Top 10 films at the UK box office (for the weekend of June 18-20, 2021):
My top five:
1. Judas and the Black Messiah
Top 10 films at the UK box office (for the weekend of June 18-20, 2021):
The succès de scandale of 1992, Basic Instinct confirmed its Dutch émigré director Paul Verhoeven as Hollywood's new leading envelope-pusher, while elevating female lead Sharon Stone - briefly noted as Arnie's duplicitous wife in Verhoeven's 1990 hit Total Recall - to international notoriety. The murder of a rockstar in flagrante delicto brings suspicion on his on-off girlfriend Catherine Tramell (Stone), a bisexual novelist whose last pulp effort ("Love Hurts") detailed the murder of a rockstar by his own girlfriend. Chief among the detectives working the case is Nick "Shooter" Curran (Michael Douglas), a reformed alcoholic lurching off the wagon again following an incident which resulted in the shooting of several tourists. Enough parallels are set up between cop and suspected killer ("she's as crazy as you are, Curran") for us to grab a feel for where this is going; sure enough, Tramell starts to get inside Curran's head, by getting both her front and back bottoms out repeatedly, and thereafter to lead the better part of San Francisco's predominantly male police force around by their dicks.
Foremost among the many hot-potato topics the film set up for discussion (Hollywood homophobia, Douglas and Jeanne Tripplehorn's near-rape scene, the pricelessly scratty V-neck gardening jumper Douglas wears to go to a gay bar) was whether Catherine Tramell's free-and-easy sexuality should be a cause for celebration or not. Her pen name Catherine Woolf suggests a certain sisterly kinship with the great suffering scribes of the past, although as a creation of Verhoeven and screenwriter Joe Eszterhas, who would go on to give the world the provocation-too-far that was 1995's Showgirls, it's almost inevitable she should have to manipulate men more with her crotch than she does with her mind, and - as it were - show her workings while she goes about it. Detach film from residual brouhaha, and what Verhoeven and Eszterhas were serving up here was a sort of lipsmacking trash cocktail, tossing handfuls of pulp cliches (the renegade detective, the killer blonde, the streets of San Francisco) into a blender along with multiple red herrings and a whole lot of wry, postmodern irony.
Every last one of its central figures - Douglas's dumb dick, Stone's femme fatale, even George Dzundza's eminently disposable sidekick - is someone who knows the role they're meant to be playing, and sets about playing it accordingly. So much of the dialogue could have been ripped from La Tramell's potboilers that the characters start to joke about it; the mirror above the novelist's bed is there specifically so she and her conquests can watch themselves fuck; Dzundza even appears to react to the killer's fatal assault on him before that assault has been made. The film is nothing if not acutely self-aware, which distinguishes it from what preceded and followed it. According to Verhoeven - who demonstrates a tiny touch of class by casting Dorothy Malone from The Big Sleep as one of his more illustrious red herrings - knowledge (and knowingness) is power, and power is immensely seductive. There's probably something to be said in favour of the old-school, non-ironic erotic thriller, for films that don't sport the prophylactic quotation marks Verhoeven and Eszterhas wrap around every frame of theirs, but there's still a certain pleasure to be taken from their approach: it's horny Agatha Christie, basically, a Columbo in an even grubbier mac, tumbling squarely into the category of Glossy Nonsense That Still Just About Works.
As is often the case in Verhoeven films, everybody's been coached to give their all. Initiating a run of choices that spawned a thousand Troubled Masculinity thinkpieces, Douglas flounts Hollywood protocol by briefly getting his front bottom out, if that's your wrinkly old bag; Stone's smirk launched a career that had its moments (Casino, The Mighty); while Verhoeven displays a funny but endearing thing for portly and/or sleazy-looking character actors (Dzundza, Daniel von Bargen, Jack McGee, Wayne Knight). The sexiest element here, Tripplehorn's insouciant shrink, deserves neither the Reader's Wives backstory of college lesbianism nor her third-act turn in the hallway, and the actress merited her own substantial career boost off the back of it, but then Waterworld was going to help nobody. Its legacy was a brief explosion of pricey sex romps with A-list performers: Douglas almost repeated the success, alongside Demi Moore, with 1994's Disclosure, but the less said about the exertions of Madonna (Body of Evidence, 1992), Bruce Willis (Color of Night, 1994), or even Stone's own tardy attempt to rekindle the magic with 2006's Basic Instinct 2, the better.
(March 2008)
Basic Instinct is now available in a 4K Collector's Edition Blu-Ray through StudioCanal.
As and when the world finally emerges from the pandemic, we may find ourselves in a new golden age for American screen musicals, as audiences who endured the Depression and World War II did before us. By the end of this year, we'll hopefully have witnessed Steven Spielberg's Covid-delayed West Side Story rejig, and if Spielberg - with his lightning-rod instincts for the desires of the common cinemagoer - has sensed the time is right to revisit the musical form, then something's definitely in the air. (A need for escapism, perhaps; for movement and communal joy.) In the meantime, we have In the Heights, which is Hollywood investing in the Lin-Manuel Miranda back catalogue in the wake of Hamilton's blockbusting stage success. (Movie string theory posits there is a reality in which the pandemic was a short blip or never happened, allowing last year's film of Hamilton to play in cinemas and razzle-dazzle its way to multiple Academy Awards.) The new film is notable for two apparent shortcomings, neither of which necessarily counts against it. Firstly, the near-complete absence of anything like a conventional dramatic core - or, more precisely, how Miranda (and Quiara Alegría Hudes, who wrote the original book and adapts here) swapped out monolithic story for something more polyphonic: a series of sketches and postcards from the streets of latter-day Washington Heights in uptown New York.
Miranda's multi-ethnic leads are presented with minor obstacles they have to sing and dance around, like the traffic snarl-ups reported by hunky cab dispatcher Benny (Corey Hawkins). For boyish bodega owner Usnavi (Anthony Ramos, veteran of Hamilton and Netflix's She's Gotta Have It), it's the inability to voice his affections for regular customer Vanessa (Melissa Barrera); for Vanessa, it's the credit checks standing between her and her preferred fashion major. Also navigating collegial woes - and this is very much a movie for kids who've grown up on Glee and are now wondering what comes next - is a coltish belle named Nina (Leslie Grace), who's been feeling out of place at Stamford, and has returned home so as to figure out where to go from here. (Even this hardly feels like life-or-death, given that she has a rocksolid Jimmy Smits on hand as Latin America's most supportive dad.) Nobody's gentrifying the area or threatening to shut down the youth club; there aren't enough Caucasians, let alone white supremacists, present to ignite a race war, which is why critical comparisons to Do the Right Thing feel more than a little offbeam. The centering of Usnavi's bodega and an adjacent beauty salon actually gives In the Heights the feel of a PG-rated variant of Kevin Smith's Clerks, or the Wayne Wang-Paul Auster collaboration Blue in the Face: it's happy just to hang out and hear these characters out, the better to point them in the right direction come the inevitable second half.
The other so-called shortcoming relates to In the Heights' standing as less a story than a love song to a place and its people. Miranda has a curious knack for writing songs that are highly dynamic and/or pleasant to listen to in the moment, but impossible to recall on the long walk back to the bus stop. They're like Alka-Seltzers: they go plink-plink-fizz, generate wonderful sounds and spectacle, and when you go back to them an hour later, there's next to nothing there. (I loved Hamilton, but I'll be darned if I could tell you what any given number was called, let alone quote their lyrics or hum the melody.) I think that's in some part because he writes songs not as showstopping setpieces, rather as ongoing conversations between characters, part of (in this instance) the ebb-and-flow of Washington Heights streetlife. They're exposition, rather than elaboration. The crucial thing is, from what I can now remember of sitting down in front of In the Heights, they are dynamic, and they are often very pleasant to hear out - and there is an argument that the songs in In the Heights demonstrate a range that the later Hamilton could only underline. Yes, we get Miranda's now-signature, Eminem-lite raps for Usnavi and his boys; but also a saucy chorus of beauticians speculating on the size of Benny's stretch limousine, and thereby nudging us back in the direction of both the ultra-Caucasian Grease and Grace Jones's "Pull Up to the Bumper". We get a mass torch song to mark the passing of a village elder; and the kind of aspirational anthems that are what I imagine the slower songs on the Olivia Rodrigo album would sound like. (Cannot confirm, because any fortysomething male downloading said album would likely wind up on some kind of register somewhere.)
The director, Jon M. Chu, is no Spielberg, but a self-effacing pro who cut his teeth on those Step Up danceathons, did a surprisingly likable job with the Justin Bieber documentary, and - buoyed by the commercial success of these and 2018's Crazy Rich Asians - now gets to recreate elaborate Busby Berkeley manoeuvres with hundreds of extras at one of uptown Manhattan's municipal swimming pools. The "municipal" there - with its inference of general access - is key to what In the Heights is going for. A post-crash proposition, it's not selling the glamour or exclusivity those Thirties musicals were, as signalled by Miranda's onscreen cameo as a street vendor whose cry is "keep scraping by". There's an element of conservatism - and knowing your place - in that, as there was a calculated element of centrism about Hamilton, a show that had to be very careful to entice middle-aged theatreland habitués to shell out $100 a ticket in return for an evening of semi-raucous hip-hop. Usnavi is characterised as a good boy who ultimately has to abandon his dreams of chilling on an idyllic-looking beach in the D.R. in order to reopen his shop and do his bit for the economy. Yet Chu's direction of bodies in motion - his celebration of whatever mobility these characters have - is enough to move his players and us past that potential stumbling block. He shoots full frames, with as few cuts as possible, the better to showcase Christopher Scott's very fine choreography; and in the final moments, he arrives at a real, quietly affecting movie flourish, watching Nina and Benny dance their way up the side of a building, as Fred Astaire did in 1951's Royal Wedding: two kids who by dint of their ethnicity wouldn't stand a chance of occupying centre stage in a Hollywood musical eighty years ago, suddenly defying gravity in a way only our better musicals permit.
In the Heights is now playing in cinemas nationwide.
The new indie comedy Shiva Baby is Messy Women: Kosher Edition, or Messy Girl, if you wanted to get all Streisand about it. Its young Jewish heroine Danielle (Rachel Sennott) is introduced via a session of sex work with the sugar daddy she's tapping to put herself through college; she's evidently rubbing against the Hasidic grain long before her parents (Fred Melamed and Polly Draper) call her away to attend a shiva where she's not entirely certain who's died. The bulk of the film plays out at this wake, which just so happens to be attended by Maya (Molly Gordon), a female ex with whom the bisexual Danielle has unfinished business; by the sugar daddy we've just met (Danny Deferrari); by his wife (Glee's Dianna Agron, the image of the skinny blonde shiksa); and by their beautiful, albeit teething newborn baby. Stop me when the humiliation gets enough: the formality of the occasion - every bit the equal of the opening cocktail party in The Graduate, or the funeral at which Alan Partridge reached new heights of prattiness - is only compounded by that awkwardness Danielle has visited upon herself. The big close-ups by which writer-director Emma Seligman seeks to disguise fairly modest resources suggest too many damn people in the same small space. Still, rather than slip through a sidedoor and away into the night, Danielle resolves to style her embarrassment out, and to try and make this event work for her. It's just the walls seem to be closing in, frame by frame. And - oy - do we ever feel it.
The film, thankfully, has the sharpest of elbows: it cuts through, like the extruding nail on which Danielle punctures herself mid-shiva, as if all this weren't agony enough. (There is something so telling about the way she later runs a finger over the wound the nail leaves on her flank: here is a gal who can't leave trouble alone, who will always find a means of making a messy situation worse.) Shiva Baby began life as a short, and it's been extended to just the right length to serve as a statement of directorial intent. Any more of it, and it might have felt like agony for us, too; at 77 minutes, however, we can be reassured this might merely be a phase this character is passing through. And what a character: Danielle is one of the few truly original creations American movies have given us in recent years. That achievement is down in part to Sennott's quiveringly defiant presence, at once irrepressibly naughty and alarmingly naive; that's why we cheer for Danielle and worry for her simultaneously. She has some of the right ideas on how to improve her station in life (and in this house, which gets so crowded it comes to stand for life), but also many of the wrong ones, and she's going about some of the right ones in the wrong way. Still, even as she forgets her phone - and forgets herself - she juts out her jaw, gathers up an armoury of scowls and sullen looks, and steels herself to meet an indifferent world head on, and Seligman has enlisted a small army of great Jewish character actors to represent this very small, ever more constrictive circle. (You've not been walled in until you've been walled in by Fred Melamed.) It's arrived late in the messy-women cycle - and I know that the comedy of embarrassment is always going to be too excruciating for some - but Shiva Baby does carve out its own space, and any built-in suffering has been very carefully and precisely calibrated. Ariel Marx's score plucks as playfully on violin and cello strings as the movie does on your nerves, while Seligman frequently gets a relief-valve laugh just from an inspired framing, as in her coda, with its perfectly Jewish punchline: even when these characters make their excuses and leave, there can be no easy escape.
Shiva Baby is now playing at London's Ciné Lumière, and streaming via MUBI.
The idea of a cinematic correspondence isn't a new one. A short-lived series of documentaries going under the name Correspondences found leading arthouse thinkers swapping letters, images and thoughts in the course of the one movie: 2011's May-to-December pairing of Jonas Mekas and José Luis Guerín was followed, in 2016, by a sequel that made penpals of veterans Victor Erice and Abbas Kiarostami. Available on MUBI from today, the new short Correspondence is entirely its own thing, but it feels like an attempt to revive the format, this time bringing together emergent female directors: the Chilean Dominga Sotomayor, who made 2012's Thursday Till Sunday and 2018's Too Late to Die Young, and the Spaniard Carla Simón, who made one of the most impressive debuts in recent times with 2017's Summer 1993. (I feel compelled to note that these women have been funded to correspond for barely twenty minutes, where their male predecessors got the full ninety.) In a mixture of handscrawled onscreen text and sundappled Super-8 - clearly, now, the sketchpaper of choice for filmmakers everywhere (see Alice Rohrwacher's Four Roads, another recent MUBI acquisition) - Simón breaks the news that she lost her last remaining grandparent over the summer of 2019, and shares recollections of the time she spent with grandma before her death. (The soundtrack buzzes with words that passed between them, often kindly, sometimes taut: a correspondence within a correspondence.) This prompts Sotomayor, who speaks her own narration, into remembering her own grandmother, a filmmaker in her own right. (Extracts from her short films appear as modern as any of the more contemporary footage.) She also considers her relationship with her mother, whom we see appearing in a campaign video for the NO vote that finally overthrew the Pinochet regime in 1988.
That title, then, has a dual meaning. It refers to both those scraps (of paper, film, memory, wisdom) Simón and Sotomayor pass down and along, and the resemblance these women bear to those who came before them. Perhaps inevitably, this raises the question of motherhood, as the filmmakers look back on the women who raised them (there's scant evidence of fathers in the picture; Simón's backstory has clear echoes of Summer 1993), and consider whether they, too, might want to have children - someone who might remember them this fondly some forty or fifty years hence. For now, it seems, they're most closely wedded to their cameras: "Is it possible to make films and have children?," Simón wonders aloud at one point. (A fortysomething filmmaker would doubtless answer that question in the affirmative; but one suspects plenty of directorial offspring would offer their own qualifications and caveats.) At any rate, the idea of correspondence is here reclaimed as a means of extending a hand to the future - a way of working out where you're heading, and allowing the words and thoughts of others to guide you in that pursuit. This Correspondence gets very deep very quickly, although in its final moments, internal communication gets overtaken by external events, Sotomayor training her camera on the civil unrest that broke out in Chile in October 2019, as the country's youth took to the streets in pursuit of their own brighter future. As we know now, a pandemic was lying in wait around the corner for all these correspondents, but I hope Simón and Sotomayor have continued to stay in touch, and that they'll allow us to eavesdrop on them again from time to time.
Correspondence is now streaming via MUBI.
The last of this year's major Oscar winners to be set before UK audiences is a dementia narrative - but it's a dementia narrative with a twist. (Multiple twists, in fact, for better and worse.) Florian Zeller's adaptation of his own stage success The Father plays out, mostly around the one set, as something like a distractible Sleuth, a Deathtrap of the mind, putting the viewer in a place that represents an increasingly befuddled protagonist's headspace, and then setting us to wonder whether we, too, are losing our marbles. The place is the capacious Maida Vale flat of a retired engineer called Anthony (Anthony Hopkins), and it's apparently been decked out by the same interior designers who furnished the couple's flat-cum-sepulchre in Michael Haneke's Amour. Here's where the confusion starts. We enter in the company of Anthony's daughter Anne (Olivia Colman), who arrives to a) reprimand dad for scaring off a new nurse, and b) to gently break the news that she's leaving the UK to live in Paris with her new French lover; if Anthony doesn't behave himself around the next carer, she insists, she'll be left with no choice but to put him in a home. A scene break follows, and then Anthony's pottering is interrupted by Paul (Mark Gatiss), a diffident fellow with a vague Northern accent, who claims to be Anne's husband of ten years, and that this flat belongs to him and his wife; when this Anne comes through the door with bags of shopping, it's in the form of Olivia Williams. (One Olivia for another: it's less radical recasting than an agreeable substitution in an Ocado delivery box.) Zeller, clearly, is keen to destabilise this world, and to dramatise the dereliction of a once-fixed mind; the unusually provisional bonds between Anthony and these interlopers both mimic and mock those neural connections breaking down inside the lead character's head.
This bewilderment has been pulled off with unarguable skill by collaborators with impeccable credentials. Zeller, making his feature directorial debut after a much-laurelled stage career in his native France, sets a particular mood from the off, chiefly by scheduling most scenes to take place between twilight and dusk. (We ask: where has the day gone? And then: where have this man's days gone?) Christopher Hampton, the most illustrious of script associates, has punched up the mindgames, setting certain phrases to circle these rooms and heighten the general discombobulation. And then there is Hopkins, Oscar-garlanded once more. It isn't just the name: everything else about Anthony fits Hopkins' recent screen persona - that air of dotty distractibility that has crept into his repertoire, finding its most crowdpleasing expression in the actor's Instagram posts - like a finely tailored glove. Here is serious range: fluidly and persuasively, he shifts between states of confusion, tetchy and evasive with Colman, dippily charming around replacement nurse Imogen Poots, capable of both raging at the dying light and weeping like a child in the face of it. If The Father succeeds in shaking off elements of its earlier theatricality, it's because there are sequences where this flat appears to develop its own weather system, and it's Hopkins who conjures that system into existence. He's sunshine and light one minute, nothing but dark clouds ten minutes later - and in between there are long spells where this performance is ominously still. (Hopkins deserved the Oscar just for the extraordinary control he exerts over his own face, as finely tuned here as any thermostat.)
And yet ultimately, and for all the virtuosity in evidence, I was never quite as moved by The Father as advance word suggested I might have been. The ratio of smarts to emotion felt skewed to me; the film inserts Meccano where the reserves of empathy would normally go in a narrative such as this, and while I could admire the construction, the joists and cogs and pulleys in this script - the meticulous grand design of Zeller's storytelling - kept getting between me and these characters. Once you work out that at least some of those figures are figments of an unravelling imagination, it's simply very hard to know where to invest your sympathies. Granted, that issue becomes a little clearer the further in we get, but the film's appeal is still largely ludic: for much of the running time, we're invited to furrow our brows and work out which of these interactions are real (which is to say trustworthy within Zeller's fiction), and which are merely a consequence of the protagonist's loose screws. The rugpulling ramps up anew in the third act, building towards a final reveal that - for all the visible trappings of QBC (Quality British Cinema) - is pure B-movie. Sporadically, the actors cut through the chicanery, peel back some of the scaffolding. Colman's smile upon realising her dad is compos mentis when he tells her her hair looks nice will stay with me, as will a final flurry of Hopkins' most punchdrunk close-ups. But I found the rest far more self-contained and stuffy than I was expecting, given the emotive responses of friends and colleagues to it: an intellectual exercise premised on the death of the intellect, a well-crafted puzzle that's never allowed to get too far out of its box.
The Father opens today in cinemas nationwide.
As we enter Pride month, another reminder that not everyone gets to celebrate so freely. With I Am Samuel, the Kenyan documentarist Peter Murimi offers an hour-long study of a sporty Nairobi resident, Samuel, as he approaches the first anniversary of his relationship with another man, Alex. Approaches with understandable caution, that is. After all, this is a country where homosexuality is still on the books as a crime that carries a 14-year jail sentence; the law of the street, more punitive yet, is represented by a chilling sliver of smartphone footage that shows a gay friend of Samuel's being stripped and brutally beaten by a baying mob. The tension only mounts as Samuel returns home to Western Kenya, to visit traditionalist parents who are still expecting their son to take a wife - and one suspects this is exactly the kind of patriarchal backwater where an archaic phrase like that might still be in regular usage. It's here that we learn the full extent of the convolutions Samuel has been forced into so as to conceal his true sexuality from onlookers, and of the complications that seem likely to keep him from coming out even to loved ones for the immediate future.
Much as Samuel seems to live life in two different places - the country, under the yoke of his parents' expectations; and the city, where he appears freer to be himself, albeit within the limits of his own or a friend's house - the film operates on two levels simultaneously. In part, I Am Samuel is a portrait of everyday Kenyan life: Murimi watches Samuel hanging out with pals, cooking, cleaning, working, doing the bare essentials. (The gentle suggestion is that Samuel's lifestyle isn't so far removed from that of any other Kenyan - though he may very well be the only person on the whole planet to combine the twin professions of labourer and netball trainer.) Yet this filmmaker isn't blind to the pressures his subject is living under; that viral video clip is inserted at an early juncture to serve as a threat, one that hangs heavy over everything that follows. Perhaps unexpectedly, those pressures are felt all the more during those sequences shot around Samuel's family home. Did Samuel's parents ever ask why Murimi had brought a camera crew to their house? Did Murimi stop to think whether he was pushing Samuel's terse father too hard on the question of his son's status? Alex, who comes to stay out this way as (per Samuel's mother) "a friend of Samuel's", is warned by his sister that his own father, appalled by news of his son's sexuality, may have hired goons "to teach him a lesson". Given the heightened tension in the air, you might want a more decisive third act - but then I'm sure Murimi would insist that, for Kenyans like Samuel and Alex, the future is yet to be decided. At any rate, he directs with insight and economy, and a gift for brisk portraiture, shooting just enough coverage to convey a sense of a place and the people living there. In the final moments, we follow Alex as he sets out through the streets of Samuel's birthplace in a game of hide-and-seek: a relaxation rather than a resolution, but also a shrewd reflection of what gay Kenyans have been having to do all these years.
I Am Samuel livestreams at 7.30pm tonight and tomorrow via Bohemia Euphoria; it will be available to rent from Monday via the BFI Player.