Monday, 11 May 2026

From the archive: "Wake in Fright"


Some films are so ferocious they refuse to sit around getting dusty in the archives for too long; by sheer force of personality, they endure, and eventually go swaggering back out into the world, looking for trouble once again. After four decades in lock-up – possibly at the behest of the Australian Tourist Board – Ted Kotcheff’s 1971 horror-cum-national character study
Wake in Fright returns to UK screens this weekend, off the back of a recent Cannes restoration, to offer its own unique and bloody-minded tour of the Outback.

The Canadian Kotcheff got here around the same time as Nic Roeg went Walkabout, yet where the latter recast this territory as another Eden, Kotcheff’s interest was more grounded (and, in some way, more comprehensible) yet: in a place where there’s nothing to do except get royally lashed, and a fellow is judged chiefly on his ability to neck a pint. (I drink, therefore I am: one of the reasons the film endures so is its resemblance to the aggressive dipsomania still prevalent in certain British backwaters.)

On trial here is one John Grant (Gary Bond), an Englishman who’s wound up, somewhat resentfully, in a middle-of-nowhere town on a teaching secondment. Of course this educated man believes himself above the locals, with their gruff militarism, arcane gambling rituals and steaks for a dollar. And of course, this certainty will be removed from him when he tries to get away from it all over the Christmas holidays, eroded by a combination of alcohol, bad luck and that familiar 70s harbinger of insanity Donald Pleasance.

During its absence from general circulation, the film has found itself lumped in with that Ozploitation cycle documented in 2008’s enjoyably rowdy Not Quite Hollywood, yet in itself Wake in Fright is far more lingering than any of those movies turned out for a quick buck. Kotcheff seems determined to hold his camera on every strange, unsettling, telling gesture and each loaded exchange, and the result is almost abstract: a portrait of a figure slowly dissolving into his surrounds, as though he were no more than a temporary heat haze.

Or some other haze, for it isn’t blood that flows through these frames, but the amber nectar. The sound of tinnies being opened becomes a prelude to gunfire, and you can sense the film developing a bad head before you – a fogginess of a kind a breakfast of kangaroo stew only worsens, through which only a bullet might really pierce. The action, however, remains joltingly vivid: a game of coinflipping that becomes as much a self-abusing ritual as the Russian roulette in The Deer Hunter, a brutal kangaroo hunt in which everybody starts blasting away at the thin tissue of civilities separating John Grant from his true nature.

In between, Kotcheff does something haunting and critical with the film’s women, who’ve long learnt to keep their mouths shut and shrug off every horny-handed slap on the arse. Yet, clearly, we’re mired firmly in man’s territory: the film keeps weighing some of the most believable drunken-destructive scraps ever recorded outside of provincial nightclub CCTV footage against those mornings-after when its characters awaken, in puddles of their own drool, sweat and filth, surrounded by strange bodies, and wondering what the XXXX just happened.

Punctuated at regular intervals by editor Anthony Buckley’s choice, suggestive blackouts, Wake in Fright re-emerges as a real hangover-movie, one that can’t easily be slept off; however physical Kotcheff got in his later, more scattershot work – which took in the agonised chest-thumping of First Blood and the knockabout of Weekend at Bernie’s – he never quite matched this one for potency.

(MovieMail, March 2014)

A 4K restoration of Wake in Fright opens in selected cinemas from Friday.

Friday, 8 May 2026

For what it's worth...




UK box office Top Ten (for the weekend of May 1-3, 2026):

1 (new) The Devil Wears Prada 2 (12A)
2 (1) Michael (12A)
3 (2The Super Mario Galaxy Movie (PG)
4 (new) Hokum (15) ***
5 (3Project Hail Mary (12A) ***
6 (new) Patriot (15) **
7 (6) The Magic Faraway Tree (U)
8 (4The Drama (15) **
9 (5) Lee Cronin's The Mummy (18)
10 (new) Eugene Onegin - Met Opera 2026 (12A)

(source: BFI)

My top five:
3. A.I.: Artificial Intelligence [above]
4. Hokum


DVD/Blu-Ray/Download top ten: 

1 (new) Scream 7 (18)
2 (1) Avatar: Fire and Ash (12) ***
4 (3) Shelter (15)
5 (8) The Devil Wears Prada (PG) ***
6 (15) G.O.A.T. (PG)
7 (5) Send Help (15) ***
8 (6) "Wuthering Heights" (15)
9 (4) The Super Mario Bros Movie (PG)
10 (14) Hamnet (12) **


My top five: 
1. Cold Storage


Top five films on terrestrial TV this week:
1. The Producers (Saturday, BBC Two, 11.45pm)
2. E.T.: The Extra-Terrestrial (Saturday, ITV1, 6am)
3. Surge (Sunday, BBC Two, 12.05am)
4. A Bigger Splash (Monday, BBC Two, 11pm)
5. Moon (Sunday, Channel 4, 11pm)

Thursday, 7 May 2026

Hotel hell: "Hokum"


Damian McCarthy's
Hokum marks an altogether eccentric revival of horror cinema's "stranger in a strange place" subgenre. The stranger is Adam Scott's Ohm Bauman (strange name, even), an obnoxious, barely functioning alcoholic horror writer who, one Hallowe'en, repairs to a hotel in rural Ireland where his late parents honeymooned so as to scatter their ashes in the nearby woods. That task, at least, is easily achieved; far trickier is extricating himself from the deeply dysfunctional hostelry, plagued as it is by tripping mountain goats, a no less cranky, wheelchair-using owner (Brendan Conroy) and a rumour said honeymoon suite has since been sealed off so as to contain a witch. Belatedly, and only after pissing off everyone around him in some way, Bauman comes to realise he's wandered into a missing-woman mystery with a twist on every other page; also that he'll have to ditch the booze and work extra hard if he's to arrive at a happier outcome than the generally doomy conclusions of his own hack novels. By naming his film as he has, McCarthy has afforded himself a get-out clause: sure enough, Hokum's penny-dreadful plotting does feel rattly, outright arbitrary in places, and never meant to be taken too seriously. The tension here, whether dramatic or comic, stems from the contrast between the upright, arrogant Yank - Scott doing just enough to suggest Bauman might be less of an asshole if he weren't navigating such a rough period - and the kooky Irish character actors looming up over our hero as he descends into darkness: Peter Coonan as the hotel's desk clerk, Will O'Connell as a dullard bellhop and David Wilmot as a local itinerant. McCarthy demonstrates an eye for unsettling symbolism (handsaws and crossbows, clay figurines that pre-empt the plot, a haunted-seeming carriage clock with a hidden, secondary purpose, half-glimpsed images on poorly tuned TV sets), while production designer Til Frohlich works overtime converting a shabby provincial hotel into a combination of escape room, puzzle to be solved and Dante's Inferno. I suspect this is one of those scripts that got the greenlight the moment 2024's Heretic went past a certain number at the box office: if it's neither as cunning nor as engrossing as that film, instead relying overly on the sight of Scott squirrelling around in the dark, it delivers a measure of baroque fun all the same. Primary takehome: some men would rather undergo supernatural trial-by-fire in remote Irish hotels than book themselves into therapy.

Hokum is now playing in selected cinemas.

Wednesday, 6 May 2026

Left to their own devices: "Patriot"


From a commercial perspective, it's little surprise Mahesh Narayanan's Malayalam film
Patriot made the UK Top Ten this past weekend: it marks a reunion of sorts for stars Mammootty and Mohanlal, the grand old men of South Indian cinema. Critical eyes might, however, be drawn this way by the prospect of a South Indian response to the North's recent, thunderous Dhurandhar diptych. This, too, is a spy thriller, albeit one that starts in appropriately stealthy fashion before tailing away into maximalist silliness; if it's similarly paranoid, it's not about India's neighbours, but threats from within, specifically big tech. At the film's centre - much remarked upon, never seen - is Periscope, an item of spyware we learn has been slipped onto citizens' smartphones and laptops so as to monitor online interactions and crush dissent. Fahadh Faasil, with shady-ass stubble, is the erratic, Musky tech bro whose Shakti Corp has engineered the program; Rajiv Menon his father, a compromised Government minister who signed the surveillance into law. Over on the side of the angels, Revathi is the opposition leader who vows to expose this scandal and clear up the mess before expiring in mysterious circumstances; Mammootty plays Dr. Daniel James, the heavy-drinking analyst she entrusts to investigate. Obliged to flee India after his employer's death, pronounced a traitor to the national cause, Danny - as he's known - heads into exile in London, where he adopts the YouTube handle Vimathan (or "Dissident") and starts to uncover the various ways consumer items have been weaponised against their users. These early scenes lend Patriot an air of Slow Horses-ish shabbiness that should play well with British audiences, who'll get to enjoy watching this fabled leading man putting the bins out and driving past a Spar. You didn't get that with Dhurandhar.

Yet if the Dhurandhars were a weapon wielded with sporadic skill but most often blunt propagandistic force, Patriot proves a more conventional entertainment. Running just shy of three hours, it's basically a more expansive update of those US techno-thrillers (The Lawnmower Man, Disclosure, The Net, Hackers) that lit up multiplexes in the first days of Web 1.0. In the strongest, most propulsive stretches here, Narayanan succeeds in fusing the old and the new, or in using the tried-and-tested to push back against the aggressive novelties of Shakti Corp and their ilk. It's rather fun to watch the now-seventysomething Mammootty, with his air of a retired university professor, donning a baseball cap to go undercover at a YouTubers' weekend symposium; in a week in which we learnt Google has been eating up storage on everybody's devices by installing AI tech without prior consent, this plot does feel timely, and there's something very much on the money about the way the Palantir-like Shakti, who we learn started as an IT consultancy firm, has rapidly remodelled itself as a major tech player with plans to operate as a private security force. (It wouldn't surprise me if we saw a thick-eared Western variant of this particular plot, probably involving Liam Neeson, within the next one-to-three years.) For some part of its running time - roughly as long as it takes our hero to parse discarded devices for the data that will make a conclusive case against the enemy - Patriot's narrative coding presents as sound, and Narayanan backs it up with solid, involving analogue setpieces: the pulse does quicken around the intermission block, when a YouTuber's prank provides the opening act of a convoluted kidnap attempt in a crowded airport. 

Other elements, alas, just don't scan. Come the second half, we once more bear witness to the spectacle of a pensionable leading man overpowering goons half his age; Narayanan has to deploy a slice-and-dice strategy in the action scenes, frenetically cutting around so as to distract from the unignorable fact his star is neither as mobile nor as dynamic as he once was. Yet beyond this aging star issue, Patriot also has a Big Movie Problem. This is, at heart, a taut two-hour thriller that has been expanded to three to fit some dubious post-pandemic idea of a cinematic event (and thereby get everybody off their sofas and phones). Tightly controlled stretches move the plot on and ratchet up the tension, but there's also a growing level of filler and waffle that relegates the whole to mixed-bag status. The movie enshittifies itself; heading into its final half-hour, Patriot has started to feel almost as exhausting as dealing with actual technology in 2026. Within this ever more sprawling superstructure, the actors are mostly left to themselves, with - again - mixed results. Mohanlal capably shoulders a long stretch at the point Daniel goes AWOL from the plot, playing a one-legged Signal Corps veteran who reconnects with our hero via streetlight Morse code (fuck you, Elon) and conceals a blade in his crutch; and Zarin Shihab is quietly forceful under a headscarf as Daniel's relentless partner Ayisha. Yet local luminary Nayanthara is stuck with a sorely underdetermined part as the hero's first wife and occasional helpmate, and though Faasil - the stealth genius of recent South cinema - brings his usual wiry intensity to the Shakti command centre, he also seems wildly overqualified for such a stock Lex Luthor role. It's still hard not to thrill when the second half pulls a narrative judo move, turning Periscope against those who engineered it - like I said, there is good stuff in here - but Narayanan also wants us to swallow down a lot of generic thriller nonsense between fat handfuls of popcorn. A bit of a tin foil hat movie, all told - and I sensed the hat being worn so as to keep the battiness and bad ideas in.

Patriot is now screening in selected cinemas.

Friday, 1 May 2026

For what it's worth...




UK box office Top Ten (for the weekend of April 24-26, 2026):

1 (new) Michael (12A)
2 (1) The Super Mario Galaxy Movie (PG)
3 (2Project Hail Mary (12A) ***
4 (3) The Drama (15) **
5 (4) Lee Cronin's The Mummy (18)
6 (6) The Magic Faraway Tree (U)
7 (new) Rose of Nevada (15) ****
8 (new) Exit 8 (15)
9 (re) Fight Club (15) ****
10 (new) The Magic Flute - ROH London 2026 (U)

(source: BFI)

My top five:
1. Slither [above]
5. Akira


DVD/Blu-Ray/Download top ten: 

1 (1) Avatar: Fire and Ash (12) ***
3 (29) Shelter (15)
4 (6) The Super Mario Bros Movie (PG)
5 (re) Send Help (15) ***
6 (4) "Wuthering Heights" (15)
7 (new) The Killer (15) ****
8 (34) The Devil Wears Prada (PG) ***
9 (re) Primate (18)
10 (5) The Housemaid (15)



Top five films on terrestrial TV this week:
1. E.T.: The Extra Terrestrial (Sunday, ITV1, 4pm)
2. The Silence of the Lambs (Tuesday, BBC One, 11.40pm)
3. Point Break (Saturday, BBC One, 11.50pm)
4. The Titfield Thunderbolt (Holiday Monday, BBC Two, 9am)
5. Hellboy II: The Golden Army (Holiday Monday, ITV1, 10.15pm)

Wednesday, 29 April 2026

On demand: "Love Means Zero"


From Showtime's documentary arm, a portrait of a tricky subject. 2017's 
Love Means Zero sees filmmaker Jason Kohn profiling Nick Bollettieri, founding father of the Nick Bollettieri Academy, the institution that came to exert an iron grip on the pro tennis circuit in the late Eighties and Nineties, thanks to such stars as Andre Agassi, Jim Courier, Mary Pierce, Maria Sharapova and, as Bollettieri puts it, "my Serena and Venus" (which will come as news to Richard Williams). He's not a monster, but from an early stage in Kohn's film, it becomes apparent that Bollettieri was an exacting taskmaster, possessed of the ruthless singlemindedness that tends to identify and make champions in pro sports. Kohn speaks to a clutch of the name players, but also those who were left to drift away and forgotten about, like tennis balls knocked over a fence or hedge; several of these players are heard to testify that they were made to feel special, like a son or daughter, then abandoned at a formative moment once Bollettieri and his coaches determined they weren't quite what the Academy was seeking. The selection process comes over as tough, perhaps necessary, but above all else poorly handled, from an interpersonal perspective: the most damning evidence Kohn introduces into the record is that even Agassi - the Academy's erratic golden boy, to the extent that Bollettieri was seen and heard to take his side when he faced fellow Academy find Courier in the French Open quarterfinals of 1989 - refused the filmmaker's request for an interview. (He will be amply represented nonetheless, both in evocative archive footage - awful late Eighties mullets and all - and, more poignantly, in the form of a letter he wrote to Bollettieri in his 2009 memoir Open.)

What follows is one of the few sports docs that owes a pronounced rhetorical debt to the combative Errol Morris; you start to feel the camera itself becoming a net. Kohn isolates Bollettieri among the ruins of one of the resorts that were left to crumble after his declaration of bankruptcy; the director lobs up a probing question or three; and Bollettieri - weathered, RFK raspy, prone to alternating between the first and third person and overusing the dated hipster slang "baby" - insistently smashes answers back. This was all in the past, Jason; I don't dwell on such things; I move on, as you should. It's presumably what he told his charges whenever they lost their serve, but around about the point Bollettieri lets slip he's been married eight times, or when one of his erstwhile prodigies opens up about an eating disorder she developed, you start to wonder just how much collateral damage one man can bring about in his quest for success. Certainly Agassi, a player made in his coach's image - a flamboyant, devil-may-care hustler, burning through endorsement deal after endorsement deal - kept getting found out at the highest level, whether by the focused, matter-of-fact Courier, the machine-like Pete Sampras, or the shithousery of Boris Becker in his sleaze era. (Becker gets ushered on to recall how he once psyched out his opponent by openly flirting with Agassi's then-wife Brooke Shields from the very centre of Wimbledon's Centre Court.) We might even question the Bollettieri definition of success. The business model here seems hazy if not outright dubious, framing players not as individuals but ambassadors for the Academy, and recycling prize money to provide scholarships for aspirant champions; late on, Kohn reveals that Bollettieri was eventually outmanoeuvred behind the scenes by one of his savvier employees. The film's subject, who died in 2022, remains defiant to the last, blurting out "I just react! Nick just does it!", like some Nike-swooshed embodiment of the American id. You conclude Bollettieri would have been great to watch as a player, forever on the attack. His flaw as a businessman, and as a human being, is that he simply had no B game.

Love Means Zero is now streaming via NOW TV.

Monday, 27 April 2026

On DVD: "The Chronology of Water"


Kristen Stewart has acted for so many distinctive auteurs in the decade since the
Twilight wrap-up that perhaps it was inevitable she would herself step behind the camera at some point. Her directorial debut The Chronology of Water is exactly the kind of project that might once have tempted her as a performer: an adaptation of a literary memoir (by Lidia Yuknavitch) centred on a muddled, self-harming young woman in desperate search of some purpose and affirmation. We meet this Lidia first as a child, within the framework of a 1960s household made tense by domestic violence; as a teenager, she takes to swimming, thereby internalising all the pressures of a solo competitive sport. When she finally reaches womanhood, embodied by Imogen Poots, she finds her mastery in the pool doesn't apply to dry land, lorded over as it is by the tyrannical men around her. The bulk of this story will outline how Lidia Yuknavitch navigated towards a place of acceptance, happiness and tranquility, a process that proves far from straightforward, and indeed far less straightahead than the average swimming lane. For much of that duration, she's having to outswim - or simply drown out - the negative voices inside her own head. The Chronology of Water will eventually run to a full two hours and eight minutes, which instinctively feels at least a reel too long, but in some ways it needs to be, because what it's detailing isn't an easy fix; like its heroine, the movie can seem tough and hard work.

For starters, you'll simply have to sit with Olivia Neergaard-Holm's free-associative editing, with its (achronological) premonitions of events to come: it's possible Stewart was seeking to emulate Nic Roeg while also intending to conjure a deeply mixed-up headspace. (We're waiting for both film and protagonist to settle down somehow.) Expect sudden swells of turbulence, then, but Stewart also affords us two constants we can cling to whenever matters get especially choppy. The first is the water of the title: the pools Lidia passes through ("how many miles does it take to swim to a self?"), the sweat and sexual effluvia, the ice in the drinks of her (alcoholic?) mother, the spit Lidia contemptuously deposits on the men she hoped might degrade her, the piss stain on one passed-out boyfriend's trousers, the condensation into which our heroine draws smiley faces (for a long time, the only happy faces in the film), the ocean into which she tosses the ashes of a stillborn baby with a muted, quietly devastating "sorry". The water raises up the film's largely floating imagery; it's both running motif and artistic self-justification. And within these emotional high tides, Stewart pins down another, adjacent image: that of the rocks Lidia habitually slips into her pockets on her travels, although it's initially unclear whether she means to ground herself - rocks as markers of time and place - or use them to drown herself à la Virginia Woolf.

The other constant here is Poots, an actress who seems to have been on the fringes of a Winslet-like movie stardom for a decade or more without really getting there. In hauling Poots front and centre, Stewart empowers her star to try things she hasn't before: to play brittle and unsympathetic, to frig herself and flash her boobs, to drink too much and drive too fast, to be as unpretty as this story demands at any given moment. In embracing these tasks, Poots creates the conditions where we cannot ignore this character, hard to be around though Lidia is, liable though she is to hurt herself and those who love her. In passing, Stewart also hands Thora Birch a gentle comeback role as Lidia's understandably concerned sister, and gifts Jim Belushi his best role in decades as the author Ken Kesey, who served as some sort of mentor for Lidia Yuknavitch's creative undertakings. (A sly comment on how fucked-up this moment was in general: we used to let someone as dishevelled as Ken Kesey mentor our young folk.) This is not, on the whole, a movie that wants or solicits the audience's approval, which likely explains why Chronology evaporated without trace within days of its UK theatrical release. (I suspect its maker had her fill of making nice during her teen franchise days.) Yet it demonstrates more than enough steel, a wilfulness its prime mover doubtless absorbed from her more adventurous directors, to be both admirable and promising indeed. Stewart has the makings of a proper filmmaker, just as the past few years have confirmed her as a formidable performer.

The Chronology of Water is now available to rent via the BFI Player and Prime Video, and on DVD via the BFI.

The chronology of water: "Rose of Nevada"


Oddities Week continues with
Rose of Nevada, Cornish auteur Mark Jenkin's distinctive take on the ghost-ship subgenre. Jenkin's previous films Bait and Enys Men were set in workaday South West coastal communities beset by social division and supernatural anomalies; collectively, they formed a heartening revival of both a rudimentary film technique (hand-developed film, post-synched sound) and the kind of regional filmmaking that fell out of fashion and favour once everybody else determined they had to go and seek their fortune in London. But now, armed with a BAFTA and an all-access festival pass, Jenkin is himself going places. His latest, shot in vibrant Nic Roeg Technicolor, introduces emergent, adventurous faces (George Mackay, Callum Turner) into this director's familiar milieu: a well-worn fishing village, here one where the trawler of the title, previously involved in a tragedy thirty years ago, has found its way back into harbour with zero hands on deck. Still, the approach remains so distinct from what's around it in the contemporary cinema that it takes a good fifteen-to-twenty minutes to resettle into the Jenkin way; the opening section has to teach us anew how to watch a film removed of all the usual fuss and clutter. What's noticeable - and surprising, even to those of us who saw Jenkin's previous films - is how much Jenkin conveys via his generally taciturn, square-framed, rough-edged close-ups. We sense, for starters, just how this community has split along generational lines, the chatty younger folk itching to talk about the tragedies befalling the local fishermen, even as their elders clam up. (One exception: a lank-haired dementia patient/seer, prone to confusing present and past, as this plot will eventually.) More striking yet: how these shots come to establish a loaded, ominous mood, borne out when a new three-man crew - grizzled captain Francis Magee and hired hands Mackay and Turner - cast off in this same cursed vessel. Etched into the wooden frame of one of the bunks the lads sleep in: a stark warning to "Get Off The Boat Now".

At which point, a fierce local knowledge - or muscle memory - kicks in. This is a trawlerman movie made by someone who's studied how these boats actually work; with its documentary-like coverage of the gulls above and the ropes and pulleys below, the film Rose most closely resembles, for long stretches at sea, is 2012's immersive experiment Leviathan. The old ways become new, pertinent and urgent again - especially once our boys return home and realise they've docked in the recent past. Something's gone adrift; bearings start to be lost. If the narrative is far from plain sailing, Jenkin's shot selection - comprising four weatherbeaten or otherwise textured close-ups to every one suggestive, Deren-like sliver of dream imagery - begins to feel like necessary ballast, exactly what this director needed to tell this particular story. (Here are shots that appear the results of several weeks' beachcombing, visual information laid out as plainly as it would be on the sands; every image is its own seashell or fossil.) And the actors put in a real shift. Few films have made better use of - and more closely relied on - Mackay's open-faced legibility, the actor set to looking ever more aghast at developments. That quality becomes doubly effective when set against the vague air of fecklessness given off by the squintier, shiftier Turner - the market-stall Richard Gere - as a young man only too prepared to go along with this new arrangement, which is to say the old arrangement, if it means sleeping with a dead man's wife. (Arguably, these youngsters are overshadowed by another cherishably characterful turn from Magee, the Bob Mitchum of the cream tea set.) If Rose of Nevada turns out to be a hit, as my packed first-weekend screening would indicate, that may partly be down to star names, and partly down to being horror/fantasy-adjacent: on some basic level, we're dealing with a brinier Brigadoon here. Yet it's also surely attributable to Jenkin attempting what few others have of late: his is a cinema that continues to speak, on some sublimated, unconscious level, to the choppy waters and backwash we're all passing through. Some of the new film's tensions are regional: you do come away with a sense of those pressures felt by the young in crumbling coastal communities to stay in place and knuckle down. But it also strikes me as significant that Jenkin has been a post-Brexit discovery. Steered by a crew of queasy and uneasy shipmates, Rose of Nevada proves unusually attuned to what it means - and how it feels - for a people to be living in the present and the past simultaneously.

Rose of Nevada is now playing in selected cinemas.

Sunday, 26 April 2026

Possession(s): "Mother Mary"


Well, April
is supposed to be the studios' R&D month, devoted to risks, gambles and shots in the dark. It's no longer Oscar season, so the movies don't have to pretend to be respectable, and it's not yet summertime, so they don't have to be IMAX big. Mother Mary, A24's choice of counterprogramming to this weekend's dubious sure thing Michael, is an old-school women's picture approached from a wildly eccentric angle by the ever-unpredictable David Lowery (Ain't Them Bodies Saints, Pete's Dragon, A Ghost Story). At its heart: a power struggle in the costume department. A scarred, nervy and generally washed out Anne Hathaway is the Gaga-like pop sensation who arrives amid a thunderstorm at the country retreat/workshop of diva costumier Michaela Coel. She's hoping to come away with a dress fit for what she insinuates will be her farewell performance, but progress in this matter is soon complicated by the fact this pair have a past: they may indeed have once been an item, and the designer has retained some measure of resentment over the way the singer subsequently stepped out in other designers' clothes. In theory, then, this is a clash of artistic visions and temperaments: the deeply damaged soul versus the prickly provocateur peering loftily down from her drawing board. Yet even that feels too conventional a reading for what's really going on here. In actual fact, those of us watching on from the cheap seats soon find ourselves scrambling to maintain our bearings and marbles, while also reaching out for a few urgently needed and reassuring reference points.

When Paul Thomas Anderson, for one, moved into this field, he returned with what was, in Phantom Thread, his most hemmed-in project, a Californian's impersonation of Brit period-flick reticence. Mother Mary initially appears far more theatrical: it opens with a long reunion scene in which Hathaway and Coel talk in a way no two human beings have ever talked, and the former performs an interpretative dance routine - with its inferences of demonic possession, it's more Linda Blair than Lionel - to a tune we don't hear. Those trailers weren't lying, one concludes: this is a decidedly odd one, and you may well spend some of it - as I did - wondering whether a script hasn't landed in the wrong pigeonhole. Sudden, stark in-camera scene and lighting changes indicate the director of the scarcely less batshit The Green Knight has set his sights on producing a better-dressed revival of the Sleuth-like filmed play; but then Sleuth, Deathtrap and their ilk never featured a scene involving a possessed FKA Twigs. That Mother Mary eventually won me over had a lot to do with these actresses, who apparently got whatever there was to get in this material, and who elevate it to a rare intensity. Something really does seem to be at stake in the matter of Hathaway versus Coel: it's soft vs. spiky, white privilege vs. lingering slights, fairytale princess vs. perhaps the most extraordinary looking performer working today. In the second half, Lowery's gift for image generation returns to the forefront; although shot on a far smaller budget, his concert scenes - reframing pop as something mythic, closer to a ritual or rite - make the Taylor Swift movie seem newly unimaginative. So there's another battle going on within Mother Mary: between the stagey and the cinematic, and - in the eyes of this judge - the latter just nicks it on points. Lowery's film doesn't attain the layered surrealism of, say, Peter Strickland's In Fabric, another treatise on the alchemy of creation fixated on a haunted red dress; some part of me couldn't shake the suspicion this is an artefact designed to justify the existence (and hefty pricetag) of a lavish, A24-published coffee table tome. Yet as flop Anne Hathaway vehicles go, Mother Mary is more intriguing, even fascinating, than 2023's Eileen - and it dares to go places next week's conventionally tailored The Devil Wears Prada 2 likely won't.

Mother Mary is now playing in selected cinemas.

Saturday, 25 April 2026

For what it's worth...




UK box office Top Ten (for the weekend of April 17-19, 2026):

1 (1) The Super Mario Galaxy Movie (PG)
2 (2Project Hail Mary (12A) ***
3 (3) The Drama (15) **
4 (new) Lee Cronin's The Mummy (18)
5 (new) Akira (15) ***
6 (4) The Magic Faraway Tree (U)
7 (new) Time Hoppers: The Silk Road (U)
8 (6) BTS World Tour 'Arirang' Live Viewing in Japan (12A)
9 (new) All My Sons - NT Live 2026 (12A)
10 (new) Bhooth Bangla (12A)

(source: BFI)

My top five:


DVD/Blu-Ray/Download top ten: 

1 (1) Avatar: Fire and Ash (12) ***
2 (8) Hamnet (12) **
3 (6) Wicked: For Good (PG)
4 (7) "Wuthering Heights" (15)
5 (5) The Housemaid (15)
6 (12) The Super Mario Bros Movie (PG)
7 (2) Sinners (15) ****
8 (9) G.O.A.T. (PG)
9 (new) Reminders of Him (12)
10 (3) One Battle After Another (15) ****



Top five films on terrestrial TV this week:
1. The Untouchables (Sunday, BBC Two, 10pm)
2. Minority Report (Saturday, ITV1, 10.20pm and Thursday, ITV1, 10.45pm)
3. Living (Saturday, Channel 4, 9pm)
4. The World's End (Friday, ITV1, 10.45pm)
5. The Man in the Iron Mask [above] (Sunday, five, 1.45pm)

Saturday, 18 April 2026

For what it's worth...




UK box office Top Ten (for the weekend of April 10-12, 2026):

1 (1) The Super Mario Galaxy Movie (PG)
2 (2Project Hail Mary (12A) ***
3 (3) The Drama (15) **
4 (4) The Magic Faraway Tree (U)
5 (5Hoppers (U) ****
6 (new) BTS World Tour 'Arirang' Live Viewing in Goyang & Japan (12A)
7 (new) You, Me & Tuscany (12A)
8 (new) undertone (15) **
9 (new) California Schemin' (15)
10 (new) The Stranger (15) ****

(source: BFI)

My top five:
5. Akira [above]


DVD/Blu-Ray/Download top ten: 

1 (1) Avatar: Fire and Ash (12) ***
2 (4) Sinners (15) ****
3 (5) One Battle After Another (15) ****
5 (2) The Housemaid (15)
6 (7) Wicked: For Good (PG)
7 (3) "Wuthering Heights" (15)
8 (9) Hamnet (12) **
9 (8) G.O.A.T. (PG)
10 (22) Apollo 13 (PG) ***



Top five films on terrestrial TV this week:
1. Jurassic Park (Saturday, ITV1, 7am)
2. Don't Look Now (Friday, BBC Two, 11.05pm)
3. Four Weddings & A Funeral (Tuesday, BBC One, 10.40pm)
4. Pearl (Friday, Channel 4, 1.05am)
5. The King's Speech (Sunday, BBC Two, 10pm)

Friday, 17 April 2026

Un air de famille: "Father Mother Sister Brother"


Much as any family is composed of disparate parts, so too Jim Jarmusch's Father Mother Sister Brother - surprise winner of last year's Venice Golden Lion - is made up of separate, only loosely connected items. This new film marks a return to the portmanteau form of Jarmusch's earlier Night on Earth and Coffee and Cigarettes: it's really three shorts, of roughly thirty minutes apiece, on a familial theme. The first, "Father", finds a straight-edged brother and sister (Adam Driver and Mayim Bialik) venturing deep into the New Jersey woods to pay a long-overdue visit with the hermit-like father (Tom Waits) who's been scrounging money off the pair of them. "Mother", set in and around Dublin's suburbs, describes a gathering of matriarch Charlotte Rampling and her two daughters, uptight Cate Blanchett and pink-haired free spirit Vicky Krieps; it's unclear whether or not it's a good sign that all three women have shown up wearing Bergman scarlet. (Ingmar, not Ingrid.) Finally, in "Sister Brother", the most wide-ranging of the three shorts, Indya Moore and Luka Sabbat play recently orphaned American twins in Paris, wondering what to do with the apartment - and the material objects - their folks have left behind. A very Jarmuschian - indeed, very indie - idea of the family emerges: people have secrets they hide from one another, communication is often awkward, strained and unnatural, and were it not for the fact they share a surname and a bloodline, nobody would think to put some of these individuals together. (For starters: Adam from Girls and Blossom from Blossom. And you're telling me Tom Waits gave life to these two?!) 
And yet: in a moment where America's conservative faction is getting weird (again) around the family unit and the roles we play within it, there is something heartening about Jarmusch's Zen insistence we could all stand to be a good deal chiller about everything familial. So yes, some of our relatives are flawed and imperfect; and yes, those closest to us by birth are still often kind of unknowable. But - and here you can almost hear Jarmusch adding a "hey man" as a footnote to every frame of each story he tells here - that's cool, too.

Onscreen, the worldview manifests as a radical simplification of form. The shorts are self-contained units, affording ample time and space to small, manageable casts whose individual components have either worked with this director before or are hip enough to know the effect Jarmusch seeks: not straining but being, with no labouring of the point. "Father" is an especially effective platform for Waits to play the sly old goat (or Jersey Devil); one of its takehomes is that every film would be improved with a bit more Tom Waits. While we wait for Hollywood to address that issue, Jarmusch leaves us to savour the eternal pleasures of the uncluttered frame: FMSB is unmistakably the work of a creative who's been left to do his own thing for nigh-on fifty years, who feels beholden to no contemporary trend. The crisp, clear photography - credited to veteran Lynch favourite Frederick Elmes and the versatile, much-travelled Yorick Le Saux - allows a hundred tiny gestures to register; one overhead shot of a table set for tea in the second part may be the most elegant spread I've seen in the American cinema this side of Scorsese's The Age of Innocence. (Jarmusch finds it so tasty he keeps cutting back to it.) If there's a slight limitation, it's that the film's overarching philosophy is consistent to the point of repetition. Jarmusch acknowledges as much, writing in links between the three shorts: shots of passing skateboarders (liberated from familial duty, unlike his main characters), a recurring use of the phrase "Bob's your uncle" (more family), an ongoing discourse on the properties and uses of water (being thinner than blood). Everything (kind of) connects, but only the third short feels like any true progression - being what happens after mother and father, and indeed "Mother" and "Father", have passed - and Moore and Sabbat work up what feels instinctively like an authentic, earnest sibling bond. (They've got one another's backs, which still counts for something in Jarmuschland.) The whole project is as vibes-based as the contemporary cinema gets without the manager hanging crystals up in the foyer, but it's fun to see Jarmusch, erstwhile king of ironic detachment, getting a little cuddlier with age: he's still chill, but he's grown into welcoming a little more warmth into his frames.

Father Mother Sister Brother is now playing in selected cinemas.

Thursday, 16 April 2026

Midsummer night's dream-film: "Miroirs No. 3"


Our beleaguered arthouse distributors are having a firesale on festival favourites before this year's Cannes gets under way: everything must go on release. As of tomorrow,
the new François Ozon will find its screens under threat from a new Christian Petzold, the German writer-director whose naggingly academic dramas have, in the past, left this viewer markedly more quizzical than many of my colleagues. (I'm not looking to write a thesis; I'm really just here for a good time.) Miroirs No. 3 is a miniature - an 86-minute four-hander - but also a throwback to the ambiguous artfilms of yore; like some cross between Three Colours Blue and Philip Haas's underrated movie adaptation of Paul Auster's The Music of Chance, it pivots on a car crash before making vague movements in the direction of a study of happenstance. The crash, on the backroads of the German countryside, robs pianist Laura (recent Petzold favourite Paula Beer) of her boyfriend, but throws Laura herself clear into the home and life of Betty (Barbara Auer), an older woman who was first on the scene. Betty, who initially appears hung up on painting the fence surrounding her roadside property, refers to Laura as Yelena, and wistfully recounts the story of Tom Sawyer to her bedbound charge as a means of getting her unexpected new housemate to pick up a paintbrush of her own. It feels like the kind of bedtime story a parent might well tell her child, much as the film around this scene gradually shapes up as a Petzoldian reverie, shifting away from the taut psychological realism of this director's early, breakthrough films in favour of something altogether more dreamlike.

The signs are there from the off. Miroirs' early scenes are somehow too bright, too sunny, too placidly quiet to belong to the real world. If we're being rational about it, it makes no sense for Laura to move in with a stranger like Betty, save that this is exactly the sort of spiritual connection the women have in, say, certain Bergman movies; it also makes no sense that Betty's rough-edged husband and son (Matthias Brandt and Enno Trebs), mechanics who make their living tampering with the GPSes on sportscars, should have left Betty rattling around on pills in a remote country property, except that's what bluffly unthinking men do in arthouse movies. (Well, that and ply the women who pass through their lives with beer. I can't rule out the possibility Petzold is floating a free-associative pun on his lead actress's surname in such moments: it's that kind of film.) The scene strategy is generally perverse, as it would be in any dream. No character is ever quite where they ought to be, which occasions a lot of huffing and puffing around between Betty's home and the garage where the men work; whether bikes, dishwashers or cars, things keep breaking down or falling apart; and Petzold positions Beer upfront as a postergirl for preoccupation. (Setting us, in turn, to wonder whether this is a limbo of Laura's own making, or one which exists solely inside her own imagination; on the soundtrack, Frankie Valli belts out the night begins to turn your head around.) Miroirs does enough, in this way, to invite spectator speculation: this, you feel, is one reason we critics have collectively had such a soft spot for everything Petzold. (He often needs explaining.) It's also that flight of fancy a filmmaker only gets to make once the moneymen have learnt to trust in them totally. As a narrative, the film feels loose, rattly, as if it too could fall apart at any moment; this script's screws forever seem in need of tightening. But it does conjure up an idea of leisure, of being far from home with no particular plans: it wouldn't surprise me to learn Petzold made it because the money and actors were available, the weather was good, and he had a gap in his schedule. Minor, but intriguing.

Miroirs No. 3 opens in selected cinemas from tomorrow.

Needles and the damage done: "Diamonds/Diamanti"


Completing this week's line-up of festival faves: the Turkish-born, Italy-based Ferzan Özpetek, whose early Noughties melodramas positioned him as a back-up Almodóvar. (To the extent that he would later bill himself, with no small measure of grandiosity, as simply 
Özpetek.) Much as the beloved Pedro has started to get self-referential with age, so too, apparently, has Özpetek: his latest Diamonds, its maker's biggest domestic hit, opens with footage of the filmmaker gathering his favourite actresses together for a meal at which he announces he has a new project for them all to star in. One of the party, observing the almost exclusively distaff line-up, wonders whether the project might be titled Vaginodrome, a suggestion her director overrules as inappropriate. Yet Diamonds does unfold within a milieu that might indeed merit such a description: a demanding costumier's female-staffed workshop in 1970s Rome, sprung into frantic life to provide the clothes for a (female) Oscar-winning director - for which cinephiles are bound to read Lina Wertmüller - as she gears up on her next production. (Özpetek, we should note, has never even been nominated for an Oscar, but a fellow can dream.) By day, the assembled minions measure, cut, ruche and stitch, pausing in between to bicker and gossip; after hours, they endure a variety of issues, from ingrate children to abusive spouses. They're the real diamonds, you see.

As a rugged, red-blooded heterosexual male keeping one eye on this year's tense Championship run-in, your correspondent is almost certainly not the target audience in this instance, but even he could broadly see the appeal: for two-and-a-quarter hours, Özpetek outlines a lavishly furnished safe space into which viewers might retreat for a few laughs, tears, sobs and swoons. (An alternative title: Glamma Mia!) Although he gets distracted when, for some reason, his women have to measure up a phalanx of shirtless young actors in tighty-whities, this is clearly a director who adores actresses, granting even the lowliest of clothiers a close-up, a moment or a signature flourish; Özpetek ends the film with a list of those grande dames he still wants to work with, which is either touching or desperate. Only if you switch on your critical faculties do you notice there's no variation of tone, no heightening of stakes, a liability in a 135-minute feature: even when Diamonds turns its hand to something more dramatic - as in the domestic abuse subplot - it soon snaps back so as to give the other gals something light to do. Everything is sunny, fabulous, bella; everyone is handsome, sassy, well-dressed; the year's most insistently applied musical theme, meanwhile, plods and pulls its strings. There are, of course, worse things for a semi-prominent filmmaker to do with the money afforded him; and there are worse ways for us to spend an afternoon than being cosseted. (It's the movie equivalent of a spa day or long lunch on someone else's dime: an indulgence.) Yet there's a reason Almodóvar is routinely hailed as a great of world cinema and Özpetek isn't; I came away from Diamonds with a newfound respect for the way Jocelyn Moorhouse's slightly under-appreciated The Dressmaker, from a decade or so ago, troubled to mix up its camp.

Diamonds opens in selected cinemas from tomorrow.