Tuesday, 31 March 2026

The cruelty is the point: "Dhurandhar: The Revenge"


Last December's
Dhurandhar was three-and-a-half hours of artful India First propaganda, propulsive enough on a scene-by-scene basis to sweep up not just the usual Friday and Saturday night crowds but sage and more seasoned observers besides; the result was the first truly global right-wing megahit since Mel Gibson's comparably bloody The Passion of the Christ in 2004. (Melania wishes her documentary had done similar numbers, but she'd have had to stick a sharpened stiletto through somebody's skull to compete.) The story's grand finale, Dhurandhar: The Revenge, runs a full four hours, making it officially the eighth longest Indian film of all time: I don't know whether final cut was locked before the first film sold the tickets it did, but it has the air of one of those YouTube channels that have realised there's money in platforming more sustained bursts of hate speech. The first movie ended with Ranveer Singh's luxuriantly locked Indian superspy (operating under the codename Hamza Ali Mazari) completing the first stage of his mission in a cesspool-snakepit Pakistan, namely infiltrating the Karachi underworld that has reportedly been facilitating cross-border terror attacks. The sequel opens with a prologue that affords our hero a mid-mission makeover and wardrobe change. Reintroduced sporting a rugby shirt and a neat short-back-and-sides, the younger Hamza - here referred to by his birthname Jaskirat - is the image of the upright college boy you could take home to mother. Until, that is, he's compelled to launch a one-man assault on the safe house where a trafficker is holding his sister captive, provoking a riot of graphic impalements and roiling hatchet attacks, carnage topped only when Jaskirat shoots one foe in the groin at such an angle that the bullet erupts out of his face. A gentle welcome back, then, to whatever the hell this aggrieved diptych is and means to be.

It's never a good idea for a critic to try and pin down a director's morality from their output, but Dhurandhar 2: The Deadening is the first movie I've seen for many years with long stretches that appear governed by a truly sociopathic sensibility. Fine, so to protect India, Hamza has to blow some bad guys away, and sure, so now we learn this man's doing what he's gotta do to protect India's wives and daughters, forever in peril from nefarious Muslims. (Hamza's own child bride (Sara Arjun) gains a kid in this sequel, but otherwise has nothing to do - and little to say for herself - until being called up for damsel-in-distress duty in the final hour. This, too, is a form of national service.) But writer-director Aditya Dhar - possessed of the online edgelord's need to push ever further, towards vicious extremes - wants us to see and cheer each snap of the neck, every limb torn from limb; he wants a standing ovation when Hamza forces his pistol into an opponent's occluded eye socket. There is zero distance between the direction and these characters; there is, instead, an absolute, in places borderline crazed commitment to the same murderous cause. It's a good job Dhar's only holding a camera, because God only knows the damage he'd do with an actual weapon. The Revenge explained to me why even this filmmaker's most starry-eyed defenders have sounded so vague and dazed in their descriptions of what in these films has worked for them; in leaning so far into this blunt-force cinema, they too have been smacked upside the head. (They weren't compelled so much as concussed.) In this world, even Jaskirat's closest childhood friend winds up with a syringe in the eyeball and a bathtub to the back of the neck (yay?); Dhar drafts in his wife Yami Gautam Dhar for a one-scene second-half cameo as a medical angel of death, which seems a deeply morbid way for a conservative to keep things in the family. Either way, the casual Islamophobia of the first movie is here overwritten by a more generalised contempt, for humanity in toto. I had to laugh when Hamza removed the toxin-laced sticking plaster he so carefully applied ahead of a (failed) assassination attempt, and promptly tossed it from a moving car's window: sure, that won't do any harm on the streets. Life is cheap here; movies are long; and sacrifice is both paramount and inevitable.

It turns out Dhurandhar needs its violence, firstly because it presents as the only way for Dhar to resolve his exhaustingly tangled plot, cursed with a thousand and one shady types, few of whom we're given cause to know or care about before they get eviscerated. The Revenge charts the fallout, both gangland and political, from the events of film one, and the more bodies that hit the floor - whether shot, stabbed or dropped from a high building - the fewer men there are left standing. Dhar affords himself some variation in his kill scenes: a certain seriousness when it comes to state-sanctioned murder, and a glibber, quack-quack-oops comedy elsewhere. The violence is the constant; death is all these films have got. Granted, The Revenge piles up more deaths and more spectacular deaths. Arjun Rampal's beardy big bad has his ankle flayed off before the rest of him is redeployed as a human stopper in a kerosene tank: bad idea, kablooey. (In 4DX, you get to pick pieces of him out of your popcorn.) But behind it all sits a rank and festering nihilism: it's India or nothing. Were there not a gang war kicking off or a knife fight in the works, Dhurandhar would consist solely of scenes of varyingly doughy middle-aged men sitting around and making threats or deals. Maybe that's the India the BJP want, but it hardly makes for good cinema. Dhar lost something when he killed off Akshaye Khanna, with his sleek, economical style of villainy, at the end of film one; now we're left with a crotch-grabbing Sanjay Dutt, always a much cruder performer in a flagwaving context. The material is no good for Ranveer, either: one of India's great contemporary stars now has to try and balance the equation of having his biggest commercial hits with two of the most worthless films he will ever make. Not every role Singh takes has to be a Rocky Randhawa, of course, but The Revenge forces him into alternately glowering and bellowing; with his charm buried beneath a wig that reminded me of the Rock Profile idea of Barry Gibb from the Bee Gees, he's just a numbed face splattered in his victims' blood. Hamza is permitted just one (understandable) smile in these four hours, upon returning to that all-singing, all-dancing terrorist training camp - emphasis on camp - that we glimpsed midway through film one, where potential mujahideen are drilled along the lines of Rockettes with rockets. (I can see the reviews now: Five stars! Commit atrocities for a ticket!) 

So where does all this carnage leave us, and where does it leave the Hindi mainstream? After a decade or so in which Bollywood has struggled to define itself anew - the old stars wheezily receding from sight along with their hairlines, the old commercial formulas not quite delivering as they once did, streaming media and Southern industries with better ideas manoeuvring past the lumbering Bombay machine on the outside - the past twelve months do look to have opened up two viable if diverging paths: the timeless, youth-skewing love story (as represented by last summer's smash Saiyaara) and the frothing, male-oriented fury Dhar's one-two has brought to the table, which - like it or not - does seem very now. Given the money the two Dhurandhars have thus far raked in between them - and it surprises me that the series' ardent-to-rabid fans haven't thought to knock up a website showing the gross spiralling upwards by the second, like the figures on a Wall Street ticker - I suspect this will now be the road more travelled by producers; Indian cinemagoers have voted decisively with their backsides, even if they're backing themselves and their cinema into an obvious dead end. (To paraphrase the poets of dystopia: you do it to yourselves, you do, and that's why it really hurts.) The Dhurandhars are so clearly the kind of runaway hit that - much as the appearance of Punxsutawney Phil's shadow in Groundhog Day predicts heavy weather - all but guarantees another decade of truly rotten cinema, of imitations and knock-offs bound to the same punitive length and cruelty, yet made by less skilful creatives with lesser players and lesser songs. In a fully functioning cinema ecosystem, dumbass action movies like these wouldn't be seized upon as state-of-the-nation texts. Yet the Dhurandhar project probably is reflective of where India's head - and its soul - is at as 2026 starts in earnest, with its politicos cheerleading for Israel's ever-mounting outrages while waging wars on their own minorities at home. That doesn't make these films' wild success any less depressing, whether sat through in person or considered in hindsight. One perverse positive, which is really the least Dhar could do for us: after enduring seven gruelling hours of this, Gibson's Passion of the Christ sequel is likely to seem like What Women Want.

Dhurandhar: The Revenge is now showing in selected cinemas.

On demand: "Transhood"


Transhood is a real journey, in just 93 minutes. As per that title, the approach this HBO doc takes is not unlike that taken by Richard Linklater in his Boyhood: documentarist Sharon Liese follows four young transitioning Americans and their families as they navigate the middle part of the 2010s. We begin in 2014: the year Linklater's film opened, but also the final sandgrains of Obamatime, when transness was altogether less contentious. We end five years later with a new President installed and taking a particular delight in waging war on the trans community. The film's subjects are seen to grow, change, adapt; around them, however, America - itself caught in a transitional moment - is devolving, becoming set in its ways and only more hardened. For much of the running time, Liese observes the usual rituals of childhood and adolescence: birthday parties, doctor's appointments, crushes, first dates, family meals, trips to the barbershop, playdates, prom nights. Fifteen-year-old Leena - the furthest along this trajectory, but also sensitive enough to grasp what kind of a world she's entering into - has started to weigh up career options. Yet the film also captures what the majority of American kids don't and won't directly experience: puberty blockers, pronoun changes, transphobic bullying, bathroom nonsense, people with placards opposing your very existence, and an elevated level of background noise that cannot be good for one's headspace. The most complicated (and thereby compelling) story here is that of eight-year-old Avery, raised by erstwhile Southern Baptists to become, among things, National Geographic's postergirl for all things gender, a position that leaves her horribly exposed as a lightning rod for online abuse.

For the most part, Transhood bears witness to the secret resilience of kids: Liese's subjects are often observed bouncing around, forever in youthful motion, oblivious to some (if not all) of that aforementioned noise. If anything, it's arguably the parents who bear the blunt of the worry, seen trying to obtain expensive medical treatments within a non-socialised healthcare system (a palpable emotional bind: they want to give their children the best shot at happiness, but struggle to afford it), recognising they've been prioritising one of their children over others with needs of their own, or juggling intervening on their trans kid's behalf with stepping back to let their offspring stand on their own two feet. You soon realise these parents must have been carefully selected at an early stage in the project. They're not obvious flowers-in-hair, hippy-dippy bohemians, rather working moms and pops, often from flyover states, who nevertheless have some idea of the issues in play and the best language to use. (Though unspoken, the editorial insinuation is clear: if these non-New Yorker subscribers can do it, why can't more Americans?) Elsewhere, an intriguing push-me-pull-you tension is visible in Liese's filmmaking: she wants to position these kids as extraordinary case studies, as brave and beautiful as they are, but she also wants to show them living ordinary lives - or at least lives that would be blissfully ordinary were it not for Trump, bathroom bans and transphobic hate attacks. The filmmaker's fix is a simple, effective one: she hangs back, watches, listens and learns, and wherever possible does her utmost to let her subjects be. The simplest story here would appear that of four-year-old Phoenix, a biologically male four-year-old - too young for puberty blockers - who's taken to wearing dresses and feather boas as countless cis kids (and the young protagonist of the French feature Ma vie en rose) have. Yet Phoenix starts dressing (and identifying) as a boy again in the wake of the Trump inauguration and his parents' divorce. Maybe Phoenix will grow up to be trans, gay or gender-queer; maybe he won't. The film's stance is firmly and that's OK: no harm, no foul, and either way his parents still dote on him. Sometimes you have to give people time and space to reveal themselves, on their own terms; sometimes a documentary's line of approach is as instructive - you'd hope as teachable - as anything its subjects say or do.

Transhood is now streaming via HBO Max and NOW.

Saturday, 28 March 2026

For what it's worth...




UK box office Top Ten (for the weekend of March 20-22, 2026):

1 (new) Project Hail Mary (12A) ***
2 (new) Dhurandhar: The Revenge (18) **
3 (1) Hoppers (U) ****
4 (2) Reminders of Him (PG)
5 (new) Ready or Not 2: Here I Come (15)
6 (new) Aadu 3 (12A)
7 (3) How to Make a Killing (12A)
8 (4) Mother's Pride (12A) **
9 (6) Scream 7 (18)
10 (new) The Good Boy (15) ***

(source: BFI)

My top five:
1. The Killer
3. Romeo + Juliet [above]
4. Moulin Rouge!


DVD/Blu-Ray/Download top ten: 

1 (5) Sinners (15) ****
2 (2) Wicked: For Good (PG)
3 (17) One Battle After Another (15) ****
4 (14) Dune: Part One (12) **
5 (3) Shelter (15)
6 (29) Spider-Man: No Way Home (12) ***
7 (2) Zootropolis 2 (PG) ***
8 (20) Weapons (15) ***
9 (26) Hamnet (12) **
10 (18) The Super Mario Bros Movie (PG)


My top five: 
1. Saipan


Top five films on terrestrial TV this week:
1. Toy Story 2 (Sunday, Channel 4, 5.50pm)
2. The Sound of Music (Good Friday, BBC One, 2.30pm)
3. The Ten Commandments (Sunday, five, 11.40am)
4. The Prestige (Monday, BBC Two, 11pm)
5. Good Vibrations (Sunday, BBC Two, 12.05am)

Friday, 27 March 2026

Curious George: "Orwell: 2+2=5"


In an era of blandly streaming hagiography, the veteran Haitian filmmaker Raoul Peck has developed the distinguishing skill of using noted lives and known properties as a platform for addressing bigger, more pressing issues. 2017's I Am Not Your Negro stitched James Baldwin's words and public appearances into an engrossing, provocative disquisition on race in America; his brilliant 2021 series for HBO, Exterminate All the Brutes, reordered the history books and emerged with a jolting exposé of the colonialist mindset. On one level, Peck's new project Orwell: 2+2=5 is telling a very specific story: that of George Orwell, heading to the Scottish island of Jura in 1948, after the death of his wife, to recover from a recent brush with tuberculosis and begin work on the novel that was to become Nineteen Eighty-Four. Yet Peck - restless, curious, adventurous, mischievous - isn't content to leave it at that. You get the feeling this is something different - something radical, indeed - from this patchwork film's first ten minutes. We get clips of TV movie retellings of Orwell's life (expected) and film adaptations of his work (very expected), but also from Lean's Oliver Twist (less so); while newsreel footage of the bombing of Berlin in 1945 (expected) is juxtaposed with the siege of Mariupol, police raids in Burma, the hangings undertaken by the Nazis in Sergei Loznitza's 2021 doc Babi Yar. Context, and the noose some doofus wielded amid the January 6 riots. It's headscrambling at first, but a unifying idea soon becomes apparent: 1948 equals 1984 equals 2026. To that old canard it couldn't happen here, Peck - via Orwell - retorts it already has, and likely will again, if we're not careful. This is not, as it turns out, solely a film about Orwell, but a film on the themes (or a film extending the themes) Orwell was putting into play.

Biographically, Peck frames his subject as an inside man, a well-bred whistleblower. Born into what the writer specified as the "lower-upper middle class", Orwell was shuttled off to Eton in his youth before joining the police force in colonial Burma. As Peck sees it - and Orwell, in his personal notes, recognised - this background left him uniquely positioned to expose the mechanisms of power whereby lies become truth, war peace, ignorance strength, slavery freedom. Peck has possibly been encouraged by producer Alex Gibney to cover this ground from multiple angles, clutching (and combining) disparate sources. In a sequence on bookburning, Peck crosscuts footage from Nazi Germany, recent US book bans, the Ramin Bahrani-directed remake of Fahrenheit 451 and some extraordinary footage of an IDF soldier torching a library in Gaza. One thing you probably weren't expecting to see in a documentary about George Orwell: a clip from 2023's M3GAN, used to illustrate both the threat posed by AI and the writer's dire warnings about mass surveillance. Big Brother continues to watch us all, even if his aim is to convert our words and likeness into deindividualised, saleable slop. I sensed Peck was really onto something when he cut in a lengthy extract from the still-contentious collectivism debate at the centre of Ken Loach's Land and Freedom - but then, this is a film of ideas rather than mere textbook or shrine: Peck clearly regards Nineteen Eighty-Four as a springboard or open-ended text, an ongoing warning from history. The ideas thrown loose by all this montage are chewy, jolting, provocative, as they were when Orwell first set them on the page; in Peck's hands, they also become an argument for reading and viewing widely and critically. (Not least because they propose a corrective to the narrow-minded monocultures that nurture and prop up fascism.) I understand where those who've found the film scattershot are coming from: Orwell himself gets a little lost in the mix, though in Damian Lewis's reading, he presents as far funnier than expected. (On Sartre: "He is a bag of wind.") Orwell: 2+2=5 is what happens when an estate affords a filmmaker free hand to run with an author's ideas; rather than a supplicant creative paying mealymouthed tribute to a great, active mind, it finds a great, active mind meeting a great, active mind head on so as to thrash something out and create a multiplication of meanings. The result, well worth grappling with, is at once a superlative feat of editing, the film equivalent of Orwell's goal "to write in plain, vigorous language", and a weapon to be wielded against the worst aspects of the modern world. Arm yourself.

Orwell: 2+2=5 opens today in selected cinemas.

Wednesday, 25 March 2026

On demand: "Saipan"


The directorial pairing of Lisa Barros D'Sa and Glenn Leyburn continue their useful project of revisiting leftfield but revealing moments in recent Irish history. After breaking through with 2012's
Good Vibrations, their film on Terri Hooley and the Troubles, the pair's latest heads south of the border to dramatise a very different shade of Celtic strife. Saipan concerns the conflict that gripped the nation - and, indeed, no small part of the wider footballing world - in the run-up to the 2002 World Cup: the increasingly noisy discord that broke out between then Republic of Ireland boss Mick McCarthy and the team's captain and star player Roy Keane. A prologue sets the scene - covering the Republic's scrappy progress to the finals via a play-off against Iran, with an agonised Keane watching on from home, injured - before it's seconds out for a surprisingly heavyhitting clash of personalities and leadership styles. This McCarthy (Steve Coogan) is a clubbably bluff relic of the old up-and-under, run-it-off, kick-it-into-Row-Z 20th century game, worshipping at the altar of his erstwhile Republic manager "Big" Jack Charlton. (Like McCarthy, Charlton was himself an Englishman, and the film invites us to wonder whether or not that very Englishness is at least partially responsible for getting Keane's goat so.) Keane (Éanna Hardwicke) is the hotheaded visionary of the game to come (a vision he may have first witnessed on the mainland in his time at the all-conquering Manchester United): professional, driven, determined to seize this moment to win, not just to enjoy a kickaround and a few weeks off. Their rumbles and grumbles come to a head at a pre-tournament training camp on the titular Pacific isle - a key WW2 location - which proves a notable shambles. No footballs were available to train with for the first few days, while the local goats had colonised a pitch that was more rocks than grass, leading FAI officials to distract the players with offers of beer and banana boats. What washes up on these shores is, in short, a perfect storm: while the backdrop inevitably recalls the moneyed farawaylands of TV's The White Lotus, this Keane and this McCarthy begin to eye one another up like Lee Marvin and Toshiro Mifune in Hell in the Pacific.

The script is by Paul Fraser, who wrote several of Shane Meadows' early features (TwentyFourSeven, A Room for Romeo Brass, Dead Man's Shoes). Fraser's trick here is to feint as if he's merely writing up footballing gossip, but then go another way and write - as he did in those first, breakthrough scripts - about men, and a certain type of man in particular. The movie's Keane and McCarthy aren't toxic in the 21st century sense of the word, but they are tough and tricky nevertheless: hung up on an idea of strength, hotwired to butt heads, pick sides, hold grudges, they're actually fairly similar in some respects, not least in their altogether aggravating refusal to back down and concede a point. (As McCarthy observes of Keane: "What makes him a great player on the pitch makes him a pain in the arse off it.") Early scenes featuring the men's wives (Alice Lowe and Harriet Cains) serve to flag how difficult championship-winning egos like these must be to have to live with - but also the advantages of having the husband-and-wife team who previously made 2019's very touching Ordinary Love behind the camera. Throughout this roiling back-and-forth, Barros D'Sa and Leyburn demonstrate a sharp shared eye for what might be missing and what might better balance this picture out; around Keane and McCarthy's more intense interactions, they wisely pull back a little, allowing us the distance and perspective their petty squabbler antagonists - locked up together in a hotel that may as well be a prison camp - rarely allow themselves. Just on the fringes of Saipan, in the judicious use of archive news clips and vox pops, we also begin to see a film about Ireland itself, found here with one foot in the past and one foot in the here-and-now, with money in its pockets - a result of the fabled Tiger economy - but differing ideas on how best to spend it. Piss it away overnight on leisure and chasing the craic, as World Cups permit, or play the far smarter game and invest in longer-term advancement?

The abstemious Keane, the moderniser in the camp, represents self-determination: weigh his subsequent, stellar career as a TV analyst against the diminishing returns of the McCarthy managerial career, and damn it if he wasn't right nine times out of ten, but - fuck me - is he abrasive about it, flying into even minor misunderstandings with the verbal equivalent of a two-footed challenge. And yet impatience is the moderniser's curse: Fraser gives him a very modern, very relatable anger at the institution (the Irish FA, in this case), and the failure of his appointed caregivers to provide the appropriate level of care. (Cruelly so, during the perceived slight Keane unearths from wounded memory late on.) Here, then, are a pair who might equally have sustained a compelling stage two-hander: the Republic's own Marat and Sade or Danton and Robespierre or Clough and Revie. Coogan obviously has form when it comes to throwback roles: he makes his McCarthy identifiably a "gaffer" rather than one of these newfangled, designer-clad head coaches or directors of football, a weary old duffer whose primary concern in Saipan is what colour to paint his fenceposts back home. And though Hardwicke doesn't look much like Keane, he absolutely nails that electric combination of attitude, drive and prickliness one saw in the player's MOTD era. (Oddly, it's he who lands the film's most Partridgean moment: stomping away from one training session in his stockinged feet, clutching a lonely kitbag.) But Saipan is well cast all round, its supporting players pinning down the personalities of everyone from a pacifist Niall Quinn (Jack Hickey) to a young FAI lackey, visibly elated to be called upon by Keano. In its closing movement, Saipan assumes an unusual shape: the inevitable confrontation is followed by archival fallout that reveals the divisions within the Ireland of 2002 (were you Team Roy or Team Mick?), then a genuinely meaningful ending as both men rue what they've lost to the strains of the Walker Brothers' "No Regrets". (It won't just be Irish viewers who will want to bash their heads together, or at least give them a wobble.) I'm not Irish, but if I were, I think I'd be delighted that these two filmmakers were turning such a thoughtful and imaginative eye to our collective history - and in the modern game, Jeff, it takes real skill to get all of the above into a film that runs to exactly ninety minutes, plus stoppage time.

Saipan is now available to rent via Prime Video and YouTube, and on DVD and Blu-ray through Vertigo Releasing.

Tuesday, 24 March 2026

In memoriam: Valerie Perrine (Telegraph 23/03/26)


Valerie Perrine
, who has died aged 82, was a game, sparky performer who started her career as a Las Vegas showgirl, emerged into the Hollywood of the early 1970s, and thereafter ran the gamut, winning a BAFTA and a Cannes Best Actress prize for playing Lenny Bruce’s stripper girlfriend in Lenny (1974), enjoying blockbuster success with Superman (1978) and gyrating alongside the Village People in the cult musical Can’t Stop the Music (1980).

Her transition from stage to screen was, as Perrine herself admitted, a matter of being in the right place with the right look at the right time: “I didn’t come to Hollywood to be a movie star. I was literally discovered at a small dinner party at a friend’s house. I never had an acting class. I was offered a seven-year contract with Universal after a couple of days shooting. Universal forbid me from going to acting classes. They didn’t want my natural talent to be corrupted.”

She made a high-profile screen debut as the pornstar Montana Wildhack in George Roy Hill’s adaptation of Kurt Vonnegut’s Slaughterhouse-Five (1972), where her inexperience worked in her favour. Upon arriving for her screen test, Perrine realised she didn’t have the required headshots to hand over; when the producers learned she’d been working as a showgirl, they asked her to pose in her skimpy costume – which she did have – and subsequently landed the role.

For some while, Perrine was cast more for her voluptuous figure than her mind or talent, a situation she leant into by posing for Playboy in 1972; she earned a further measure of notoriety upon becoming the first woman to appear topless on US network television, the result of her shower scene in the PBS drama Steambath (1973).

It was Bob Fosse who saw hidden depths in Perrine, casting the actress as Honey Harlow, the showgirl who caught the eye of troubled stand-up Lenny Bruce (played by Dustin Hoffman), in his black-and-white biopic Lenny. The role entailed unlearning everything she’d picked up in Vegas: “[Fosse] choreographed the dance scenes. But I was supposed to dance badly… Here I was working with the greatest directors and choreographers in the business and I had to dance badly! The irony!”

Yet she held her own against the fractious Hoffman in the film’s dramatic scenes and found herself in demand on the awards circuit, earning an Oscar nomination, the Cannes Best Actress prize and two BAFTA nods: as at the Oscars, she lost Best Actress to Ellen Burstyn, star of Martin Scorsese’s Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore (1974), but picked up a consolation gong in the Most Promising Newcomer category, beating out no less a figure than Robert De Niro in The Godfather Part II (1974).

At that point, it appeared as if things were beginning to turn in Perrine’s favour. She had a narrow escape when the flight carrying her to the San Sebastián festival to promote Lenny crashed shortly after take-off from a small airport in the Pyrenees; not only did the actress walk away unharmed, but she was later observed returning to the wreck to retrieve her make-up kit. Yet her subsequent career only sporadically achieved cruising altitude, a result of iffy script choices and life intervening.

She landed her most prominent role as Eve Teschmacher, PA and girlfriend to Gene Hackman’s Lex Luthor in Superman (1978) and Superman II (1980), shot back-to-back. Yet she never quite capitalised on this newfound visibility: she picked up a slightly thankless role as Robert Redford’s ex-wife, discarded in favour of Jane Fonda, in Sydney Pollack’s rodeo romance The Electric Horseman (1979), before signing up for Can’t Stop the Music, a notorious turn-of-the-Eighties flop.

The latter, a showcase for the novelty disco outfit Village People, again drew on Perrine’s showgirl training: she splashed around topless in a tub to the strains of “YMCA”. Yet a fallout between the star and director Nancy Walker complicated the shoot; the reviews were dire; and the box-office was all but disastrous, the film taking $2m against a $20m budget. (Its campier aspects have since been embraced: the Australian network Channel 9 screens the film every New Year’s Eve.)

Compounding this setback, Perrine turned down Kathleen Turner’s career-making role in Body Heat (1981) but she found more substantial employment in Tony Richardson’s The Border (1982) as the social-climber wife spurring Jack Nicholson’s corrupt border guard on to greater misdeeds. Even critic Pauline Kael, never a fan, offered praise, albeit in a backhanded way: “Perrine, who has been giving disgraceful performances for several years, plays the dumb-tart wife to whiny perfection.”

Of the actors’ guru Stanislavsky, Perrine once said “I don’t know anything about Chavanasky [sic] or whatever you call him. I really don’t think about anything until I get on the set.” For her, acting was an enjoyable social activity: she claimed to have dropped LSD 400 times and was renowned for the wild parties she threw at her house in Sherman Oaks. Asked in a 2023 interview with The Hollywood Reporter what made her shindigs so special, Perrine had a one-word response: “Cocaine.”

Valerie Ritchie Perrine was born in Galveston, Texas on September 3, 1943 to Kenneth Perrine, a lieutenant colonel in the US Army and his wife Winifred (née McGinley), a former dancer in the provocative Broadway troupe The Earl Carroll Vanities. She spent most of her childhood in Japan, where her father was stationed at the end of World War II; aged four, she began performing ceremonial dances to friends of the family (“I wanted to show off”).

In her teens, the family relocated to a ranch in Scottsdale, Arizona. Her father, who had adapted poorly to civilian life, began drinking, prompting Perrine to run off to Vegas in the hope of becoming a showgirl: “I was almost nineteen when I got there. I had to lie about my age to work… We had fun. But you have to remember being a showgirl is very time consuming. All you do is work and sleep.”

She eventually worked her way up to appearing in the spectacular Lido de Paris revue, falling in with the showbiz crowd who commuted between the Vegas Strip and Sunset Boulevard. On the night of August 9, 1969, she was due to attend a party in the Hollywood Hills with her then-boyfriend, the celebrity hairstylist Jay Sebring, but after one of her fellow dancers fell ill, she was called upon to work instead. It was another narrow escape: the party was that crashed by the so-called Manson Family, and Sebring numbered among their victims.

Perrine worked more sparingly as the new millennium approached. She appeared alongside Billy Crystal and Jeff Goldblum in the Three Little Pigs episode of Faerie Tale Theatre (1982-87), had fun making the St. Lucia-shot La Frenais/Clement comedy Water (1985) with Michael Caine (“the nicest human being I’ve ever worked with”), and popped up in the Ally Sheedy teen comedy Maid to Order (1987) and the Wesley Snipes thriller Boiling Point (1993).

TV became a regular source of income, offering guest roles in Homicide: Life on the Street (1993-99), medical hit e.r. (1994-2009) and Nash Bridges (1996-2001), where she played a gangster’s moll. Her last major movie was the Mel Gibson comedy What Women Want (2000); thereafter, she returned to TV, appearing on David Spade’s Just Shoot Me (1997-2003) and sitcom Grounded for Life (2001-05), and became a favourite on the convention circuit. Her final screen credit came with the retirement home comedy Silver Skies (2016), opposite George Hamilton.

Though she enjoyed relationships with the likes of Jeff Bridges (her co-star in 1972’s The Last American Hero), Mick Jagger and Dodi Fayed, she never married; she was engaged during her showgirl years to the businessman and gun collector Bill Haarman, who died when the pistol he habitually carried fell from his waistband and discharged in a freak accident one month before the couple’s planned wedding.

In her final years, Perrine battled severe health issues: she underwent spinal surgery to correct wear-and-tear incurred during her dancing days and was diagnosed with Parkinson’s after a sound engineer spotted her dialogue was being obscured by the rattle of a saucer she was holding with tremulous hands. In the crowdfunded documentary Valerie (2019), she bemoaned her condition: “I can’t walk. I can’t write. I can’t talk right… I can’t act. I didn’t want the world to think I’d faded away.”

By the time of a 2022 interview for the Parkinson’s Europe website, however, she seemed to have come to terms with her situation: “I’ve always lived in the moment. I don’t dwell on the past or worry about the future. I try to live for today, and Parkinson’s hasn’t changed that.”

Valerie Perrine, born September 3, 1943, died March 23, 2026.

Monday, 23 March 2026

Coarse corrections: "The Good Boy/Heel"


The latest filmmaker to migrate from the arthouse fringes to the English-language commercial cinema is the Pole Jan Komasa, whose impressive
Corpus Christi was Oscar-nominated back in 2020. That film was a clerical drama with a slowburning thriller element (would our fake priest hero be defrocked before completing his good works?). The new film - marketed here in the UK as The Good Boy, but credited as Good Boy on screen and being released in the US as Heel, for extra confusion - is genre up until the point it isn't. In some way, it presents as a companion piece (or corrective) to its leading man's recent TV success Adolescence: what Komasa's film wonders is what would happen if a character played by Stephen Graham took extreme measures to prevent a kid from going murderously off the rails. The kid is Tommy (Anson Boon, from streaming telly's Mobland), a swaggering young alpha - chains round his neck, wrap of blow in his Chinos - who's introduced mid-Saturday night tear-up (scrapping, shagging, pissing up the bus shelter) before being snatched off the street by persons unknown. Cut to: Chris and Kathryn (Graham and Andrea Riseborough), a pair of neatfreaks bringing up a ten-year-old (Kit Rakusen) in a remote country house. Chris is first seen interviewing a Macedonian cleaner (Monica Frajczyk), 2026's first Character Who Doesn't Know What She's Getting Into (And Who Should, Really, Be Running Off In The Exact Opposite Direction). Doubly so after Chris, giving his new employee the grand tour, reveals Tommy chained up in the basement, the couple having taken him in and on as a perverse pet project. Weird as it may sound, we're not so far removed from Corpus Christi. The central clash is again that between orthodoxy and restless youth; for a symbolic dog collar, Komasa now swaps in an actual dog collar, slipped around Tommy's neck on a chain bolted to the cellar wall.

The Good Boy is a smaller and dingier endeavour, though - it's not going to be nominated for awards - and there are things Komasa misses that a local director would surely have spotted and fixed. British viewers are likely to spend the film's opening reels marvelling (and maybe chuckling) at how much effort has been expended to remove Stephen Graham of his essential Stephen Grahamness. With his suburban accent, Dennis Nilsen specs, limp hairpiece and persistent air of prissiness, Chris is a role crying out for Reece Shearsmith, albeit in a world where Reece Shearsmith's name secured international distribution deals and sold cinema tickets. The Good Boy could easily be mistaken for a feature-length episode of Psychoville or Inside No. 9: its early exchanges (one location, low-lit sets, small knot of players) suggest a self-contained sitcom that has started to break bad. Patches of darkly funny writing follow, as when Tommy is allowed upstairs to watch Kes ("as if I weren't depressed enough, living in a basement"). Yet much as Chris and Kathryn gradually afford their captive greater roaming range, so too these characters offer the actors more wiggle room than first thought. A sly midsection, benefitting from a day or so's shooting on the Yorkshire Moors, expands the film's scope while also suggesting just how quickly Fritzl-like behaviour can become normalised. I'm less sure about the film's closing movement, which struck me as an obvious misstep: setting the thriller aspects to one side for an extended coda, Komasa finally appears to side with the conservatism Chris and Kathryn represent. Maybe the idea was to reflect the general direction of travel in a Britain busy limiting access to porn and social media (or, indeed, in a Poland that has of late taken a similar lurch rightwards), but it feels instinctively wrong for this story: I wondered whether the two separately credited writers disagreed at some stage about where exactly these characters should land. Still, overseas directors have made far less auspicious debuts on British soil, and The Good Boy might well serve as a teachable example of what a film gains from having good actors commit to silly, vaguely disreputable material: Riseborough, in particular, works spooky wonders with a depressed-ghoul character who can't have registered as all that much on the page.

The Good Boy is now playing in selected cinemas.