Wednesday, 12 April 2023

On demand: "Sr."


If you know of Robert Downey Sr. at this stage, it'll likely be for one or more of the following things: 1) the run of low-budget, offbeat-to-offbeam, quietly influential comedies he wrote and directed at the turn of the 1970s, most prominently 1969's adland satire Putney Swope; 2) his billing as "Robert Downey Sr. (a prince)" on the credits of Paul Thomas Anderson's early works; 3) his status as father to - you guessed it - Robert Downey Jr. An aptly irreverent profile of a prince in his final years (Downey Sr. died aged 85 in 2021, from complications with Parkinson's), Sr. finds the documentarist Chris Smith with his hands well and truly full. Smith's breakthrough doc, 1999's American Movie, centred on folks who had as little idea what to do behind the camera as they did standing in front of it. Here, the filmmaker finds himself being outmanoeuvred on two fronts: by a seasoned sometime director (Sr.), who has his own ideas of how a movie on his life and work ought to be framed, and then again by a relentless performer (Jr., here as a producer and middleman) who's always 'on', and generally enjoys hamming it up. We have the father to blame for this, we learn: St. gave the then five-year-old Jr. his first onscreen role in 1970's Pound, an eccentric quasi-prison flick that cast human performers in the roles of canines sequestered by the authorities. Sr. also gave Jr. the line "Does he have hair on his balls?" What follows over these ninety minutes is a film in which a child of the industry confronts one of his parents over a turbulent shared past: a countercultural The Fabelmans, if you will, its narrative newly littered with empty beer bottles, pills and wraps.

Amid the film's own tumult - and some part of this production visibly overlapped with Covid - a lot of worthwhile information and emotion is conveyed; it's a cherishably rare case of many cooks only adding to the richness of the broth. For starters, Sr. gives us an informed idea of the scene and places Downey emerged from, and the work that he did. (It benefits from the fact most of RDS's films have neither been widely available nor analysed to death: the images and ideas behind them strike us as fresh.) Smith makes some inroads into Downey's singular, somewhat guarded character: not even Tony Stark can blast the whole truth out of him, but he's often dryly funny in his observations. (Watching Jr. clown around with Sean Hayes at the piano, Sr. comments "it all looks sweetly narcissistic".) The film is never less than candid about its subject's seniority and infirmity: the tremors, aches and pains that disrupt the physical labour of filmmaking, the sessions of physio for a condition that will eventually leave Sr. bedbound. And after all the shits and giggles, Smith leaves us with the sight of a communion: a father and son united at the end, reviewing a life eventfully lived with a humour that reflects well on the pair of them. Jr. may be the only creative who's emerged from his MCU obligations with both his reputation and likability intact; the frankness with which he discusses his addiction issues, and the part his father had to play in those issues, speaks to years of top-dollar therapy, but it's also instructive in many ways. (You too could quit abusing your body and become a prominent superhero of your age - or, you know, a functional human.) Where Sr. matches American Movie is in the filming of an evident aura of love and affection - the love and affection that, in this instance, allows family members to broach any conversational topic without fear of judgement, and which steers them towards understanding, both of their own wayward steps and the stumbles of those around them. There would be worse places to arrive at in your twilight years; there are worse places to arrive at in middle age.

Sr. is currently streaming on Netflix.

Monday, 10 April 2023

"The Pope's Exorcist" (Guardian 10/04/23)


The Pope’s Exorcist **

Dir: Julius Avery. With: Russell Crowe, Daniel Zovatto, Alex Essoe, Franco Nero. 103 mins. Cert: 15

Hustled out over Easter without press screenings, Julius Avery’s papal potboiler derives brisk if well-trodden hokum from the writings of Father Gabriele Amorth, the Vatican’s demonslayer-in-chief between 1986 and 2016. The film’s Amorth is a wry old pro, finding the levity in a devilishly tricky day job; not unhelpfully, he’s played by Russell Crowe, alternating gruff Italian and Italianate English, and possibly eyeing the prospect of a late-career franchise-slash-retirement plan. Crowe is by far the film’s strongest suit, pre-empting (some of) our gigglier responses and mitigating against (some of) the material’s flimsiness. We still have movie stars, even if the pictures thrown up around them are getting smaller, staler and sillier.

Crowe’s Amorth is pulled away from Dan Brown-ish Vatican politicking to attend a gloomy San Sebastian abbey being renovated (in vain) by single parent Julia (Alex Essoe). Here, things are going bump in the night, chiefly Julia’s son Henry (Peter DeSouza-Feighoney), possessed by a pesky demon who scratches “GOD IS NOT HERE” on his host’s chest as if it were an “I’m with Stoopid”-like T-shirt slogan. Only Father Gabriele is a worthy enough opponent: propelling an earnest local cleric (Daniel Zovatto) across an adjoining corridor, Henry’s demon bellows “Wrong fucking priest!”, with the voice of Finchy from The Office, for extra chuckles. The subsequent growl-off is something like The Exorcist redone as a Tik-Tok video.

Despite the presence of Franco Nero, enlisted for a few days’ frowning as a non-specific Pope, there’s zero remaining trace of theological seriousness, even after the demon-baiting gets paused so genial Gabriele can unearth the abbey’s long-buried secret. Dim lighting only partially obscures the secondhand possession-movie imagery, but Avery at least keeps everything moving, which elevates this above those sluggish Conjuring films. Racing towards its splattery finale, it just about qualifies as lively schlock, and is likely your one chance to see Crowe in flowing robes piloting a Vespa to the strains of Faith No More; add a half-star if you’re attending in a state of advanced refreshment.

The Pope's Exorcist is now showing in cinemas nationwide.

Friday, 7 April 2023

For what it's worth...




Top ten films at the UK box office (for the weekend of March 31-April 2, 2023):

2 (1) John Wick: Chapter 4 (15)
3 (new) Mummies (U)
4 (2) Shazam! Fury of the Gods (12A)
5 (3) Creed III (12A) ***
6 (4) Scream VI (18)
8 (5) Allelujah (12A)
9 (7) 65 (12A)
10 (10) Rye Lane (15) ***

(source: BFI)

My top five:
1. Three Colours White [above]
5. Top Hat


DVD/Blu-Ray/Download top ten: 

1 (2) Roald Dahl's Matilda: the Musical (PG)
2 (1) A Man Called Otto (15)
3 (7) Top Gun: Maverick (12) ****
4 (new) Cocaine Bear (15)
6 (8) John Wick: Chapter 2 (15) ***
7 (9) John Wick (15) ***
8 (4) Elvis (12) **
9 (6) Babylon (18)
10 (5Black Adam (12)


My top five: 
1. Saint Omer
3. Living


Top five films on terrestrial TV this week:
1. The Graduate (Easter Monday, BBC2, 9.45pm)
2. Sexy Beast (Saturday, Channel 4, 12.35am)
3. Passport to Pimlico (Easter Monday, BBC2, 11.20am)
4. The Lavender Hill Mob (Easter Monday, BBC2, 10am)
5. The Sound of Music (Easter Sunday, BBC1, 1.50pm)

Bigger than Jesus: "Monty Python's Life of Brian"


Once scandalous - once, even, banned outright in Aberystwyth - 1979's Monty Python's Life of Brian returns to a multiplex near you this Easter weekend, carrying its newish 12A certificate. That might suggest the film has somehow been tamed by time. In fact, confirming its status as among the great screen comedies, it's all still thrillingly alive; even its trickier, more dated elements enter into lively conversation with the concerns and hang-ups of our present moment. Much of this was built in from the off. Its prime movers were smart-arsed Oxbridge mischief makers who by this point knew full well how to make an audience snort and titter, to grab and goose our attention, but who also now wanted to make us think, and possibly give us something to argue about as we filed towards the car park. Watching Life of Brian in 2023, you become aware of five distinct comic sensibilities (six, if you include Gilliam, whose opening credits offer their own take on the haphazard way stories are constructed) arguing among themselves. Some of its jokes are, in satirical terms, universal; others betray a particular ideological leaning or bias. (Brian, of course, is betrayed both by the Roman establishment and the revolutionary Left, the splitters.) It invites interpretation as at once countercultural and iron-willed, sending on an unsmiling Colonel of a joke (or just Cleese) whenever matters get too silly. All the Pythons have at some point to take a backseat, watching as their handiwork gets hijacked by whoever was responsible for that wholly gratuitous Star Wars nod everybody forgets; someone scribbles in an Antonioni joke in the closing seconds. Rather than have the last word on the Bible, as some insisted, the movie achieved something more lasting: it set an agenda for the fractious debate that followed.

Traces of a very boysy, very Seventies strain of thinking remain. It's not blasphemous, as the era's angrier faces alleged: this script takes care to set up Brian's story in parallel to whatever is going on offscreen with JC. But there are places where the prevailing irreverence rubs up against a certain insensitivity. Having an actual woman in the writers' tent (rather than men gamely dragging up as women) might have taken the edge off the throwaway invocations of rape; the speech impediment business feels overdone; and there's an early running joke - about the genesis of Brian's nose - that I'm still unsure about, partly because I can't quite untangle its thinking. Is it funny? Antisemitic? Subtler than that, for better or worse? (A misogynist crack at Brian's mother?) Equally, there are superb jokes that only this rowdy mob could have come up with. The "Romans Go Home" scene, with its glorious reveal of an entire fort turned into a blackboard, is exactly what you take away from private schooling, along with years of emotional repression. The crucifixion itself hinges upon Eric Idle's cheerily mollifying presence, singlehandedly reshaping a bummer ending into a payoff for the ages. They were lucky, heading into movies just as comedies begat hits and movies in turn spent money on comedy: it got them non-British (Tunisian) skies, detailed sets and the extras to fill them, scale for that final sequence. But they were solely responsible for the film's bustling density of jokes. If after years of culture-war piffle, you feel disinclined to debate them at length, you could instead pick and choose your favourite performer. Chapman's frazzled reticence is just right for Brian, but Palin underlines his claim to being this group's McCartney, able to play anything: aggressive Twerp on the Mount, long-time prisoner, befuddled philosopher, caring-sharing Roman officer, and most memorably of all, the immortal Pontius Pilate, defending the good name of his old friend Biggus Dickus. Something for everyone, even today.

Monty Python's Life of Brian returns to selected cinemas from today; it is also available to stream via Netflix, and on DVD/Blu-Ray through Sony Pictures.

Thursday, 6 April 2023

Up in the air: "Superman"


Richard Donner's 1978 adaptation of DC Comics' Superman returns to the big screen this weekend, marking its 45th anniversary. If that seems an odd milestone to commemorate, well, a) maybe Earth will have gone the way of Krypton by 2028, and b) Warner Bros. and DC need to remind us this character is an ongoing concern, no matter that they've demonstrated little clue how best to deploy him since the turn of the millennium. Back in the immediate wake of Star Wars, however - and Superman's opening credits, soaring through the galaxy, betray a certain artistic debt, as does the lightsaber green of Kryptonite - there was no such problem. This was the psyched-up Salkind lads setting out their stall for a new franchise hope, and throwing a half-century of movie nous at the screen - everyone from Jackie Cooper, Trevor Howard and Glenn Ford to Marlon Brando, Gene Hackman and Mario Puzo (who did the story and a draft of the script, punched up by hip young Bonnie and Clyde gunslingers Newman and Benton) - in a predominantly successful attempt to sustain the idea that a man can fly. Only in the extended prologue - part Blake's 7, part neo-Biblical myth, with Brando and Susannah York in day-glo jumpsuits as Mr. and Mrs. Superman - do you still get a sense of what a gamble this would have been to invest in at the back end of the Seventies. Yes, George Lucas had demonstrated there was a market for out-of-this-world visual effects, but Superman pushes its buttons to wipe out an entire civilisation, and all but one of the characters to whom we're initially introduced. Right from the off, then, this is a comic-book movie with scale, stakes and strangeness, but its masterstroke was to choose the earthly over the intergalactic and virtual. The machines are kept what now seems like on a low hum thereafter, and as a result, it's an event movie from which you come away remembering the big skies and cornfields, the newsrooms and skyscrapers. (Not as yet phone boxes, although Christopher Reeve's Clark Kent rather ruefully eyes up an open payphone in one moment of crisis.)

You couldn't teach it as a smooth model of story construction - it existed in part to set up the events of Superman II, shot simultaneously - but here's what this Walter Mondale-era artefact still has over most of today's state-of-the-art wannabes: having painted in a narrative superstructure, it goes out of its way to look for signs of human life within it. It's the love triangle between Margot Kidder's Keaton/Fonda-ish Lois Lane, gentlemanly klutz Clark Kent (Reeve suggesting both that he'd been studying Cary Grant in his 1940s prime, and a man-or-superman fundamentally out of his time) and the latter's beefcake alter ego, who loses some viewer sympathy by apparently taking precious seconds to fix his kiss curl before saving the day. It's whatever the hell is going on between Hackman's Lex Luthor, Ned Beatty and Valerie Perrine in that tremendously appointed bunker beneath Grand Central Station. It's an unexpected snatch of Supertramp (very 1978) heard as Lois pulls up to the gas station just before the finale; it's a marvellous sight gag, worthy of the funniest comic books, involving a hood taking a crowbar to our hero's ironclad torso. With almost every beat, Superman reflects a moment when American cinema believed in people, and was as interested in people as it was in spectacle. It was interested in spectacle, too, but it was interested in the roles flesh-and-blood people could play amid such spectacle; that's why the super-finale - five 70s disaster movies for the price of one - works as well as it does. As a result, the spectacle is never allowed to overwrite and obliterate the smaller moments of magic. You get a natural high off the glowing close-ups as Superman takes Kidder's Lois for an aerial spin around downtown Metropolis, and it's stirring indeed in 2023 to encounter a sequence in the middle of a blockbuster that is as lyrical as anything in, say, Top Hat or An American in Paris. It endures as a funny, romantic and charming entertainment, with - in the restored print - colours that properly pop: no actor has ever worn Spandex as handsomely as Reeve did here. There's been a lot of super-leaden fuss and nonsense since, but when Donner's film needs to, it still soars.

Superman returns to cinemas nationwide tomorrow; it is also available to rent via Prime Video and YouTube, and on DVD and Blu-Ray through Warner Bros.

Head in the clouds: "Weathering with You"


The release of Makoto Shinkai's Suzume next week is a very big thing indeed in anime circles, such that it's triggered a theatrical reissue of Shinkai's last two features, 2016's Your Name and 2019's Weathering with You. The framing-slash-hype thus far has been that Shinkai, 50, represents the heir apparent to the now 82-year-old Hayao Miyazaki, but this remains an idea that the former's features have only sporadically borne out. Shinkai undeniably has some measure of Miyazaki's artistry and delicacy, in particular a marked attention to environmental elements, although the films released here so far suggest the younger man is more urban fox than country mouse, and he demonstrates a zappy, poppy, 21st-century approach to storytelling you suspect the stately Miyazaki might frown upon in his grumpier moments. (Shinkai likes montages set to keening emo, and you can't imagine Miyazaki committing undue time - or, indeed, any time at all - to perfecting the look of an animated Big Mac.) My ongoing reservation is that Shinkai's films have emerged out of a modern YA sensibility, and thus can feel underdeveloped when set against the fully articulated, entirely universal works of art his illustrious predecessor has produced over the last half-century; in short, their maker still has some growing to do before he inherits the crown.

Weathering with You, which originally opened here just before lockdown, is Shinkai's take on the making-it-in-the-big-city narrative; the city, however, is a permanently drizzly near-future Tokyo, labouring under a climate ruined for outward-looking young sunbeams by the careless elders sploshing around them. The YA-ness here comes through most sharply in the dismissive description of those grown-ups, set in frowning opposition to fresh-faced heroes who represent the picture of innocence: Hodaka (voiced in the original Japanese version by Kotaro Daigo, and in the US dub by Brandon Engman), an editorial assistant for a disreputable urban myths website run by a serial philanderer, and Hina (Nana Mori, or Ashley Boettcher), the "sunshine girl" - so named for her supernatural ability to part the clouds - whom the upstanding Hodaka rescues from her pimp. This altogether melodramatic development shows Shinkai isn't afraid to broach the seamier side of life, but in the main, he comes across as a shy boy who's still somewhat awkward and squirmy around the subject of sex. (Listen to Hodaka as he waits on Hina's doorstep after the pair's initial encounter: "Could this be... the first time... I'm visiting... a girl's home?" Heaven help him if he ever gets to first base.) This integral naivety is as much limitation as boon, and Weathering with You doesn't do all that much to push back against the (debatable) notion that anime remains primarily kids' stuff, juvenilia designed to fill the days and nights of poppets who haven't yet got round to touching another person's bottom.

It's far happier with the U-rated stuff. Rapt attention is paid to the preparation of a lunchtime salad, an afternoon playing in the park with an adorable young relative, a mid-film pillow fight, the way the sky turns from drab grey to ebullient blue under Hina's redirection. For Shinkai, it's all about the simple things, and maybe that precludes the turbulence of adult relationships, or any conception of teenage life that isn't terminally dreamy - but Weathering with You is exactly that. Dramatically anaemic, too, in a way the great Miyazaki narratives never are: the wide-eyed first hour finds the characters waiting for a troubling formation of cumulonimbi to pull into position, so Shinkai can initiate the cloudbusting necessary for the slip-and-slide action of the movie's closing half-hour. As I, too, waited for the weather to turn, I found myself thinking not of Miyazaki, but of Hirokazu Kore-eda's lesser dramas, the ones that believe gentility alone is enough to sustain a two-hour entertainment. Weathering with You retains its minor charms: as a visual representation of a city bombarded by the elements, it's often very pretty. But it's perilously wet behind the ears; it's a surprise to learn something so soppy could be the work of a creative approaching his sixth decade on this planet. Even formally, Shinkai wards off those with bladders that predate the 1990s: you can't watch this much water sloshing around on screen without rushing out for a pee break every fifteen minutes.

Weathering with You is now playing in selected cinemas; the American dub is available to rent via Prime Video.

Wednesday, 5 April 2023

Another roll of the dice: "Dungeons & Dragons: Honour Among Thieves"


Some good news: it feels like just about the smallest challenge Hollywood could set itself at this point in its history, but the new
Dungeons & Dragons reboot, Honour Among Thieves, sails above the notoriously dire 2000 effort featuring an unhappy Thora Birch and an especially hammy Jeremy Irons. The new film requires similar ingredients, perhaps unsurprisingly - production design, bafflingly arbitrary special powers, orcs - and even sitting in the same room as it feels like dooming yourself to seven years of sexlessness. Yet writer-directors Jonathan Goldstein and John Francis Daley bring to the table sporadic flashes of the ludic wit that made their earlier Game Night such a blast, and they've at least tried to figure out ways to make randomised medieval roleplay palatable to a non-LARPing audience. This tale's an extended matter of childcare - or, as Vin Diesel puts it in those Fast & Furious movies from which Goldstein and Daley cop a few narrative licks (and a key cast member), faaaam-leee. Roguish thief Edgin (Chris Pine, probably now Hollywood's best Chris - another low bar - and definitely improving with age) escapes prison with Amazonian sidekick Holga (Michelle Rodriguez), and sets out to retrieve the now-teenage daughter he'd previously left in the custody of a criminal associate named Forge. The latter has broken truly bad in the meantime, setting himself up as both a Lord and a vengeful god; he's played by Hugh Grant - inheriting the Irons mantle of post-Rickman Anglo supervillain - who's had the mischievous wheeze of playing the part as Boris Johnson. Forge goes AWOL for the entire second act, preparing to take the credit for some kingdom-uniting sporting event at which he plans to do away with large numbers of his own people, effectively wedding the Johnson of 2012 with the Johnson of 2020.

That's one sliver of human interest to cling to as the movie winds its way through its two-and-a-quarter hours, but - while doubtless a sprint by real-world D&D standards - two-and-a-quarter hours is still a long time to dwell on a plot that depends on the whereabouts of The Thingummy of Doodah, that can fall back on fifty years of in-game fixes to get its characters out of a tight spot, invites us to invest in the exploits of an owl-bear hybrid, and still winds up with a city being shot to shit for the final 35 minutes. (It's a walled city this time, but still.) Somewhere en route, I got the sense of further bars being mechanically lowered. After the busted grand designs of the MCU, this looks very much like the American event movie reconnecting with that strain of tatty, post-Legend swords-and-sorcery screenfiller that was a staple of half-terms in the 1980s. Honour Among Thieves has had rather more money thrown at it, albeit not enough to pep up an underpowered supporting cast: the kids Pine and Rodriguez pick up (Justice Smith, Sophia Lillis) aren't as sparky as the middle hour needs them to be, while Regé-Jean Page appears terribly smug for a sometime Next Big Thing who's already being cast as Third Wizard from the Left. I will also grant you that it's been shot with altogether more dynamism and care than one might expect from a Dungeons & Dragons movie from the guys behind the Horrible Bosses films. What's still vaguely depressing about it - and I'll confess to experiencing the same sinking feeling I felt watching the first Pirates of the Caribbean movie - is that you can already map out exactly where this series is heading. They'll make a bunch of these now, helmed by creatives for whom the gig is no more than a moderately fat paycheque, and interest will wane accordingly. We've been there before; we're going there again. What's up on screen this week is harmless enough fluff that will kill time before the fully grown blockbusters come round again, but which can only truly be considered good when set against the meagre standards of the earlier D&D disaster. Still, it struck me about an hour in: there may be no more prominent recent example of the kind of thing we critics are meant just to let folks enjoy. So, y'know: have at it, as you will, whatever.

Dungeons & Dragons: Honour Among Thieves is now playing in cinemas nationwide.