Wednesday, 29 April 2026

On demand: "Love Means Zero"


From Showtime's documentary arm, a portrait of a tricky subject. 2017's 
Love Means Zero sees filmmaker Jason Kohn profiling Nick Bollettieri, founding father of the Nick Bollettieri Academy, the institution that came to exert an iron grip on the pro tennis circuit in the late Eighties and Nineties, thanks to such stars as Andre Agassi, Jim Courier, Mary Pierce, Maria Sharapova and, as Bollettieri puts it, "my Serena and Venus" (which will come as news to Richard Williams). He's not a monster, but from an early stage in Kohn's film, it becomes apparent that Bollettieri was an exacting taskmaster, possessed of the ruthless singlemindedness that tends to identify and make champions in pro sports. Kohn speaks to a clutch of the name players, but also those who were left to drift away and forgotten about, like tennis balls knocked over a fence or hedge; several of these players are heard to testify that they were made to feel special, like a son or daughter, then abandoned at a formative moment once Bollettieri and his coaches determined they weren't quite what the Academy was seeking. The selection process comes over as tough, perhaps necessary, but above all else poorly handled, from an interpersonal perspective: the most damning evidence Kohn introduces into the record is that even Agassi - the Academy's erratic golden boy, to the extent that Bollettieri was seen and heard to take his side when he faced fellow Academy find Courier in the French Open quarterfinals of 1989 - refused the filmmaker's request for an interview. (He will be amply represented nonetheless, both in evocative archive footage - awful late Eighties mullets and all - and, more poignantly, in the form of a letter he wrote to Bollettieri in his 2009 memoir Open.)

What follows is one of the few sports docs that owes a pronounced rhetorical debt to the combative Errol Morris; you start to feel the camera itself becoming a net. Kohn isolates Bollettieri among the ruins of one of the resorts that were left to crumble after his declaration of bankruptcy; the director lobs up a probing question or three; and Bollettieri - weathered, RFK raspy, prone to alternating between the first and third person and overusing the dated hipster slang "baby" - insistently smashes answers back. This was all in the past, Jason; I don't dwell on such things; I move on, as you should. It's presumably what he told his charges whenever they lost their serve, but around about the point Bollettieri lets slip he's been married eight times, or when one of his erstwhile prodigies opens up about an eating disorder she developed, you start to wonder just how much collateral damage one man can bring about in his quest for success. Certainly Agassi, a player made in his coach's image - a flamboyant, devil-may-care hustler, burning through endorsement deal after endorsement deal - kept getting found out at the highest level, whether by the focused, matter-of-fact Courier, the machine-like Pete Sampras, or the shithousery of Boris Becker in his sleaze era. (Becker gets ushered on to recall how he once psyched out his opponent by openly flirting with Agassi's then-wife Brooke Shields from the very centre of Wimbledon's Centre Court.) We might even question the Bollettieri definition of success. The business model here seems hazy if not outright dubious, framing players not as individuals but ambassadors for the Academy, and recycling prize money to provide scholarships for aspirant champions; late on, Kohn reveals that Bollettieri was eventually outmanoeuvred behind the scenes by one of his savvier employees. The film's subject, who died in 2022, remains defiant to the last, blurting out "I just react! Nick just does it!", like some Nike-swooshed embodiment of the American id. You conclude Bollettieri would have been great to watch as a player, forever on the attack. His flaw as a businessman, and as a human being, is that he simply had no B game.

Love Means Zero is now streaming via NOW TV.

Monday, 27 April 2026

On DVD: "The Chronology of Water"


Kristen Stewart has acted for so many distinctive auteurs in the decade since the
Twilight wrap-up that perhaps it was inevitable she would herself step behind the camera at some point. Her directorial debut The Chronology of Water is exactly the kind of project that might once have tempted her as a performer: an adaptation of a literary memoir (by Lidia Yuknavitch) centred on a muddled, self-harming young woman in desperate search of some purpose and affirmation. We meet this Lidia first as a child, within the framework of a 1960s household made tense by domestic violence; as a teenager, she takes to swimming, thereby internalising all the pressures of a solo competitive sport. When she finally reaches womanhood, embodied by Imogen Poots, she finds her mastery in the pool doesn't apply to dry land, lorded over as it is by the tyrannical men around her. The bulk of this story will outline how Lidia Yuknavitch navigated towards a place of acceptance, happiness and tranquility, a process that proves far from straightforward, and indeed far less straightahead than the average swimming lane. For much of that duration, she's having to outswim - or simply drown out - the negative voices inside her own head. The Chronology of Water will eventually run to a full two hours and eight minutes, which instinctively feels at least a reel too long, but in some ways it needs to be, because what it's detailing isn't an easy fix; like its heroine, the movie can seem tough and hard work.

For starters, you'll simply have to sit with Olivia Neergaard-Holm's free-associative editing, with its (achronological) premonitions of events to come: it's possible Stewart was seeking to emulate Nic Roeg while also intending to conjure a deeply mixed-up headspace. (We're waiting for both film and protagonist to settle down somehow.) Expect sudden swells of turbulence, then, but Stewart also affords us two constants we can cling to whenever matters get especially choppy. The first is the water of the title: the pools Lidia passes through ("how many miles does it take to swim to a self?"), the sweat and sexual effluvia, the ice in the drinks of her (alcoholic?) mother, the spit Lidia contemptuously deposits on the men she hoped might degrade her, the piss stain on one passed-out boyfriend's trousers, the condensation into which our heroine draws smiley faces (for a long time, the only happy faces in the film), the ocean into which she tosses the ashes of a stillborn baby with a muted, quietly devastating "sorry". The water raises up the film's largely floating imagery; it's both running motif and artistic self-justification. And within these emotional high tides, Stewart pins down another, adjacent image: that of the rocks Lidia habitually slips into her pockets on her travels, although it's initially unclear whether she means to ground herself - rocks as markers of time and place - or use them to drown herself à la Virginia Woolf.

The other constant here is Poots, an actress who seems to have been on the fringes of a Winslet-like movie stardom for a decade or more without really getting there. In hauling Poots front and centre, Stewart empowers her star to try things she hasn't before: to play brittle and unsympathetic, to frig herself and flash her boobs, to drink too much and drive too fast, to be as unpretty as this story demands at any given moment. In embracing these tasks, Poots creates the conditions where we cannot ignore this character, hard to be around though Lidia is, liable though she is to hurt herself and those who love her. In passing, Stewart also hands Thora Birch a gentle comeback role as Lidia's understandably concerned sister, and gifts Jim Belushi his best role in decades as the author Ken Kesey, who served as some sort of mentor for Lidia Yuknavitch's creative undertakings. (A sly comment on how fucked-up this moment was in general: we used to let someone as dishevelled as Ken Kesey mentor our young folk.) This is not, on the whole, a movie that wants or solicits the audience's approval, which likely explains why Chronology evaporated without trace within days of its UK theatrical release. (I suspect its maker had her fill of making nice during her teen franchise days.) Yet it demonstrates more than enough steel, a wilfulness its prime mover doubtless absorbed from her more adventurous directors, to be both admirable and promising indeed. Stewart has the makings of a proper filmmaker, just as the past few years have confirmed her as a formidable performer.

The Chronology of Water is now available to rent via the BFI Player and Prime Video, and on DVD via the BFI.

The chronology of water: "Rose of Nevada"


Oddities Week continues with
Rose of Nevada, Cornish auteur Mark Jenkin's distinctive take on the ghost-ship subgenre. Jenkin's previous films Bait and Enys Men were set in workaday South West coastal communities beset by social division and supernatural anomalies; collectively, they formed a heartening revival of both a rudimentary film technique (hand-developed film, post-synched sound) and the kind of regional filmmaking that fell out of fashion and favour once everybody else determined they had to go and seek their fortune in London. But now, armed with a BAFTA and an all-access festival pass, Jenkin is himself going places. His latest, shot in vibrant Nic Roeg Technicolor, introduces emergent, adventurous faces (George Mackay, Callum Turner) into this director's familiar milieu: a well-worn fishing village, here one where the trawler of the title, previously involved in a tragedy thirty years ago, has found its way back into harbour with zero hands on deck. Still, the approach remains so distinct from what's around it in the contemporary cinema that it takes a good fifteen-to-twenty minutes to resettle into the Jenkin way; the opening section has to teach us anew how to watch a film removed of all the usual fuss and clutter. What's noticeable - and surprising, even to those of us who saw Jenkin's previous films - is how much Jenkin conveys via his generally taciturn, square-framed, rough-edged close-ups. We sense, for starters, just how this community has split along generational lines, the chatty younger folk itching to talk about the tragedies befalling the local fishermen, even as their elders clam up. (One exception: a lank-haired dementia patient/seer, prone to confusing present and past, as this plot will eventually.) More striking yet: how these shots come to establish a loaded, ominous mood, borne out when a new three-man crew - grizzled captain Francis Magee and hired hands Mackay and Turner - cast off in this same cursed vessel. Etched into the wooden frame of one of the bunks the lads sleep in: a stark warning to "Get Off The Boat Now".

At which point, a fierce local knowledge - or muscle memory - kicks in. This is a trawlerman movie made by someone who's studied how these boats actually work; with its documentary-like coverage of the gulls above and the ropes and pulleys below, the film Rose most closely resembles, for long stretches at sea, is 2012's immersive experiment Leviathan. The old ways become new, pertinent and urgent again - especially once our boys return home and realise they've docked in the recent past. Something's gone adrift; bearings start to be lost. If the narrative is far from plain sailing, Jenkin's shot selection - comprising four weatherbeaten or otherwise textured close-ups to every one suggestive, Deren-like sliver of dream imagery - begins to feel like necessary ballast, exactly what this director needed to tell this particular story. (Here are shots that appear the results of several weeks' beachcombing, visual information laid out as plainly as it would be on the sands; every image is its own seashell or fossil.) And the actors put in a real shift. Few films have made better use of - and more closely relied on - Mackay's open-faced legibility, the actor set to looking ever more aghast at developments. That quality becomes doubly effective when set against the vague air of fecklessness given off by the squintier, shiftier Turner - the market-stall Richard Gere - as a young man only too prepared to go along with this new arrangement, which is to say the old arrangement, if it means sleeping with a dead man's wife. (Arguably, these youngsters are overshadowed by another cherishably characterful turn from Magee, the Bob Mitchum of the cream tea set.) If Rose of Nevada turns out to be a hit, as my packed first-weekend screening would indicate, that may partly be down to star names, and partly down to being horror/fantasy-adjacent: on some basic level, we're dealing with a brinier Brigadoon here. Yet it's also surely attributable to Jenkin attempting what few others have of late: his is a cinema that continues to speak, on some sublimated, unconscious level, to the choppy waters and backwash we're all passing through. Some of the new film's tensions are regional: you do come away with a sense of those pressures felt by the young in crumbling coastal communities to stay in place and knuckle down. But it also strikes me as significant that Jenkin has been a post-Brexit discovery. Steered by a crew of queasy and uneasy shipmates, Rose of Nevada proves unusually attuned to what it means - and how it feels - for a people to be living in the present and the past simultaneously.

Rose of Nevada is now playing in selected cinemas.

Sunday, 26 April 2026

Possession(s): "Mother Mary"


Well, April
is supposed to be the studios' R&D month, devoted to risks, gambles and shots in the dark. It's no longer Oscar season, so the movies don't have to pretend to be respectable, and it's not yet summertime, so they don't have to be IMAX big. Mother Mary, A24's choice of counterprogramming to this weekend's dubious sure thing Michael, is an old-school women's picture approached from a wildly eccentric angle by the ever-unpredictable David Lowery (Ain't Them Bodies Saints, Pete's Dragon, A Ghost Story). At its heart: a power struggle in the costume department. A scarred, nervy and generally washed out Anne Hathaway is the Gaga-like pop sensation who arrives amid a thunderstorm at the country retreat/workshop of diva costumier Michaela Coel. She's hoping to come away with a dress fit for what she insinuates will be her farewell performance, but progress in this matter is soon complicated by the fact this pair have a past: they may indeed have once been an item, and the designer has retained some measure of resentment over the way the singer subsequently stepped out in other designers' clothes. In theory, then, this is a clash of artistic visions and temperaments: the deeply damaged soul versus the prickly provocateur peering loftily down from her drawing board. Yet even that feels too conventional a reading for what's really going on here. In actual fact, those of us watching on from the cheap seats soon find ourselves scrambling to maintain our bearings and marbles, while also reaching out for a few urgently needed and reassuring reference points.

When Paul Thomas Anderson, for one, moved into this field, he returned with what was, in Phantom Thread, his most hemmed-in project, a Californian's impersonation of Brit period-flick reticence. Mother Mary initially appears far more theatrical: it opens with a long reunion scene in which Hathaway and Coel talk in a way no two human beings have ever talked, and the former performs an interpretative dance routine - with its inferences of demonic possession, it's more Linda Blair than Lionel - to a tune we don't hear. Those trailers weren't lying, one concludes: this is a decidedly odd one, and you may well spend some of it - as I did - wondering whether a script hasn't landed in the wrong pigeonhole. Sudden, stark in-camera scene and lighting changes indicate the director of the scarcely less batshit The Green Knight has set his sights on producing a better-dressed revival of the Sleuth-like filmed play; but then Sleuth, Deathtrap and their ilk never featured a scene involving a possessed FKA Twigs. That Mother Mary eventually won me over had a lot to do with these actresses, who apparently got whatever there was to get in this material, and who elevate it to a rare intensity. Something really does seem to be at stake in the matter of Hathaway versus Coel: it's soft vs. spiky, white privilege vs. lingering slights, fairytale princess vs. perhaps the most extraordinary looking performer working today. In the second half, Lowery's gift for image generation returns to the forefront; although shot on a far smaller budget, his concert scenes - reframing pop as something mythic, closer to a ritual or rite - make the Taylor Swift movie seem newly unimaginative. So there's another battle going on within Mother Mary: between the stagey and the cinematic, and - in the eyes of this judge - the latter just nicks it on points. Lowery's film doesn't attain the layered surrealism of, say, Peter Strickland's In Fabric, another treatise on the alchemy of creation fixated on a haunted red dress; some part of me couldn't shake the suspicion this is an artefact designed to justify the existence (and hefty pricetag) of a lavish, A24-published coffee table tome. Yet as flop Anne Hathaway vehicles go, Mother Mary is more intriguing, even fascinating, than 2023's Eileen - and it dares to go places next week's conventionally tailored The Devil Wears Prada 2 likely won't.

Mother Mary is now playing in selected cinemas.

Saturday, 25 April 2026

For what it's worth...




UK box office Top Ten (for the weekend of April 17-19, 2026):

1 (1) The Super Mario Galaxy Movie (PG)
2 (2Project Hail Mary (12A) ***
3 (3) The Drama (15) **
4 (new) Lee Cronin's The Mummy (18)
5 (new) Akira (15) ***
6 (4) The Magic Faraway Tree (U)
7 (new) Time Hoppers: The Silk Road (U)
8 (6) BTS World Tour 'Arirang' Live Viewing in Japan (12A)
9 (new) All My Sons - NT Live 2026 (12A)
10 (new) Bhooth Bangla (12A)

(source: BFI)

My top five:


DVD/Blu-Ray/Download top ten: 

1 (1) Avatar: Fire and Ash (12) ***
2 (8) Hamnet (12) **
3 (6) Wicked: For Good (PG)
4 (7) "Wuthering Heights" (15)
5 (5) The Housemaid (15)
6 (12) The Super Mario Bros Movie (PG)
7 (2) Sinners (15) ****
8 (9) G.O.A.T. (PG)
9 (new) Reminders of Him (12)
10 (3) One Battle After Another (15) ****



Top five films on terrestrial TV this week:
1. The Untouchables (Sunday, BBC Two, 10pm)
2. Minority Report (Saturday, ITV1, 10.20pm and Thursday, ITV1, 10.45pm)
3. Living (Saturday, Channel 4, 9pm)
4. The World's End (Friday, ITV1, 10.45pm)
5. The Man in the Iron Mask [above] (Sunday, five, 1.45pm)

Saturday, 18 April 2026

For what it's worth...




UK box office Top Ten (for the weekend of April 10-12, 2026):

1 (1) The Super Mario Galaxy Movie (PG)
2 (2Project Hail Mary (12A) ***
3 (3) The Drama (15) **
4 (4) The Magic Faraway Tree (U)
5 (5Hoppers (U) ****
6 (new) BTS World Tour 'Arirang' Live Viewing in Goyang & Japan (12A)
7 (new) You, Me & Tuscany (12A)
8 (new) undertone (15) **
9 (new) California Schemin' (15)
10 (new) The Stranger (15) ****

(source: BFI)

My top five:
5. Akira [above]


DVD/Blu-Ray/Download top ten: 

1 (1) Avatar: Fire and Ash (12) ***
2 (4) Sinners (15) ****
3 (5) One Battle After Another (15) ****
5 (2) The Housemaid (15)
6 (7) Wicked: For Good (PG)
7 (3) "Wuthering Heights" (15)
8 (9) Hamnet (12) **
9 (8) G.O.A.T. (PG)
10 (22) Apollo 13 (PG) ***



Top five films on terrestrial TV this week:
1. Jurassic Park (Saturday, ITV1, 7am)
2. Don't Look Now (Friday, BBC Two, 11.05pm)
3. Four Weddings & A Funeral (Tuesday, BBC One, 10.40pm)
4. Pearl (Friday, Channel 4, 1.05am)
5. The King's Speech (Sunday, BBC Two, 10pm)

Friday, 17 April 2026

Un air de famille: "Father Mother Sister Brother"


Much as any family is composed of disparate parts, so too Jim Jarmusch's Father Mother Sister Brother - surprise winner of last year's Venice Golden Lion - is made up of separate, only loosely connected items. This new film marks a return to the portmanteau form of Jarmusch's earlier Night on Earth and Coffee and Cigarettes: it's really three shorts, of roughly thirty minutes apiece, on a familial theme. The first, "Father", finds a straight-edged brother and sister (Adam Driver and Mayim Bialik) venturing deep into the New Jersey woods to pay a long-overdue visit with the hermit-like father (Tom Waits) who's been scrounging money off the pair of them. "Mother", set in and around Dublin's suburbs, describes a gathering of matriarch Charlotte Rampling and her two daughters, uptight Cate Blanchett and pink-haired free spirit Vicky Krieps; it's unclear whether or not it's a good sign that all three women have shown up wearing Bergman scarlet. (Ingmar, not Ingrid.) Finally, in "Sister Brother", the most wide-ranging of the three shorts, Indya Moore and Luka Sabbat play recently orphaned American twins in Paris, wondering what to do with the apartment - and the material objects - their folks have left behind. A very Jarmuschian - indeed, very indie - idea of the family emerges: people have secrets they hide from one another, communication is often awkward, strained and unnatural, and were it not for the fact they share a surname and a bloodline, nobody would think to put some of these individuals together. (For starters: Adam from Girls and Blossom from Blossom. And you're telling me Tom Waits gave life to these two?!) 
And yet: in a moment where America's conservative faction is getting weird (again) around the family unit and the roles we play within it, there is something heartening about Jarmusch's Zen insistence we could all stand to be a good deal chiller about everything familial. So yes, some of our relatives are flawed and imperfect; and yes, those closest to us by birth are still often kind of unknowable. But - and here you can almost hear Jarmusch adding a "hey man" as a footnote to every frame of each story he tells here - that's cool, too.

Onscreen, the worldview manifests as a radical simplification of form. The shorts are self-contained units, affording ample time and space to small, manageable casts whose individual components have either worked with this director before or are hip enough to know the effect Jarmusch seeks: not straining but being, with no labouring of the point. "Father" is an especially effective platform for Waits to play the sly old goat (or Jersey Devil); one of its takehomes is that every film would be improved with a bit more Tom Waits. While we wait for Hollywood to address that issue, Jarmusch leaves us to savour the eternal pleasures of the uncluttered frame: FMSB is unmistakably the work of a creative who's been left to do his own thing for nigh-on fifty years, who feels beholden to no contemporary trend. The crisp, clear photography - credited to veteran Lynch favourite Frederick Elmes and the versatile, much-travelled Yorick Le Saux - allows a hundred tiny gestures to register; one overhead shot of a table set for tea in the second part may be the most elegant spread I've seen in the American cinema this side of Scorsese's The Age of Innocence. (Jarmusch finds it so tasty he keeps cutting back to it.) If there's a slight limitation, it's that the film's overarching philosophy is consistent to the point of repetition. Jarmusch acknowledges as much, writing in links between the three shorts: shots of passing skateboarders (liberated from familial duty, unlike his main characters), a recurring use of the phrase "Bob's your uncle" (more family), an ongoing discourse on the properties and uses of water (being thinner than blood). Everything (kind of) connects, but only the third short feels like any true progression - being what happens after mother and father, and indeed "Mother" and "Father", have passed - and Moore and Sabbat work up what feels instinctively like an authentic, earnest sibling bond. (They've got one another's backs, which still counts for something in Jarmuschland.) The whole project is as vibes-based as the contemporary cinema gets without the manager hanging crystals up in the foyer, but it's fun to see Jarmusch, erstwhile king of ironic detachment, getting a little cuddlier with age: he's still chill, but he's grown into welcoming a little more warmth into his frames.

Father Mother Sister Brother is now playing in selected cinemas.