Tuesday, 30 September 2025

The expendables: "Homebound"


India's submission for Academy Award consideration this year, Homebound, is an unusual one: inspired by a New York Times article and executive produced by Martin Scorsese, it's 
a near-contemporary piece - set in the months leading up to the pandemic - which alludes (and, in places, speaks openly) to the fact all's far from well in Modiland. Co-writer/director Neeraj Ghaywan, who brought us the exceptional Masaan a decade ago, introduces us to a pair of childhood friends who've endured the rural poverty of North India; now in young adulthood, they've concocted a scheme to elevate themselves further, namely taking the police recruitment exam. Chandan (Vishal Jethwa) is a Dalit-caste farmboy whose parents have worked themselves to the bone to afford their offspring this chance; his pal Shoaib (Ishaan Khatter, from Dhadak), son of Pakistani migrants, tries to shrug off his community's prevailing Islamophobia. The opening sequence finds these brothers-in-arms cramming onto a packed, city-bound commuter train ("I never knew taking an exam was so much like going to war"), then they return home to take whatever work they can find while waiting for the make-or-break results to be published. What they get in the meantime is an unsentimental education in how latter-day India both works and doesn't work: they're at that age where we really begin to notice the infelicities and inequities of this world. The police ranks are oversubscribed and prone to sudden hiring freezes, but even if they weren't, there'd be other issues; this is not a society set up in such a way as to afford its young easy mobility. Even the pandemic, a leveller in certain respects, serves to further divide those who were vulnerable from those who weren't.

That the film has so far passed without censorious comment is surely due to the way it goes softly and quietly: it opens with the personal, detailing credible people in actual locations, and only then builds towards the political. For much of its duration, Homebound plays as a naturalistic study of smart, sensitive kids finding things out the hard way: how people in power react when your status becomes apparent, say, or the price of the average textbook (it's a bit on-the-nose that Chandan should wind up studying business, but the lesson takes), how fragile dreams are, that these boys will for some while be set on different paths. Ghaywan once more strips his performers of Hindi film's usual comforting melodrama, and complicates our assumptions to some degree by casting emergent posterboy Khatter as the downtrodden Shoaib, a choice that only underlines how bafflingly arbitrary the caste system is: in this India, you could even be a pin-up, and some people would still look down on you. (No wonder Khatter's performance radiates growing disillusion, a profoundly felt disappointment; the actor has been forced to consider what might have happened if he hadn't caught such a break.) Jethwa, by contrast, spends much of the film suggesting something more robust: a lad pulling himself up by his bootstraps. His reward will be a kiss from Janhvi Kapoor as the middle-class college girl who takes a shine to Chandan, though even she - famously, the daughter of Bollywood royalty - has been removed of much of her usual glamour. (A quirk of scheduling means Homebound will likely end up sharing UK multiplex space with Kapoor's next project, the frothy-looking romance Sunny Sanskari Ki Tulsi Kumari. Two films, adjacent screens, worlds apart.)

As in Masaan, Ghaywan seeks out real spaces, lined faces, lived-in homes; a family wedding unfolds in a single room on a touchingly finite budget. The whole film is suffused with sadness: everywhere one looks, one sees unrealised potential, hopes dashed, people being led to expect the worst (Chandan comes to answer his phone with a blunt "what happened?") or, worse, nothing at all (a line to haunt all of us: "I even dream of biryani now"). It should by rights be despairing - it is, to an extent - yet on a moment-by-moment, scene-by-scene basis, Ghaywan and his collaborators resolve to show us something new, to reroute our downturned gaze and emotions: there's some really astute screenwriting going on in a scene that asserts that, however bad Chandan has it, his sister has it even worse on account of her sex. It's a very organised film about a society that still isn't as organised as it could or should be. These boys are required to race across live train tracks, travel vast distances to work; this, the film underlines, is an India that forces people to run around in extreme heat - making migrants of its own citizens - or otherwise expend unnecessary energy chasing things up. Measurable, straightforward progress is all but impossible: the rungs have rotted on those ladders that haven't already been pulled up. And that's when it's business as usual; when Covid hits, the State's response makes the Boris Johnson-Matt Hancock approach appear capable and coherent. Ghaywan, in complete contrast, knows exactly what he wants to say and show: each scene and sequence develops his argument, up until the point where he pares back to stark essentials (two kids abandoned at the roadside) and illustrates what happens when this way of life becomes life-or-death. He goes softly but assuredly, and he cuts deep. Though it catches moments of poetry, beauty, even possibility in passing, what strikes you most about Homebound is its very great seriousness of expression. Confronted once again with the hazy indifference of those occupying positions of power, Ghaywan and his team counter with a blazing, ardent belief: these people deserve better.

Homebound is now playing in selected cinemas.

Monday, 29 September 2025

Back from the dead: "The Curse of Frankenstein"


A quarter-century on from James Whale and the Universal horror cycle, Hammer assembled what was to become its A-team - writer Jimmy Sangster, director Terence Fisher - to give Mary Shelley's writing enthralling new life. For 1957's
The Curse of Frankenstein - the latest Hammer reissue, serving as an appetiser for Guillermo del Toro's upcoming Shelley adaptation - Bad Science was to be given the full colour treatment, ideal for those gruey close-ups of severed body parts; Peter Cushing was cast as an especially cruel and supercilious Victor Frankenstein, while Christopher Lee emerged from bandages as his Goth-faced creation. The title had already served notice of Sangster's intent to tinker creatively with his source material. Some of his changes were an inspired matter of economy: the small child the movie Creature has always traditionally tossed into a lake is here the grandson of Shelley's blind forester, allowing Fisher to suggest two kills within a single setpiece. Elsewhere, those changes went towards characterisation, of a kind rarely attempted in straight horror adaptations of this book. This narrative is framed as a tale the incarcerated Victor tells a priest, not as a confession (he's too arrogant to believe in any power greater than his own) but as a boast; it also features far less of the kind of fizzy-beaker laboratory action we now associate with this title, preferring talky set-tos in handsomely appointed parlours where our Vic can set out the full extent of his warped philosophy.

This Frankenstein doesn't have an Igor at his side, but a fully sentient tutor (Robert Urquhart), who bridles when his charge starts playing God, and a cousin (Hazel Court) keen to tempt him outside (and into a life of righteousness), whom he pushes away so as to head deeper into his deadly obsession, murdering a colleague whose brain he has an eye on, and allowing his maid-cum-mistress to suffer a terrible fate after she threatens to expose his science project. For once, the title really does point to the doctor and not the monster - or, rather, seems to underline how the doctor is the monster - and Cushing comes through with a great, endlessly hissable performance that counts among the actor's very best. Such nuances suggest that, this time, the book had found its way to sensitive horror scholars, though Fisher and Sangster also come up with a riproaring finale in which the Creature takes to the rooftops, King Kong-style, and the Baron gets (or at least appears to get) his long-overdue comeuppance. The following year, the same team would reunite for a sequel, The Revenge of Frankenstein, and their immortal take on Dracula - Lee this time given the starmaking screentime as the Count, Cushing in support as Van Helsing - and, lo and behold, the genre that refused to die rose from the grave all over again.

The Curse of Frankenstein returns to selected cinemas from Thursday; a new 4K box set will be available from October 13.  

Saturday, 27 September 2025

For what it's worth...




UK box office Top Ten (for the weekend of September 19-21, 2025):

1 (1) Downton Abbey: The Grand Finale (PG)
3 (2) Demon Slayer - Kimetsu No Yaiba The Movie: Infinity Castle (15)
4 (4) The Long Walk (15) ***
5 (5) The Roses (15)
6 (new) A Big Bold Beautiful Journey (15)
7 (6) The Bad Guys 2 (PG)
8 (41) Inter Alia - NT Live 2025 (15)
9 (re) The Sound of Music (U) ****
10 (new) Tesciowie 3 (15)

(source: BFI)

My top five:
5. Billy Elliot [above]

  
DVD/Blu-Ray/Download top ten: 

1 (new) Nobody 2 (15)
2 (1) 28 Years Later (15) ****
4 (5) Jurassic World: Rebirth (12)
5 (3) Ballerina (15)
6 (31) Karate Kid: Legends (12)
7 (17) How to Train Your Dragon (PG)
8 (4) Superman (12)
9 (6) Weapons (18) ***


My top five: 
1. Battleship Potemkin
4. Elio


Top five films on terrestrial TV this week:
1. My Darling Clementine (Saturday, BBC Two, 12.30pm)
2. The Gift (Wednesday, BBC One, 12 midnight)
3. The Sound of Music (Sunday, BBC Two, 4.35pm)
4. Till (Thursday, BBC Two, 11pm)
5. I for India (Thursday, Channel 4, 2.35am)

The current war: "One Battle After Another"


After a couple of September soft launches, awards season officially opens with Paul Thomas Anderson's One Battle After Another, which qualifies as multiple films simultaneously. This is at once an auteurist statement of some description (pushing three hours, so that we might feel the weight of it), a star-driven action movie (which is why Warner Bros. have shelled out so for it), a literary adaptation (riffing on Thomas Pynchon's Vineland) and a vision of an America split down the middle, revolutionary Left on one side, authoritarian Right on the other. To call it timely would be the understatement of the year; there are stretches where you could convince yourself you were watching one of those live events that are now beamed into cinemas, only here the live event is 2025 itself. What's extraordinary is that the film remains as spry and as light on its feet as it does; it illustrates how far and how fast a movie can go when it doesn't have to slow down or stop every twenty minutes to have someone explain the plot. Anderson trusts his audience to intuit what's really going on, and allows us to pick things up on the run. In doing so, he puts us in more or less the same position as his main characters: members of an antifa collective introduced cranking up their campaign against an oppressive administration by liberating a migrant detention centre in the Cali desert overseen by close-cropped martinet Captain Steven J. Lockjaw (Sean Penn). When a later mission goes awry, however, the group - headed by angular Black firebrand Perfidia Beverly Hills (Teyana Taylor) and her explosives-expert squeeze Bob (Leonardo DiCaprio) - are forced to go underground, pursued at every turn by the humiliated, dogged Lockjaw. The first sixteen years of this narrative are covered in a thirty-minute prologue; its conclusion, laid out over the following two-plus hours, all but breaks the movie land-speed record. Best buckle up.

It's not long before the stakes begin to spike wildly. Lockjaw has a hard-on for Perfidia, blurring the political and personal. Bob and Perfidia raise a daughter, Willa (Chase Infiniti), so they're fighting for her future - even if this teenager presents as some way more grounded and responsible than her goofball pop, a dope-smoking paranoiac spiralling into bewildered middle age. It wouldn't surprise me if some viewers, new to this director's oeuvre, are discombobulated by the idiosyncratic way Anderson gets us into and out of certain scenes and sequences. Lockjaw shows up at Perfidia's front door, first with flowers, then - minutes later, after there's been no response - with a handheld battering ram. (How quickly love and lust can turn to hate.) Often, the narrative line will veer miles away from the leads to explore this plot's backchannels - its Deep State, as it were. Lockjaw finds himself courted by Republican grandees, and targeted by representatives of a KKK-like white supremacist organisation, headed by a craggy David Duke lookalike, who operate out of a rabbit warren of offices and corridors built under a nondescript suburban home. To quell potential unrest, the military are sent into a high-school prom, which actually doesn't seem that wild a swing given some of the images coming out of America Now. (You fearfully envision a real-world headline: Actor Who Played 'One Battle After Another' Migrant Snatched By ICE.) Unlike Ari Aster, busy both-sidesing in his recent, pipsqueak Eddington, Anderson acknowledges this is plainly asymmetrical warfare: the unsmiling, State-sanctioned, heavily armed Lockjaw against a ragtag of kooks, weirdos, dropouts and flakes who urgently need to get their shit together if they are to stand a fighting chance. (Fans of Anderson's fetish-worthy phonecalls - think Philip Seymour Hoffman in Magnolia or Adam Sandler in Punch-Drunk Love - should be delighted by Bob's haphazard efforts to recall his former passwords and rendezvous points.)

I say urgently, because a) the murderous Lockjaw isn't messing around here, and b) the film proceeds in one of those Andersonian fugue states, in permanent, perpetual, sometimes even perplexing motion. Jonny Greenwood's antic, antsy score is often the only reassurance that some outside presence is steering and shaping a multiplex film that would otherwise appear to be moving in highly mysterious ways. (When the film kids of TikTok say nobody right now is doing it like Paul Thomas Anderson, that's because, well, no-one really is doing it like him.) Even at the film's most expositional - a midstretch diversion to a karate club frequented by Willa and operated by benign sensei Benicio del Toro, all twinkly Zen - Anderson is busy coaxing DiCaprio to heights of mania that arguably surpass those of his Wolf of Wall Street turn, while arming his supporting players with skateboards to keep the wheels spinning. This sense of speed with precision is rare indeed in the contemporary cinema; it's been ten years since Mad Max: Fury Road, and in that decade, we've not seen anything much like it, even taking last year's prequel Furiosa into consideration. But you could get it just from listening to the film's finale, where three distinct engine sounds let us know exactly where the players are in a full-throttle chase along several miles of the bumpiest desert road. (If there were an Oscar for Best Location Scouting, the movie would win at a canter, and that'd be the only time it might be seen to pump the brakes.) In other places, though, Anderson's speed threatens the film's legibility; this is not a film that wants to be pinned down for questioning, which is what I suspect got it past WB's more conservative-minded executives, and why it's yielded the exhilarated responses it has. It's a film that moves so rapidly that the default position is simply to go along with it, yet it might be more interesting if we dig our heels in, offer some resistance of our own, and recognise how the film's brilliance comes to obscure its flaws.

Particularly in that second half, I felt Anderson distinctly trying to hustle us past OBAA's own politics, which had previously struck me as liberal in the ambiguous sense, Gavin Newsom liberal, and buried some way down - like that white-supremacist rabbit warren - beneath the film's fast-passing pronoun jokes and occasionally questionable supporting characterisations. However much you and I will enjoy it, I fear OBAA is also destined to be Quentin Tarantino's Film of the Year, which should give us all some pause for concern. For one thing, you wouldn't necessarily have to be practising left-wing purity politics to object to the way the film frames Perfidia as sexual gelignite, too hot for anyone to handle, even this camera, pantingly delineating Taylor's curves. The opening half-hour does kind of chime with those ungallant stories you may have heard about this filmmaker and Fiona Apple, and the idea that while Anderson is exceptionally good at dramatising doltish or confused men butting heads, he remains significantly less reliable in his depiction of women. Fathers driven to extremes on behalf of their daughters is the real site of One Battle After Another's revolutionary activity; mothers are an afterthought. (That's why Penn's magnificently cruel bastard gets a grand movie sendoff, while Taylor's character simply disappears into the movie's background, a bombshell who blew herself up.) Everything that's great about OBAA can be attributed to Anderson the pop-culture nostalgist, clinging to the books, films and sounds of an earlier era. (His needledrops here range from Steely Dan to Tom Petty, which doesn't seem all that far on the FM dial.) But the flaws come from that earlier era, too. This is the first film of the 21st century to bear serious comparison to the American studio movies of the 1970s, worthy of that oft-misapplied phrase major motion picture, but it's also worth wrestling with; if it's not quite a masterpiece as this director's Magnolia and There Will Be Blood were, it is a miracle that it exists in the here and now, particularly in this here and now, and that it arrives with the distribution it has, preceded by the WB logo. Just pray it doesn't tank.

One Battle After Another is now showing in cinemas nationwide.

Thursday, 25 September 2025

In memoriam: Stuart Craig (Telegraph 24/09/25)


Stuart Craig, who has died aged 83, was a giant of British production design whose ability to conjure highly immersive sets and worlds won him three Oscars and three BAFTAs; as one of the key architects of the
Harry Potter series, he led the team that helped bring Hogwarts to blockbusting life.

Craig broke through in his field at the start of the Eighties, with two films that demonstrated his versatility: the Lew Grade-produced, Martin Amis-scripted Saturn 3 and David Lynch’s The Elephant Man (both 1980). While the former’s sexed-up sci-fi nosedived, the latter’s enveloping recreation of a soot-blackened Victorian London garnered Craig his first Oscar nomination and BAFTA win.

He rapidly became an industry go-to, bolstering a succession of globetrotting Britfilm landmarks. With Robert Laing and Michael Seirton, he shared an Oscar for the handsome, Lean-like art direction of Richard Attenborough’s Gandhi (1982) before going on to tackle the comparably grand historical designs of Greystoke: The Legend of Tarzan, Lord of the Apes (1984) and The Mission (1986).

A second Oscar, shared with Gérard James, followed for his sumptuous work on Stephen Frears’ Dangerous Liaisons (1988), underlining Craig’s period credentials. “In this country, we’ve become very adept at the look of a period film,” Craig told the academic Jane Barnwell in 2010. “We’re good at pattern and aging and the effect of the atmosphere on the architecture – the way moss grows, the way rain runs, and the stains it leaves behind.”

That eye for historical authenticity served Craig well into the Nineties: he reunited with Attenborough on Chaplin (1992) and Shadowlands (1993), where he installed Anthony Hopkins’ CS Lewis in a retrofitted CFA Voysey house. Gorgeously blending locations with sets, Craig’s designs for Agnieszka Holland’s The Secret Garden (1993) set a high bar for family films; the Gothic look Craig proposed for Frears’ horror-inflected biopic Mary Reilly (1996) was arguably more compelling than the drama.

That same year, Craig excelled himself with Anthony Minghella’s The English Patient (1996), shot on location in Tunisia and Italy. This sweeping WW2 epic illustrated Craig’s facility with scale: his work encompassed both the vast Saharan Cave of Swimmers, with its prehistoric daubings, and the rustic simplicity of the bedroom in which Ralph Fiennes’ wounded Count Almásy recuperates.

A third Oscar resulted, shared with Stephenie McMillan, the set decorator Craig had met on Chaplin and subsequently collaborated with on the Potter films: “I haven’t worked with another set decorator in fifteen years,” Craig told an interviewer in 2007. “I’d be devastated if I had to work without her.” When McMillan died six years later, it was Craig who penned her Guardian obituary.

Born on April 14, 1942 in Norwich, Stuart Norman Craig studied at Norwich University of the Arts and the Royal College of Art before making swift progress within the film industry. After uncredited work as a draughtsman on the Bond spoof Casino Royale (1967), he was promoted to assistant art director on Scrooge (1970) before serving as art director on A Bridge Too Far (1977) and Superman (1978). 

Following The English Patient’s Oscar sweep, Craig moved into contemporary territory with Notting Hill (1999) before the phone call that changed the course of his career: “I was decorating a bedroom for my as-yet-unborn grandson when I got the call to come to Los Angeles and meet [Harry Potter producer] David [Heyman] and [director] Chris [Columbus]. I read the novel on the plane over. My first reaction was fright: how the hell are we going to do this?” 

A map of Hogwarts sketched by J.K. Rowling on their first meeting helped (“I was still referring to that map ten years later”); Craig’s own draughtsmanship yielded Sirius Black’s “Wanted” poster and the Marauder’s Map. He designed all eight films, winning his second BAFTA for Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (2005), then – at Rowling’s behest – leading the design team for the various Potter theme parks. 

“Because the Leavesden studio was our permanent home, because there was time, because the films were guaranteed to make money, we were in a very privileged position, really, to experiment and to test things,” Craig reflected upon the series’ conclusion. He received an OBE in 2003 and lifetime achievement awards from the Art Directors’ Guild in 2008 and the British Film Designers’ Guild in 2018. 

He continued working after a 2011 diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease, designing all three of the Potter-adjacent Fantastic Beasts films, winning a third BAFTA (with set decorator Anna Pinnock) for the series’ 2016 opener. His final credit was Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore (2022).

Though the logistics of his job grew complex, Craig confessed he adhered to a simple process: “I often start with a sheet of blank paper and without an idea in my head at all. Sometimes I’ll have a flash of inspiration, but it’s rare. So I just make a mark and rub it out; then make another mark, and add another, and then rub one of those out. It’s an incredibly faltering process towards something.”

He is survived by his wife of sixty years Patricia Stangroom, and their two daughters Becky and Laura.

Stuart Craig, born April 14, 1942, died September 7, 2025.

Wednesday, 24 September 2025

Bad teacher: "Steve"


The unprepossessingly named
Steve arrives trailing a certain novelty: it's the first Cillian Murphy vehicle for some years that doesn't in any way work. The puzzle facing us is why that should be so. Its constituent parts, at least, were promising. This is the actor reuniting with Tim Mielants, the Belgian director who oversaw pivotal episodes of Peaky Blinders and last year's much-admired indie hit Small Things Like These; now the pair bring us a drama set during the footballing summer of 1996 that suggests a 21st century update of that moment's Dangerous Minds and Clockwork Mice (the underrated because rarely revived British variant with Ian Hart in the Michelle Pfeiffer role). There are two big differences. First, we're not stalking the inner city but are instead out and about at a Summerhall-like progressive school in the leafy Home Counties, operating as a last-chance saloon for teenagers who'd otherwise have been packed off to borstal. Second, Murphy's eponymous headmaster isn't your typical white knight, rather something of a screw-up himself, a dazed, indecisive pillpopper working under duress and at the very limit of his resources. Screenwriter Max Porter, adapting his own 2023 novel Shy, sets Steve's breakdown over the course of the one day, during which the school will be visited first by a TV news crew, catching some of the fallout on camera, then by a pompous Tory MP (Roger Allam, inevitably). Here's where the problems start: it's the kind of neat organising principle that can streamline a 300-page book, but which invariably starts to look contrived when projected on a big screen. Who's tending the diary at this school? Given that half the kids introduced in act one don't reappear until the very last minute, who's taking the register?

Small Things Like These, itself a literary adaptation, was considered, modulated and worked over, dogged in its recreation of period and mood. The appeal here for Mielants and Murphy had to have been to try something looser and off-the-cuff: the fact the film reaches cinemas less than a year after its predecessor would indicate a quick turnaround. (It's the kind of project that gets set in motion when your star is newly Oscar-minted and everyone's saying yes.) There are honourable intentions in play: a yen to pay tribute to those teachers (like the star's parents) who spend their careers working their arses off to give kids a good start, an openness to casting relatively untested, non-stage-schooled working-class performers, an urge to put something back into the British film industry rather than chase the A-list cheques that must now be dangled in Murphy's face on a daily if not hourly basis. The trouble is that the narrative framework these intentions have settled around is never remotely persuasive. At no point does Steve address why a school being run out of a country house in the middle of nowhere is teaching a mere eight pupils, and why a school housing teenagers earmarked as proven troublemakers is being overseen by four members of staff, one of whom is Tracey Ullman. I get Mielants and Murphy's desire to cut back on the logistics of filmmaking - to extricate themselves from the machine-tooled industry that their alma mater Peaky Blinders has become - but they've also accepted cuts to their operating budget that simply don't make sense in this context. The first thing that does make sense here is the film's inciting incident: representatives of the school trust showing up to notify everyone that the school will be closing in six months, further accelerating Steve's freefall. We're meant to think this is a terrible thing, but I'll wager most viewers are going to take one look at this sparsely appointed staffroom and think: well, yeah. Obviously. Duh. Nothing about this place adds up.

It is, I'll grant, a good venue for an actors' workshop, which is what the film resembles most of all: a chance to get disparate players in the same room and attempt something scuffed-up and semi-improvised, which allows the kids to trash a kitchen and take a passing pop at establishment figure Allam. Again, this isn't a bad idea, but the longer this 97-minute film drags on, the more it seems as though everyone's having to work around a script that has no clear idea whose story this really is. Porter's novel was named for one of the student body's bullied underdogs (sensitively played here by Jay Lycurgo), and while the film takes its title from Murphy's instructor, its tendency to hop and skip around is formalised in Robrecht Heyvaert's hand-held photography, landing arbitrarily on faces and details. (The one visual flourish, a computer-assisted mid-film travelling shot of spectacular pointlessness, has been inserted to zhuzh up a duff, talky staffroom scene that's otherwise going nowhere.) Despite onscreen timechecks, there's no sense of the school day, even less of any rehabilitative infrastructure. Granted, the senior pros - Ullman, Emily Watson in five minutes as a guidance counsellor, a briefly glimpsed Youssef Kerkour; again, the rota system is baffling - can steady certain scenes, and you can see why Murphy, wearing a late-period George Best beard that's a red flag in itself (here's a character with judgement so poor he's let those cheekbones fuzz over), was drawn this way: the role allows him to veer off the rails after several years of deeply internalised work. Even so, his responses as tracked by Mielants here seem unusually non-specific: less those of a teacher driven to despair by the pressures of his working environment than those of a harried producer-star realising the script he's dealing with is tissue paper coming apart in his hands. Netflix doubtless leapt aboard anticipating some serendipitous algorithmic midpoint between Oppenheimer and the platform's big 2025 hit Adolescence. But Steve has been rushed and gabbled; it has the air of a miniseries that's been unsuccessfully compressed, a formatting failure transmitted by mistake. There may well be a lesson in here for the British film industry: stop letting novelists adapt their own work, however much clout they have. The rest merits a D at best, and I don't think I've ever felt a stronger urge to end a review with the words 'see me'.

Steve is now playing in selected cinemas, and streams on Netflix from October 3.

Monday, 22 September 2025

Maria full of grace: "The Sound of Music" at 60


1965's
The Sound of Music, that wet Bank Holiday standby, marks its sixtieth anniversary this week with a full theatrical rerelease. It's been quite the journey. A major studio hit - one of the last of its kind - it fell into readily parodied disrepute, only for history to come full circle, much as Robert Wise's camera spends a glacial age hovering over the Mehlweg before alighting on Julie Andrews' singing nun Maria. (Rarely can an opening set-up have better conveyed to the viewer that they're in for a long haul.) The hills are alive once more with the sound of jackboots; to cite opportunistic promoter Max (Richard Haydn), encountering a little of that old SS huffiness, "everybody's cross these days". Can a big, lumbering, three-hour roadshow movie, subsequently boiled down to a single meme - refusenik Captain Christopher Plummer tearing the Nazi flag - be reclaimed as a tool of the resistance, or at the very least workable escapism? (No-one did this for Gigi or My Fair Lady.) You surely know the drill by now: problematic nun-turned-governess Maria brings renewed vivacity to a mausoleum-like household (so far, so Poppins), then helps the Von Trapp children swerve the Anschluss as if the latter were a school trip in danger of going badly awry. The movie remains a singular mix of musical melodrama, Sunday schooling, a semi-radical redirection of Leni Riefenstahl's bergfilms, and a merger of two prominent strands in post-War American filmmaking: the missionary movie (The Inn of the Sixth Happiness, The Nun's Story) and the wartime mission movie (anticipating The Dirty Dozen and Where Eagles Dare). If it's as boxy as most of its Sixties musical cohorts, it's also socked over with greater chutzpah: the theatre of war is here hijacked by theatre kids who believe the worst thing about the years 1939-45 was the number of shows that didn't and couldn't go on. This show goes on for them. And on. And on.

It nevertheless required some measure of lateral showbusiness thinking, first on Rodgers and Hammerstein's part, then on the part of Wise and screenwriter Ernest Lehman. Even knowing the musical facts of the Von Trapp story, it's still some leap to get to "The Lonely Goatherd" and, indeed, doe, a deer, a female deer. The movie is funnier than I remembered it, too: in what now seems an unlikely trial run for the following year's Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?, Lehman (who'd written Sweet Smell of Success a decade before) ensures even the characters intended to represent virtue of a sort have their tetchy and pass-agg moments. (As the lyrics of "How Do You Solve A Problem Like Maria?" go to demonstrate, Maria's sisters have teeth and claws beneath their wimples.) The film's enduring appeal speaks to the apparently universal desire to be told off by someone in a plummy, stage-trained English accent - not necessarily Julie Andrews, though she'll do: playful and mollifying here, a Poppins who won't accept the deathly status quo, doesn't have a magic bag, and has instead armed herself with radical optimism and a capacity for love. Everyone gets it in the neck at some point: the grumpy Captain, contemplating marriage for money and not for love (tsk); the incorrigible children, lined up as if being primed for service (but in whose army?) or the firing squad (you may develop your own preferred order of execution); and, finally, the Nazis themselves, for disrupting everybody's picnics and choir practice. The Sound of Music insists world history would have been very different had someone just put Hitler on the naughty step at a formative moment; you can accuse it of political naivety, but that's also not so different from the premise of a Serious Auteurist Statement like Brady Corbet's more recent, entirely nun-and-songless The Childhood of a Leader. (Or, indeed, from the premise of contemporary world events.)

The minor miracle is that the movie runs three hours, with the Nazis only showing up towards the end of the second, and still it remains broadly entertaining, even stirring. The songs are almost exclusively memorable; their spoken introductions cue that tingle of pleasure you only get when you know something special's next on the jukebox. "My Favourite Things", your gran's "Reasons To Be Cheerful (Part Three)", is great on what we cling to in heavy or stormy weather, even if it all but begs the listener to add the song and the film to their own list of preferred items. Sure, la, a note to follow so is lazy craft (and not a patch on the Half Man Half Biscuit rewrite do re mi so far up your own arse) and "Edelweiss", like "Climb Every Mountain" and "Something Good", is purest sap, but it's also what the film is going for, never more so than in the rousing finale (may you bloom forever) which also doubles as a Lehman-engineered joke about awards ceremonies that run so long one could conceivably flee occupied territory during them without anybody noticing. Setting it all out on studio sets where the Sixties never happened (and WW2 has only just happened) allows Wise to preserve a certain innocent charm and uncomplicated idealism. Believe it or not, at this point we were only two years from Bonnie and Clyde and four from Easy Rider, films that decisively marked the end of post-War American cinema's extended adolescence. Never mind that misleading anniversary, The Sound of Music is eternally sixteen going on seventeen, the true barbarism, beastliness and temptations of the adult world forever just beyond its mountain range. It's not - and was never meant to be - a revolutionary text like If... or La Chinoise, but it is, in the end, not unlike shutting yourself away in a convent during wartime: a safe space, where the worst that can happen is somebody reaching for an acoustic guitar. The show continues to go on.

The Sound of Music is now playing in cinemas nationwide, and streaming via Disney+.

Sunday, 21 September 2025

Domino dancing: "Battleship Potemkin"


To mark the film's centenary, the BFI have reissued 1925's Battleship Potemkin with the Pet Shop Boys soundtrack commissioned by then-Mayor of London Ken Livingstone for the open-air screening in Trafalgar Square in September 2004. (These boys were ahead of the trend for reprogramming the silent canon: at my screening, the film was preceded by a promo for the new Silents Synced initiative's upcoming first iteration, setting 1922's Nosferatu to the Radiohead albums Amnesiac and Kid A. Play two Radiohead albums back-to-back, and reawakening the pallid undead is the very least you can expect.) It wouldn't surprise me if some purists still cavilled at this attempt to convert a space as sacred as the cinema hall into a common club or dance tent, yet the PSBs' EDM closely aligns with the Eisensteinian push for agitation: the maggots in the meat rhyming with the sailors wriggling about the ship, the swinging galleys and ever-pumping pistons, the crowds scuttling this way and that, the general rat-a-tat cutting, even before any rifle is picked up in anger and everybody heads for the Odessa Steps. (Watch them all fall down.) These were always moving pictures from an era when the very idea of motion pictures was still in flux, with montage sequences - edit suite mash-ups - which themselves wanted to make the viewer dance in some way. But this is the version that bangs down the Es in Eisenstein.

It is, then, a markedly different experience from watching Potemkin on a dusty VHS with a traditional orchestral score, as I must have done in my film student days. This busy score, performed with the Dresdner Sinfoniker (conducted by Jonathan Stockhammer, with orchestrations by Torsten Rasch), matches Eisenstein's cast of thousands with a cast of a thousand instruments, striving to seize our ears much as the director sought to seize our eyes: the push-and-pull extends to some battle between sound and vision. The agitation is mostly ambient, though there are places where you can see and hear the Boys having mischievous, sight-specific fun: a synthesised reveille, a Lord's Prayer inscription on a plate sung as a vocal refrain, an electronic heartbeat in the moments before the uprising that inevitably recalls the duo's hit single "Heart", a stretch towards the end that may well be the closest PSB have ever sounded to Depeche Mode. (The revolutionary urges Eisenstein preserved are so powerful they begin to change the composers themselves.) Potemkin made subject to a very 21st century accelerationism, brought back into synch with the turbulence of the modern era, the film now seems quicker and more propulsive than it's ever been: a brief sketch of shipbound hell, the paradise of self-determination regained and then decisively lost, before the tatters of the red flag are finally, stirringly picked up and waved anew. It's no longer historical drama, but perhaps the first great action movie: the original Red October, a proto-Crimson Tide, and never once caught being boring.

Battleship Potemkin is now playing in selected cinemas, and available on limited-edition Blu-ray through the BFI.

Friday, 19 September 2025

For what it's worth...




UK box office Top Ten (for the weekend of September 12-14, 2025):

1 (new) Downton Abbey: The Grand Finale (PG)
2 (new) Demon Slayer - Kimetsu No Yaiba The Movie: Infinity Castle (15)
4 (new) The Long Walk (15) ***
5 (2) The Roses (15)
6 (5) The Bad Guys 2 (PG)
7 (new) Spinal Tap II: The End Continues (15)
8 (4) Freakier Friday (PG)
9 (3) Weapons (18) ***
10 (new) Next to Normal (15)

(source: BFI)

My top five:

  
DVD/Blu-Ray/Download top ten: 

1 (1) 28 Years Later (15) ****
3 (7) Ballerina (15)
4 (3) Superman (12)
5 (4Jurassic World: Rebirth (12)
6 (new) Weapons (18) ***
7 (11) Downton Abbey: A New Era (PG)
8 (new) Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World (12)
9 (9) The Conjuring: The Devil Made Me Do It (15)
10 (6) The Bad Guys 2 (PG)


My top five: 
1. Misericordia
3. Elio


Top five films on terrestrial TV this week:
1. Schindler's List [above] (Thursday, BBC Two, 11pm)
2. Carrie (Sunday, BBC Two, 10pm)
3. Get Out (Sunday, BBC Two, 11.35pm)
4. The Mitchells vs. the Machines (Saturday, ITV1, 7.30am)
5. The Guilty (Sunday, Channel 4, 12.55am)

Thursday, 18 September 2025

Afterlife: "Ghost Trail"


The taut new French film
Ghost Trail maps the coolly paranoid spider's-web narratives of the 1970s onto the present day, and does something noteworthy with what we might call the agonised detachment of contemporary life: our sense something very bad is happening, just over there, at the limits of our gaze and reach, which we may ultimately be powerless to stop. Our protagonist is an intense, unsmiling young man, Hamid (Adam Bessa), first observed being dumped out of a truck in the desert. An onscreen graphic reveals one reason for his sombre mien: this is the Syria of 2014, and Hamid, a professor of literature in his former existence, is one of the many given reasons to flee the barbarism of the Assad regime. We rejoin him two years down the line, clean shaven though no less downcast, working a cash-in-hand gig at a construction site in Strasbourg, although this daily grind clearly occupies him far less than the mission that consumes his nights and days off: tracking down one Sami Hanna, a fellow ex-pat somehow connected to the period Hamid spent behind bars back in Aleppo. What Hamid plans to do with him once identified is unclear, though it seems unlikely this reunion will be an altogether happy one.

What this quest initially prompts, however, is another of the movies' occasional exercises in looking and watching. Our peeper-hero collects intelligence, identifies possible suspects, tracks their movements across town; and as we walk several miles in his shoes and begin to see the world through his eyes, we're nudged first to consider anew the plight of those displaced and traumatised by conflict, and then to reckon with what exactly is going on inside this one refugee's head. Within these supremely well-organised frames, director Jonathan Millet (who also co-writes, with Florence Rochat and Sara Wikler) starts to separate out two distinct planes of looking. In the foreground, there is so-called normal life: folks in coffee shops and libraries, joggers in the park, the city's annual Christmas market. In the background, tuned out by most: the looker-lurker and his oblivious quarry, unfinished business, a nagging loose end from another time and place. What Ghost Trail describes above all else is one horribly isolated life, the kind where obsession can easily set in, abetted in this instance by what Hamid insists in putting in his eyes and ears. He spends his downtime listening to statements setting out what his quarry is alleged to have done back in Syria, words and deeds so heavy they begin to weigh down and smother any good news that comes our guy's way; he's either psyching himself up to strike or torturing himself.

One of Millet's tactics is to deny us the certainty and clarity his protagonist is seeking. The intelligence that comes Hamid's way is fitful and patchy, sometimes contradictory: the Sami Hanna he begins to tail (Tawfeek Barhom) could be the wrong man, or a different wrongdoer, or just the sort of blank who invites intense projection. (A chance encounter in a cramped cafe suggests he may, in fact, be a wise elder and repository of friendly advice - which doesn't rule out any of the above possibilities.) Bessa's largely internalised performance isn't giving anything away for free, except that even Hamid has reason to doubt and rage and grieve; a quasi-romantic interlude with a fellow refugee (Hala Rajab) gestures to what they've both lost and know they'll never get back. (The film's original French title Les fantômes underlines how this community is stuck in limbo, caught between past and present, one place and another.) Yet the watching and waiting lends the film an inbuilt suspense and unease, and every stylistic choice knits together: the analogue stalking cuts well with footage of a Call of Duty-style game Hamid plays as a release valve, while the muted palette chimes with the notional Sami's remark that "France isn't bad, but it lacks colour... everything's grey". Millet lets his characters lead him - the final reel carries us to Berlin, Beirut, Paris, the ends of the earth - yet this extended stakeout puts us so deeply in Hamid's battered shoes and psyche that Ghost Trail starts to make last week's The Long Walk seem a relative stroll in the park. (The difference, perhaps, between first world problems and everywhere else's.) At the very least, Millet's film proves a potent illustration of the very French notion of dérangement, centred on a figure knocked so far from the straight and narrow we've given cause to wonder if he'll ever regain sure footing.

Ghost Trail opens in selected cinemas from tomorrow.

Wednesday, 17 September 2025

"Queen of the Ring" (Guardian 15/09/25)


Queen of the Ring
***
 
Dir: Ash Avildsen. With: Emily Bett Rickards, Josh Lucas, Francesca Eastwood, Cara Buono. 129 mins. Cert: 12A
 
In the coming months, there will be a lot of noise – and oh-so-many Sunday supplement features – about it girl Sydney Sweeney’s transformation into boxer Christy Martin for David Michôd’s biopic Christy. A spoiler is proffered by this genial, roundly entertaining indie, which arrives without fanfare yet goes to demonstrate all any film requires is a good yarn and the right jobbing performers in place. It’s one of those stories you can’t believe hasn’t been filmed before: that of Mildred “Millie” Burke (played here by Emily Bett Rickards), a single mother and diner waitress who, in the post-War era, became America’s first millionaire sportswoman under the sobriquet of “the Kansas Cyclone”, first lady of the nascent all-girl wrestling scene.
 
At a more confident moment, such material might have yielded a major studio vehicle for one of Demi or Angelina’s sporadic flexes. In this economy, a modest stipend has been afforded director Ash Avildsen (son of the late Rocky helmer John G. Avildsen) to fashion something resembling a superior telemovie. Part of the fun is that Mildred and trainer/manager/on-off beau Billy “the Big Bad” Wolfe (Josh Lucas) are having to invent a sport on the hoof, girl-on-girl activity having been proscribed in certain states, while pinning stuffed shirts convinced this just isn’t a woman’s place. The script – by Avildsen and Alston Ramsay, parsing Jeff Leen’s biography – has one pointed, self-sustaining running joke: wherever Mildred fights, she draws contemporaries looking to unleash frustrated energies.
 
Avildsen makes his Fifties quietly, unfussily handsome, casting folks who look the part, and most often look fantastic. Small-screen face Rickards (Arrow, The Flash) and double Kelly Phelan more than hold their own amid the distaff grappling action, while Lucas – a movie star like they used to make – offers a terrific heel turn as a glorified carnival barker rattled by Mildred’s success. Avildsen’s prone to luxuriating in his own Americana – the midsection’s mildly baggy – and you sometimes sense the writing tiptoeing around this scene’s less salubrious aspects. The stronger stretches, though, display ample pluck and moxie; if you’ve missed that genus of spinning-headline movies where men address women as “toots”, this one’s for you.

Queen of the Ring opens in selected cinemas from Friday.

Tuesday, 16 September 2025

"The Shepherd Code: Road Back" (Guardian 15/09/25)


The Shepherd Code: Road Back
**

Dirs: Alan Delabie, Michael Morris. With: Alan Delabie, Michael Morris, Shaina West, Jo Price. 90 mins. Cert: 15

This may prove the most curious item to hit UK screens all year: the latest in a run of microbudget calling cards for hulking French martial artist Alan Delabie, who co-writes, co-directs, composes some of the incidental music, and would probably even do you a theme tune if it got him closer to the Expendables gig. Last year’s straight-to-streaming The Shepherd Code introduced Delabie’s Alex “the Shepherd” Lapierre, not the dutiful sheepherder that title conjures, but a hired assassin striving to go straight, with inevitable complications. Now this series generates a theatrical sequel, despite persisting with a look that more readily recalls home movies than those kickboxer flicks starring Don “The Dragon” Wilson (a guest star here) that went straight-to-VHS three decades ago.

The economics at play would seem haphazard at best. Some cash has been splashed on locations: the Shepherd is rejoined swerving his narky former colleagues in a lavish Portuguese villa with adjacent boating facilities, before clodhopping to Paris, L.A. and London (naturally introduced via filler footage of Tower Bridge) or their green-screen equivalents. Yet Delabie and co-writer/director/star Michael Morris fill every last one of these destinations with friends and associates who spend the ensuing vengeance saga mumbling and muttering. Between the copious dead air and abundant dead wood, we’re not so very far from a French-accented remake of Michael Flatley’s infamous Blackbird.

Prone to baleful off-camera stares as if waiting to pass an understirred protein shake, Delabie has some sort of presence, should the movies require a greying, vigorously tatted hybrid of Jean Reno and Gael García Bernal. Yet his script needed a few more leg days, while his pacing negates any thick-eared pleasures: it takes fully thirty minutes to approach anything like a fistfight, time filled by hapless exposition, randomly inserted flashbacks and placement for somebody’s wine label. British-Ghanaian fighter Shaina West belatedly raises the film’s pulse, wielding iron bars and a resplendent Pam Grier afro as a potential Shepherdess; points, too, for a leftfield Frozen reference (“in the words of Elsa, you need to let that shit go”), but like so much of this burly fumble, it’s not quite there. 

The Shepherd Code: Road Back opens in selected cinemas from Friday.

Friday, 12 September 2025

For what it's worth...




UK box office Top Ten (for the weekend of September 5-7, 2025):

1 (new) The Conjuring: Last Rites (15) **
2 (1) The Roses (15)
3 (3) Weapons (18) ***
4 (5) Freakier Friday (PG)
5 (4) The Bad Guys 2 (PG)
6 (6) Caught Stealing (12A)
7 (10) Lokah Chapter One: Chandra (15) ****
9 (new) Inter Alia - NT Live 2025 (15)
10 (new) Honey Don't! (15)

(source: BFI)

My top five:
1. Battleship Potemkin

  
DVD/Blu-Ray/Download top ten: 

1 (new) 28 Years Later (15) ****
3 (2) Superman (12)
4 (3) Jurassic World: Rebirth (12)
5 (4) Lilo & Stitch (U)
6 (5) The Bad Guys 2 (PG)
7 (9) Ballerina (15)
8 (8) A Minecraft Movie (PG)
9 (re) The Conjuring: The Devil Made Me Do It (15)
10 (7) How to Train Your Dragon (PG)


My top five: 
1. Misericordia


Top five films on terrestrial TV this week:
1. Brief Encounter (Sunday, BBC Two, 3.15pm)
2. Selma (Friday, BBC Two, 11pm)
3. The Last Stand (Saturday, Channel 4, 11pm)
4. Red Eye [above] (Tuesday, BBC One, 10.40pm)
5. American Pie: The Wedding (Friday, Channel 4, 10.35pm)