Friday, 7 October 2022

Threads: "Mrs. Harris Goes to Paris"


Mrs. Harris Goes to Paris
 presents as a cherishable rarity, which may well explain its status as a summer sleeper hit in the States. Here is the kind of genial crowdpleaser that could have been produced and released at any moment in the last sixty years: indeed, its source novel, Paul Gallico's Flowers for Mrs. Harris, was published in 1958, inspiring an almost immediate teleplay starring Gracie Fields, as well as a series of West German telefilms in the 1980s, and an American TVM in 1992 (ushered straight-to-video in the UK) starring the hardly-new-for-'92 Angela Lansbury. By way of a fine tune, we now get Lesley Manville as Ada Harris, the Battersea war widow and charlady who undergoes a personal epiphany after encountering a prime example of Christian Dior haute couture - the kind of dress a cleaning lady could never take for rags - at one of her richer clients' houses; successive turn-ups on the football pools, at the dog track, and with the British state pension permit her the opportunity to follow her dream all the way to the French capital. (The title doesn't just hint at the plot; the title is the plot.) You can see why they've returned to Gallico's novel now. For one thing, it's easily claimed and reframed as a push for better representation. "That's what we are: invisible women," shrugs Ada's West Indian colleague Vi (Ellen Thomas), and the dress functions as a sort of reverse-invisibility cloak, transforming a lowly Hilda Ogden lookalike into the belle of the ball. It's a Cinderella story at heart, its escape from post-War austerity liable to play as well after the appointment of Kwasi Kwarteng as Chancellor as it did post-Black Monday. The last line of this version is "There is hope for us all." Nothing could be less 2022; nothing could be more needed in 2022.

If it's very much the kind of film British cinema does, it's also - crucially - the kind of film British cinema does, done surprisingly well. Unlike the sparsely populated See How They Run, this co-production has money to spend on extras, dresses and fittings, its centrepiece a fully ten-minute showcase of the lavish goods Dior was hawking to Parisian high society circa 1957; it has both life and some creative vim about it. There's an ensemble of British and French character actors, worn lightly: Christian McKay as a running-gag roué who introduces Mrs. H to a different "niece" each morning, Jason Isaacs typically foursquare as an Irish bookie with a soft spot for our heroine, Lambert Wilson super-smooth as a marquis who escorts Ada out of a nasty scene upon her arrival over the Channel. Director Anthony Fabian troubles to make everyone look good: in Paris, the men are insanely handsome, the women exceedingly pretty, and even Isabelle Huppert has been dolled up as Dior's control-freak gatekeeper. (There's a perverse thrill about seeing one of Europe's most daring actors in a British tea-and-biscuits movie.) Manville, bless her, is busy making Ada Harris a genuine character in the Mike Leigh vein, gradually paring back the chirpy mannerism to suggest an inner life only this one dress can properly express. No film has better explained to me, a lumpen recluse typically clad in potato sacks, the function and appeal of fashion - and that's because this narrative invites us to view fashion through the eyes of a woman who's worked hard her whole life and just wants to feel special. The film is special, too: finely, carefully tailored - a midfilm insert of a red ribbon being cut is deluxe ASMR if ever I encountered it - and with a ratio of charm-to-calculation unlike anything else now in the multiplex. Maybe we needed a thoroughly 20th century proposition to refute the most insidious of 21st century memes: we can still have nice things.

Mrs. Harris Goes to Paris is now screening in cinemas nationwide.

Better out than in: "Flux Gourmet"


Peter Strickland has spent lockdown thinking about art - and farts. His latest film
Flux Gourmet takes place within the cloistered confines of the so-called Sonic Catering Institute, a wholly fictional retreat that enables performance-art collectives with a gastronomic bent to workshop new projects: plunging microphones into, say, bubbling tureens of soup, or spitting frying pans, or gloopy chocolate gateaux. Its latest artists-in-residence - yet to decide on a name for themselves - are a trio with alarming fringes, fronted by the intense glare of Strickland fave Fatma Mohamed with support from Ariane Labed (the weird wave's Kristen Stewart) and our very own Asa Butterfield (nervier than he ever was on Sex Education, which is saying something). As the group hone their aesthetic, their process - from drawing and chopping board to post-show "tribute" (i.e. group sex with the audience) - is documented by an appointed dossieur or journalist (Makis Papadimitriou, the squat fellow from 2016's Suntan, becoming a specialist in unlovely types), although he appears greatly more preoccupied by the intestinal stress that's left him with acid reflux and bad wind. It's all a matter of taste and digestibility, then: the Institute's queenly director Jan (Gwendoline Christie) reveals she turned her nose up at a rival group of performers after they proved reckless with terrapins. There are lines here that strike the ear as Strickland scratching out a manifesto of sorts: "Give anyone too much freedom in any direction, and it's often counterproductive." Yet Flux Gourmet is also a manifesto with commentary in Greek - the philosopher's tongue - from a narrator who's shifting from one buttock to another and using his role to muse on the potency of his own guffs.

Already, I think you should be getting a sense of how for you this is; there may be no other British director currently at large whose films invite assessment on an individual basis. When Strickland leans too far into artful fetishism - as in 2014's The Duke of Burgundy - I can feel my patience being sorely tried; and at my public screening of Flux Gourmet, the audience of solitary oddballs like myself was audibly split between tittering and stony silence. (The film was going over some viewers' heads to sock others in the gut.) The perversity of the Strickland approach is such that I can think of one pal whom Flux Gourmet was made for, and another fifty it would leave entirely cold. Still, if you are that person, then the film may well strike you as the darnedest thing you will have seen in quite a while. Everything here further underlines this filmmaker's standing as Britfilm's new nutty professor, a creative for whom each new project - and practically every scene in each new project - is its own experiment, an exercise in turning the knobs and dials that have been such a prominent part of this oeuvre since 2012's Berberian Sound Studio and seeing what responses can be generated. The new film is a balancing act: sometimes it's funny ha ha, sometimes it's funny-bizarre, and in its most potent sequences, like the happening that sees Mohamed smearing her naked form with pig viscera, it's both simultaneously. Here, as elsewhere, the soundtrack is prone to discord: the noise of a blender as amplified through a mixing desk or a stomach turning somersaults. But the images are elegantly sticky: cigarette butts discarded in a vat of unused blood, the decanting of a substance that resembles (and may, for the purposes of performance, be) Nutella. One of the film's subjects is provocation, but it also succeeds in being a provocation in itself; every other scene poses a question. On a scale of one to five, what do you make of that?

If Flux Gourmet proved to be more for me than Strickland's previous inquiries - its scenes scoring closer to fives than ones - that's because his characterisation is more vivid than ever, and his performers have a lot of juice in them. Above all else, there is the inherently compelling dynamic of the troupe, a turbulent lot who appear simultaneously on the brink of a breakthrough and on the verge of splitting up. (The movie would make a fine double-bill with both Crimes of the Future and Get Back.) Yet there's also playing to savour from Christie, wafting around the screen and leaving impenetrably thick plumes of art theory in her wake, and from Richard Bremmer as a sherry-sipping physician, prone to withholding his diagnoses as if they were the punchlines to an intestinally long-winded joke. The script has funny turns of phrase: the couple whose break-up is attributed to "dietary differences", much faffing around with a device referred to as a "flanger". But it also holds funny turns of plot. Of course, the journalist will end up being part of the troupe - his toots are too loud to ignore. How, and what results, is less predictable, only fully revealed once the curtain goes back on opening night. Strickland's characters are like odd-shaped jigsaw pieces, mostly lumps, bumps and kinks, but this new set squares up very nicely indeed; like a lot of artists, they'd be good for little else, but they also work well together, and do amount to something after a while. In this way, the film imbues sonic catering with a certain seriousness - it's not a total joke, as it would be in, say, a Christopher Guest comedy, and just as fascinating a process as making movies or music. That allows Strickland to pass at least semi-sincere comment on the realities (as well as the absurdities) of making art, and the art here is as striking, cathartic and therapeutic as anything you'll witness in a gallery or workshop setting: a means of letting go or off, or simply following something through. Yet Strickland's fictional performance art improves upon a lot of actual performance art by being clearly, forcefully funny - as clearly, forcefully funny as a fart. You just need it in you to get the joke, that's all.

Flux Gourmet is now playing in selected cinemas, and available to rent via Curzon Home Cinema.

Saturday, 1 October 2022

For what it's worth...




Top 10 films at the UK box office 
(for the weekend of September 23-25, 2022):

1 (new) Ticket to Paradise (12A)
2 (new) Don't Worry Darling (15)
3 (re) Avatar (12A) ****
4 (1) See How They Run (12A) ***
5 (10) Moonage Daydream (15) ***
6 (3) Minions: The Rise of Gru (U)
7 (5) DC League of Super-Pets (PG)
9 (2) Bullet Train (15)
10 (4) Top Gun: Maverick (12A) ****

(source: BFI)

My top five:
3. Avatar
5. Jackie Brown


DVD/Blu-Ray/Download top ten: 

1 (new) Elvis (12) **
2 (1) Top Gun: Maverick (12) ****
3 (2) Jurassic World: Dominion (12)
4 (new) The Lost Boys (15) ***
5 (3Downton Abbey: A New Era (PG)
6 (new) Thor: Love and Thunder (12) **
7 (new) The Black Phone (15) ****
8 (new) Poltergeist (15) ***
9 (4) The Batman (15) ***
10 (6) Sing 2 (U)


My top five: 
1. Memoria


Top five films on terrestrial TV this week:
1. The Color Purple (Tuesday, BBC2, 11.15pm)
2. Moonlight (Monday, BBC2, 11.15pm)
3. Megamind (Saturday, Channel 4, 11.05pm)
4. The Mask of Zorro (Sunday, five, 1pm)
5. Ready or Not (Friday, Channel 4, 1.05pm)

Friday, 30 September 2022

"Vikram Vedha" (Guardian 30/09/22)


Vikram Vedha
***

Dir: Pushkar & Gayatri. With: Saif Ali Khan, Hrithik Roshan, Radhika Apte, Yogita Bihani. 156 mins. Cert: 15

2017’s Tamil hit Vikram Vedha was a twisty, semi-subversive thriller that set a bad-ass Chennai cop and a wily criminal to swapping stories rather than blows or bullets; mashing up mythological, procedural and rhetorical elements, it circled fresh genre territory before a dead-end payoff in an abandoned factory. Its makers, the married narrative strategists billed as Pushkar-Gayatri, now relocate to Lucknow for a Hindi remake with major Bollywood stars. Nothing about VV v2.0 refutes the idea India’s best movie ideas are bubbling up from the South, but the filmmakers have taken the money and really run with it. Longer and rangier, this version is also far more relaxed and enjoyable in its taletelling, scattering swag with every plot swerve.

Replacing lived-in original leads Madhavan and Vijay Sethupathi, who looked like they’d prefer a chinwag over indulging in sustained fisticuffs, we get Saif Ali Khan (as lawman Vikram) and Hrithik Roshan (Vedha, the hood): visibly ready to rumble and nifty dramatic players who make their mutual interrogations zip and zing. In a further upgrade, Radhika Apte’s sceptical air makes Vikram’s lawyer wife Priya – entering this battle of manly wills as Vedha’s counsel – a more forceful presence. It’s crucial to Pushkar-Gayatri’s mischievous project that the cop gets it from all sides, and Roshan – easily Bollywood’s most improved – displays such phosphorescent, screen-torching charisma our sympathies are regularly redistributed.

The finale hasn’t been overhauled, exactly: after the inventive leaps to get us there, it still feels like the conclusion of a more conventional, even derivative crime story. Yet souping up the narrative engine makes for a smoother ride through the falling bodies; the directors’ cutting and framing, sharp enough first time out, is only more so here. The prominence of Vikram’s motorcycle seems a tell: like their debatable hero, Pushkar-Gayatri are keen tinkerers, and there’s genuine pleasure in watching a Saturday-night spectacle where all the nuts, bolts and pistons are operating more or less as they should. A likely hit for an industry that sorely needs one – and a story that bears, even improves with, repetition.

Vikram Vedha is now playing in cinemas nationwide.

On demand: "Vikram Vedha"


There's nothing especially novel about the set-up of the 2017 Tamil thriller Vikram Vedha: once again, we're invited to observe a badass cop's obsessive pursuit of a mocking master criminal. In the hands of emergent narrative strategists Pushkar-Gayatri, however, the movie finds appreciably different routes through the labyrinth of yore. An animated prologue, for starters, recontextualising this time-honoured tale within ancient mythology (while also illustrating the dangers of jumping headlong into the void so as to battle monsters). This cop, Vikram (played by local star Madhavan), also proves to be notably less heroic than the cinematic norm, introduced humiliating a junior colleague, being framing the unarmed suspect he's just shot dead and being an absolute git to his lovely lawyer wife (Shraddha Srinath). Ominously, this dude hasn't unpacked his belongings in the marital home: as per the De Niro character in Heat (some precedent), he's apparently all set to do a runner at any moment. (The good guy, folks!) The scene is right for a takedown, then, or at the very least a shake-up. This duly follows when Chennai's most wanted Vedha (Vijay Sethupathi) surrenders to police custody barely a third of the way through the picture and proceeds to tell a long and convoluted story - thereby preventing Vikram from carrying out the asskicking that is the preserve of cops in Saturday-night crowdpleasers such as this. Suddenly, we're watching an authority figure losing control of their own carefully constructed narrative, the foundation stone of their own heroism. But that's what you risk upon entering into a dialogue: you risk being interrupted, redirected, corrected.

An altogether self-reflexive affair, then - an exercise in long-form, big-picture yarnspinning that also encompasses a fair amount of running, jumping and those tremendous open-handed slaps that are the signature move of the Indian action hero. The discourse starts in the opening sequence, Vikram insisting one hood tell him a joke at gunpoint; it develops - festers, maybe - back at HQ, the cops swapping legends that shore up what would otherwise be fairly tattered reputations; in the interview-room scenes, it explodes into a full-on battle of wills and philosophies. What Pushkar-Gayatri are themselves interrogating is what we want from stories such as these, and what the men's self-glorifying tales tell us about the tellers. At its most radical, Vikram Vedha gestures towards a procedural that is above anything else rhetorical, where talk replaces action - or talk becomes a kind of action in itself, the villain tying the hero up in knots with his tongue and giving everybody the runaround. More conventional forms of thinking hold sway elsewhere. It's fun to see Srinath's lawyer getting drawn into these cat-and-mouse negotiations (as Vedha's counsel, no less, in a further slap to her man's ego), but this broadly remains a boys' town, the leads making light work of this chatter while suggesting the growth that comes from reflecting on the words of others; it's an actioner where the hero and villain are chastened by one another.

The final act struck me as disappointingly rote, almost like something a money-grubbing, risk-averse, trailer-conscious producer would have insisted on filming: a shootout in an abandoned factory, where the conversation is finally halted, loose ends are tied up at length, and nothing really gets as subverted as it is in the first two-thirds. It's ultimately a playful film rather than an especially deep one, an entertainment above all else. But it is entertaining for the most part, scouting out characterful locations that prove very nearly as lived-in as the premise and therein unlocking unexpected lines of entry and exit for each scene; Pushkar-Gayatri also pay a high level of attention to exactly that character development and plot detail now missing from a lot of high-profile Bollywood (and Hollywood) scripts. You can tell someone behind the camera has spent late nights getting all the structural nuts-and-bolts in place, and making sure everything else lines up as it should. It proved as much a statement of creative intent for its makers as The Usual Suspects (another touchstone of some sort) was for Christopher McQuarrie: within five years, this pair would be running their own Amazon streaming show (Suzhal: The Vortex) and remaking Vikram Vedha in Hindi with major Bollywood stars. You can still go a long way with the gift of the gab.

Vikram Vedha is now streaming on Prime Video.

Wednesday, 28 September 2022

On demand: "Village Rockstars"


It's a stilled prologue, and an extraordinary way to launch both a film and a career: a young girl at large in a wide-open Assamese field, queen of all she surveys, turning away from the camera - from us - and appearing to close her eyes so as to envision a future for herself.
Village Rockstars, the self-taught writer-director Rima Das's breakthrough feature, unfolds around a quiet backwater where the youngsters spend their days reading comics (the girls) or getting into scrapes (the boys) or picking betel nuts from the trees they loll around between (everyone). Our heroine Dhunu (Bhanita Das, the filmmaker's cousin, and one of a number of close associates called out to play here) has ambitions of forming a band, although - in a region-specific twist on those School of Rock narratives so beloved out West - she hasn't the money to afford actual instruments, nor really access to the kind of shops that sell them. Instead, the kids fashion their own replica guitars and drums out of cardboard, scrap metal and discarded polystyrene, so as to mime to popular hits; they're even playing at playing, caught rehearsing for the adult world. In an opening caption, Das asserts the film is "a tribute to the people and places I come from", and you can't help but sense she is that girl on the screen - somebody with a dream that begs to be realised - much as François Truffaut was once Antoine Doinel. The guitar, after all, swaps in easily for the camera, as a means of expressing yourself, a way of amplifying your voice, and carrying it from here to there. Art can take you places you otherwise couldn't imagine.

The real delight of Village Rockstars is that this story should be told so organically - there's really no other word for it. Guided by Das's patient, attentive direction, we collectively feel out this place, and the way these people spend their time: the first act has no more pressing narrative concern than watching the kids try to make off with a local bully's bike. Before we know it, we find ourselves up to our knees not just in story, but in an entire way of life. What's more, the film continues to proceed at the same, becalmed pace as this life, with none of the sudden lurches or accelerations you find elsewhere in world cinema, in the films of first-timers so desperate to make an impression they can't resist putting pedal to the metal at some point. (You hope against hope that Das avoids the clutches of the Sundance Lab, with its one-size-fits-all approach to storytelling.) One major boon: these are a great bunch of kids to tail around after. From the blithe way they shimmy up trees - with the ease you and I might demonstrate popping to the Co-Op on a good day - we observe they're entirely at one with the landscape they pass through; even when monsoon season rolls around, they adapt, picking up vast leaves to use as umbrellas, and staging a joshing, ad hoc march in a bid to ban the rain. When they finally avail themselves of that heartless bully's bike, they charge off into the long grass like actual kids, tumbling in one another's wake; they haven't had the vital energy trained or rehearsed out of them.

If their mischief translates easily, so too does their lowly status: we're left in no doubt by a poignant episode in a shop where a real, fully-stringed guitar hangs tantalisingly out of reach. (They can look, but not touch.) After their village is submerged, wiping out both agriculture and the bridge connecting these youngsters to an education, the vision of that prologue looks more than ever a pipe dream; it's hard enough keeping one's head above water round here. (Somewhere in the background, like a painful memory: the story of Dhunu's father, who drowned in an earlier flood.) Yet Das is never sentimental about her subjects, as someone who's lived out this way could never be. Her camera displays a warmth and fondness, even love, for those who pass before it, but it also knows deep down that this can be a hard, cold, wet life. As a party thrown to mark Dhunu's passage into womanhood, half the guests show up emptyhanded; "people are useless", shrugs one of her world-wearier contemporaries, reflecting on the state's failure to protect the village from flooding. Increasingly, the film comes to seem even more like non-fiction than fiction, a production that had to adapt to the seasons and elements, to the way the very landscape altered. Even the fake instruments get swept away, leaving behind people in a place getting by, making do. Das was surely tucking all of this away for future use - the shrugged-off tragedy, the hard-earned triumphs, banked in the memory like the coins Dhunu secretes in the joists of her home. As Village Rockstars draws toward a finale every bit as unforgettable as that prologue, it becomes clear: there are some visions you just can't let go of.

Village Rockstars is now streaming via All4.

Heroes: "Moonage Daydream"


If the movie mainstream has succeeded in anything this past decade, it's been making fan service feel like a special event. No longer willing or able to grasp the universal, our filmmakers now routinely reach out to ultra-specific, ultra-enthusiastic cliques and groups, hoping against hope for the review that adopts the formulation "if you like
Star Wars/Marvel/DC/whatever, you'll love this". (Precedent is profitable.) The documentary Moonage Daydream is that, but for David Bowie; it's been as carefully curated from the official Bowie archive as the touring exhibition David Bowie Is.... You'll look in vain for any sign of the teenage groupies from one end of this career or the midlife crisis of Tin Machine from the other, the material a more critical sensibility might feel obliged to work in somewhere. Instead, the director Brett Morgen (who did something similar for Robert Evans in The Kid Stays in the Picture, and for Kurt Cobain in Cobain: Montage of Heck) engages in two hours of energetic, often imaginative, yet generally wide-eyed cheerleading for Bowie the artist, the thinker, the free spirit, the shapeshifting stage persona. It's the best of Bowie, from start to finish. 

The film's biographical elements are secondary to the setpiece spectacle of the singer at and on various stages: the live performances he gave in his Ziggy and post-Ziggy pomp, the more reflective appearances of the 1980s, once he'd left the Spiders from Mars behind to pursue his own path through musical space. By way of punctuation, we get cutaways to fans visibly moved by their idol's lyrics, presence, aura, each shot of an awestruck face its own little nudge in the casual cinemagoer's ribs. As produced by concert promoters Live Nation, the whole often resembles one of those one-night-only simulcasts that now get beamed into otherwise moribund multiplex screens, only with the difference of featuring a musician who's already taken his final bow. Morgen waves his pompoms hard, and makes such a noise, in the hope of bringing Bowie back to life before our eyes; his is fan service with a distinctly American element of religious revivalism. I was stirred and swayed by a lot of it, if never quite fully converted.

It helps that Morgen begins his order of service with "Hallo Spaceboy", being Nineties Bowie looking back at Seventies Bowie and marvelling at how far he'd travelled: a song that sets the parameters for the following two hours. (Full disclosure: I come this way as someone who most admired Bowie for being Pet Shop Boys-adjacent, the man who emboldened the strange and shy creatures creeping out their bedrooms and up the pop charts towards the end of the last century to express themselves.) Of course, Bowie is a worthy subject of extended cinematic study, in large part because, pre-Prince, pre-Madonna, pre-Gaga, Bowie was the pop star more obsessed than most with image - it's what landed him on the radar of filmmakers from Oshima to Lynch. It's just conceivable that the conclusion the young David Jones drew from the first phase of his career was that he simply wasn't being photographed often enough, or in the right way, at a moment when the look of pop was becoming every bit as significant as the sound. 

Morgen scatters a few monochrome snapshots of this whey-faced, Mod-about-town Bowie - the skin that was quickly shed, or rather thickened up with pancake - but the bulk of the footage here stems from that era when Bowie had colour on his cheeks and all the world's cameras pointed quizzically in his direction. Your correspondent was too young even to recall Boy George's sensational, tabloid-alarming debut on TOTP, so a lot of this was new to me - and the film is at its strongest in evoking just how staggering it must have been to have this extraterrestrial figure appear on your TV set in a drab front room in the middle of the 1970s; and more specifically, how staggering to have him appear amid the cosy prime-time squareness of Harty and Parky - the shows your mum and dad watched - suggesting by his very being another, less square, markedly more fluid and bohemian way of going about one's business. Chatshow Bowie really does seem like an emissary, thinking beyond the dull flatness of 1970s Britain, and encouraging the open-minded onlooker to do likewise. One choice, typically droll statement: "The imagination can dry up in England". To Berlin!

Thereafter, Moonage Daydream falls a bit too readily into the ill-defined rhythms of the New Documentary, so determined to avoid staid chronologies and singular points-of-view that it risks turning circles, chasing its own tail, cancelling itself out. As is the post-Kapadian norm, this is Bowie in his own words, often Bowie in conversation with himself, allowing Morgen to cut freely between the middle-aged man confronting death and the young punk playing dress-up, between the junkie and the artist, the mime and the philosopher. Sometimes this mix-and-match approach pays off: Morgen consistently finds new routes into and through the music, typically by sourcing alternate versions of songs made familiar by heavy radio rotation. (It's a stratospheric improvement on 2020's unauthorised biopic Stardust, which couldn't afford the rights to anything.) Sometimes, however, it misses the mark, starts babbling, gets het up over nothing much. We get two goes at the paintings - a Sunday sideline - which are only interesting as paintings by Bowie, while a brief interlude on the singer's Broadway stint as John Merrick only underlines the limitations of his creative range. When he opened his mouth to sing, Bowie could transcend anything and everything; when he did so to speak the words of others, it all became oddly self-conscious.

Fans - for it is that point in the review - will likely be delighted to find themselves immersed in what's effectively been constructed as a Bowie flotation tank; the wilder you are about Bowie, the more you're bound to love Moonage Daydream, largely because it, too, is wild for its subject. At around the sixtieth insert of Dave riding Japanese escalators, however, I started longing for at least a little more sifting and structure, something beyond a fanzine's cut-and-paste. Unmoored from its original context, some of this footage is merely free-floating; and while the interviews give up a fair share of wisdom, there's also the odd whiff of lofty musician BS. You don't spot these things when you're desperate for another glimpse of your idol, and hanging on his every word; Morgen is operating from the perspective that all this material is gold, doubly so now that the individual who generated it has left us. That's understandable, but the sense of Bowie the film leaves us with is naggingly superficial. It orbits the loneliness, the alienation, the damage and despair, as in a great interview with the late Mavis Nicholson that catches DB in a mid-Eighties transitional phase, with his guard partway lowered, and gets close to the source of his restlessness. But it can't ever touch down on Bowie the man, because it's too in thrall to Bowie the unknowable enigma, the Buddha of suburbia, Bowie-as-lifestyle-accessory. It wants Bowie to be what any fan wants Bowie to be, which is why the film plays as more consolidatory (consolatory, even) than revelatory. It's very Major Tom - indeed, it's the film you could well imagine Bowie directing about himself, had his ambitions extended into this field. But even Major Tom had to check in with Ground Control from time to time.

Moonage Daydream is now playing in cinemas nationwide.