Thursday, 28 April 2022

From the archive: "Man of Steel"


Sometimes deciding what to see when you’re stood at the ticket counter of a Saturday night is a trade-off. More so than ever with the Superman reboot
Man of Steel: anyone getting excited at the input of executive producer Christopher Nolan, the filmmaker responsible for the Batman revamp, may be given pause by the Kryptonite presence of Zack Snyder, whose Watchmen, 300 and Sucker Punch were products of that leeringly adolescent yet highly bankable sensibility that’s effectively blocked the mainstream from making movies for grown-ups.

In fact, even Nolan’s presence might be seen as a double-edged sword: the Superman we’re getting here is one of those origin stories that effectively tells us what we already know – only, y’know, at greater length, in gloomier colours, and with more digital whistles and bells. An interstellar prologue seems particularly garbled: something about how noble Jor-El (Russell Crowe) shuttled away his infant son after their native planet Krypton fell subject to a coup by angry military advisor Zod (Michael Shannon), everybody dressed in those silly costumes that sunk much of the Green Lantern movie.

Yet some indication Snyder has here been pointed in a marginally different direction – one equally interested in physical and virtual forms – can be inferred from the film’s early effects work: underwater baby farms that resemble medical diagrams of haemorrhoids, thrusting, tapered prison cells that square the penal with the penile. Even the S-shaped memory stick Jor-El slips into his offspring’s escape pod is fashioned out of a skull.

The film finds its feet when the kid – Kal-El, assumed name Clark Kent – lands in the kind of small town where a guy might reasonably expect to have Diane Lane and Kevin Costner as foster parents. Yet growing up great in nondescript flatland is no easy task. Kal’s persistent heroism – heaving a schoolbus from a lake, for instance – only shows up his contemporaries as weak and muddling; he grows into a bearded drifter (Henry Cavill) whose good deeds attract as much opprobrium as they do acclaim – like a really, really buff Jesus.

It should be noted that the cape fits Cavill pretty well. He's just blank enough to pass unnoticed in large crowds, and capable of demonstrating sensitivity as well as strength when set in close-up. His biceps are, frankly, out of this world: away from bending girders to put out an oilrig fire, you suspect he’d make an exceptionally satisfying cuddler.

That said, it may be a sign of the New Event Movie’s near-total lack of interest in anything like flirtation or romance – what fanboys generally have down as “girly stuff” – that this Kent reveals himself to his Lois Lane (Amy Adams) as Super from the off: happening upon her as she snoops around his crashlanded pod, he cauterises a wound on her torso with his eyes, while telling her “I can do things other men cannot do”, which is one way of piquing a gal’s interest.

Maybe it’s the presence of proper actors like Adams, Lane and Costner – some distance removed from the Ken and Barbie dolls who staffed this director’s earlier work – or maybe it’s Nolan’s steadying hand, but Snyder seems to grow up a little in this central section, finding at least an hour amid the usual blockbuster storm for something more reflective and human. He loses the smirk, rations the CGI, even packs the doubting Kent off to church in a scene that would have been unthinkable in 300 or Sucker Punch.

It gets serious, in other words, which fits the Nolan conception of comic-book capers as Terribly Important Modern Myths; some may miss the vein of chipper comedy that ran through the 1978 Superman. Still, at least we’re spared the morbidly self-involved mythology that played out on the cramped sidestreets of the Dark Knight movies. This is a Middle American story at heart, and Snyder seeks out wide open spaces (a cornfield, a salt flat, the galaxy) in which Man of Steel can at least gesture towards an exploration of what it is to be good, and do good – a theme even Snyder cannot help but make resonate.

Almost inevitably, the final hour gives into the kind of loud crashes and bangs market forces (and studio trailer-makers) demand, which lessens some of the impact; it’d take a filmmaker with a personality stronger than Cavill’s arms to pull away from that urge, one suspects. Yet it’s pleasing to be able to report that, for the moment, Superman has survived Zack Snyder. That ticket can be bought without undue fear.

(MovieMail, June 2013)

Man of Steel screens on ITV at 10.45pm tomorrow night.

Friday, 22 April 2022

For what it's worth...




Top 10 films at the UK box office (for the weekend of April 15-17, 2022):

1 (new) The Lost City (12A)
2 (1) Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore (12A)
3 (2) Sonic the Hedgehog 2 (PG)
4 (new) The Northman (15) **
5 (new) Operation Mincemeat (12A)
6 (3) The Bad Guys (U)
7 (new) Beast (12A)
8 (new) KGF: Chapter 2 (15) ***
9 (5) The Batman (15) ***
10 (4) Morbius (15)

(source: BFI)

My top five:
2. Cries and Whispers

 
DVD/Blu-Ray/Download top ten: 

1 (1) Spider-Man: No Way Home (12) ***
2 (3) Scream [2022] (18)
3 (new) Sing 2 (U)
4 (new) Death on the Nile (12)
5 (2) Dune: Part One (12) **
6 (new) Belfast (12) **
7 (4) The Matrix Resurrections (15)
8 (12) Clifford the Big Red Dog (PG)
9 (9) Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald (12)
10 (7) Paw Patrol: The Movie (U)


My top five: 
1. The Souvenir: Part II
3. Cow


Top five films on terrestrial TV this week:
1. Cape Fear [above] (Friday, BBC1, 10.40pm)
2. The World's End (Saturday, ITV, 10.30pm)
3. Funny Girl (Saturday, BBC2, 2.05pm)
4. Man of Steel (Friday, ITV, 10.45pm)
5. Iron Man (Saturday, C4, 9.15pm)

Thursday, 21 April 2022

School of hard knocks: "Playground"


Some school stuff - mostly facts: alternatives to oxbow lakes, most of trigonometry, how to balance a chemical equation - disappears from the memory on contact with the real world and adult life. Some school stuff, on the other hand, stays with you forever. From the opening seconds of Laura Wandel's remarkable debut feature
Playground, we're completely onside with its pint-sized protagonist Nora (Maya Vanderbeque), in large part because the situation she's in is almost primally familiar: being dropped off at the school gates for the very first time. Her sense of confusion and abandonment stirs something in us; we are reminded of the myriad terrors that await her. The nervy search for someone to sit with at lunch. The stress of having to walk the highbeam in P.E. when you've barely learnt to tie your own laces. Swimming lessons. It all comes flooding back, as Wandel digs further and further into this transitional moment - a pivotal, sink-or-swim point where a child goes from having a parent or two looking out for them to being placed in the care of teachers busy enough with fifty other kids, all of whom have issues that demand close supervision. This camera does what it can. Essentially, Playground is the shoulder-level realism of the Dardennes, dropped down to first-grader height. The world it perceives there (and the original Francophone title Un monde identifies it as such, at least in microcosm) is as disconcerting and brutal as that of the beetles and bugs David Lynch stooped to film in the opening moments of Blue Velvet. Nora's brother Abel (Günter Duret) is initially supportive of his younger sis, cluing her in as to how the playground operates before tearing off to bully the newcomers. But within this ecosystem, he too is smallfry, a fact Nora only grasps a few days later when she spies Abel being pushed around by older boys. A properly dramatic reversal presents itself: sister now has to look out for brother, only as per the law of this jungle (or jungle gym) he doesn't want her to look out for him, because it might make him look wussy. It's all fun and games until someone gets hurt.

Formally, the film is fascinating. Playground has the spontaneity of social realism, its youthful subjects - bored or sad or helpless, alighting on lines and obsessions only kids left to their own devices would alight on - coached to interact as they would on any actual playground. But the action chiefly takes place as foreground. This may have been a technical choice on Wandel's part, to keep tabs on one or two characters when there are 200 vying for attention around them. Yet it also has dramatic implications, leaving the world beyond these button noses a blur, as it is in one's early schooldays, when you don't know your way around. Classmates loom up on Nora out of nowhere, and we've no immediate idea whether they want to play or punch our heroine in the face. (Sometimes, it's a little of both: they blindfold her, and watch giggling as she clangs her head on a metal gatepost. They can be merciless little fuckers, kids.) Wandel is very deliberate, and supremely canny, in the way she withholds focus. Only gradually do we get a sense of this girl's family, and the world outside the schoolgates. It's her dad who drops her off and picks her up; there's no sign of a mother. "Dad, why don't you work like everybody else?," Nora asks at one point; when he turns up one lunchtime with a black eye, it's both a bleak vision of these kids' futures, and something like a prison visit, replete with desperate hands-through-the-bars moment. 

From the siblings' wardrobe, malnourished air and perennially downturned expressions, we guess they're somewhere towards the bottom of the socioeconomic food chain. When Abel wets himself, it cues both outspoken disgust among his classmates - "Your brother stinks of piss," his classmates tell Nora - and the thought he is very much the Sean Maguire-as-Tegs of the Belgian education system. We want them to get out of the film in one piece - god, how we want them to get out of the film in one piece - but we also get so caught up in their moment-by-moment, lunchbreak-by-lunchbreak struggle for survival that we may overlook the arc Wandel sets in place here. The Nora we see towards the end of Playground is very different from the tearful young cherub to whom we're first introduced. Now she's independent, resilient, tenacious (watch her response to learning she hasn't been invited to a classmate's birthday party, surely the biggest snub any five-year-old can face), but also bruised and scarred. She's seen some shit, and that shit will likely stay with her, because it does somehow. (And if this mild, 12A-rated trauma does, heaven knows what it must be like for the kids who get into real trouble.) The assumption that great artists can fashion extraordinary art out of the smallest things isn't always a reliable one, because we've all seen plenty of trivial, flyweight, disposable art to the contrary. But the last filmmaker to direct children this attentively and this rewardingly was Celine Sciamma (first in Tomboy, more recently Petite Maman), and there's an argument she's kicked on to become just about the most vital filmmaker in the world right now. With Playground, Wandel graduates with honours as world cinema's Girl Most Likely.

Playground opens in selected cinemas from tomorrow.

Sacred flesh: "Benedetta"


Fair to say the pandemic hasn't changed Paul Verhoeven in any way. The flies-open Dutchman's latest,
Benedetta, has so far been positioned in the press as an item of premium-grade trolling, taking aim at dual targets: audience expectations around the costume drama (it isn't the clothes Verhoeven wants us to goggle at) and the Catholic church (presented as a proto-capitalist racket designed to leech money from the same women it ensnares and turns against themselves). It starts comparatively mildly for a film from the director of Total Recall and Basic Instinct, with a one-eyed pillager getting bird poop in his eye, a fleeting glimpse of a Pétomane-like stage act featuring a man setting light to his own farts, and some passing anti-Semitism from cynical Abbess Charlotte Rampling. The main event, as you'll surely have gleaned from the lipsmacking pre-publicity, is some based-on-true-events girl-on-girl (more precisely, nun-on-nun) action, drawing on historian Judith C. Brown's 1986 book Immodest Acts: The Life of a Lesbian Nun in Renaissance Italy; the warm-up for this turns out to be some girl-by-girl, nun-by-nun shitting on a dual hers-and-hers commode. (You can only imagine the smile on Verhoeven's face when he first saw production designer Katia Wyszkop's handiwork.) We caper towards the kind of visions and fantasies, usually involving a hunky, blue-eyed Jesus (Jonathan Couzinié), which had protestors gathering in their multitudes for 1988's The Last Temptation of Christ and saw 1989's nunsploitationer Visions of Ecstasy banned outright by the British censor. If restraint (in the non-S&M sense) is what you're after, you're in entirely the wrong screen; heed the advice of the septuagenarian usher at the public screening I attended last night, who jovially cautioned her patrons that tonight's presentation was "quite pornographic", with a knowing chuckle. How far we've all come.

We might quibble with the usher's terminology - though 18-rated, everything on screen is carefully, attentively simulated - but Benedetta does at least adhere to porno rules. Once behind convent walls, Verhoeven spends a good while teasing hardened sensation seekers with cursory boobs and bums, typically obscured by shadows and curtains, before finally going all-in with the assistance of a crucifix repurposed as a dildo, a readymade talking point guaranteed to rival Basic Instinct's no-knickers interrogation scene. It's an hour before our virtuous heroine (Virginie Efira) enjoys her first orgasm, at which point it feels like a matter of life and death; only in the final moments are we presented with unabashed full-frontal nudity in the open air, and a liberation (albeit a temporary one). The net result is that Benedetta allows us to be seduced by the possibilities of a story before its clammy hands venture decisively below the belt. What do we notice? Firstly, that it represents Verhoeven's most obviously feminist undertaking in a long while: a tale of women trapped within a system that depends for its continued survival on their coming to hate themselves, one another and their own bodies. "Your body is your worst enemy," Benedetta is told upon entering the convent, understood here as a place where women are sent so as to let their flesh wither, the better to keep temptation at bay and preserve their spirit for the Son of God. (Verhoeven, inevitably, heightens this process to an extreme, by having one older Sister (Guilaine Londez) consumed by untouched, untreated breast cancer; she dies with the word "mensonges" (lies) on her lips.) The arrival of wild child Bartolomea (feral newcomer Daphné Patakia) offers Benedetta someone closer to her own age to bond with, but their sisterly solidarity - the new outspokenness it prompts, and the radical reinterpretation of Christ's teachings it represents - poses a threat to the sexless status quo. Given the slightly sniggering tone of the reviews, you may find yourself surprised - as I was - by how seriously Verhoeven takes the girls' affair, both as an engine for generating thrills and a challenge to the established social order.

Still, Benedetta isn't quite the return to full form many were hoping from this director. Unlike 1985's free-roaming Flesh + Blood, it's limited - possibly by the pandemic - to a single location that assumes an air of self-reflexivity as the Black Death blows in. Narratively, it feels episodic, the selected, salacious highlights of one cloistered life flattening one another out: even Benedetta's reported possession by Christ is Just Another Thing, although it is quite a thing. The film is broadly entertaining, never boring, committed to its point-of-view and to filling its widescreen frames with the eyepopping and jawdropping; it does plenty to stir the blood. Yet - and this has long been a Verhoeven limitation - it never cuts deep enough to touch the soul. Just on an editorial level, it can't fully connect the hypocrisies and horrors of Benedetta's age to those of our own: it's all still walled off, another Verhoeven movie that seems to exist within heavily ironic quotation marks. Its strongest suit is Efira, one of the most daring actresses in world cinema, though I'm not sure I ever bought her as a potential bride of Christ. She was convincing as a nervy newlywed in 2018's An Impossible Love, but Verhoeven clocks the hot-to-trot woman in her from the off. (When Benedetta and Bartolomea fuck, they fuck like the characters in a Nineties movie - not necessarily an issue for those of us who like Nineties movies, but a further trashing of real period authenticity.) Yet as befits a movie bound for an appointment with the stake, you look upon Efira as you look upon Jean Seberg in Saint Joan: as a movie star, someone worth looking at, with a body that - doubtless to the Catholic Legion of Decency's alarm and dismay - simply never quits. (This camera works overtime recording that fact.) Is it sleazy? Or is it sex-positive? Verhoeven has spent his entire career collecting such perverse, double-edged responses. I'll say this for Benedetta: you wouldn't be able to guess from watching it that its maker had been away from the cinema for some while, nor that the movies had comprehensively lost their libido in that time. Verhoeven is still the same old horny fucker making horny films in a moment when everybody else is fiddling round with plastic action figures. In a sense Benedetta herself would understand more than most, this could be considered God's work.

Benedetta is now showing in selected cinemas.

Monday, 18 April 2022

My Desert Island Movies


In September 2021, I wrote my 10,000th film review. I know this, because I've been keeping a handwritten record in a variety of notebooks since 1993 (starting with a brisk four-line appraisal of Sister Act: "instantly forgettable, but fun while it lasts"). Given that I'll be marking 20 years as a working critic in 2023 - and given that the last lockdown left me with very little else to be getting on with - it seemed a good time to try and assemble a representative canon: the best of what I've seen over that period, whatever that's worth. 1,001 movies; the top ten percent.

You can now download the list, in various formats:

Alphabetically (here)
Chronologically (here)
As an Excel spreadsheet, with director/year/country of origin info (here)
As a 10" flexidisc with exclusive Mike poster and stickers (here)

It's also available as a Letterboxd list here.

Going into this project, I entertained grandiose ideas of revolutionising or at least freshening up the established canon. I'm not so sure the finished list quite achieves that lofty aim: there aren't anything like enough films from Africa and pre-2000 India (even this far into the streaming era, accessibility and availability remain obstacles); though there are more films directed by women than there would have been 25 years ago, there aren't as many as there will be in another 25 years; and there are almost certainly too many films on there from 1993, foundational year though it was. (One of your first tasks as a critic is identifying your own blindspots and biases. I think it's fairly obvious I was a 90s videoshop kid.)

In shuffling titles in and out, however, I did succeed in explaining something to myself: my recent disillusionment with American cinema. Look at the films on there from the 1980s, 90s and early 00s - my formative decades as a cinephile - and clock how many of those hail from the American studio system. Then consider the great variety of forms, genres and styles within those films; and finally contrast that with the situation as it is in 2022, with the surviving studios going all-in on funding franchisable fantasy epics based on pre-existing/long overworked* (*delete as appropriate) material. We were raised to expect so much more from the movies; what's coming down the multiplex tubes nowadays can't help but seem thin gruel.

Still, the multiplex isn't (and shouldn't be) everything, as I hope this list makes clear. May it lead you towards many new and rewarding horizons in the months and years ahead.

(Photo: Tabu: A Story of the South Seas, F.W. Murnau, 1931.)


P.S. The list contains titles from 52 different nations, topped by the USA (656 films), France (157), the UK (137), Germany (57) and Italy (54). The countries represented by a single title are as follows: Armenia, Bulgaria, Iceland, Luxembourg, Mali, Monaco, Peru, the Philippines, Portugal, Senegal, South Africa, Syria, Thailand, Uzbekhistan and Zambia. (Told you there was more to life than the multiplex.)

P.P.S. Top directors: Alfred Hitchcock (12 titles), Martin Scorsese and Steven Spielberg (10 titles apiece), Woody Allen (9), Ingmar Bergman and Jean-Luc Godard (8 apiece), John Ford and Preston Sturges (7). On six: Robert Altman, Tim Burton, Joel Coen, John Huston, Stanley Kubrick, David Lean, Ang Lee, Richard Linklater and Peter Weir. On five: Robert Aldrich, Paul Thomas Anderson, David Fincher, Howard Hawks, Krzysztof Kieslowski, Leo McCarey, Satyajit Ray, Paul Schrader, Orson Welles and Billy Wilder. Top female directors: Kathryn Bigelow, Jane Campion, Nora Ephron, Mia Hansen-Løve, Amy Heckerling, Nicole Holofcener, Tamara Jenkins, Elaine May, Agnès Varda, Lana Wachowski and Lilly Wachowski (all 2 apiece).

Friday, 15 April 2022

For what it's worth...




Top 10 films at the UK box office (for the weekend of April 8-10, 2022):

1 (new) Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore (12A)
2 (1) Sonic the Hedgehog 2 (PG)
3 (3) The Bad Guys (U)
4 (2) Morbius (15)
5 (4) The Batman (15) ***
6 (6) Uncharted (12A)
7 (new) The Outfit (15) ***
8 (5) Ambulance (15)
10 (10) Sing 2 (U)

(source: BFI)

My top five:
1. Lost in La Mancha [above]
2. Cries and Whispers
5. Dr. No

 
DVD/Blu-Ray/Download top ten: 

1 (1) Spider-Man: No Way Home (12) ***
2 (4) Dune: Part One (12) **
3 (2) Scream [2022] (18)
4 (3) The Matrix Resurrections (15)
5 (new) Spider-Man Triple Pack (12) ***
6 (5) No Time to Die (12) ***
7 (10) Paw Patrol: The Movie (U)
8 (6) Encanto (U) ***
9 (18) Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald (12)
10 (19) Fast & Furious 9 (12)


My top five: 
1. Cow
4. Flee


Top five films on terrestrial TV this week:
1. The Lion King (Easter Sunday, BBC1, 5.45pm)
2. The Ten Commandments (Easter Sunday, five, 2pm)
3. Animal Farm (Thursday, C4, 2.40am)
4. Shrek (Easter Monday, ITV, 2.05pm)
5. Hot Fuzz (Saturday, ITV, 10.40pm)

Snitches and stitches: "The Outfit"


You may be drawn to one of The Outfit's pitifully scattered showtimes by the prospect of an original(ish) live-action entertainment, something non-fantastical and targeted at grown-ups that also happens to feature one of the great actors of the age. Here is a film that could have been made in 1956 (the year it's set), the late 1990s or the present day; a rare 21st century studio release that seems to entirely predate the era of IP and the MCU. Graham Moore, whose script for 2014's The Imitation Game won a (somewhat generous) Oscar, has written and directed a clever, Roald Dahl-ish fable about an English tailor who crosses paths with the Chicago Mob. The tailor, Leonard, is played by Mark Rylance, and you can spot exactly why he's been drawn here from the film's opening sequence: a brisk spot of scene-setting in which we watch the protagonist open up his store, put the kettle on, sweep the floor for the day's activity, and start to ply his trade, cutting the pieces for an elegant slate-grey two-piece while the camera looks on in rapt fascination. (You settle in for 100 minutes of quiet craft.) We sporadically return to the progress of that suit, but the calm, measured atmosphere of that backroom invites interruption and intrusion, in this case from hoodlums leaving envelopes filled with cash and contraband in a dropbox fixed to the wall; that floor gets messy again when one goon (Dylan O'Brien) stumbles in, gutshot, from a mounting turf war. An ordered world, presided over by a man of manners, invaded by the rat-a-tat chaos of organised crime. How long before it all unravels?

If you can see why Rylance was drawn here, you can also see why Universal and their various subsidiaries agreed to pick this material up. The Outfit is a low-risk, low-cost, ultra-manageable proposition: it unfolds over three rooms (a foyer, a fitting room and a workshop), populated by a cast you can count on the fingers on two hands. (It looks very much like a Covid production, easily turned around and out without endangering anybody unduly.) It's also a useful showcase for Moore's talents - more so, I'd say, than a literally by-the-book adaptation like The Imitation Game offered. The plot is set up to twist and turn (there's a mole; who's the mole?); the actors are shuttled in and out of these rooms with some skill; and while we're clearly not (yet) in the realms of Pinter or Mamet, the dialogue yields the odd choice exchange. "I was in the War," Leonard tells O'Brien's chillier sidekick Francis (Johnny Flynn). "At your age?," comes the dismissive response. "The other War," Leonard shrugs. Is it all still a bit too neat, too manageable, a puzzle Moore can wrinkle and then iron out at will? Certainly, the film wouldn't suffer for a little extra threat, or at least some further directorial oomph; what it will tell industry onlookers is that Moore is nicely placed for a career making Dad Films or even Grandad Films. (Alexandre Desplat's score tends to shortsell the intrigue, tweely middle-of-the-road where something tougher and more propulsive might have helped.) The single location can't help but suggest the theatrical or televisual, although The Outfit mostly resembles a well-behaved B-movie, making up in narrative intelligence what it lacks in rude, subversive, grabby energy. 

Moore's shotmaking abilities remain unclear - veteran lenser Dick Pope has only so many places to set his camera down on these sets - yet he works well with his actors. Of course Rylance needs no excuse to burrow down into a character, but never has that burrowing been afforded such prominence on film, which represents a draw in itself. He makes Leonard a mystery in a waistcoat, which only assists the layered reveal of the plot. Doddering and querulous one scene, he's unexpectedly sprightly the next, possibly too sprightly to have served in WW1; he keeps us guessing, and the film relies on Rylance's ability to spin a yarn (cf. Leonard's much-upholstered story of how he was driven from London) and tailor it to the needs of whoever's listening. (The roles of protagonist and screenwriter haven't seemed this interchangeable since Christopher McQuarrie's script for The Usual Suspects.) Putting Rylance front and centre makes all these relationships more interesting than they would have been on the page. He's paternal around erstwhile Maze Runner O'Brien; he works up something edgier - deadlier - with Flynn, the latter channelling Richard Widmark as a sneering tough who deserves to have the smirk wiped from his face. The Outfit feels like a project from which the less experienced participants will have learnt a lot: Moore, for one, would have realised he was onto a good thing when sending on Simon Russell Beale around the halfway mark to do for him what M. Emmet Walsh or Charles Durning used to do for the Coens. It's unquestionably a B-movie in form and (to some degree) appearance, which may explain why the studio seems almost embarrassed to be releasing it into the wild. Yet at a moment when our A-movies have the disposability of the flimsiest Bs of yore, it's encouraging to encounter a B-movie fashioned with evident care and skill.

The Outfit is now playing in selected cinemas.