Wednesday, 24 June 2020

Malpractice: "On the Record"


The story On the Record has to tell probably won't come as a complete surprise, just as the revelation that Harvey Weinstein was up to no good came as no real surprise to those with open eyes, ears and minds: its message is that there are things going on behind the scenes of the music industry that would chill the marrow of any reasonable observer. What's new is the insight the film provides into the processes by which such stories come to light. In November 2017, filmmakers Kirby Dick and Amy Ziering sat down with Drew Dixon, a highly respected, since-retired A&R woman for Def Jam and Arista, to talk about her experiences in the rap game. For a while, her testimony yields the kind of anecdotes that would be manna for any celebratory Friday-night BBC4 doc. She gurgles with pride while recalling her first recorded shoutout (via Bone Thugs-n-Harmony, an act she signed); she discusses how she helped Puff Duffy decide on the Tammi Terrell sample that helped to make Method Man's Mary J. Blige collab "You're All I Need" what it was. Her credentials are impeccable. But note the date of the meeting: post-Weinstein, with the #MeToo hashtag beginning to circulate. Heed, too, the sporadic audioclips in which Def Jam boss Russell Simmons privately - but forcefully - indicates his preference for "tall, skinny bitches". Evidence is being assembled; a case is being made. We can but hope someone will answer for it, but equally we know now just what it takes for justice to be achieved.

What we'll watch, in these 95 minutes, is but the tip of an iceberg, both in terms of music-industry malpractice and the extent of the filmmaking: heaven knows how many hours were spent in lawyers' offices ensuring that the film was litigation-proof. (Simmons' response has been to go into retreat on the island of Bali, which - as On the Record notes in a waspish end-credit - has no extradition treaty to the United States. Weinstein must be kicking himself with his gammy leg.) Clearly, there was a degree of waiting around for Dixon's story to be factchecked and go to press, but the filmmakers use that time constructively, in the main. For one, they endeavour to ensure Simmons is viewed not as a solitary bad apple, but representative of a wider misogyny within the industry. Dick, exhibiting the same pop-cultural savvy he brought to 2006's This Film is Not Yet Rated, traces it at least as far back as the era of the Beatles and the Stones, although rap misogyny tends to strike the ear with more force than, say, Tom Jones boasting of slaying the errant Delilah. Context is everything here: I sensed Dixon had reached out to Dick and Ziering almost as a back-up - to allow her to get her story out to receptive, sympathetic listeners before she and the New York Times went public with her accusations - and there are clear reasons for this defensiveness. This case was further complicated by issues of race: Dixon is a light-skinned WOC, who joshes about "light privilege" but appears all too aware such privilege stretches only so far. As the author Michele Wallace puts it: "You're worried, as a Black woman, that you'll say something that will have consequences you hadn't anticipated - even down to calling the police." Dixon admits she was reluctant to describe Simmons as sexually aggressive because it might have been perceived as perpetuating a racial stereotype, but there were others - it turns out many, many others - who had similar, in some instances near-identical stories. There was more back-up than Dixon dared hope.

The film's strength resides in setting the viewer down alongside a rape survivor as her story goes live, develops, is debated in the court of public opinion: there's something fascinating, never prurient and hopefully emboldening in seeing how Dixon navigates her situation, doubles down or develops coping strategies, and finally draws her own strength from the realisation she wasn't as alone as she may first have thought. Equally, though, Dick and Ziering can't help but spot the toll these extremes of emotion take on a woman busy enough with the everyday work of living a life. We're right in the thick of it, which may explain why the structure gets a little ragged or wobbly in places. Evidently, this is a documentary that had to change shape to accommodate new voices coming forward, and doubtless suggestions from the legal department. (Oprah Winfrey had an executive-producer credit scrubbed after disagreements about the film's scope.) Yet On the Record is so focused on making the case against Simmons that it badly fumbles the Dixon biography. Having spent some while setting up marriage and motherhood as the route that allowed the film's subject to turn her back on the business and find renewed happiness, the final reel nonchalantly lets slip she's now divorced, a revelation to which the only possible response is: oh. Unintentionally, the film opens the door for a well-paid defence lawyer to argue a certain inconsistency of character, and for an ever-patient prosecutor to point out, once again, that erratic behaviour and a haphazard personal life can in themselves be proofs of injury. It's a pity, because there is an undeniable rhetorical force in hearing so much testimony, much of that corroborating, recounted at such close quarters. Here's a film about trauma - a trauma Dixon and her fellow plaintiffs would maintain is all too commonplace - which dares the viewer not to believe it.

On the Record will be available to stream from Friday.

Tuesday, 23 June 2020

Problem child: "The Girl with a Bracelet"


Nothing so decorous or flattering as that noted pearl earring, rather a location monitor slapped less than delicately around the ankle of a young woman under suspicion. From its opening tableau of police interrupting a family day out at the beach to drag 16-year-old Lise Bataille (Melissa Guers) away into custody for reasons unknown, Stéphane Demoustier's The Girl with a Bracelet delights in raising questions the courtroom drama at its centre takes a long, hard think about answering. What crime could a girl from such a conspicuously well-appointed household have committed? Why - when her case comes to trial two years after this prologue - do her parents (Roschdy Zem and Chiara Mastroianni) suddenly appear estranged? Why are a concerned group of citizens, paid interrogators, going to such great lengths to establish what went down in the course of a teenage sleepover? From the manner in which she stares down the uptight prosecutor (Anaïs Demoustier, the director's sister), we understand Lise herself will be providing no easy answers; while we wait for the relevant particulars of the case to be entered onto the record, the camera submits her to a level of scrutiny previously only experienced by the heroines of certain 1940s melodramas.

Does this problem child merit and sustain such scrutiny? It's true that Guers' mercurial performance stands as by far the film's strongest suit. Observed within the confines of her parents' home, her Lise could be any other, slightly sullen teenager; but lead her anywhere beyond the boundaries permitted by that bracelet - up into the dock, say - and she defaults to a dead-eyed, heavy-lidded stare that indicates something's seriously off with this girl. The viewer's task, over the course of these faintly tinny 95 minutes, is to judge whether that something is latent sociopathy or just mortified shame, for that element of melodrama is a remnant of the old Scarlet Letter plot, most recently worked out as comedy in 2010's Easy A. This case, it transpires, turns on the existence and circulation of that most 21st century of macguffins, a viral video clip. For a while - in what constitutes the film's most involving stretch - it looks as though Demoustier is attempting to cram into one courthouse some of the sprawling complication of last year's strong Australian series The Hunting, the better to observe what happens when adults try to regulate burgeoning teenage sexuality, when schoolyard crushes become a matter of law.

That's a noble aim, and it's possible to imagine The Girl with a Bracelet sparking bridging conversations in some forums between teens feeling their way out into adulthood and parents who never had to worry about their first fumblings finding their way onto Pornhub. Narratively and stylistically, however, Demoustier's film comes to feel a touch limited; it may just be more effective as a talking point than it is as drama. The Hunting pulled the adults into the mess their kids made, seeing it as a logical consequence of their failure to understand what their offspring were doing with the freedoms they had to fight for. Here, the same grown-ups are merely shuttled on and off as character witnesses; though Zem and Mastroianni make credible statements when called, there's never enough going on away from the courtroom for them to become active participants in the film. What that leaves us watching is basically an episode of Crown Court with sexy new subject matter and rather more money at its disposal. Inevitably, a lot comes to rest on the verdict, and whether the film will stump up the answers it's spent much of its running time withholding. No spoilers from me, save to say the final moments are less about the crime than court mechanics - precisely the film's least engaging aspect. It's disappointingly characteristic of Demoustier's direction after that intriguing start: he's too interested in what that bracelet represents, and not nearly interested enough in the girl wearing it.

The Girl with a Bracelet will be available to stream via Curzon from Friday.

Minor frets: "Carmine Street Guitars"


Incoming: a wave of nostalgia for bricks-and-mortar retail, either because Covid-19 means we've forgotten what it is to pop to the shops, or because popping to the shops is ultimately a phenomenon destined to go the way of the dodo, Covid or no Covid. Next week sees the release of The Booksellers, a documentary centred on the kind of poky holes-in-walls that have achieved the impossible and held out against the tyranny of Amazon 1-Click™. This week's doc Carmine Street Guitars pays fond, slightly indulgent tribute to an emporium that offers a service and experience you'd be hard-pushed to find online: a bijou Greenwich Village mainstay, run by Rick Kelly with assistance from his mom Dorothy, which deals in the manufacture, sale and repair of instruments carved by hand out of wood retrieved from prominent New York City landmarks. (A Kelly guitar has a story to tell even before it strikes up a tune.) The narrative writer Len Blum and director Ron Mann (who may just have the exact right name to be directing a documentary about a guitar shop) have constructed to show this place off in its best light is a mellow week-in-the-life number. Musicians drop by, sometimes playing a few chords; Kelly, a stalwart of the Greenwich Village scene dating back to the Hendrix era, dredges up an anecdote or two; and somehow, somehow, the shop staves off the forces of gentrification for another day.

The film that emerges from this selective observation is a cross between those reality-TV shows set in testosterone-filled backrooms and Wayne Wang and Paul Auster's enjoyable, under-revived collaborations Smoke and Blue in the Face. (Jim Jarmusch, whose cameo was a highlight of the latter movie, shows up again here, and promptly contrives a very Jarmuschian riff about beetles eating his elm trees.) It was often a bit too reality-TV for this viewer's preference, to be completely honest. You see and hear the directorial prompting when peroxide-locked apprentice Cindy Hulaj confronts Kelly as to his indifference to the shop's Instagram account ("You need to get into the 21st century"); the point is that Kelly values craft over celebrity, and sure as hell doesn't need the easy affirmations of the digital age, but it's as artlessly made as it would be by the average episode of Salvage Hunters. Rather more appreciable is the joy the film takes in simply hanging out (god, remember that?), whether in the CSG workshop, where Mann's camera appears fascinated by the planing, bevelling and application of varnish, by sawdust floating into the air; or front-of-shop, where we invariably find one of New York's hipper residents gawping at some new artisanal wonder Kelly sets before them. A closing-credit hat-tip to the late Jonathan Demme just about feels right, though it's a film that requires some patience, a pre-existing interest in guitars as pieces of kit, and possibly the ability to be starstruck in the presence of Jamie from The Kills. Either way, there almost certainly won't be a 2020 release more specifically tailored to a demographic of 45-to-64-year-old males - but then, heck, it was Father's Day last weekend. Dads need playthings, too.

Carmine Street Guitars will be available to stream from Friday.

Monday, 22 June 2020

On demand: "Jallikattu"


As a filmmaker, the Keralan maverick Lijo Jose Pellissery would appear to be fascinated by the mob, a feature that sets him in illustrious company. (Hitchcock and Lang would count among his cinematic forebears.) It also leaves him well-placed not just to comment on modern India, but the wider world: he spots that which is primal and tribal in the everyday. This fascination manifests most obviously in Pellissery's swirling, hectic, apparently uncontrollable crowd scenes. The fisticuffs that broke out in the backalleys of 2017's Angamaly Diaries grew to occupy what seemed like half of Kerala, whether the locals were in on the action or not; the extraordinary funeral rites of 2018's Ee.Ma.Yau provided the perfect capper to that film's thesis about the draining hard work involved in allowing a man to rest in peace. Jallikattu, Pellissery's most stylised and yet most commercial-seeming venture to date, opens by chopping together proofs of a jungle village's manic ebb and flow; these images come to congregate and jostle one another like people. Much of the attention is focused on the village meat stall, seen doing a roaring trade, although at the umpteenth shot of a cleaver tearing through animal flesh (this is not, at least not initially, a film for vegans), an idea is planted that this way of life is unsustainable; something's got to give. And so it does: the rope tying the butcher's pet buffalo frays, enabling the vengeful beast to go on the rampage through the surrounding area, and leaving the villagers to either gang and tool up in a bid to halt it, or - more wisely - get the hell out of its way. That's right: Jallikattu is Sharknado played more or less straight, Unstoppable with the runaway train replaced by 500 pounds of horned beef. If that doesn't get you salivating somehow, then the cinema may not be your natural home.

Important to note, however, that we barely see this unit once loosed - more notable is the crisis it prompts. What makes Pellissery so special is that he's one of the few directors currently working anywhere in the world who is as adept with social commentary as he is with action, who can stick the big-picture stuff audiences have traditionally thrilled at and deft character beats that yield subtler, more thoughtful responses. He's John Woo with the brain of Henry James, an ironist who loves setting things off. Everyone's on edge in Jallikattu even before the rumble of approaching hooves (there's a Peeping Tom doing the rounds, and a wedding being planned, which you fear can only go the same way as Ee.Ma.Yau's funeral); after trampling a herb garden and crops, and running amok through the bank, the buffalo succeeds in sowing further anxiety, division and confusion in its wake. The first responders are the local alpha males, although it's soon clear they don't have a coherent strategy beyond charging out with sleeves rolled up to their biceps; other men flood in from neighbouring villages, get drunk and look to make a night of it; the growing consensus seems to be that brute force is the way forward, which is why, though they vastly outnumber their quarry, the men wind up outthought at every turn. Nobody seems to have considered the fact that hundreds of blokes charging round in the dark with sticks and guns will likely incur some form of collateral damage; no-one seems willing to let the buffalo go, for the thorny matter of male pride is at stake. (Even when they have the poor creature cornered, the hunters are too busy arguing over who gets to kill it to actually do the deed.) Jallikattu builds on the burial rites of Ee.Ma.Yau, in that it extrapolates from one event a complete, immersive picture of a society, here one with one foot in the present and the other very firmly in the Stone Age. 

The bonus is that it should generate such an exciting picture. The controlled chaos of Pellissery's shotmaking is gripping in itself, even when it's not immediately clear what's going on from a narrative perspective. You never can tell which way these meathead characters (from the buffalo on down) are going to enter or exit the frame, or where this camera - which assumes some of the elasticity and stamina of the camera in any Looney Tunes cartoon - is headed. It leads to remarkable setpieces (a Fitzcarraldo-like effort to haul the buffalo out of a well, a final-reel pile-on that carries everyone back in time), but Pellissery can also mix things up via droll sketches of those less testosterone-y villagers idly watching TV or scrolling through their phones, effortlessly showing up the primitive idiocy of this wild moo-se chase. His ever-swelling ensemble are good either way: they can fade into a crowd, or step up to add some new note of satire. I don't think Pellissery is rolling his eyes at the stupidity of Man so much as actively and enthusiastically enumerating the many and distinct ways in which men are capable of being stupid; still, he cuts briskly through them, taking just 94 minutes to outline an entire, crazy world, the grunts and hollers he addends to his soundtrack providing their own succinct comment. Nine months on from the film's release at home, we find Kerala being cited as a model for dealing with the Covid-19 outbreak, its leaders celebrated for listening to experts, taking swift action, and thereby avoiding the death toll being racked up elsewhere. Think deeply, act decisively: that's also Jallikattu's moral, although the cherishably perverse Pellissery chooses to underline the point by filming what happens when growing numbers of people don't do this. A few years ago, the results might simply have stood as a cautionary tale; as we charge headlong into the third decade of another turbulent century, Jallikattu now unspools as that rare action movie you could cite as a teaching aid.

Jallikattu is streaming on Amazon Prime.

Sunday, 21 June 2020

On demand: "Honey Boy"


Honey Boy sounds some way more conceptual (let's say it, wankier) than it actually is: a film in which Shia LaBeouf plays a version of his own father, and - as writer-star - strives both to describe the process whereby he was launched on the world as a child star as the 20th century gave way to the 21st, and confront the effect that success had on him as an adult. Some of the names have been changed to protect the debatably innocent. Our onscreen LaBeouf surrogate is called Otis - he's writing about himself in the third person - and played by a newly pumped-up Lucas Hedges as an easily bored, quick-to-drink tearaway first seen on set being shot at by robots that look awfully like those damn Transformers. An enforced spell in rehab cues flashbacks to Otis's youth, when - now incarnated by Noah Jupe as a guileless moppet - he was shuttled to and from the set of a successful kids' show (for which we presumably read Even Stevens) by his heavy-drinking, casually abusive father James - and here's where the real LaBeouf comes in. James could have been just another showbiz monster, this century's Joan Crawford in Mommie Dearest. Instead, the casting of LaBeouf has a balancing effect: for ninety minutes, we watch as a son tries to work out why his father behaved as he did, and more specifically yet, why he behaved as he did towards him. Director Alma Har'el has been scratching around on the indie fringes in the company of non-professional performers (Bombay Beach, LoveTrue); here, she achieves something genuinely radical with a star, forcing a young millionaire to take a long, hard look in the mirror and separate that part of his bad behaviour that was passed down in his genes from that for which he - and he alone - must finally bear responsibility.

Perhaps that gives Honey Boy the air of a therapeutic exercise, possibly one best achieved behind closed doors, but it's a revealing one, both for what it conveys about LaBeouf family dynamics and more generally about family ties. With Mrs. LaB out of the picture via an earlier divorce - an unseen Natasha Lyonne takes a prominent credit for contributing one telephone conversation - the focus is exclusively on that father-son bond, the default axis of mainstream American cinema. Yet Har'el takes it seriously, and goes deep with it; the problem here isn't that this kid didn't have anyone to throw a baseball around with back in the day. Rather, it would appear from this account that dad - an altogether odd, failed former TV personality trailing Mick Miller hair and inexplicable schtick with chickens - was attempting to live out his own fantasies through his child: hence his drill-sergeant manner of parenting, hence his inappropriate comments towards the girls who recognise his boy. Is it possible that Otis/Shia was set on guard for so much of his youth that he was bound to feel boredom even amid the hyper-stimulation of those giant robot movies - that his problems derived from the fact there was no longer anyone threatening to clip him around the ear? If so, that's one heck of a breakthrough for a movie - and a movie star - to make. You can imagine the lessons of Honey Boy being applied to a hundred other cases in the wider Los Angeles area, and an appropriate course of treatment being prescribed.

What's in it for us?, you might well ask. Well, for one thing, Har'el - and her great cinematographer Natasha Braier (In the City of Sylvia, The Neon Demon, Somers Town) - give these images a subtle, haunted beauty commensurate with the sight of people attempting to banish their ghosts and demons. The editing keeps making deft, delicate connections between the present and the past, the child picking through the junkyard adjacent to his roach motel and the young adult lost in the woods surrounding the clinic. And the performers do their bit to ensure the psychology stitches together: the previously milquetoast Hedges assumes some of LaBeouf's confrontational sincerity, that singular need the actor has displayed in his public appearances for others to take him as seriously as he does himself. Perhaps they will from here on out. Backed up by his similarly committed, unsentimental work in last year's The Peanut Butter Falcon, this does look like a breakthrough moment for LaBeouf, the point at which he revealed an emotional maturity no previous director - not Michael Bay, nor Lars von Trier - troubled to coax out of him. What ultimately raises Honey Boy above and beyond the crowded ranks of Hollywood vanity projects is that it's a maturity even those of us who weren't raised as child stars might recognise: the ability to forgive the sins and flaws of our fathers, take whatever love they put in our pocket growing up, and with it resolve to go one better as we plot our own path through this world. At this stage in the 21st century, it's undeniable that the putting on of shows has generated almost as much damage and trauma as it has entertainment, but there have been a few souls for whom the creation of moving images has become therapy, a way of straightening out their own wrinkles, keeping themselves honest and making sense of the universe. LaBeouf is following this path now; watching this deeply affecting act of personal catharsis, we can but hope he carries onwards.

Honey Boy is available to stream via Amazon Prime.

Saturday, 20 June 2020

On demand: "A Question of Silence"


A major arthouse talking point back in 1982 - since quieted by falling out of wider circulation - Marleen Gorris's feminist parable A Question of Silence absolutely merits rediscovery now that it's been uploaded to YouTube by the good folks at Solidarity Cinema. Three very different women - a meek housewife (Edda Barends), a garrulous café owner (Nelly Frijda) and a bright secretary (Henriëtte Tol) - are arrested around Amsterdam on suspicion of murdering a shopkeeper; they surrender without protest, on the assumption whatever's waiting for them in custody will be easier than what they've had to endure day to day. It's down to a female psychologist (Cox Habbema), notably more empathetic than those male colleagues writing off these women as mad, to interview them, their loved ones and their colleagues, and thereby understand a) where they were coming from and b) whether this most violent of crimes was premeditated, and not just the result of a sudden snap. As whodunnits go, it's an open-and-shut case, with no other suspects in the frame; what Gorris understood was that such cases are more usefully approached as whydunnits, taking the extra time to find out just what drives a woman to breaking point.

That inquiry is presented within the framework of a highly constructed narrative, designed to point the viewer in a certain direction - or at least to nudge him or her towards further consideration. Two elements keep A Question of Silence from becoming unduly programmatic. Firstly, it's shot almost like a TV documentary of the period, following these women through airless front rooms, nondescript shopping malls and drab office spaces in which they invariably find themselves pushed into the background, then into a system where (up until the trial, when they face the condescensions of the judiciary) they at least have the advantage of being free from the micro-aggressions of the opposite sex. Secondly, the women's testimony is offered up in the form of jabbing fragments that require the viewer to do much of the work, figuring out what brought these three strangers together to kill a fourth. Very strong writing and playing personalises and differentiates these women: Frijda's proprietress laughs off the flak she gets, but Barends' homemaker internalises it, and Tol's eternally overlooked PA apparently feels so liberated by the act of murder that she turns a trick on the way home, which can't help but seem a decidedly Dutch response.

Gorris also shows us how these women respond to the psychologist's questioning in markedly different ways. "I could murder someone for some chocolate," joshes the café owner; the housewife, rendered all but mute by long afternoons with no-one to talk to, is reduced to drawing clues for her interrogator. Frans Bromet's camera is deeply alert to the body language that might well be ignored by more restless and brusque investigators: a lot of this story's clues are hidden in plain sight. Some of its details are inseparably 1982, like the Casio score, credited to Lodewijk de Boer and Martijn Hasebos but all too clearly the work of John Shuttleworth. And in the wake of subsequent provocations from Catherine Breillat and the Baise-Moi dames, the murder scene plays as a little quaint when we eventually alight upon it. (Far more unnerving is the supervising mortician's assessment of the corpse: "The genitals were almost unrecognisable as such." Now there's a line to make the gents in any audience stop manspreading.) Watching it in 2020, I could well imagine some bright spark updating it as Steve McQueen did Widows - but it remains unusually potent as is: a film to make women think, and to make men think twice.

A Question of Silence is now streaming on YouTube, and can be found here.

Friday, 19 June 2020

For what it's worth...



My top ten streaming picks (for the week beginning June 19, 2020):

1 (new) Just Don't Think I'll Scream (uncertificated) **** (MUBI)
2. The Australian Dream (15) **** (via Amazon, Curzon, BFI)
3. The Uncertain Kingdom (15) **** (Curzon, BFI)
4. The County (12A) **** (Curzon)
5 (new) The Day After I'm Gone (uncertificated) *** (MUBI)
6. Virus Tropical (uncertificated) *** (MUBI)
7. Days of the Bagnold Summer (12A) *** (via Amazon, Curzon, BFI)
8. Guest of Honour (uncertificated) *** (Curzon)
9. Woman at War (12A) *** (MUBI)
10. Dating Amber (15) *** (Amazon Prime)


DVD/Blu-Ray/Download top ten: 

1 (37) Sonic the Hedgehog (PG)

2 (3) 1917 (15) ***
3 (1) Dolittle (PG)
4 (2) Onward (U) ***
5 (re) Bloodshot (12)
6 (5) Bad Boys for Life (15) ***
7 (10) Jumanji: The Next Level (12)
8 (7) Little Women (U) ****
9 (8) Frozen II (U) **
10 (6) Cats (U)

(source: officialcharts.com)

My top five: 
1. Parasite

2. The Personal History of David Copperfield
3. Ordinary Love
4. Portrait of a Lady on Fire
5. Vivarium


Top five films on terrestrial television:
1. The Magnificent Seven [above] (Sunday, BBC2, 2pm)
2. Leviathan (Sunday, BBC2, 1am)
3. Skyfall (Saturday, ITV, 8.30pm)
4. A Knight's Tale (Sunday, five, 1.15pm)
5. The Man in the Iron Mask (Sunday, five, 3.55pm)