Thursday, 29 May 2025

Marginal gains: "Bogancloch"


Back in 2011, the artist and filmmaker Ben Rivers completed 
Two Years at Sea, a distinctive non-fiction account of the daily life of one Jake Williams, a bearded hermit native to the Scottish Highlands who'd taken the decision to opt out of polite society many years before that society got far less polite. Time and recent developments have proven Jake Williams right in some respects - here's somebody who was practising social distancing before it went mainstream - and so we now have an unlikely sequel. Bogancloch speaks not just to how Williams caught the imagination of those who saw him first time around (you did wonder what would become of him), but also the very great rapport that must exist between this filmmaker and the subject who's welcomed him back into the woods. (I'm guessing Rivers couldn't just ping Williams a WhatsApp to say he was thinking of rocking up again.) Certain elements of Two Years at Sea persist into the new film. Again, Bogancloch has been shot on flickering, hand-developed, black-and-white stock, the filmmaker's own renunciation of the conventional path; again, the action (such as it is) is interrupted by colour photos that may or may not have been found around Williams' house and may or may not clue us in as to his backstory. The title, at least, gives us a closer idea of where we might locate that house, but again there is no voiceover, no interview for context and insistently no indication that Jake Williams has been on or will be going on some sort of "journey". Bogancloch remains its own film, much as Jake Williams is his own man.

A few things have changed, however. The new film opens with Williams at the wheel of a car he's now using to tow the caravan we saw lodged up in the trees a decade ago. (Rivers hones in on the arrangement's telling detail: the toothbrush wedged in the car's air vents, the dead pheasant lying among the caravan's clutter.) Though another decade older, greyer and shaggier, Williams appears more active than ever, leading Rivers to dedicate the bulk of the film to recording his various processes. Two Years at Sea had that memorable setpiece in which the hermit constructed a raft for himself, the kind of task a man might reasonably undertake when his inbox has long been purged of emails (or, indeed, when he's not even on email). In Bogancloch, we observe Williams feeding his cat, tending to seedlings, skiing through the forest, clearing the snow from his yard, and donning overalls to fashion a discarded beer-garden parasol into a model of the cosmos he can show to local schoolchildren. (The film's first surprise: this is no longer a one-man universe.) We quickly realise why Rivers finds Williams so compelling. It isn't just his life choices; it's that Williams is an artist of a type, someone who doesn't have vast sums of money to play with, but has nevertheless cultivated his own interests (curating, for example, a notable collection of world-music cassettes, much as some normies cling to obscure vinyl), developed methods and techniques for survival, and found he doesn't mind operating at the very margins of society under entirely his own steam. Williams is visibly part of a nonconformist tradition, but his chosen medium and canvas is life itself: he's afforded himself time and space, the circumstances under which the artist typically functions best.

By filming him, Rivers can give us the same gifts. This creative came to prominence during the emergence of what was labelled slow cinema, a new form that defined itself against the rapid and often vapid accelerationism of fast and furious mainstream fare. One sequence here is textbook slow cinema: Williams potters through a forest, settles at the base of a sturdy tree, murmurs a song to himself, takes a hearty swig of whatever is in his flask, and then apparently nods off as the camera keeps rolling. Though the sequence is eventually interrupted by the arrival of a group of hikers - the Rivers equivalent of a crowd scene - it's one of several where the director stands back and allows us to soak a scene in, a line of approach he sustains right through to Bogancloch's wonderful, how-did-they-do-that? closing image. Crucially, this is not some featherheaded utopian vision: the weathered Williams - whose home appears to house everything but the duster it really needs, as is the case with so many artists' hovels - inspires as much worry as wonder. (Not least in a stretch where his workshop fills with smoke from an unseen source.) That grainy black-and-white photography captures a hardscrabble, make-do-and-mend existence; the surrounding hillsides are romantic only in the sense that an Edward Gorey print might be considered romantic. Yet Williams has made it all work for him, which is why he's still here some fourteen years later, long after many of his contemporaries in bigger houses have departed. For him, this is a way of life; for his director, a source of ongoing fascination; for us, a break from the hyperaccelerated norm, be that AI boosterism, the endless bellowing about borders, or the quest for upward mobility in a society that doesn't - and won't - allow it. I don't think I entirely grasped what Two Years at Sea represented back in 2011; in 2025, it would be impossible not to notice, appreciate, even cherish it.

Bogancloch opens in selected cinemas from tomorrow.

In memoriam: Robert Benton (Telegraph 28/05/25)


Robert Benton
, who has died aged 92, was an American filmmaker who played a foundational part in the New Hollywood of the 1970s with his screenplay for Arthur Penn’s Bonnie and Clyde (1967); as a director, he specialised in high-toned character pieces, most prominently the Oscar-winning divorce drama Kramer vs. Kramer (1979).

Co-authored with David Newman, the Bonnie and Clyde script drew on Benton’s childhood memories of Depression-era Texas. (His father had attended both outlaws’ funerals on the same day in 1934.) Yet for all its vivid Americana, it was equally influenced by the emergent freedoms of European cinema, as Benton confessed: “The French New Wave allowed us to write with a more complex morality: more ambiguous characters, more sophisticated relationships.”

Both François Truffaut and Jean-Luc Godard considered directing before Penn and star Warren Beatty asserted creative control, insisting the scribes remove their (wholly invented) suggestion of Clyde’s bisexuality. The film’s still-jolting final bloodbath set critics bickering over matters of morality; yet young cinemagoers, electrified by the sight of something new after years of fusty studio entertainments, made it a substantial word-of-mouth hit, and the script earned an Oscar nomination.

For Benton, the project’s appeal resided in its non-judgemental framing: “I wanted to see criminals without moralising [about] them. I wanted to see them as people.” With Newman, he scripted a run of offbeam crime pictures: period prison-break romp There Was a Crooked Man… (1970), Peter Bogdanovich’s screwball homage What’s Up, Doc? (1972) and Bad Company (1972), a droll Western about Civil War draft-dodgers with which Benton made his deft feature directorial debut.

He won more plaudits – and a second Oscar nod – for writing and directing the smartly tempered PI yarn The Late Show (1977), then a sizeable paycheque for his script contributions to Richard Donner’s blockbusting Superman (1978). The latter helped exorcise a super-ghost: in 1966, Benton and Newman had written the book for It’s a Bird… It’s a Plane… It’s Superman!, a musical that became Broadway’s biggest flop of the time, closing after three months with losses of $600,000. 

Kramer vs. Kramer proved a thoughtful, even-handed adaptation of Avery Corman’s novel, overseen – ironically enough – by one of the few New Hollywood creatives not to have experienced divorce firsthand. A runaway hit (earning $173m off an $8m budget), it picked up four Golden Globes and five Oscars, including Best Adapted Screenplay and Best Director for Benton himself.

He added one further writing Oscar to his tally with the 1930s-set Places in the Heart (1984), centred on what Benton called “a highly fictionalised version of my family” and starring Sally Field as a widow trying to save her farm. The latter’s Best Actress win underlined Benton’s ever-shrewd casting instincts: “When I was going to direct the first time, I remember walking behind two people talking, and thinking, ‘How can I get actors to just talk and not act?’ And the secret was to hire good actors.”

Robert Douglas Benton was born on September 29, 1932 in Waxahachie, Texas to telephone company employee Ellery Benton and his wife Dorothy (née Spaulding). A dyslexic child, he soon sought refuge in the cinema: “I was very lucky that I had a father who instead of saying ‘Did you do your homework?’ would ask, ‘Do you want to go to the movies?’”

He studied fine arts at the University of Texas and art history at Columbia University before joining the editorial staff of Esquire, where he first met and befriended Newman. “We were allowed to be like noisy kids trying to get attention,” Benton later recalled. “I would never have left Esquire if I hadn’t gotten fired. I would have stayed there forever.” 

Branching out, he directed the short film A Texas Romance, 1909 (1964), based on his own family history; after Bonnie and Clyde, he joined the likes of Samuel Beckett and John Lennon in contributing to Kenneth Tynan’s provocative theatrical revue Oh! Calcutta!, which premiered off-Broadway in 1969.

Post-Kramer, Benton fell out of fashion, directing character-driven dramas at a time when flashy concepts ruled the box-office: the Hitchcockian thriller Still of the Night (1982), Kim Basinger comedy Nadine (1987) and the E.L. Doctorow adaptation Billy Bathgate (1991) all underperformed, though his script for Nobody’s Fool (1994), a fond late-life vehicle for Paul Newman, earned him one last Oscar nomination.

The ruminative PI drama Twilight (1998) proved less successful, however, and Benton actively angered Philip Roth with his loose adaptation of The Human Stain (2003). His final screenwriting credit was the John Cusack thriller The Ice Harvest (2005); his final directorial credit was the ensemble drama Feast of Love (2007).

He retained a romantic idea of what good storytelling could achieve, and his own part in the process: “There’s a part of me that thinks I don't really control the film, I sort of chase after it. There’s a terrific thing that happens as the film starts to take on its own life. And either you let it breathe and you let it live, or you control it. And part of me has always loved seeing what happens in a film.”

His wife of sixty years, the artist Sallie Rendigs, died in 2023; he is survived by their son John.

Robert Benton, born September 29, 1932, died May 11, 2025.

Wednesday, 28 May 2025

Succession by Fisher-Price: "The Phoenician Scheme"


Hardcore Wes Anderson devotees have been quiet on
The Phoenician Scheme, though the film could hardly have helped its cause by launching at Cannes, traditional site of new and newly expansive cinematic visions. By contrast, TPS is nothing if not Anderson by numbers: poky Academy frame, limited, doll's-house worldview, trifling caper plot, flatly written and spoken dialogue, all set in the usual high-end production design and sold to us as some exotic delicacy, the comedy without laughs. Yet my eyebrows and expectations were momentarily raised by a prologue that gets some blood on the walls of these ultra-curated, ever-rectilinear frames: the opening scene describes the first of several assassination attempts, in this instance a bomb that blows a hole in the private jet of tyrannical industrialist Zsa-Zsa Korda (Benicio del Toro). Set over the course of 1950, that banner year for American capitalism, The Phoenician Scheme is Wes Goes Business, a period film in which this artful writer-director offers his own sideways take on the cutthroat back-in-the-headlines dealings of Succession, Trump et al. The true believers will doubtless thrill to see their idol storming the boardroom to unlock a further set of rules, contracts, tchotchkes within boxes, boxes within boxes, eccentric hangers-on and arcane onscreen statistics. Even by this director's recent standards, though, TPS is several thousand feet of trivia, another layer of fluff painstakingly extracted from the navel of The Royal Tenenbaums.

What the new film does provide, however, is a useful, 100-minute lull in which we might reflect upon the authorial tradeoffs that have been necessary to convert a once-promising comic outlook into a recognisable, profitable, now mostly sterile brand. Anderson has built enough of a customer base to justify banging another of these out every twelve-to-24 months, but he's long since run out of compelling situations, interesting characters (rather than agglomerations of quirks) and solid jokes. TPS has one joke at its disposal, really - those leftfield assassination attempts - and it's one that could perhaps have caught fire with some pace behind or heat underneath it. Instead, tweezered into their display case and then duplicated with kid gloves, pinky finger extended, each reiteration here lands with a dull, silence-inducing splat. Anderson is just about the last comedy director at large in America, and he's survived by turning Screen Two of the Odeon into a library. The compensation offered for this flimsy product is a heavyweight line-up of endorsing celebrities. (As with The French Dispatch and Asteroid City, TPS makes for a better billboard than it does a film.) As Korda's estranged daughter and potential heiress, a wimple-clad Mia Threapleton is allowed to retain her British accent and some of her own cadences; everybody else is obliged to don the uniform and adopt the policies of WesCorp, to impersonate the words and gestures of the players in previous Anderson films. Any surprise at seeing Richard Ayoade pop up in this milieu is dulled by the inevitability of seeing Richard Ayoade pop up in this milieu; it's amazing Anderson hadn't recruited him before Covid, although you suspect Ayoade might wish the director had made the call twenty years ago. If you've bought shares in this stock, fine, have at it again; but Anderson shows no sign of wanting or needing to expand his customer base. The films remain newsletters composed in a treehouse, possibly using one of the film's tie-in "bespoke writing implements" (pens, those of us on the ground call them), and dispatched to the faithful. I went in wondering whether Branderson is to the aspirant bohemians of the Left what MAGA is to the American Right, an airtight personality cult inexplicable to anyone looking on unamused from the other side of the pond; I left thinking of late-period Woody Allen, and how a hardened accumulation of compulsions, fetishes and tics is really no vision for a truly popular cinema. Sell, sell, sell.

The Phoenician Scheme is now showing in selected cinemas.

Tuesday, 27 May 2025

From the archive: "Two Years at Sea"


Some movies take us away from it all by going big, allowing us to escape among the monsters and aliens of universes far, far away. Others do so by clinging assiduously to all things micro, paring back the frippery, VFX and other fun and games in a bid to show what life might look like if we actually dared to remove ourselves from such clutter. Shot on grainy, flaring monochrome stock apparently half-inched from some experimental filmmakers' co-op at the arse-end of the 1960s, Two Years at Sea - the artist Ben Rivers' non-fiction study of one hermit's life - falls squarely into the latter camp. Though an early shot of a letter establishes this hermit's name as Jake Williams, Rivers' refusal of narration, title cards or other framing devices leaves us to figure out his particulars for ourselves. Frequent snow suggests Williams has made his home - a gingerbread house deep in a forest, with a backyard full of junk - somewhere north of the Scottish border; the film will be dotted with photos of persons who may be family members, but the taciturn Williams is unwilling to introduce us (or even really acknowledge the camera), and Rivers has to respect him for that. We do too, sort of.

This viewer was reminded of the peaceable solitude of the Carmelite nuns whose lives were captured in the 2009 No Greater Love, a surprise arthouse crossover hit at the time, but Rivers' goal here is less observational than experiential: he wants to put the viewer in the same neck of the woods for eighty-odd minutes, and maybe even get us to inhabit this guy's headspace - to marvel at the natural world in the way that first led Jake Williams to take off on his tod, and not just because it happens to be the only element on screen for long stretches. Inevitably, this kind of filmmaking isn't for the antsy, and there is a kind of limitation inherent to this lifestyle. You may come away wanting a bit less beardy pottering and a shade more excitement, true as the former may be to this marginal figure's daily existence. The litmus test comes with a longish sequence in which we watch Williams painstakingly craft a raft from tree branches, packing foam and plastic bottles, then transport it on his shoulders to a nearby lake, where he pushes himself out into the middle so as to sit there doing, well, nothing very much at all, meaning a soundtrack layered with birds cooing and wind ruffling the trees has to take up the slack for five minutes. Rivers has expanded his vision in subsequent, busier projects (last year's A Spell to Ward Off the Darkness, for one), but this remains memorable as one of those films that quietly opens up a window on some small, previously unfilmed corner of the world - no matter that you may value central heating and Freeview television enough not to leap through it for yourself.

(January 2014)

Two Years at Sea is available to rent via Prime Video and the BFI Player; a sequel of sorts, Bogancloch, opens in selected cinemas from Friday, and will be reviewed here in the days ahead.

Friday, 23 May 2025

For what it's worth...




UK box office Top Ten (for the weekend of May 16-18, 2025):

(1) Thunderbolts* (12A)
3 (2) Sinners (15) ****
4 (3A Minecraft Movie (PG)
5 (4) Ocean with David Attenborough (U)
6 (new) Hurry Up Tomorrow (15)
7 (5The Accountant 2 (15)
8 (new) Hallow Road (15) **
9 (new) 2024 Ateez World Tour: Towards the Light (PG)
10 (6Until Dawn (15)

(source: BFI)

My top five:
2. 28 Days Later

  
DVD/Blu-Ray/Download top ten: 

1 (2) Captain America: Brave New World (12)
3 (new) Disney's Snow White (PG)
4 (3) Dog Man (U)
5 (13) Venom: The Last Dance (15)
6 (24) The Wild Robot (U) **
8 (7) Wicked: Part 1 (PG) **
9 (new) A Fistful of Dollars (15) [above] ****
10 (12) Gladiator II (15) ***


My top five: 
1. Hard Truths
2. Anora


My top five films on terrestrial TV this week:
1. Meet Me in St. Louis (Saturday, BBC Two, 2.25pm)
2. From Russia with Love (Sunday, ITV1, 4.20pm and Friday, ITV1, 10.45pm)
3. How to Train Your Dragon (Sunday, ITV1, 2.20pm)
4. The Taking of Pelham 123 (Sunday, ITV1, 10.20pm)
5. Pride & Prejudice (Holiday Monday, BBC Two, 10pm)

Thursday, 22 May 2025

ChatGPTC: "Mission: Impossible - The Final Reckoning"


After thirty years, the spark reaches the end of its long fuse; the question facing us is whether it triggers a properly big bang, or simply fizzles out. For one thing, we might have wanted a more dynamic keeper of the M:I flame over this past decade than Christopher McQuarrie: where the sensationalist Brian De Palma seized upon this spy scenario to bombard the screen with spectacle, and the erstwhile animator Brad Bird (in 2011's Ghost Protocol) approached the material as the basis of a live-action cartoon, writer-turned-director McQuarrie has used his stewardship to bring in knottier plotting - more conversation, more complication - as if the TV show that inspired this series wasn't some brisk, peppy Cold War diversion but House of Cards. Far from a natural showman, this filmmaker has set about his task in the manner of a stressy events manager, overseeing the construction of ever more grandiose story scaffolding that producer-star Tom Cruise - the real prime mover here, as evinced by the opening credit "A Tom Cruise Production, starring Tom Cruise" - can dangle off one-handed. That task has got trickier with each new instalment: in the past week, my social media has been awash with the disappointed reactions of folks who've revisited 2023's Dead Reckoning - Part One only to find it lacking, and the opening stretch of The Final Reckoning continues in much the same haphazard vein, comprehensively flubbing the business of scene- and stakes-setting, and instead coming up clutching false starts and loose ends. You could drive yourself mad pondering the fate of Ving Rhames in the new film's first reels: one minute, he's happily soldering kit at his IMF station, the next he's hooked up to a drip in hospital, and a moment later he's hunched, sweating, over a ticking timebomb. The real mission with these films has been ensuring their chicanery remains at least semi-coherent, at least for the all-important opening weekend; The Final Reckoning, alas, hasn't even got that far.

Through this fraying narrative carapace, you can at least spy why the franchise has alighted upon artificial intelligence as its ultimate big bad. As The Final Reckoning opens, big tech has divided the world so completely that nuclear war is back on the agenda, and martial law has been imposed in several nations; AI is as much a marker of where the world is now as, say, the Eurostar was back at the time of the series' first film in 1996, albeit an element that signifies division rather than connection. Cruise, by contrast, has remained steadfast (and business-savvy) in his desire to pull together a franchise that means all things to all people: of our time, in as much as the M:Is have paid lip service to the concerns and conflicts of our time, but not so much of it that they can't serve as Saturday night escapism. Early on here, Cruise's Ethan Hunt wins over one assailant by outlining an altogether utopian endgame (no nations, no dogma, no rival ideologies); his grand plan involves powering down the Internet, which will presumably have the positive knock-on effect of getting everyone back into cinemas. Right to its closing frames, this series has made much of the IMF agents' ability to slip unnoticed into crowds of strangers: what better place to achieve that than the back rows of the IMAX? This profession of unity is an intriguing story idea, and one that hinges on Hunt's team overcoming their own differences to work together as a team: lots of handshakes and hugs, a reunion with a minor player from the very first film, and a setpiece that depends on everybody coordinating their diaries to arrive at the same remote place at the exact same time. That will be trickier than first thought, not least as the M:I ensemble has expanded with each instalment, and only more rapidly after the franchise set up shop in London, availing itself of the best of BAFTA. The sense we're watching a classier Fast & Furious (or pricier Slow Horses) grows with each new familiar face: Mark Gatiss! Nick Offerman! Janet McTeer! Katy O'Brian! The Ted Lasso lady! Yet much as the human villain (Esai Morales, all but an afterthought this time round) plays second fiddle to a machine, so many of these players have nothing to do bar growl their dialogue and stand around watching Tom Cruise in a Tom Cruise production. More than ever this time, everything goes through Tom.

There is a lot of dialogue to growl, admittedly; again, McQuarrie exerts whatever influence he can here, but this also leaves The Final Reckoning as by far the talkiest film of the entire series. It's Hunt asking his superiors to trust him, time and again, despite his broadly unimpeachable track record over the previous seven films; it's those same superiors muttering darkly among themselves; it's Simon Pegg coming up with more of his fanboying schtick; it's extensive exposition, and - more worryingly - lengthy descriptions of events and missions we never get to see. There is so much preamble in the new film you honestly begin to wonder: did the insurers pull their cover after Cruise broke his ankle shooting 2018's Fallout? Is that why so much of The Final Reckoning sounds like people poring at length over a binding legal document's terms and conditions? Is this a Mission: Impossible movie, or some Mission: Impossible-themed podcast? In this cut, there isn't an identifiable setpiece for fully eighty minutes - four-fifths of the original film's running time - and those that come along belatedly won't make anybody's M:I Top Five: some sploshing around inside a sunken submarine, more stifling than stirring; a subterranean shootout during which we learn you can apparently plug in AI devices in caves (?); a final round of stunt flying that merely reminds one how much better Top Gun: Maverick understood its assignment. Were it not for the inevitable NDAs in place, The Final Reckoning might have generated some interesting chatter, on the topic of how a production overseen by a megastar operating close to his commercial peak drifted so far off-course: this does not have the look of an event movie where the assembled creatives were on the same page. (The endless, criss-crossing onscreen talk may be a barely encrypted reflection of behind-the-scenes disagreement on the ultimate direction of travel.) Either way, that spark is now non-existent, and the explosives have been stuffed not with gelignite but flannel and waffle; there's so little holding The Final Reckoning together it looks to have imploded under the weight of its own infrastructure. Cruise can stand unbowed on as many tall buildings as he likes to sell it, but this franchise limps over the finish line in tatters, and summer 2025 opens with a very strange and sorry sort of mess.

Mission: Impossible - The Final Reckoning is now showing in cinemas nationwide.

Wednesday, 21 May 2025

On demand: "Cloud"


The latest ambient thriller from Japanese genre ace Kiyoshi Kurosawa,
Cloud, hones in on the ways we now work. Protagonist Yoshii (Masaki Suda) is a faintly passive, vaguely uptight young man whose nine-to-five gig in some sort of printshop has become secondary to a lucrative sidehustle: buying up and then reselling sought-after consumer goods online, much as you and I might from time to time on eBay or Vinted. This entrepreneurial savoir-faire, a characteristic we're told employers in our free-market economy find most attractive, has turned his poky flat into a branch of Argos, because he's obliged to buy in bulk to turn even a marginal profit; it also empowers him to shrug off the obstacles Kurosawa begins to sling in his path, which range from the dead rat one aggrieved customer leaves on his doorstep to the razorwire that trips him off his motorbike. Matters get unignorably tricky, however, once an old schoolfriend - the model of the movie tech bro folks probably shouldn't be getting involved with - invites Yoshii to double his money by overseeing an auction website that presents as a sleek new incarnation of the old black market. As if this weren't ominous enough, the position requires relocation to a modernist house on the banks of a vast lake, the kind of liminal space in which nothing good can ever happen.

These last developments are a little conventional for a Kurosawa film, but Cloud is another of this director's thrillers to be driven by a recognisably human urge - in this instance, the desire to shut oneself away behind screens so as to make one's fortune, to plug in, switch on and cash out. Yoshii can't, however - or at least he can't without serious consequences: his paranoia ramps up as this bucolic Fort Knox proves vulnerable to attack, and a narrative rupture around the halfway mark proves him right to be on edge, by introducing an angry mob of consumers weaponising the Internet to put a price on Yoshii's head in turn. (This is a nice, pulpy reversal: a man who trades in collectibles and designer clutchbags suddenly finds he's become a prized item.) Yet if the scenario invites the manic accelerationism one encounters online, Kurosawa remains glacial in his pacing; he's one of the few contemporary thriller directors to grasp how unsettling sustained silence can be (doubly so in an ever-noisier world that demands we serve as our own carnival barkers), and he alights upon one naggingly creepy effect in having the sun set suddenly on any given scene, as if we were witnessing not just the end of trading but the end of the very world. (Here, perhaps, is that apocalyptic capitalism Naomi Klein and Astra Taylor were writing about, willing to trade the climate and planet for a few more coins in the bank.)

Cloud presents as one for the connoisseurs rather than the casual thrillseekers among us: for at least an hour, it's more elegant than particularly exciting. Though those sudden, jolting lurches around the midpoint demonstrate a keen understanding of just how rapidly things can turn ugly within a life lived primarily online, Kurosawa remains temperamentally closer to Michael Haneke than Michael Bay, forever predisposed to apply the cold compress of rigorous critical thought to material that might, in other hands, be encouraged to heat up. Still, it does seem logical that a thriller so vehemently opposed to shameless commerce should come over as anti-commercial in its methods. The movie's grim endgame unfolds around an abandoned factory, that stock thriller location here afforded an entirely new context (presumably any manufacturing there has been hollowed out by the pivot to digital), and comprises sequence after sequence of desperate begging and petty throatcutting, undertaken by ordinary citizens driven to protect their interests and/or make a killing of one kind or another. "Surprisingly easy," a minor character notes after Yoshii has gunned down one of his pursuers in cold blood. Rather than any slambang conclusion, this is what unchecked capitalism reduces us all to, Kurosawa ventures, and it sure ain't pretty or stirring.

Cloud is now available to rent via Prime Video, YouTube and the BFI Player.

Tuesday, 20 May 2025

Das boot: "Burden of Dreams"


This viewer happens to admire Werner Herzog's 1982 film 
Fitzcarraldo very much - in my book, it ranks alongside Apocalypse Now in the pantheon of turn-of-the-Eighties grand follies, a prime example of how-slash-why-on-earth-did-they-do-that? cinema. Yet arguably you could watch Burden of Dreams, Les Blank's making-of doc from the same year, and have an altogether more satisfying experience: you get a sense of the story Fitzcarraldo told, a relatively candid glimpse at how it was achieved, and a bonus layer of critical commentary on top of the action. Blank's was, indeed, the film that Pauline Kael used as a stick to attack Herzog's megalomania, with some reason. Early on, Blank films Herzog admitting that he has comprehensively trashed the true story on which his film was based: the real Barry Fitzgerald, we learn, had his ship dismantled and reassembled rather than attempting to haul the whole vessel up and over a hill, as Herzog does. The latter set about this Herculean labour, then, not because he needed to, rather because he could, because he had the resources at his disposal to make a notionally improbable act a physical possibility. 

Nothing here would have done much to downplay Herzog's then-growing rep as a wayward thrillseeker: at one point, Blank catches the director spreadeagled over the prow of a speedboat, attempting to pluck animals from the river with his bare hands, as if making a picture in the middle of the Amazon using extras from warring indigenous tribes wasn't enough in itself to worry the insurance men. It's as if Herzog learnt nothing from his own Aguirre, Wrath of God - or that he felt he had to go at least one better than Coppola's vision of a boat moored in a tree. (We might now view the competing new waves of the 1970s as the work of male creatives finding ever more extravagant ways to compare penises.) On the positive side, Blank's film stands as a lesson, albeit an extreme one, in the flexibility and tenacity required to overcome substantial logistical obstacles and bring an extraordinary project to fruition. (Thankfully, Burden of Dreams has so far avoided the sorry fate of being screened at corporate teambuilding weekends, though it may still be fit for that purpose.) 

For cinephiles and other lovers of lost causes, Burden offers a tantalising peek at Herzog's first shot at filming this story, with Jason Robards as Fitz, and a miscast Mick Jagger as his Sancho Panza; after Robards retires hurt, the lead role is filled by Klaus Kinski, who appears thoroughly unhappy to be here, in as much as Kinski ever appeared happy to be anywhere. Blank is far more inquisitive about the tribespeople propping up this project than Herzog is on camera, and here you can see why Kael felt Herzog saw these natives as a means to an end, a way of physically dragging the movie from A to B. (She conflates the director with those other white Europeans who colonised the planet by seizing upon the locals as a source of cheap, disposable labour.) It is true that Herzog comes over as coy indeed when asked about shipping in sex workers for cast and crew, and it's clear he had sections of the Amazon basin bulldozed to get the shots he wanted; as Fitzcarraldo gets bigger and riskier than first intended, Blank's doc becomes a record of what happens when a filmmaker refuses to set limits on his imagination, or to apply the usual checks and balances of conscience.

The burden of the title is Herzog's, then, and it's felt to some degree. As the boat bogs further into the mud, the more Blank's camera captures the true perversity of this spectacle - and the more Herzog (who earns a "starring" credit, somewhat justified, in the opening titles) feels compelled to explain himself and his methods. Whippet-thin and moustachioed - often observed shirtless in tiny football shorts, looking for all the world as though he should be feeding Karl-Heinz Rummenigge from midfield rather than making movies in the back of beyond - he displays the patience of a saint when faced with Kinski, a dissenting turkey, and the non-professionals holding up this ship of dreamers and fools, though even he starts to seem chastened by the effort, confessing "sometimes I wish I could sit in an E-Zee chair with a cup of tea". It's one of those docs that must have encouraged countless film students to pick up a camera, in part by implication: if this dude could pull that movie out of that jungle, your low-budget two-hander set entirely in a branch of Subway will be a breeze. But - as Kael was entirely right to point out - there's just no way it has to be this complicated.

Burden of Dreams returns to selected cinemas from Friday.

Into the woods: "Hallow Road"


Hallow Road is Carpool Karaoke Locke, or Locke x State of the Union. Now we have a whole married couple in a car headed down a road to nowhere, responding via phone to a developing situation, often acting at crosspurposes, neither of them being in the most serene headspace as they strap themselves in. It is, after all, half past two in the morning when the Finches (Matthew Rhys and Rosamund Pike) receive a call from their distraught offspring Alice (Megan McDonnell), who stormed away from a family meal earlier that night and now tearfully admits to having knocked someone down on the B-roads of Norfolk. A paramedic by trade, Mrs. F takes control, steering Alice through various recovery manoeuvres over the speakerphone as she and her husband drive out into the wilds to intervene, but this crisis opens up pre-existing faultlines between the couple, who've been working different hours and keeping secrets from one another, and react to Alice's plight in different ways. (Even the simple lighting of a cigarette triggers some old tension.) Our eyes are drawn back to two readouts: the call duration on the phone clipped to the dashboard, ticking upwards as events at the accident scene take one turn after another, and the distance to location on Dad's satnav, coming rapidly down as Finches and film speed on into the night. The couple's internal data, by contrast, is scrambled, less than reliable, frankly all over the map.

We quickly grasp this is the British film industry's preferred shape of project: self-contained genre fare, lowish budget, two proven, reliable actors plonked inside a car (or replica thereof) for a brisk-seeming eighty minutes. Plonked behind the camera: Babak Anvari, obliged to maintain an even tighter focus than he did in his 2016 breakout Under the Shadow. (No other cars appear on the road at this time of night, and the underlit route the Finches take has the effect of casting the leads in near-darkness.) That formal tautness returns our attention to the writing and performances, which struck me as somewhere between brittle and shaky; I felt the illusion could shatter at any moment. Debutant William Gillies' screenplay crams a lot into this car's boot: stuff we haven't witnessed, stuff the Finches haven't yet spoken about, other business that emerges under duress. Steven Knight's script for Locke was far shrewder in rounding up a lot of smaller, relatively trivial things (an unplanned pregnancy, yes, but also the finer details of concrete pouring) which felt easier to swallow, even if - taken collectively - they drove the protagonist around the bend. Gillies comes up with one nicely British diversion, as the Finches awkwardly try to shoo off a pair of dogooders who've arrived at the accident scene before them, but pretty much everything else here is potentially lifechanging from the off. That has a knock-on effect on these performers, increasingly encouraged to bellow at one another in this confined space, where Tom Hardy, left (more or less) to his own devices, could improvise, modulate, go through the gears. Old hands Rhys and Pike can also steady matters whenever this script threatens to go completely awry, but there are still a lot of skids, and I really wasn't sure that the destination was worth all the turbulence. Locke was cinema; this tinnier rerun feels more like a radio play that missed its turning and has now driven into the oncoming traffic of the final Mission: Impossible movie.

Hallow Road is now playing in selected cinemas.

Monday, 19 May 2025

On demand: "Subarnarekha"


From its opening moments, Ritwak Ghatak's 1965 film
Subarnarekha paints an altogether complicated picture of the India of 1948. A flag is raised optimistically high over a new school at precisely the instant a violent mob descends upon a lower-caste woman, sweeping her away and leaving her child behind; news breaks of Gandhi's assassination, and protagonist Ishwar (Abhi Bhattacharya) severs a friendship bond to make a new life for himself, his young sister Sita (Madhabi Mukherjee) and that now-adopted child Abhi (Satindra Bhattacharya) in a milltown on the banks of the titular golden river. In the foreground, then, the everyday disruption that followed from Partition; in the background, some sense of India in its entirety, its people, politics and stories, its devotional music and unanswered prayers. The narrative itself seems to split. On one side of the screen, the adults, trying to pick up the pieces left behind by the Brits and to make the country function again, this time under their own steam. On the other, the children who would inherit this earth, enjoying their final days of innocence in an Eden that hadn't been entirely childproofed. What Ghatak had locked onto were the haphazard processes of stabilisation and growth in a post-colonial state - again observed at two levels, that of the nation, and that of its citizens.

Thus did Subarnarekha expand upon the Satyajit Ray films of the same time and place. Where the latter mastered the word, Ghatak couples word to masterly image, contextualising his characters within a landscape that is simultaneously natural, industrial and contested, both abandoned and ripe for reclamation: a disused airstrip - the Eastern equivalent of the the airplane graveyard in The Best Years of Our Lives - which serves as a symbol of the country's fractured past while offering a playground for the next generation, a forest where the teenage Sita learns of her adopted brother's affections. They are but babes in the woods, but then so was India; the country's collective innocence could last only so long. Like that river, and the trains Ghatak films from time to time, these characters are caught in transition, passing through, looking out towards engineering courses in Germany and export businesses in Switzerland (one lightly spoken subtext: how the diaspora became a diaspora, and the effects it had on those left behind); the final reel, which broaches the excesses of urban Calcutta, seems to hail from another movie entirely, something Fellini or Wilder might have dreamt up. Here, Subarnarekha circles back to its main characters to suggest a state spiralling out of control. You could find the bare historical facts of these matters in any history book, but Ghatak gives us the poetry - and the tumult - in his country's soul. This director's reputation in the West now rests almost exclusively on 1960's striking The Cloud-Capped Star, the one Ghatak film that made the leap from repertory to VHS and then DVD. Yet Subarnarekha, currently getting by in a battered print with burnt-in English subtitles on YouTube, strikes me as by far the more complete vision: multilayered, sensual, enveloping, mysterious - not least in its use of narrative ellipses to describe life drifting by - this is clearly the work of someone who saw all this playing out with his own eyes as a young man, and could still barely believe it happened.

Subarnarekha is currently streaming on YouTube.

Friday, 16 May 2025

For what it's worth...




UK box office Top Ten (for the weekend of May 9-11, 2025):

1 (1) Thunderbolts* (12A)
2 (2) Sinners (15) ****
3 (3A Minecraft Movie (PG)
4 (new) Ocean with David Attenborough (U)
5 (4) The Accountant 2 (15)
6 (5) Until Dawn (15)
7 (new) The Surfer (15) ***
8 (6) The Penguin Lessons (12A)
9 (7) Bluey at the Cinema: Let's Play Chef Collection (U)
10 (10) Warfare (15) **

(source: BFI)

My top five:
1. 28 Days Later

  
DVD/Blu-Ray/Download top ten: 

2 (4) Captain America: Brave New World (12)
3 (8) Dog Man (U)
4 (1) A Complete Unknown (12) **
5 (2) Conclave (12) ****
6 (re) Anora (18) ***
7 (9) Wicked: Part 1 (PG) **
8 (7) Sonic the Hedgehog 3 (PG)
9 (11) Marching Powder (18)
10 (24) Kraven the Hunter (15)


My top five: 
1. Hard Truths
2. Anora


My top five films on terrestrial TV this week:
1. The Untouchables [above] (Saturday, BBC Two, 10pm)
2. Malcolm X (Monday, BBC Two, 11pm)
3. Matilda (Saturday, ITV1, 6.30am)
4. Booksmart (Friday, BBC One, 11.40pm)
5. Man Up (Sunday, BBC One, 12.30am)

Thursday, 15 May 2025

Numb: "Final Destination: Bloodlines"


Let's at least acknowledge the longevity. It was fully 25 years ago when the brains trust at New Line Cinema realised they could piggyback on the success of Wes Craven's Scream films with a franchise that swerved the hassle of story and characters (and that irritating metaness) to give gorehounds all the kill scenes they could possibly want of a Friday night; indeed, the first wave of Final Destinations realised they could profitably use the time saved on story and character development to make those kill scenes the whole, spectacular package. (Also uppermost in the series' golddigging DNA: the entire second half of James Cameron's blockbusting Titanic.) These would be disaster movies where you weren't encouraged to care about anybody on screen; they were Rube Goldberg machines pointed inescapably towards death, designed to chew up everyone that fell into their maws, to reduce the sum total of their frames to a big fat zero. The franchise took off among teenage nihilists, naturally, and even managed to survive the supposed ironyslayer of 9/11 (a very Final Destination-ish spectacle, considered in this context), remaining an ongoing commercial concern as late as last decade's Final Destination 5. Now, following a sorta-successful Scream reboot, we get the revival Final Destination: Bloodlines, which attempts to retcon some existential superstructure onto the films so far, while obviously preying on any nostalgia for the exploitation cinema of our misspent youth. At my screening, Bloodlines was prefaced with a trailer for the new I Know What You Did Last Summer, arriving later this year: in the absence of any more elevating vision for the popular cinema, everything that goes around comes back around, to be pancaked by a speeding dumptruck.


My objection to Bloodlines remains largely constitutional: as with the reckless endangerment of the Jackass franchise, which emerged from the same sniggering cultural moment (and itself sought its post-lockdown flowers), this continues to be very much Not My Jam. Partly it's the combination of glibness and cheapness that sits so uncomfortably in my gut: we are once more invited to chuckle, again and again, upon seeing the bodies of non-characters played by no-mark actors being endlessly torn apart. (It'd make an especially tricky round on TV's Pointless: without consulting the IMDb, name any of the actors who appeared in the original movie. Four people will have said Devon Sawa, and that was the level the franchise was operating at in its pomp.) Partly it's the way these films foreground their own cynical engineering, so that it becomes impossible to approach them as anything other than killing machines. Bloodlines opens with a 1960s-set prologue involving a fateful date night at the Skyview Tower, a high-rise restaurant marked for destruction the minute this camera alights on the transparent glass dancefloor, one chef's carefree handling of a flambé pan, and the insouciant tyke threatening to toss pennies from the observation balcony. A further warning siren is the song playing at the valet station ("Ring of Fire"); when the bodies start tumbling from the sky, exploding on the surrounding pavements in clouds of CG crimson, the same radio is heard playing "Raindrops Keep Falling On My Head". The latter is soon drowned out by the sound of the audience gurgling like drains, which struck me as a weird response for a movie to aspire to in 2000, and seems no less weird in 2025, when we know from lived experience that the planet has long been overrun by sick, soulless, empathy-voided fucks cheering on those executive-level ringmasters plotting the wholesale destruction of humankind.

Look, I get it: these films replicate the same controlled anxiety and collective release as any rollercoaster, yadda yadda. But there's still something so gloating - so gross - about the way the ultra-corporate carnies running this show keep tossing these bodies into the woodchipper, which is all this show ever is and wants to be. A garden party featuring a leaky gas cylinder, a shard of broken glass in the icebox, and a Jenga set. (You'll recognise it: it's been in all the trailers.) A tattoo parlour appointed with nose rings, bobblehead toys and a labouring ceiling fan. A hospital with wobbly vending machines, MRI scanners, and many more bodies besides. The film pushes on through its viscera, permitting no mourning period for any of its characters, none of the usual human markers of loss; a genuinely revolutionary Final Destination movie would at least try and take these people's trauma seriously, but that clearly isn't the film that would fill the multiplex with teenagers and earn David Zaslav his quarterly bonus. (That film, in fact, already exists: 1993's Fearless, made by Peter Weir for Warner Bros. three decades ago, and thereafter allowed to tumble into obscurity as the world turned to hypercapitalised shit.) Bloodlines cops to its baser motives in having its doe-eyed heroine (Kaitlyn Santa Juana) note, of Death's long-term bookbalancing, "It's like an equation... it's math." Carnage (spikes through face) times carnage (lawnmower to head) plus carnage (body in trash compactor) equals $$$, as I'm sure next week's box-office charts will confirm. Is there any bright side for us to look upon? A sendoff of a kind for the late Tony Todd, although the erstwhile Candyman appears so painfully frail, so much the dead man working here, that the primary takehome from his brief cameo isn't the intended life-is-precious so much as that Hollywood exploitation really knows no bounds. You can argue, as many will over the days and weeks ahead, that Bloodlines represents as grand and as elaborate a deathtrap as this series has so far arrived at, and that this is inherently a good thing for the movies and us alike. But once again, all a Final Destination film offers is a procession of grisly images, the option to laugh insensibly at them, and possibly a compulsion to seek out more of the same. If I wanted any part of that, I'd return to my former post on Elon Musk's X.

Final Destination: Bloodlines is now playing in cinemas nationwide.

The artist is(n't) present: "It's Not Me"


Technically, 2022's
Annette was Leos Carax's lockdown project, or at least the project Leos Carax would have been working on as the world locked down. Yet Carax's latest artefact It's Not Me really does have that lockdown project feel. Here is a dense, 40-minute Godardian collage - originally conceived for an exhibition at the Centre Pompidou that never happened, subsequently premiered at last year's Cannes, and now available to be pored over on MUBI - in which this singular French imagemaker looks back over his own life and work, perhaps with the aim of reintroducing himself to a generation who only know him from the Sparks musical about the flying baby doll. As that title suggests, however, It's Not Me also takes the form of a game of authorial hide-and-seek, in which a filmmaker addresses the question of who he isn't, in part to get out of the bind of having to explain who he is. His tools, on this occasion, are his own images: childhood photos, footage from his own back catalogue (ready yourself for lots of Denis Lavant, Carax's acteur fétiche, in various guises), new material filmed for the occasion, home videos showing Carax's young daughter Nastya - who may or may not have been the inspiration for Baby Annette - skipping along the banks of the Seine. Occasionally, to bolster his points, Carax will reach for the images of others: in a segment headed Bad Fathers, a shot of Adam Driver in Annette is juxtaposed with a publicity still of Robert Mitchum in The Night of the Hunter. Is Carax admitting to having been a poor papa (as some part of Annette surely seemed to), or indicating he was the fruit of a feckless tree? You be the judge, although Carax rather puts a thumb on the scales by flashing up a caption insisting "Cinema Forgives You Everything".

What's clear here is that by talking about (and filming) others, Carax means to better understand and define himself: it's been his life's practice, after all. He was, visibly, born into that generation that understood the Holocaust as more than just the Internet meme it's become: here, he juxtaposes the image of Hitler with those of latter-day tyrants (a real rogues' gallery: Putin, Xi, Trump, Netanyahu). A return to those lamentable images of dead migrant children washed up on European shores indicates a functioning conscience; the prevailing facility with multilayered sound and vision tells us something of Carax's artistic sensibility (and virtuosity). He cops to a more troubled relationship with the opposite sex, even while a few choice clips of the young Binoche in 1986's Mauvais sang demonstrate that few have filmed them so adoringly. The loaded name of Roman Polanski comes up in passing, though Carax is keen to point out that while he too is a director, he is not a monster. He is, instead, a man stalked by death, just like everybody else: in a touching closing sequence, Carax channels the spirits of former collaborators David Bowie, Guillaume Depardieu (son of, well, you know) and the director's erstwhile partner Katia Golubeva, all of which have long since flown. And a man who, for better or worse, has spent his days looking for beauty, and looking to find ways to enshrine beauty. (Stay tuned through the closing credits - with their not inconsiderable, Carax-approved bibliography and watchlists - for one of the great movie comebacks of recent times, a very special sequence that elevates the whole within touching distance of the essential.) The caveat is that It's Not Me can only ever be a snapshot; whether a Leos Carax highlights reel or a selfie taken by a less than willing subject, the film is but a flicker, and it would take 24 of them - frames or features - to get a fuller picture. Yet there's a kind of truth mixed up in there, as ever. Like so many of his films, Carax remains indefinable, elusive, perhaps indescribable even by himself. And unlike Godard: he's still here.

It's Not Me is currently streaming via MUBI.

Wednesday, 14 May 2025

Violent cop: "HIT: The Third Case"


That The Third Case has become the first in the HIT series to make the UK Top Ten is doubtless largely down to the presence of Nani, the South Indian superstar whose production company has helped finance the franchise. Having been persuaded this will be an ongoing business concern, the actor appeared on screen at the end of 2022's second instalment in the guise of one Arjun Sarkaar, a bad-ass detective introduced with a trussed-up body in the back of his SUV. As The Third Case opens, Sarkaar isn't so much bad-ass as actively disgraced, standing trial and eventually serving time for murder, having been caught on camera stringing a body up from a tree and cutting his victim's throat. The bulk of the movie that follows, again written and directed by Dr. Sailesh Kolanu, will be an exculpatory flashback explaining why the protagonist broke bad so, and another first for the series: the story of a detective effectively investigating himself. That's an intriguing hook, and one of several major improvements here that may only be possible when a conscientious, audience-savvy star climbs aboard, determined to up a previously middling serial's game and convert what's hitherto been multiplex filler into a bonafide (ahem) hit. For starters, Arjun Sarkaar feels like a graspable, fleshed-out character rather than a mere police sketch, afforded contradictions, quirks, medical conditions, his own thick-eared sense of style. And this script is markedly funnier than what's come before. While waiting for his victim to bleed out, Arjun grumbles to a call-centre employee about India's subpar 5G coverage; when it comes to his personal life, this notionally grown man proves such an alienating oddbod that the father he still lives with (stored in our antihero's phone under "Dad - Do Not Answer") has him signed up to a marriage site. The hook isn't just a detective investigating himself; it's that - at long last, after four previously indifferent hours - the series has finally alighted upon the one character who merits a full interrogation.

Kolanu, accordingly, takes his time in this. "Don't be in such a hurry," advises potential love interest Mrudula (Srinidhi Shetty) after a first date that goes surprisingly well, given everything we've discovered about Arjun; these become the film's watchwords, too. There were but two years between the first and second cases, during which time Kolanu was recruited to oversee the Hindi remake of the Telugu original; that possibly explains why all those films seemed to scramble over the finish line. Three years have passed between cases two and three, the latter of which runs two-and-a-half hours rather than the usual two, and at almost every turn, The Third Case bears out the advantages of a director allowing himself more time to make connections and think things through. Kolanu still pushes onwards at some clip through the genre's inevitable exposition, and he actively accelerates into his setpieces, such as a Maoist attack on a police station, the likes of which can't have featured in many films made after 1974. Yet he's also armed himself with the valuable weapon of suspense, as in one early sequence that deftly intercuts between simultaneous raids on three suspects' properties. (Cases one and two implied Kolanu had been bingeing CSI on his downtime; The Third Case suggests he's sat down with The Silence of the Lambs, which is very definitely an upgrade.) The latter comes during a first half that packs the livewire Sarkaar off to Kashmir, this of all moments, and while one might question the delicacy of this - doubly so when our man begins throwing his weight around in Muslim-owned workshops loaded with buzzsaws and sharp objects besides - for the very first time in the whole series, the B-movie material starts to take on an electrifying edge: we're watching a bull set loose not in a china shop, but mortally contested territory. Should Kolanu have set up permanent basecamp there? Instead, with the restlessness of the modern mass movie, he turns away from the real world and into the realms of the virtual. This case's primary site of interest turns out to be a dark website, something like Facebook for sickos, found organising its annual, bloody in-person knees-up. (The dress code - white tuxedo - would appear somewhat impractical, given the levels of arterial spray occasioned; a Pacamac would be a better suggestion.)

Even here, though, that curious "Dr." appellation Kolanu affords himself comes to make sense, for The Third Case ventures beyond this series' prevailing interest in crime-scene forensics to offer its own multiplex science lesson. Cut to the quick, those first two cases were if anything too lean for their own good - they looked and played like TV movies, Frankensteined together from the body parts of a dozen other procedurals. In The Third Case, the blood has time to pool and clot, and the material attains the density and walloping heft of the pulp the HITs have perhaps always aspired to be. You see it - clearly now - in the regular recurrence of prime pulp images: Sarkaar standing with a killer's knife wedged in his torso, in the headlights of an abandoned breakdown truck; the rhyme encoded in the cop's everyday patrol outfit (stubby cigar, baseball bat used to clout ne'er-do-wells); a juxtaposition between bloodsoaked hero and a gladiatorial portrait adorning the walls of a Burmese palace. Kolanu even allows himself flickers of pulp wit: balancing rhymes, involving three separate locations in the film's second half and Sarkaar being stabbed in the exact same spot. (Blood upon blood.) There is much you could choose to be queasy about amid this gory impasto: a love song where Sarkaar prowls the corridors of a sleeper train, trying to find somewhere unoccupied to fuck one of his academy students; a sublimated sex scene between the detective and a female sociopath. We're always aware we're watching an especially baroque form of copaganda, as if the Law & Order franchise had been wrestled out of Dick Wolf's hands by a shiv-wielding Takashi Miike. Yet where the first two films struggled to generate much beyond shrugs, The Third Case has plenty to make you shudder, jolt and spill your popcorn; when it's not thrashing around like a wild beast, it pulses and throbs as keenly as a flesh wound. Suddenly, out of nowhere - struck whether by the lightning bolt of creative inspiration, or detailed notes from a committed producer-star - this series is alive. It's alive!

HIT: The Third Case is now showing in selected cinemas.