Friday, 21 August 2026

For what it's worth...




UK box office Top Ten (for the weekend of August 14-16, 2026):

2 (2) The Odyssey (15) ***
3 (new) The End of Oak Street (12A) ***
4 (new) Katseye: Wild Hearts (12A)
5 (3) Paw Patrol: The Dino Movie (U)
6 (4) Toy Story 5 (PG) **
7 (5) Minions & Monsters (U)
8 (new) Tony (15)
9 (7) Moana (PG)
10 (new) Vishwanath & Sons (12A)

(source: BFI)

My top five:
1. Trainspotting [above]


DVD/Blu-Ray/Download top ten: 

1 (1) Michael (12)
2 (re) Project Hail Mary (12) ***
3 (2) Scary Movie (15)
4 (new) Minions & Monsters (U)
5 (5) Obsession (18) *
6 (4) Disclosure Day (12) **
7 (7) The Super Mario Galaxy Movie (PG)
8 (6) Star Wars: The Mandalorian and Grogu (12)
9 (3) The Devil Wears Prada 2 (12)
10 (8) Supergirl (12)


My top five: 
1. Rose of Nevada


Top five films on terrestrial TV this week:
1. The Third Man (Saturday, BBC Two, 10.15am)
2. We Dive at Dawn (Saturday, BBC Two, 1.25pm)
3. The Quiet Girl (Tuesday, Channel 4, 1.55am)
4. Paddington (Saturday, BBC One, 7.15pm)
5. Everything Everywhere All At Once (Saturday, Channel 4, 10.15pm)

From the archive: "Early Man"


Amid the chaos of Brexit, Aardman - one of our last remaining national treasures - keep calm and carry on. In its own way, Nick Park's directorial comeback
Early Man arrives as a comment on tribalism and our relationships with our neighbours - but what it most closely resembles is a British retort to Disney's Moana, the big, belting inspirational songs replaced by a cover of Mud's "Tiger Feet", jokes about the most trivial of things, and a football motif that entails more than a few cheeky riffs on the word "balls". Only Park would have visualised the glowing remains of the meteorite that wiped out the (here, very Harryhausen-ish) dinosaurs being juggled and knocked about by game cavemen in the direction of obelisks passing for goalposts; only Park would have imagined the crater formed by that meteor strike being co-opted as a pitch framed by cantilevered Subbuteo stands (and a New Wembley-style arch) containing neo-pleisticene supporters paying over the odds for entry. This will be the venue for Early Man's derby tie between wealthy Europeans who've enjoyed the considerable evolutionary advantages of the Bronze Age and a plucky troop of stone-age Brits, made up of types that have endured into the 21st century: a lumpen, fists-first Northerner who goes by the name Asbo (and is voiced, somewhat inevitably, by Johnny Vegas), an embarrassing mum (Selina Griffiths) who nods and winks around the word "tackle", plus a silky-skilled continental import who - as per 21st century animation convention - is female (voiced by Maisie Williams, no less) and bears the name Goona, which may limit the film's appeal in certain North London postcodes.

Early Man opened to modest reviews at home - not terrible, but certainly cavilling, less effusive than those generated by Park's Wallace-and-Gromit output, which may just be to this director what the Toy Storys were to Pixar: a high bar set very early. Tellingly, this is the first time Park has directed from somebody else's script, and it does look as if the pleasurably baroque, fiendishly clever plotting of Park's own screenplays has been quietly dropped in favour of something altogether more route-one. The new film sets up its main event and stakes - that football match for the right to live on in this valley - then doodles gags while we wait for the big kick-off. Most of these gags, thankfully, are rather good: the stadium, with its "suspended" players hanging over the centre circle, offers comic possibilities in every direction. Maybe it's the blokey soccer milieu, but there is also a certain tendency here towards dad gags: it's the kind of script where a character says "a simple solution won't just walk through the door", only for the door to open and present everybody with just that. (You smile, but it's a little predictable, where Park's very best work has generally been more surprising.) Still, even on this midtable, playoff-chasing form, Park's films remain a reliable pleasure to watch, and none of those critics could have foreseen how, with its "we're going home" subtext, Early Man did pre-empt the summer of 2018, when a plucky tribe under big chief Gareth Southgate pulled itself together and performed better at the World Cup than anyone dared hope. Given the unusually convivial atmosphere within the England camp, it wouldn't surprise me to learn there was a copy of Park's film aboard the team bus, and that it provoked the same levels of chuckles and titters there as it had everywhere else on the continent.

(January 2019)

Early Man returns to selected cinemas from today.

In memoriam: Mark Rydell (Telegraph 19/08/26)


Mark Rydell
, who has died aged 97, was an American actor-turned-director who straddled the divide between the studio contract era and the New Hollywood that followed, refusing to pick sides. He filmed John Wayne being shot in the back for The Cowboys (1972); in his role as gangster Marty Augustine in Robert Altman’s The Long Goodbye (1973), he was seen to smash a Coke bottle into his girlfriend’s face. It was something of a curveball, then, when Rydell directed On Golden Pond (1981), that genteel matinee perennial pairing Katharine Hepburn with Henry Fonda. 

Rydell’s career-long ease with performers derived partly from his own acting experiences, and partly from his apprenticeship as a director-for-hire on the American television of the 1960s, where he oversaw episodes of The Virginian (in 1963), I Spy (in 1965), Gunsmoke (1964-66) and The Fugitive (in 1966): “I come from the school of sitting around the table for two weeks examining every detail of the material, working out relationships with the actors, so they know what they are doing, [then] bringing them to locations, so they can get comfortable.”

He made an immediate impact with his feature directorial debut The Fox (1967), which transposed D.H. Lawrence’s WW2-set tale to present-day Canada while revelling in the era’s permissiveness. The New York Times’ Renata Adler judged it “quite faithful in spirit to something D.H. Lawrence would not have minded”; Roger Ebert went further, pronouncing the film “a quiet, powerful masterpiece”. Golden Globes voters agreed, nominating Rydell for Best Director.

Sprung into the Hollywood big leagues, Rydell reteamed with Steve McQueen, his co-star in a 1960 episode of Wanted: Dead or Alive (1958-61), for The Reivers (1969), a sentimental adaptation of the Faulkner novel that rustled up Oscar nods for actor Rupert Crosse (the first Black performer to be nominated for Best Supporting Actor) and emergent composer John Williams. (The young Steven Spielberg, then working his own way up in television, was among those taking note of Williams’ name.)

Warner Bros. briefly attached Rydell to The Exorcist (1973), but he was instead reassigned to The Cowboys, pitting him against a different boogeyman: the ever-looming Wayne. Before filming, Rydell decided to have it out with his firebrand star: “I said ‘How the hell are we going to work together? I hate everything you stand for politically, and you despise my liberal points of view.” Wayne replied: “Well, we’ll just talk about acting.” For Rydell, “[Wayne] taught me a lesson, an important lesson in my life: not to judge too quickly.”

Despite this bonhomie, The Cowboys underwhelmed – Pauline Kael dubbed it “pious muck” – yet Rydell secured regular studio employment, earning a reputation as a boon for actors. He made the freewheeling Cinderella Liberty (1973) with James Caan and an Oscar-nominated Marsha Mason; the patchy post-Sting caper Harry and Walter Go to New York (1976), starring Caan, Elliott Gould, Michael Caine and Diane Keaton; and The Rose (1978), a full-throttle rock musical toplined by an electrifying (and, again, Oscar-nominated) Bette Midler.

It was On Golden Pond, Ernest Thompson’s adaptation of his own 1978 play, which proved most attuned to Academy voters’ tastes, although for it to succeed Rydell found himself having to address movie royalty with tact and delicacy. Hepburn showed up wearing entirely the wrong costume, in what onlookers determined was a queenly test of her director’s ability to run a tight set; Rydell duly shepherded his venerable leading lady back to wardrobe, and the shoot ran like clockwork.

The results split the critics. Ebert confessed he “left the theater feeling good and warm, and with a certain resolve to try and mend my own relationships and start listening better”. Kael, representing the naysayers, called it both “a doddery valentine” and “a rather indecently premature memorial service” for its stars. Cinemagoers flocked, however, making the film the year’s second biggest hit after Spielberg’s Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981), and it was eventually garnished with three Oscars, for Hepburn, Fonda and Thompson’s screenplay. 

Rydell was left clutching a full house of Best Director nominations – Oscars, BAFTAs, Golden Globes – but no trophies to show for it. Still, this inarguably sincere throwback served to indicate he’d survived the 1970s without succumbing to the negativity of certain contemporaries: “I’m a hopeful person; I’m not a cynic. I believe that cynicism is a cancer for an artist. It’s a way of insulating yourself from experience… If you believe that life [is all] to do with an engagement of issues and personalities that make you young and vital, it’s hard to be anything but hopeful.”

He was born Mortimer Harold Rydell in New York on March 23, 1929 to stockbroker Sidney Rydell and wife Evelyn (née Cohn), a talented pianist. Inheriting his mother’s musical gifts, he would study at Julliard, where he found his hopes of becoming a conductor threatened by his peers’ mounting drug habits: “[Given] that I have an addict’s personality, in that a little is good but a lot is better, I knew I was in danger.”

Changing course while snappily rechristening himself, Rydell began acting at New York’s Neighborhood Playhouse before joining the Actors Studio, falling in with the young James Dean. He juggled stage and TV roles with a sideline as a jazz pianist, before landing a notable supporting part opposite John Cassavetes in Don Siegel’s juvenile-delinquent melodrama Crime in the Streets (1956) and a recurring spot on the long-running CBS soap As the World Turns (1956-2010). 

In the latter’s early years, Rydell’s upright Jeff Baker became a fan favourite; one episode even showcased his piano skills. Upon rejecting a new contract in 1962, his character was killed off in a car crash; retraining as a director, Rydell acted only sporadically thereafter, muscling on as mobster Meyer Lansky in his friend Sydney Pollack’s Havana (1990) and as Woody Allen’s agent in the ill-fated Hollywood Ending (2002).  

By then, however, Rydell was far better known for his work behind the camera. Marketed as “from the director of On Golden Pond”, the Mel Gibson/Sissy Spacek farming drama The River (1984) endured iffy reviews to reap four more Oscar nominations; the wartime flagwaver For the Boys (1991) enjoyed modest multiplex success, despite thunderous on-set disharmony between leads Midler and Caan.

After the glossy love triangle Intersection (1994) nosedived at the box office, Rydell segued to cable TV, with renewed success. His HBO film Crime of the Century (1996) nobly dramatised Ludovic Kennedy’s non-fiction account of the Lindbergh baby kidnapping; the biopic James Dean (2001) launched James Franco in the title role. (Rydell bolstered the impersonation, appearing as studio chief Jack Warner.)

His final theatrical release was the poorly received addiction drama Easy Money (2006), but he signed off where he began, on TV, directing “A Clean Escape”, the premiere of Showtime’s anthology series Masters of Science Fiction (2007). His final acting appearance was in the streaming-bound mockumentary Senior Entourage (2021), opposite fellow veterans Ed Asner and Marion Ross.

In recent decades, Rydell taught at the Actors Studio, eventually becoming director of Actors Studio West, from which vantage he reflected on what American movies had become: “All the pictures I made, I don’t think I could get them made today. The market is so different; they’re not interested in substantial, human dramas. That’s what attracted me to become a director in the first place: the dramatic interaction between people.”

He married twice, to Joanne Linville and Esther Jacobs; both marriages ended in divorce. He is survived by three children, actors Amy and Christopher Rydell by Linville and the filmmaker Alexander Rydell by Jacobs.

Mark Rydell, born March 23, 1929, died August 13, 2026.

On demand: "Ocean with David Attenborough"


Renewed signs of ecological urgency: David Attenborough has left the small screen behind to make big-picture presentations, in the hope we popcorn-guzzlers might finally learn to stop smashing shit up and setting the world on fire. It's a format shift that reflects a wider shift in the Attenborough thinking and methodology. Where his early BBC ratings toppers sought merely to inspire wonder at the myriad miracles of the natural world, more recent projects have had to solicit our concern, perhaps even our outrage at what has been done, and continues to be done, to the planet in our collective name.
Ocean finds this now nonagenarian greyhair standing on a shore, staring at the sea and wondering "what lies beyond", a phrase that in this stark existential context seems to refer simultaneously to the open ocean before him, his own immediate future and mankind's wider future. The documentary that follows comprises Attenborough's most Cousteauvian (or James Cameron-ish) endeavour, determined as it is to get to the bottom of the big blue. Yet it's also been anchored in those recognisably Reithian concerns its creative prime mover internalised over his many decades at the Beeb, setting its entertainment alongside something more informative, seeking to dazzle us with oceanic spectacle before opening our eyes anew to the threat such spectacle now faces. We're initially hooked by the prospect of 95 minutes' worth of chill or trippy imagery: corals popping, tendrils putting on a lightshow, crabs donning gloves made of venomous anemones to see off their predators. (Another bedrock of the BBC, the DJ John Peel, would surely have got The Venomous Anemones in to record a session.) Some part of Ocean resembles those VHS tapes of fishtanks sold in the 1990s to soothe the frazzled psyches of overworked yuppies: these sections are as mollifying and as invigorating as any dawn plunge. 

But there's also a certain fragility in play, linked to Attenborough's repeated assertions that everything we see is in some way connected. Remove one element from this ecosystem, and many others will disappear with it; take away the plankton who suck up vast amounts of atmospheric CO2, keep on hit-and-hope trawling the ocean bed in scenes that resemble a traumatic setpiece from a Pixar movie, and the whole house of cards will come crashing down. The film, too, has been delicately structured. Half an hour of wonder; half an hour of despair, the filling in the sandwich, something for us to chew over and digest; and then a closing half-hour of cautious optimism. What if we change this? Why don't we try that? What, ultimately, can we do? The answer to the latter, reassuringly, is very little, which is to say leave the seas alone; it's one of those rare occasions where to step back and do nothing is exactly the right course of action. (As my limited grasp of marine biology understands it, nature is fundamentally horny: give it space, time and privacy, keep the trawlers indoors as one would delinquent children, and it'll soon be reproducing at a remarkable rate of knots.) Through it all, the man posing the questions, attempting to steer us, remains a great connector and a great communicator. As with that similarly aging eco-warrior Steven Seagal - star of 1994's On Deadly Ground - Attenborough has to do most of his onscreen work sitting down nowadays, but he's retained the qualities that made him such a revered broadcaster: he cannot hide his excitement nor his despair at the footage his camera team have brought back to shore, and he finds the right words to frame complex environmental concepts and processes in terms even non-scientists can understand. Like the ocean, like the wildlife it shelters, we shall miss him terribly when he's gone.

Ocean with David Attenborough is now streaming via National Geographic and Disney+, available to rent via Prime Video, and on Blu-ray via Altitude.

Friday, 14 August 2026

For what it's worth...




UK box office Top Ten (for the weekend of August 7-9, 2026):

2 (2) The Odyssey (15) ***
3 (new) Paw Patrol: The Dino Movie (U)
4 (3) Toy Story 5 (PG) **
5 (4) Minions & Monsters (U)
6 (new) André Rieu's 2026 Summer Concert: Viva Maastricht! (U)
7 (5) Moana (PG)
8 (new) Ice Cream Man (18)
9 (6) The Invite (15) ****
10 (7) Obsession (18) *

(source: BFI)

My top five:


DVD/Blu-Ray/Download top ten: 

1 (2) Michael (12)
2 (new) Scary Movie (15)
3 (7) The Devil Wears Prada 2 (12)
4 (1) Disclosure Day (12) **
5 (5) Obsession (18) *
6 (4) Star Wars: The Mandalorian and Grogu (12)
7 (6) The Super Mario Galaxy Movie (PG)
8 (3) Supergirl (12)
9 (9) Troy (15) **
10 (11) Spider-Man: No Way Home (12) ***


My top five: 
1. Hoppers


Top five films on terrestrial TV this week:
1. The Graduate (Saturday, BBC Two, 11.40pm)
2. The Untouchables (Tuesday, BBC One, 10.40pm)
3. Bonnie and Clyde (Sunday, BBC Two, 11.40pm)
4. The French Connection (Sunday, BBC Two, 10pm)
5. Mission: Impossible (Saturday, BBC One, 10.20pm)

Wednesday, 12 August 2026

Growth: "Songs of Forgotten Trees"


"Presented by" Anurag Kashyap in his role as the Hindi cinema's most forceful moderniser, Anuparna Roy's
Songs of Forgotten Trees has the air of an odd-couple flatshare comedy redirected into more naturalistic and reflective territory; its heroines' apartment block would appear to stand equidistant between recent critics' darling All We Imagine As Light and Claudia Weill's repertory fave Girlfriends. The flatmates here are two women occupying different positions in Mumbai society. Shweta (Sumi Baghel) is an IT worker and the new girl in town, a bit of a country mouse who flinches at the city's noise and men. Naaz Shaikh's Thooya, on the other hand, is a sex worker and aspirant actress struggling to process the recent death of her father, her last living relative: she's started to think anew of both an old school friend and one of her elderly clients, who didn't so much as lay a finger on her, although these fond reveries are sporadically interrupted by an altogether less positive relationship with her (married) cheeseball of a landlord. Roy watches the pair's initially tentative interactions, catching in passing those lonely nights when one or both parties have nothing better to do than gaze longingly out of the window at the city beyond; every now and again, though, the director cuts away to the mighty hollong trees swaying in some other part of the country. The implication appears to be that these girls are themselves trees, or at least saplings that might some day grow into trees - and who'd likewise go overlooked or otherwise taken for granted were it not for the loving gaze of Roy's camera.

It is, as you may sense from the above, a film that demands a certain patience on the viewer's part: what Roy sets herself to recapturing here is that period where we're still waiting for life to start and for a reason to go out into the world. For most of these 80 minutes, we're holed up in this embryonic flat, a sparsely furnished and carefully maintained nutshell, watching its inhabitants cooking, cleaning and washing, or humming to themselves in the downtime between meetings with their variously demanding clients; in their quiet, observational way, these commonplace back-and-forths tell you a lot about the state of play between men and women in today's India. It helps that both these actresses are very watchable: skilfully suggesting a growing bond while maintaining distinct personalities, these women come to fit together inside this poky flat like trees in the forest, providing mutual support, shade and cover. (By the closing image, their roots seem to have intertwined.) The one scene that doesn't wholly ring true is a late argument between the pair in the back of a cab - this, you feel, is Roy attempting to force some overt conflict into shot before the credits roll - although even this slight misstep yields a choice sequence of huffy laundry-folding: we've surely all known awkward moments in flatsharing like this. It remains a project that clearly needed some watering and tending to reach us. (Maybe it wouldn't have travelled this far without Kashyap sticking his name on the credits; such is the way the industry still operates.) Yet you can see Songs of Forgotten Trees growing before your eyes: we're watching and living with Mumbaikars we know here - or people we feel we know almost intimately by the time cinema protocol requires us to move out.

Songs of Forgotten Trees opens in selected cinemas from Friday.

Tuesday, 11 August 2026

Land of the lost: "The End of Oak Street"


The End of Oak Street
 presents as a prime opportunity. It arrives towards the end of a summer that has generated a lot of money for the studios, but also a dearth of original and creatively rewarding blockbusters. And amid a movie summer in which even that bedrock normie Steven Spielberg was seen to go a touch nutty in the heat (cf. Disclosure Day), it offers the season's most conventionally Spielbergian premise, being part evocation of 1980s suburbia and part dinosaur flick. As if all this wasn't enough, it's also a chance for a major studio release to finally deliver on the promise of those tepid Jurassic World reboots, which kept threatening to bring their dinosaurs ashore and into densely populated areas - as a savvier Spielberg did in 1997's The Lost World - but then... just didn't. It's not that the couple played by Anne Hathaway and Ewan McGregor and their two-point-four children (the point four being the dog, Starbuck) don't have problems enough of their own before the dinos show up. He's been laid off and has started drinking; she's leaning in the direction of divorce; and the dog is making a terrible mess of the neighbours' gardens, although perhaps not as big a mess as some will. But then a tear in the space-time continuum - represented by some very Spielbergian flashes of light - mires this sunny block of 20th century suburban housing in prehistoric swampland, and here's where The End of Oak Street starts to get interesting. All the sub-Stand By Me/Stranger Things nostalgia of the first reel falls away, leaving behind a study of a family unit operating in near-isolation, having been cut off from the grid and left at the mercy of the law of the jungle. Somewhere in here: the kind of B-movie Rod Serling might have written had he had the misfortune to see the people and policies the America of 2026 keeps voting for.

Your actual writer-director is David Robert Mitchell, who did as much as anyone to kickstart the current horror renaissance with 2014's It Follows; the new film demonstrates that the latter was no fluke, and also that this filmmaker's head has cleared a little in the years since 2018's Under the Silver Lake. (Which may actually have been Mitchell's Disclosure Day.) From the off, you catch Mitchell working nifty split-diopter tricks within his panoramic frames: he's sly about introducing his scaly antagonists as tails and silhouettes, and he's rightly insistent in his belief that fewer VFX means better VFX (because it gives the effects houses time to finesse what they're working on). True, some of the elements he's having to marshall here are as generic as they come. There's a scene or two of Hollywood Science Talk as the family try and fathom what's just happened and how to get back to the future. The crisis allows McGregor's weak-willed paterfamilias to prove his worth, and his son (Christian Convery) to get closer to the classmate he's been crushing on. There's even a subplot about the fate of the dog. Yet I enjoyed Oak Street, in large part because it's one of the few films this summer to understand what's so tantalising and compelling about its own premise, in the same way, say, Speed or Twister did. These little boxes on a hillside become fancy packaging for the film's apex predators to tear through; it's mildly unnerving to witness the bustling, sunny suburbia of those opening scenes emptying out - or being emptied out - once the tyrannosauruses take over. Mitchell treats us to at least one image Spielberg didn't dare film in his dino movies, and keeps one or two nasty tricks up his sleeve for the home straight; this is a film operating at the upper limits of its 12A certificate. Arguably it's no more than Jumanji with bigger teeth and a softish takeback ending (partly justified by a tribute Mitchell pays amid the closing credits: it's his fantasy as much as it is that of anybody else). Yet running to a brisk 99 minutes, it's also an unusually economic example of what has come to seem like an endangered species: the purely fun summer movie, made by creatives who've devoured enough of them growing up to know what makes a good one.

The End of Oak Street opens in cinemas nationwide this Friday.

Monday, 10 August 2026

Soldier boys: "Ish"


Silly season isn't the worst time for a British filmmaker to announce themselves with a forceful opening statement: at the very least, it affords us the opportunity to watch a creative daring to go against the flow and taking their chosen medium seriously, if not perhaps Nolan-seriously. The story the erstwhile visual artist Imran Perretta is telling with his debut feature
Ish is, in many respects, a familiar one: it's that of two little boys coming of age the hard way. But Perretta brings to it new-ish strategies and station calls, new-ish lines of attack. For starters, he frames events in a snazzy, high-contrast black-and-white that recalls La Haine, that epochal coming-of-age tale, or - closer to home - Shane Meadows' tragicomic boxing saga TwentyFourSeven; and he's training his camera on the altogether underfilmed mean streets of Luton and its immediate environs. The first time we meet Perretta's boys - pint-sized British-Asian lad Ishmael, known as Ish (Farhan Hasnat) and his older, taller, curly-haired Arab pal Maram (Yahya Kitana) - they're biking into the woods to scrump handfuls of blackberries; the scene could be described as Edenic, were it not for the planes roaring overhead on the way to the airport where Ish's dad Naeem (Avin Shah) works a security detail. The fall here occurs once the boys are back on concrete, in an urban environment defined by sirens, fractious chatter, not quite broken but lopsided and fragile homes, and a pivotal police stop-and-search that drives a decisive wedge between the film's protagonists. Gather ye blackberries while ye may.

Here, Ish follows on from countless recent Britfilms, not least 2015's jolting stop-and-search documentary The Hard Stop. But the Britain of 2026 is not the same as the Britain of a decade ago; the world has changed, and this is the first feature I've seen to deploy the current state of play in the Middle East as a resonant plot point. On paper, granted, it sounds more than halfway goofy: overhearing the urgent sniping on talk radio and seeing the Palestinian flag flying nearby, Ish and Maram come to believe the conflict will spill over into their own backyard. You'd call them too young to know any better, except that the conflict does spill over, in a roundabout way: what Perretta is getting at is how our young internalise a world that appears to be ever more frantically border-policing, and in a state of near-constant conflict. Crucially, this filmmaker isn't a polemicist, rather an artist and a humanist: he observes that the stop-and-search, on an otherwise nondescript suburban backroad, merely accelerates a gradual, possibly organic severing of the bond between the two boys. Maram is falling in with an older, more boisterous crowd who leave their bikes at home to refocus their energies and attentions on cars and girls; when Ish flees the scene of the stop-and-search - leaving Maram at the mercy of the coppers - it's because he's scared, like the child he is, watching the streets that had previously been his playground transformed into a warzone, contested territory. It's "think global, act local" writ widescreen large: a drama that doesn't go anywhere near the West Bank, but which nevertheless sets us to thinking about power structures, allyship, courage, the choosing of sides.

Rather than approaching these subjects with a heavy hand, Perretta gathers small but telling incidents and interactions: Ish retains an appreciably anecdotal shape and feel, as if something like this happened to this filmmaker as a boy and has bugged him ever since. Making a movie about it twenty-odd years on allows him to flesh such incidents out, to try and see more sides of the story, and to stop beating himself up about it. (Most of the characters here are compromised or conflicted in some way, even if it's just Dad shaking people down at the airport to keep a roof over his family's head or Gran - a warm, wise turn from veteran Sudha Bhuchar - sneaking the odd cigarette.) There are sporadic overemphases, a few shortfalls in the prevailing empathy. It's a little on-the-nose that every TV and radio on screen should be tuned to news from Gaza, though this at least explains how the conflict gets into the boys' heads in the first place; and Perretta has no time whatsoever for the police, depicted as silent, faceless pursuers with Terminator-like tracking technology, as much a merciless machine as the IDF of the boys' nightmares. (The tracking sequences might as well flash "ACAB" in the corner of the screen.) But Ish has the craft to make even perversely localised conflict cinematic. This supporting cast collectively push for a depth beyond the reach of our primetime telly dramas; Perretta's self-composed score enhances the lyricism of his images; and cinematographer Jermaine Canute Edwards shoots it like one of Ray's Apu films, going not for prettifying sheen but well-lit, granular detail. Some part of it remains perverse: perhaps only an artist could have stopped to consider what effect a genocide in Gaza would have on the youth of Luton. But that very thoughtfulness, that leap of the creative imagination, proves central to a film that answers the age-old lament "won't somebody think of the children?" Perretta has, most persuasively.

Ish is now playing in selected cinemas.

Sunday, 9 August 2026

For what it's worth...




UK box office Top Ten (for the weekend of July 31-August 2, 2026):

1 (new) Spider-Man: Brand New Day (12A) ***
2 (1) The Odyssey (15) ***
3 (2) Toy Story 5 (PG) **
4 (4) Minions & Monsters (U)
5 (3) Moana (PG)
6 (6) The Invite (15) ****
7 (7) Obsession (18) *
8 (8) Evil Dead Burn (18)
9 (new) Ish (15) ****
10 (5) Jana Nayagan (15)

(source: BFI)

My top five:
2. Ish


DVD/Blu-Ray/Download top ten: 

1 (3) Disclosure Day (12) **
2 (8) Michael (12)
3 (new) Supergirl (12)
4 (1) Star Wars: The Mandalorian and Grogu (12)
5 (5) Obsession (18) *
6 (2) The Super Mario Galaxy Movie (PG)
7 (9) The Devil Wears Prada 2 (12)
8 (4) Mortal Kombat II (15)
9 (6) Troy (15) **
10 (7) Backrooms (15)


My top five: 
1. Hoppers


Top five films on terrestrial TV this week:
1. The Man Who Knew Too Much [above] (Sunday, BBC Two, 12.20pm)
2. Inside Llewyn Davis (Sunday, BBC Two, 10pm)
3. Fallen Leaves (Saturday, BBC Two, 12.50am)
4. Lady Macbeth (Sunday, BBC Two, 11.40pm)
5. How to Have Sex (Sunday, Channel 4, 11pm)

Thursday, 6 August 2026

On demand: "The Ear/Ucho"


Filmed under the noses of the Soviets and consequently withheld from the eyes of the viewing public for twenty years, 1970's odd but effective political fable The Ear shuttles back and forth between the rooms of one Prague household, conveying as it goes the perilous position many Czechs found themselves in at the moment of its making. A Government minister (Radoslav Brzobohatý)
 returns home from a broadly typical high-society function and finds he's both keyless and powerless, a source of particular annoyance to the wife at his side (Jiřina Bohdalová). More curious still: once the couple eventually get inside the house, they find their electricity may be off, but the lights are still on in a neighbour's property. So they're very much in the dark, and co-writer/director Karel Kachyňa's illuminating flashbacks begin to tell the tale of what actually went down at the night's big party, reframed now as a hotbed of scheming and plotting that may well have something to do with the pair's present predicament. The mind immediately goes to Miloš Forman's The Firemen's Ball, from a few years earlier, except that these festivities have turned somehow sinister, with a lot of talking behind backs in euphemisms and coded whispers. Having spent the evening being in with the regime's in-crowd, our protagonist will now spend the wee small hours not just sleepless but out in the cold, apparently designated as an enemy of the State.

What Kachyňa was working towards - and gets - is a potent idea of being under surveillance, under suspicion and under threat; these 95 minutes describe a state of psychological siege in which even boozy, after-midnight chatter between a husband and wife might prove somebody's undoing. The married parties come to turn against one another; we sense how even a well-placed functionary isn't safe in this set-up (in large part because he is so well-placed); and the darkness of the house leads us to wonder and worry whether someone's physically waiting in the shadows. (There's barely any let-up once power is restored to the property around the halfway mark: now this couple appear hopelessly exposed.) If we become edgy, too, it's because this camera functions both as a sympathetic ear, recognising what it is to have to live under these pressures, and a silent co-conspirator, recording everything for the powers-that-be. By the end of this long dark night of the Communist soul, it's got brutal, bearing down so heavily on the superb lead performers that it threatens to shatter the very foundations of this marriage: the closing stretch is a Bergman movie where Big Brother has usurped God, leaving poisonous ideology in the place of vacillating faith. A textbook example of a small, self-contained story elevated and expanded by canny craft and technique, what's most thrilling and daring about it is that Kachyňa would himself have been at great risk of returning home from any cast-and-crew screening to find an unmarked car parked on his street and his name on some sort of list.

The Ear is now streaming via YouTube.

Wednesday, 5 August 2026

Rats!: "Flushed Away"


We rejoin the summer Aardman retrospective with the company entering a new era, and a difficult moment. By this point, the Bristol-based animators had formed a partnership with American giants DreamWorks, whose executives presumably hoped to convert what had previously been an uncommonly successful cottage industry into an all-out hit factory. More specifically, they were looking for product for Q4 of 2006 that would match the success of DreamWorks' big Easter release Over the Hedge (budget: $80m, final take: $340m). Aardman and DreamWorks' previous collab, 2005's Wallace and Gromit in the Curse of the Were-Rabbit, was essentially an extension of the Bristolians' short triumphs, with a built-in audience. (From a budget of $30m, it made $193m: everyone left the boardroom happy.) But Flushed Away proved a trickier sell. This time round, Aardman were starting from scratch; they were moving away from their specialist field of claymation into digimation; and they were determined to hang onto their signature Britishness at all costs. The story, engineered by co-director Sam Fell, Morph creator Peter Lord and sitcom legends Dick Clement and Ian LeFrenais, was unusually attuned to class: it followed the progress of well-to-do Kensington house mouse Roddy St. James (voiced by Hugh Jackman) after he's flushed into the underworld of the London sewers. Beyond Jackman, the voice cast was a job lot of BAFTA's finest: Kate Winslet as the sort-of love interest, Ian McKellen - heard imitating Larry Grayson at one point - as underworld heavy The Toad, Bill Nighy as an albino hired thug, plus John Motson burbling about the England-Germany World Cup final going on in the background and - as the slobbish sewer rat who kickstarts the plot by booting Roddy down the khazi - TV's Shane Richie (yes, that Shane Richie), found at the point where he presumably felt Hollywood would surely come calling. It's all very 2006, then; so 2006, indeed, that the soundtrack not only features the Dandy Warhols' "Bohemian Like You" but Jet's "Are You Gonna Be My Girl", the unofficial theme song of this era's mid-list family entertainments.

The result constitutes the one film in this retrospective that hasn't dated especially well, for multiple reasons. This was Aardman, the masters of clay, having to learn the ropes of digimation - then being framed as just as much an inevitability for the animation industry of 2006 as AI is being framed as the future of today. (In fact, animation subsequently developed in multiple directions, so nobody need feel too sad about uninstalling ChatGPT.) From its very first frames, Flushed Away looks horribly flat: we're watching recognisably Aardmanish characters capering in front of tentative, underdetailed, in some cases barely finished backdrops, with almost zero interaction between foreground and backgrounds. If it weren't for that distinctive character work, indeed, the film might resemble no more than those cheap Euro animations that get redubbed and repurposed as half-term screenfiller; even the inventive storytelling that Aardman were known for at this point seems to have been flushed away, replaced by the sight of a bunch of characters running around manically for 85 minutes. One or two titters remain, but this was all too clearly a halfway house for its makers, falling awkwardly between the aesthetic Aardman had been developing and nurturing with each careful thumbprint in the plasticine and the vulgar American product then running amok in the multiplexes. (I should note this was also the year of Disney's The Wild, Paramount's Barnyard and Sony's Open Season; it was not a golden age for animation.) There's lots more burping than Aardman would usually permit as a substitute for genuine wit, and twenty years later, any studio would struggle to get away with the line "my bum looks like the Japanese flag" (which has the ring of Seventies men Clement and LaFrenais) or a sequence in which an offscreen voice approximates the owner of a Chinese takeaway. (At the very least, they'd need a sensitive redub for the Asian market.) As it was, the film followed Roddy St. James down the toilet, barely recouping its excessive $149m budget internationally; there was no way of selling the movie outside the UK as anything other than an oddly parochial curio. (I mean, Shane Richie, for heaven's sake.) The partnership between the two studios dissolved shortly thereafter, but the Bristolians soon rallied. Next week's reissue: 2012's marvellous The Pirates! In An Adventure with Scientists!

Flushed Away returns to selected cinemas from Friday.

Tuesday, 4 August 2026

The final countdown: "The Sacrifice"


In the beginning, Tarkovsky's films were somewhat glacial; they were composed of frozen blocks of imagery, refrigerated emotions and memories, which melted at a sometimes perilously slow drip to reveal the intended meaning. By 1986, the year of the Chernobyl explosion, Tarkovsky had decided to bow out in a blaze of glory. The world was on fire, he felt, and all but the smallest glimpse of hope for the future had been obscured by the smoke; nobody was doing anything much to prevent the planet from burning up and some people, indeed, were actively adding fuel to the flames. A man could go mad from watching that. Suffice to say,
The Sacrifice presents as no less urgent forty years on - even if urgency isn't quite what the film itself is dealing in. Tarkovsky was in Sweden now, working with an international cast and crew (a young Claire Denis was among the casting assistants), not least Bergman's preferred cinematographer Sven Nykvist, and the director had seemingly metabolised Bergman's mastery of the theatrical and his awareness of the loudly ticking clock. (One of many possible pitches for The Sacrifice: what if Bergman filmed something that related directly to the ongoing Cold War?) In both its set-up and its country-house setting, the film is decidedly Bergmanesque: it opens with a conversation on a desolate shore that invokes Dostoyevsky and Nietzsche, so we know things must be getting serious. Our protagonist for the evening is Alexander (Bergman regular Erland Josephson), a sometime actor and critic turned lecturer - the latter proves most significant - who's retired to this brooding stretch of the Baltic Coast with his wife Adelaide (Susan Fleetwood), a mute son (Tommy Kjellqvist) and innumerable signifiers of bourgeois privilege. These will be disrupted, however, by the world beyond the family's front drive, which radio and television reports insist is gearing up for war of some kind; indeed, the final, fatal missiles may already be in the air. In muted colours, Tarkovsky and Nykvist watch as the sun goes permanently down on a world and a way of life; occasional black-and-white inserts, meanwhile, convey some idea of the world after the big bang, while also carrying this filmography back to where it all started. What if the Mirror was shattered? What if Ivan's Childhood had come to a premature end?

Darkly compelling though this premise is, it's largely just a framework for Tarkovsky to fill with what he was actually fretting about as the end of his life neared: a certain helplessness, a growing impotency, a sense he may have outlived civilised history. Like many of Bergman's final works, The Sacrifice is a film out of time; you'll struggle to square it with the fact it emerged in the same century as, say, Short Circuit, let alone the same month. Within a decade, the mantle of Great Arthouse Filmmaker would pass to a generation of Kieślowskis, Almodóvars and Von Triers, flashier, more ironic sensibilities, maestros with marketing degrees. Watching Tarkovsky's characters fussing around dusty maps or swapping old war stories, one is transported back to another era, another place, a moment when our filmmakers were actively encouraged to absorb the best of theatre, painting, literature. The Sacrifice would make an especially apt double-bill with another final film, John Huston's 1987 adaptation of Joyce's The Dead, not least as the latter might have been co-opted as an alternative title for that which Tarkovsky looks out on here. All of which, as the Alexanders of this world will recognise, is criticspeak alerting the reader to the fact The Sacrifice follows a long and winding road to arrive at its eventual destination: one of Tarkovsky's legacies is the consecration of a slower cinema, consciously pushing back against the myriad mindless accelerations of the modern world. The extra time on offer led this viewer to the jolting realisation that The Sacrifice adheres to more or less the same narrative line as Steve De Jarnatt's poppy L.A. story Miracle Mile, released two years later: guy learns that the end of the world is nigh, then has to figure out what to do with the time still available to him. Where De Jarnatt cast Anthony Edwards - Goose out of Top Gun, later Mark Greene from e.r. - as a workaday Everyman, Tarkovsky plumped for the altogether loftier Josephson to portray a man of learning, a stand-in for an ailing director, an artist in exile who, if he's lucky, has another couple of hours to communicate before he utters his final word. These characters will spend those hours mostly talking, which again opens the film up to charges of windiness - but then talking is all these folks can do in the circumstances: they try and reckon with a situation that is fundamentally out of their hands, or make peace with their fates, or offer up screams, last gasps and hail Marys. There are stretches of writing here that prove so honest and so raw it's almost as though we're sat at the bedside of the dying; and we're also now aware, as viewers of the time possibly wouldn't have been, that this was the last occasion Tarkovsky could talk to us (and to his son, referenced in the film's coda). Unlike the vibrant Miracle MileThe Sacrifice is, almost needless to say, little to no fun to watch - or, rather, it's exactly as much fun as being sealed in a house with people who know they're not long for this world promises - but it does mean what it's saying, sincerely and absolutely, in a way so many modern films don't. Our movies haven't got smaller over these past four decades, but they have lost weight - the great, wrenching gravity of belief Tarkovsky expresses in every last frame here.

The Sacrifice is now playing in selected cinemas, and available to stream via Prime Video and Curzon Home Cinema.

Slingback: "Spider-Man: Brand New Day"


Turns out people like comic books more than they enjoy epic poems. Amid this patchiest of movie summers, we again spy Hollywood in a creative tailspin: having indulged Spielberg and Nolan - past and present saviours of the blockbuster form - with decidedly niche, varyingly cranky event movies, the suits now play a little safer with their money, coming full circle to all things Marvel. For the first time since lockdown, the graphic novel-slingers may well end up with the two biggest hits of the year -
Avengers: Doomsday opens this Christmas - and the rest of us may be struck by a sense of deja vu, of old cinemagoing habits dying hard. Didn't we do this once before, quite recently, and didn't we determine then that - however much revenue it generated - it was far from healthy for the cinema long-term? In fairness, Sony have placed their bets on a self-improving franchise. Unlike the Sam Raimi and Marc Webb iterations of the Spider-Man universe, the variant launched by Jon Watts with 2017's Spider-Man: Homecoming didn't run out of ideas after two instalments; many viewers, I suspect, would be inclined to pick 2021's No Way Home as the best of this latest bunch. The title of the latest film, Spider-Man: Brand New Day, rather sunnily proposes a fresh start, and the executive expectation must have been that recent narrative developments (to preserve his secret identity, Peter Parker had the memories of those he loved wiped, in a manner that suggested the surprisingly enduring influence of the theatrical cut of 2004's The Butterfly Effect) will be mirrored by developments in the real world (chiefly, that we the audience will have forgotten all that nothingy late-period Marvel junk that snuck out either side of lockdown to lower the company's stock price). The movies are back (everything's making money, even the duff stuff), the audience looks to be back (even if only for the blessed relief air con provides from a world set ablaze), so this is where the powers-that-be start making us commit once more to a long-term corporate strategy. The question facing us here today remains the same: does Brand New Day really merit forking over your hard-earned cash?

This was the first item of Marvel product this viewer had sat down with since last summer's forgotten-because-forgettable The Fantastic Four: First Steps, which may explain why I found the opening reels hard work to say the least. While setting Spidey (Tom Holland) on the trail of latest big bad Scorpion (Michael Mando), this script has also to engineer meetings between our friendly neighbourhood superhero and various ongoing corporate concerns, including - deep breath - Jon Bernthal as the latest iteration of gun-toting hardnut The Punisher (they've met before, apparently, although the last time I saw the Punisher on screen, he was played by the late Ray Stevenson); Florence Pugh's Slavic hacker Black Widow, standard-bearer for the so-called New Avengers; Mark Ruffalo's Bruce Banner a.k.a. Hulk; some roaming ninja-type people presumably recruited to keep the Asian market happy; and another, recognisable name, who is not of this immediate world (but soon will be). We might be reassured that Marvel is no longer trading in footnotes and instead returning to large-scale scaffolding projects, busily forward planning. (You feel the execs were only a heartbeat away from adding an excitable exclamation mark to that title. Brand new day!) Yet while these things are notionally action movies - being films that occupy the same coveted place in the summer release schedules as Beverly Hills Cop and Con Air did back in the day - they still can't get round to that action until the contractors have set in place the half-dozen other stories that will be following Brand New Day down the pipe; that's why these movies now run closer to three hours than two. Brand New Day is an action movie that's also a romance (the Peter/MJ business), a live-action cartoon (whenever things go crash), science fiction with a dash of body horror (latest concerns: Peter Parker's cortisone levels, and a villain who teleports between victims like the killer in the Denzel Washington vehicle Fallen), a teaser trailer for coming attractions, and an account of a superhero's identity crisis that is also a record of a film (and studio)'s own identity crisis. Maybe the above is what "something for everyone" looks like in 2026, but Brand New Day struck these eyes as crazy cluttered, and in a way that didn't entirely guarantee getting one's money's worth: individual elements tend to tread on each other's toes, or otherwise obstruct or occlude one another. (A crisp five-pound record token to the first reader who can tell me, without looking anything up, where Scorpion, the catalyst of all the film's chaos, is by the end of the picture. Better Call Saul breakout Mando seethes effectively in the role, but the character seems to vanish amid the chicanery, discarded like an old toy deemed surplus to playtime requirements. Ooh, look at these shiny new X-Men dolls!)

Still, the whole doesn't fully collapse under the weight of all this folderol, and that may be down to incoming director Destin Daniel Cretton, one of a number of former indie tyros recruited as grist to the Marvel mill. Like Watts before him, Cretton seeks out valuable pockets of space for his actors, and really does appear invested in these characters as people rather than pieces to be shuffled around a board or screen. (They're not always so apparent during the flurries of falling masonry, but in the quieter scenes, traces of this director's sensitive, intimate breakthrough Short Term 12 persist.) There are even occasional flickers of a slightly more adult Spider-Man, if such a thing isn't a contradiction in terms. Holland spends much more time with his top off than he did in the Watts era, Frank Punisher (gay porn name, if ever there was) lets fly with half of the Oedipal expletive before Spidey silences him with a mouthful of web, and the narrative has one good, cruel trick up its sleeve in having Zendaya's Mary-Jane possessed by Scorpion at exactly the moment Peter believes she's come back to him of her own accord. The pity is that this possession lasts for all of five minutes before the franchise moves on to the next cameo, the next setpiece and thereby reverts to the series status quo. Raimi, operating under his own steam, might well have made something more of that development; Cretton can't, because these are now characters in a cosmic sitcom that doesn't allow for the overturning of applecarts. None of it remotely matters outside the next five-to-ten years of Marvel movies - it is, at the end of the day, all the escapism a line item on a corporate portfolio can provide - and though Cretton goes lighter than usual on the studio-issue filters, it looks much the same as before, all backlots and blue screens. (Though I enjoyed the scenes of real New York streetlife under the closing credits: a breath of fresh, naturalistic air, at the very last.) The staggering opening weekend takings would suggest the MCU is back on its feet again, but this is hardly a brand new day, merely a renewal of what this studio was attempting to sell us on a decade ago - a reminder of partway functional mega-entertainments, of a moment when these movies were spectacularly mid rather than egregiously awful. This summer continues to cry out for something original, punchy and expertly executed - for a movie that qualifies as a movie, rather than a cinematic timeshare scheme or a pretext for spending three hours in an air-conditioned room.

Spider-Man: Brand New Day is now showing in cinemas nationwide.