plus John Motson burbling about the England-Germany World Cup final going on in the background and - as the slobbish sewer rat who kickstarts the plot by booting Roddy down the khazi - TV's Shane Richie (yes, that Shane Richie), found at the point where he presumably felt Hollywood would surely come calling. It's all very 2006, then; so 2006, indeed, that the soundtrack not only features the Dandy Warhols' "Bohemian Like You" but Jet's "Are You Gonna Be My Girl", the unofficial theme song of this era's mid-list family entertainments.

The result constitutes the one film in this retrospective that hasn't dated especially well, for multiple reasons. This was Aardman, the masters of clay, having to learn the ropes of digimation - then being framed as just as much an inevitability for the animation industry of 2006 as AI is being framed as the future of today. (In fact, animation subsequently developed in multiple directions, so nobody need feel too sad about uninstalling ChatGPT.) From its very first frames, Flushed Away looks horribly flat: we're watching recognisably Aardmanish characters capering in front of tentative, underdetailed, in some cases barely finished backdrops, with almost zero interaction between foreground and backgrounds. If it weren't for that distinctive character work, indeed, the film might resemble no more than those cheap Euro animations that get redubbed and repurposed as half-term screenfiller; even the inventive storytelling that Aardman were known for at this point seems to have been flushed away, replaced by the sight of a bunch of characters running around manically for 85 minutes. One or two titters remain, but this was all too clearly a halfway house for its makers, falling awkwardly between the aesthetic Aardman had been developing and nurturing with each careful thumbprint in the plasticine and the vulgar American product then running amok in the multiplexes. (I should note this was also the year of Disney's The Wild, Paramount's Barnyard and Sony's Open Season; it was not a golden age for animation.) There's lots more burping than Aardman would usually permit as a substitute for genuine wit, and twenty years later, any studio would struggle to get away with the line "my bum looks like the Japanese flag" (which has the ring of Seventies men Clement and LaFrenais) or a sequence in which an offscreen voice approximates the owner of a Chinese takeaway. (At the very least, they'd need a sensitive redub for the Asian market.) As it was, the film followed Roddy St. James down the toilet, barely recouping its excessive $149m budget internationally; there was no way of selling the movie outside the UK as anything other than an oddly parochial curio. (I mean, Shane Richie, for heaven's sake.) The partnership between the two studios dissolved shortly thereafter, but the Bristolians soon rallied. Next week's reissue: 2012's marvellous The Pirates! In An Adventure with Scientists!

Flushed Away returns to selected cinemas from Friday.

Tuesday, 4 August 2026

The final countdown: "The Sacrifice"


In the beginning, Tarkovsky's films were somewhat glacial; they were composed of frozen blocks of imagery, refrigerated emotions and memories, which melted at a sometimes perilously slow drip to reveal the intended meaning. By 1986, the year of the Chernobyl explosion, Tarkovsky had decided to bow out in a blaze of glory. The world was on fire, he felt, and all but the smallest glimpse of hope for the future had been obscured by the smoke; nobody was doing anything much to prevent the planet from burning up and some people, indeed, were actively adding fuel to the flames. A man could go mad from watching that. Suffice to say,
The Sacrifice presents as no less urgent forty years on - even if urgency isn't quite what the film itself is dealing in. Tarkovsky was in Sweden now, working with an international cast and crew (a young Claire Denis was among the casting assistants), not least Bergman's preferred cinematographer Sven Nykvist, and the director had seemingly metabolised Bergman's mastery of the theatrical and his awareness of the loudly ticking clock. (One of many possible pitches for The Sacrifice: what if Bergman filmed something that related directly to the ongoing Cold War?) In both its set-up and its country-house setting, the film is decidedly Bergmanesque: it opens with a conversation on a desolate shore that invokes Dostoyevsky and Nietzsche, so we know things must be getting serious. Our protagonist for the evening is Alexander (Bergman regular Erland Josephson), a sometime actor and critic turned lecturer - the latter proves most significant - who's retired to this brooding stretch of the Baltic Coast with his wife Adelaide (Susan Fleetwood), a mute son (Tommy Kjellqvist) and innumerable signifiers of bourgeois privilege. These will be disrupted, however, by the world beyond the family's front drive, which radio and television reports insist is gearing up for war of some kind; indeed, the final, fatal missiles may already be in the air. In muted colours, Tarkovsky and Nykvist watch as the sun goes permanently down on a world and a way of life; occasional black-and-white inserts, meanwhile, convey some idea of the world after the big bang, while also carrying this filmography back to where it all started. What if the Mirror was shattered? What if Ivan's Childhood had come to a premature end?

Darkly compelling though this premise is, it's largely just a framework for Tarkovsky to fill with what he was actually fretting about as the end of his life neared: a certain helplessness, a growing impotency, a sense he may have outlived civilised history. Like many of Bergman's final works, The Sacrifice is a film out of time; you'll struggle to square it with the fact it emerged in the same century as, say, Short Circuit, let alone the same month. Within a decade, the mantle of Great Arthouse Filmmaker would pass to a generation of Kieślowskis, Almodóvars and Von Triers, flashier, more ironic sensibilities, maestros with marketing degrees. Watching Tarkovsky's characters fussing around dusty maps or swapping old war stories, one is transported back to another era, another place, a moment when our filmmakers were actively encouraged to absorb the best of theatre, painting, literature. The Sacrifice would make an especially apt double-bill with another final film, John Huston's 1987 adaptation of Joyce's The Dead, not least as the latter might have been co-opted as an alternative title for that which Tarkovsky looks out on here. All of which, as the Alexanders of this world will recognise, is criticspeak alerting the reader to the fact The Sacrifice follows a long and winding road to arrive at its eventual destination: one of Tarkovsky's legacies is the consecration of a slower cinema, consciously pushing back against the myriad mindless accelerations of the modern world. The extra time on offer led this viewer to the jolting realisation that The Sacrifice adheres to more or less the same narrative line as Steve De Jarnatt's poppy L.A. story Miracle Mile, released two years later: guy learns that the end of the world is nigh, then has to figure out what to do with the time still available to him. Where De Jarnatt cast Anthony Edwards - Goose out of Top Gun, later Mark Greene from e.r. - as a workaday Everyman, Tarkovsky plumped for the altogether loftier Josephson to portray a man of learning, a stand-in for an ailing director, an artist in exile who, if he's lucky, has another couple of hours to communicate before he utters his final word. These characters will spend those hours mostly talking, which again opens the film up to charges of windiness - but then talking is all these folks can do in the circumstances: they try and reckon with a situation that is fundamentally out of their hands, or make peace with their fates, or offer up screams, last gasps and hail Marys. There are stretches of writing here that prove so honest and so raw it's almost as though we're sat at the bedside of the dying; and we're also now aware, as viewers of the time possibly wouldn't have been, that this was the last occasion Tarkovsky could talk to us (and to his son, referenced in the film's coda). Unlike the vibrant Miracle MileThe Sacrifice is, almost needless to say, little to no fun to watch - or, rather, it's exactly as much fun as being sealed in a house with people who know they're not long for this world promises - but it does mean what it's saying, sincerely and absolutely, in a way so many modern films don't. Our movies haven't got smaller over these past four decades, but they have lost weight - the great, wrenching gravity of belief Tarkovsky expresses in every last frame here.

The Sacrifice is now playing in selected cinemas, and available to stream via Prime Video and Curzon Home Cinema.